Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 08:43:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 [185] 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 »
3681  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Sidehack stick solo pool club on: September 11, 2015, 09:42:55 PM
I like the idea are we able to point bigger solo miners twords it?  For example U3's?

I do think a club could be fun.

For now, Phil said you can as donation. Maybe after the 30 day run we can elaborate more on shares, with the entry requirement being "owning a Sidehack stick and pointing it at x.youraccountnamestick.
3682  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Sidehack stick solo pool club on: September 11, 2015, 09:35:34 PM
I am still in to point my Stick when the Canada batch get it.

I am surprised you are throwing additional rented hash at this Phil, so i am going to reciprocate with what i can afford, i am adding an underclocked S1 as donation hash.

http://solo.ckpool.org/workers/1JiWuyX94wrCr7JhkAn7x5qNMCEef1KhqX.VirosaGITSdonation
3683  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: M's Miner (Ant/SP) Monitor v5.2: alerts,auto/mass/scheduled reboot/mobile miner on: September 11, 2015, 09:31:23 PM
How about a feature to prevent MMM from rebooting a miner with under 1min uptime? I'm set to 12minutes refresh and it has happened several time that it ask a miner that was manually rebooted to reboot again.
3684  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Diff thread sept 4th. to sept 17th Picks are closed. on: September 11, 2015, 09:22:20 PM
So its;
Estimated Next Difficulty:   60,052,954,837 (+5.43%)

Right now and the 504 block hashrate is much higher, so we're looking at a pretty big, even higher bump upward it looks like. Thankfully the BTC price went back to 235+ for now, hopefully the price will stabilize while following the diff increase a bit.
3685  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: GreenAddress: open source multisig wallet service on: September 11, 2015, 09:17:45 PM
I made a payout to my greenaddress wallet 3 hours ago .  It has 15 confirmations, but my greenaddress wallet does not show this transaction.  (I tried 2 browsers to check it)

Huh


Are you sure you're connected and sent to the right address and selected the right wallet? (Main, others)


(I login into this account at least 5 times a day. )

It showed up in my wallet only after 3.5 hours.  (at this time the transaction had 15 confirmations, greenaddres showed unconfirmed, 5 minutes later 1 confirmation, 10 minutes later 3 confirmation, and so on. )

This is not my first issue with greenaddress. (Last time i could not login more than 12-16 hours into one of my wallet, the other ones worked.)

I  never got any answer to my emails, customer service does not exists.

It is time to find another wallet service for me.



I stopped using GreenAddress for the exact same reason. For me it was their server going down all the time so i would lose access to my coin all the time. Now i just went back to SPV wallet, offline HD one.

You can see i posted here over one month ago and i never got a reply. Same for reddit. GreenAddress seem dead to me.

Meanwhile Multibit HD replied to me within a day. Even several time same day while we discussed an ongoing issue.
3686  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: September 11, 2015, 09:13:25 PM
Not all the spikes seem to apply at the same time. But some does, so it doesn't seem like a single unit, but not always the same either. I have that with my S5, maybe you have a combination thereof?

Maybe if you tell us what miners they are it could help shedding some light.

The big one is you blatantly losing connection for a few minutes however.
3687  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitmain Antminer S6 and S7 Speculation on: September 11, 2015, 05:37:56 PM
Now ... we need a new thread Smiley.  We should be speculating S7+, S8, etc.   

So not sure who is the one who is active enough in this thread to do it, I think would be a good idea to get a new fresh start as this has already hit market.

Well you're plenty active, go ahead. Tongue Then post the link here.
3688  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: I am floating an idea here a sidehack usb stick solo pool. on: September 11, 2015, 05:33:49 PM
I didnt know you could set worker name and track each and everyone, on ck solo.
You figured out a way to not have to do it manually?

And it sound overly optimistic to get 30 of the 50 unique users to join, unless you contact them directly and let them know of this.
3689  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitmain Antminer S6 and S7 Speculation on: September 11, 2015, 05:29:09 PM
The S7 is showing up on Bitmain's site. Sorry if this is duped in another thread.


The fist pre-sale round will be deployed before 11:59PM on October 10th 2015 beijing time.

AntminerS7
Price: 1923.0 USD(8.05349228฿)  Stock: 978

         Power: 0.249w/GHS
Maintenance Fee:$0.0005796/GHS/Day


It's $1,823.00; Not $1,923.00 USD + shipping costs.  Its been available for purchase at least a week now.  I bought on day two (2) of their first availability.

He's talking about the S7 on hashnest. They cost 100$ more xD

Thx for clarifying...

Makes sense that they charge some for a PSU.   They are not going to eat the cost of anything.

Likely the 100 pay's for the PSU and cost of person to install it.

Or they just use their own PSU, which they mostly charge you for, but don't give back to you ever. Sound clever to me!
3690  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.319/GH & 0.51W/GH on: September 11, 2015, 05:28:12 PM
some testing done on some cheap-ass psu's, fan at 0% 2400rpm:

    hash               frequency            wattage
    670.50               200                       340
    869.06               250                       418
   1,002.91             300                       488
   1,102.99             350                       560

i think the 2psu's that are feeding the miner are guilty for the missing 50gh at stock


It is also a bit odd, because at 350 you should be draining 580 watt with a 91~% PSU. Your chips all show "ooo.." etc?

You can use my review to compare consumption and hashrate from 350 to 450hz.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151326.0
3691  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: GreenAddress: open source multisig wallet service on: September 11, 2015, 05:25:15 PM
I made a payout to my greenaddress wallet 3 hours ago .  It has 15 confirmations, but my greenaddress wallet does not show this transaction.  (I tried 2 browsers to check it)

Huh


Are you sure you're connected and sent to the right address and selected the right wallet? (Main, others)
3692  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: September 11, 2015, 05:23:34 PM
And it would be interesting to see work get done on a gh/$ effective "cpu pod" or more so PCB to be mounted on S1 heatsinks or such, but i'm guessing Bitmain is calling dibs on selling their(BM1385) chips for now until competition arise.

Right now they kind of have monopoly at that range.
3693  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: September 11, 2015, 12:44:20 AM
No. Tongue

No? As in "No i lose money over this and i do it only out of good will." Kind of no? How come? This should easily run on a server hosted in a affordable datacenter. The monthly cost would be be minimal compared to 14THs commission.
Minimal?
Currently it's about half my fee ... which is also very low Smiley

In the future it could be better, but over the past few months ... no.

Look in the blockchain - Aug I got ... 3.65BTC in pool fees (yes -ck gets some of the fee also - that's my part of it - but I pay for everything)
This month the fee total will be lower.

Not sure what some might consider a good datacenter and a good powered server to run a pool, but monthly server fees are not small unless you are running crap or someone else is paying for it.

A miner is now pretty much a set and forget item.
I know, I've had many different miners over the years, and I write and test the software that runs on lots of them Smiley
-ck and I wrote a lot of the software in most of the miners running on the planet ...

A pool is more than a full time job.
Some may think my time is worth nothing ... I don't ... but I don't expect a lot (and don't get a lot) for the very large amount of time I spend on Bitcoin.

Not sure what specs you need but my friend pays 40$ per month to host his industrial grade server in the US. He has /27, 10tb band, 1gb ethernet. He pays the same for his Supermicro E3-1230v2 server. I wonder where your 400$ premium goes. Do you need 10 of those?
3694  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: September 10, 2015, 10:30:20 PM
Seriously.  It's not a test, either.  A test implies an unknown outcome.  We all know what the problem is (will be, actually), this spamfest shit is just FUD.  I already hated XT, and if these guys support it then I hate it even more.  In fact, I wouldn't support anything created by anyone who has a hand in these spam attacks, even if they cured world hunger with world peace.

I don't really mind the attack but this concept of "proving the need of XT" is a fairly big Fallacy. It merely prove that the blocksize limit will need to be increased in the eventuality that the rate of transaction during the "attacks" become the normal(real) transaction rate.

Which can be solved just fine without XT. Thanks.
3695  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: September 10, 2015, 10:13:29 PM
No. Tongue

No? As in "No i lose money over this and i do it only out of good will." Kind of no? How come? This should easily run on a server hosted in a affordable datacenter. The monthly cost would be be minimal compared to 14THs commission.
3696  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Mining nod setup ? on: September 10, 2015, 10:10:24 PM
This is a remote controlled computer i am trying to set up, i have a miner at home, and the computer is at a warehouse.

They are not on LAN network.

if that helps to udnerstand what i am trying to do, i have miners on the warehouse but those are fully working and don't want to put one down to test if the server is working or not as i want it for my home miner..


Sweminer, to help you further I'm going to need personal information that I don't want you to post in the forum. I'll PM you.

Why not recommend him to use a pool? It sound like he want to remotely connect to solo mine to its own node with nearly no networking knowledge. He'd probably have better return even on solo pools?


Because he didn't ask how to mine on a pool. He wants to mine to his own node and support the Bitcoin network.


correct that is what i want, i don't care if a make anything at all.

Because mining in the wind doesn't really support it imo. You're just penalizing yourself. If you have bandwidth to contribute, run core, set a reasonable bandwidth limit. BTC wouldn't benefit from you losing money on top of it.
3697  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Solo Mining on an S3 with 51.1 Difficulty - here we go! UPDATE: Block Found!! on: September 10, 2015, 10:07:07 PM
I read this threat
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=123726.0

I that threat they said don't trust blockchain.info.
but didn't understand why?

Just start with something cheap. A small stick, gpu mining alt coins, maybe even CPU mining.

Use a software wallet, personally i use Multibit for BTC. SPV wallets are certainly the way to go for a new comer. Do a few transaction, figure out the value. Etc. Get a feel for it. I started my mining venture with a 560 ti on scrypt a while back.
3698  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: I am floating an idea here a sidehack usb stick solo pool. on: September 10, 2015, 10:02:37 PM
yeah logistically I am working on this but I suspect that I may not be able to get it to work.

Maybe a clone of Kano pool? You'd need to do some manual policing but all the data needed would be there.
3699  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Compac BM1384 Stickminer Official Support Thread on: September 10, 2015, 09:59:22 PM
The stick does not have any temperature sensor.

A great way to figure out what current your hub will run would be to measure the input voltage, if it starts to sag that means you're burning power inside the hub.

--
novak

I see, i think with my technical skill, i will use a laser thermometer on the back of the pcb. (For the temp)

However i did finally got a decent multimeter so it would probably good to learn a bit that way. By sag you mean i should figure out how to check the voltage of the usb port under load and if its not at the voltage it should be, i've found the hub's limit?
3700  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience Compac BM1384 Stickminer Official Support Thread on: September 10, 2015, 08:47:09 PM


I got a stick to run at 450MHz which gives an expected hashrate of 24.75GH/s, I got 24.89GH/s.  It had kind of bad error rates though, around 6% hardware errors.  It was drawing 3A at 4.9V which is 14.7W.  

--
novak

Thanks that was exactly what i was looking for. Does the stick have no temp sensor?

I'll have to think it through but since i have a powered hub and will only receive one stick, overclocking one with a small usb fan cooling it seem like a good path. Seeing how far you just pushed it, it help figure out what to expect. It sound like it would probably run great at 16ghs for instance.

Just need to figure out whats the per port watt limit of a usb hub's port. Not that i'm planning on running one at 14.7W but still. Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 [185] 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!