I like the idea are we able to point bigger solo miners twords it? For example U3's?
I do think a club could be fun.
For now, Phil said you can as donation. Maybe after the 30 day run we can elaborate more on shares, with the entry requirement being "owning a Sidehack stick and pointing it at x.youraccountnamestick.
|
|
|
How about a feature to prevent MMM from rebooting a miner with under 1min uptime? I'm set to 12minutes refresh and it has happened several time that it ask a miner that was manually rebooted to reboot again.
|
|
|
So its; Estimated Next Difficulty: 60,052,954,837 (+5.43%)
Right now and the 504 block hashrate is much higher, so we're looking at a pretty big, even higher bump upward it looks like. Thankfully the BTC price went back to 235+ for now, hopefully the price will stabilize while following the diff increase a bit.
|
|
|
I made a payout to my greenaddress wallet 3 hours ago . It has 15 confirmations, but my greenaddress wallet does not show this transaction. (I tried 2 browsers to check it) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Are you sure you're connected and sent to the right address and selected the right wallet? (Main, others) (I login into this account at least 5 times a day. ) It showed up in my wallet only after 3.5 hours. (at this time the transaction had 15 confirmations, greenaddres showed unconfirmed, 5 minutes later 1 confirmation, 10 minutes later 3 confirmation, and so on. ) This is not my first issue with greenaddress. (Last time i could not login more than 12-16 hours into one of my wallet, the other ones worked.) I never got any answer to my emails, customer service does not exists. It is time to find another wallet service for me. I stopped using GreenAddress for the exact same reason. For me it was their server going down all the time so i would lose access to my coin all the time. Now i just went back to SPV wallet, offline HD one. You can see i posted here over one month ago and i never got a reply. Same for reddit. GreenAddress seem dead to me. Meanwhile Multibit HD replied to me within a day. Even several time same day while we discussed an ongoing issue.
|
|
|
Not all the spikes seem to apply at the same time. But some does, so it doesn't seem like a single unit, but not always the same either. I have that with my S5, maybe you have a combination thereof?
Maybe if you tell us what miners they are it could help shedding some light.
The big one is you blatantly losing connection for a few minutes however.
|
|
|
Now ... we need a new thread ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . We should be speculating S7+, S8, etc. So not sure who is the one who is active enough in this thread to do it, I think would be a good idea to get a new fresh start as this has already hit market. Well you're plenty active, go ahead. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Then post the link here.
|
|
|
I didnt know you could set worker name and track each and everyone, on ck solo. You figured out a way to not have to do it manually?
And it sound overly optimistic to get 30 of the 50 unique users to join, unless you contact them directly and let them know of this.
|
|
|
The S7 is showing up on Bitmain's site. Sorry if this is duped in another thread.
The fist pre-sale round will be deployed before 11:59PM on October 10th 2015 beijing time.
AntminerS7 Price: 1923.0 USD(8.05349228฿) Stock: 978
Power: 0.249w/GHS Maintenance Fee:$0.0005796/GHS/Day
It's $1,823.00; Not $1,923.00 USD + shipping costs. Its been available for purchase at least a week now. I bought on day two (2) of their first availability. He's talking about the S7 on hashnest. They cost 100$ more xD Thx for clarifying... Makes sense that they charge some for a PSU. They are not going to eat the cost of anything. Likely the 100 pay's for the PSU and cost of person to install it. Or they just use their own PSU, which they mostly charge you for, but don't give back to you ever. Sound clever to me!
|
|
|
some testing done on some cheap-ass psu's, fan at 0% 2400rpm:
hash frequency wattage 670.50 200 340 869.06 250 418 1,002.91 300 488 1,102.99 350 560
i think the 2psu's that are feeding the miner are guilty for the missing 50gh at stock
It is also a bit odd, because at 350 you should be draining 580 watt with a 91~% PSU. Your chips all show "ooo.." etc? You can use my review to compare consumption and hashrate from 350 to 450hz. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151326.0
|
|
|
I made a payout to my greenaddress wallet 3 hours ago . It has 15 confirmations, but my greenaddress wallet does not show this transaction. (I tried 2 browsers to check it) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Are you sure you're connected and sent to the right address and selected the right wallet? (Main, others)
|
|
|
And it would be interesting to see work get done on a gh/$ effective "cpu pod" or more so PCB to be mounted on S1 heatsinks or such, but i'm guessing Bitmain is calling dibs on selling their(BM1385) chips for now until competition arise.
Right now they kind of have monopoly at that range.
|
|
|
No. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) No? As in "No i lose money over this and i do it only out of good will." Kind of no? How come? This should easily run on a server hosted in a affordable datacenter. The monthly cost would be be minimal compared to 14THs commission. Minimal? Currently it's about half my fee ... which is also very low ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) In the future it could be better, but over the past few months ... no. Look in the blockchain - Aug I got ... 3.65BTC in pool fees (yes -ck gets some of the fee also - that's my part of it - but I pay for everything) This month the fee total will be lower. Not sure what some might consider a good datacenter and a good powered server to run a pool, but monthly server fees are not small unless you are running crap or someone else is paying for it. A miner is now pretty much a set and forget item. I know, I've had many different miners over the years, and I write and test the software that runs on lots of them ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) -ck and I wrote a lot of the software in most of the miners running on the planet ... A pool is more than a full time job. Some may think my time is worth nothing ... I don't ... but I don't expect a lot (and don't get a lot) for the very large amount of time I spend on Bitcoin. Not sure what specs you need but my friend pays 40$ per month to host his industrial grade server in the US. He has /27, 10tb band, 1gb ethernet. He pays the same for his Supermicro E3-1230v2 server. I wonder where your 400$ premium goes. Do you need 10 of those?
|
|
|
Seriously. It's not a test, either. A test implies an unknown outcome. We all know what the problem is (will be, actually), this spamfest shit is just FUD. I already hated XT, and if these guys support it then I hate it even more. In fact, I wouldn't support anything created by anyone who has a hand in these spam attacks, even if they cured world hunger with world peace.
I don't really mind the attack but this concept of "proving the need of XT" is a fairly big Fallacy. It merely prove that the blocksize limit will need to be increased in the eventuality that the rate of transaction during the "attacks" become the normal(real) transaction rate. Which can be solved just fine without XT. Thanks.
|
|
|
No. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) No? As in "No i lose money over this and i do it only out of good will." Kind of no? How come? This should easily run on a server hosted in a affordable datacenter. The monthly cost would be be minimal compared to 14THs commission.
|
|
|
This is a remote controlled computer i am trying to set up, i have a miner at home, and the computer is at a warehouse.
They are not on LAN network.
if that helps to udnerstand what i am trying to do, i have miners on the warehouse but those are fully working and don't want to put one down to test if the server is working or not as i want it for my home miner..
Sweminer, to help you further I'm going to need personal information that I don't want you to post in the forum. I'll PM you. Why not recommend him to use a pool? It sound like he want to remotely connect to solo mine to its own node with nearly no networking knowledge. He'd probably have better return even on solo pools? Because he didn't ask how to mine on a pool. He wants to mine to his own node and support the Bitcoin network. correct that is what i want, i don't care if a make anything at all. Because mining in the wind doesn't really support it imo. You're just penalizing yourself. If you have bandwidth to contribute, run core, set a reasonable bandwidth limit. BTC wouldn't benefit from you losing money on top of it.
|
|
|
Just start with something cheap. A small stick, gpu mining alt coins, maybe even CPU mining. Use a software wallet, personally i use Multibit for BTC. SPV wallets are certainly the way to go for a new comer. Do a few transaction, figure out the value. Etc. Get a feel for it. I started my mining venture with a 560 ti on scrypt a while back.
|
|
|
yeah logistically I am working on this but I suspect that I may not be able to get it to work.
Maybe a clone of Kano pool? You'd need to do some manual policing but all the data needed would be there.
|
|
|
The stick does not have any temperature sensor.
A great way to figure out what current your hub will run would be to measure the input voltage, if it starts to sag that means you're burning power inside the hub.
-- novak
I see, i think with my technical skill, i will use a laser thermometer on the back of the pcb. (For the temp) However i did finally got a decent multimeter so it would probably good to learn a bit that way. By sag you mean i should figure out how to check the voltage of the usb port under load and if its not at the voltage it should be, i've found the hub's limit?
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs9.postimg.org%2F6l4hgpj3j%2Fcgminer_450.png&t=663&c=y_hLXU6f21tpdA) I got a stick to run at 450MHz which gives an expected hashrate of 24.75GH/s, I got 24.89GH/s. It had kind of bad error rates though, around 6% hardware errors. It was drawing 3A at 4.9V which is 14.7W. -- novak Thanks that was exactly what i was looking for. Does the stick have no temp sensor? I'll have to think it through but since i have a powered hub and will only receive one stick, overclocking one with a small usb fan cooling it seem like a good path. Seeing how far you just pushed it, it help figure out what to expect. It sound like it would probably run great at 16ghs for instance. Just need to figure out whats the per port watt limit of a usb hub's port. Not that i'm planning on running one at 14.7W but still. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|