So many posts about this question but I think question is completely wrong. People can hate other people, not religions or faith. We have, for example, Catholics, Muslims and Jews who can love and respect people from other faiths, and Catholics, Muslims and Jews who who can't. Is this because of their faith, some religious book or because of their character, way of life, tradition? Not easy matter, really but surely we shouldn't generalize people according to their religion, race, nationality, sex etc.
i actually like what you said, you cannot blame a religion for the actions of its people. and you cannot blame people for actions of other people from the same religion. regardless which religion they are.. but some people see it like this : war - muslims/ islam killing - muslims/ islam bombs - muslims/ islam threats - muslims/ islam fish dies in the ocean - muslims/ islam we are near to hear this too : microsoft got hacked - muslims/ islam You cannot blame a religion for the actions of its people, except Islam. Why? Because Muhammad knew there would be people like you and the terrorists that would come along if he wrote the Quran like he did. So, he wrote it like he did because he knew there would be people like you and the terrorists. So in the case of Islam, you can blame the religion for the actions of its people. Otherwise Muhammad wouldn't have written the Quran like he did, and you and the terrorists wouldn't be part of Islam. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Let me correct you HERE. Muhammad (S.A.W) Did not Wrote the Quran. He is the messenger of ALLAH. And ALLAH Wrote the quran. Thank you for confirming that Allah is not God. Just because the word "Allah" is the Arab word for "God," when the word "Allah" or the word "God" are referring to Islam, they are not God. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I go through all the above post and Concluded that, People are just Trolling here. They Dont want to argue they are just spamming here. What they are They Just DON'T WANT TO understand Other point of view. Taking only one word from the Whole post and Throwing tons of their Openion on other.
On the other hand, you got some supporters too! That's how bitcointalk is. Similarly to all online forums there are going to be trolls. That video from pedrog, and the other videos around it in Youtube, show that the Quran is full of just as much or more BS as it might have actual knowledge. Go look, but if you don't, I understand. It's hard to look at the flaws in your pet religion. Here's the link again - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POJdu4HV-Ng. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
So many posts about this question but I think question is completely wrong. People can hate other people, not religions or faith. We have, for example, Catholics, Muslims and Jews who can love and respect people from other faiths, and Catholics, Muslims and Jews who who can't. Is this because of their faith, some religious book or because of their character, way of life, tradition? Not easy matter, really but surely we shouldn't generalize people according to their religion, race, nationality, sex etc.
i actually like what you said, you cannot blame a religion for the actions of its people. and you cannot blame people for actions of other people from the same religion. regardless which religion they are.. but some people see it like this : war - muslims/ islam killing - muslims/ islam bombs - muslims/ islam threats - muslims/ islam fish dies in the ocean - muslims/ islam we are near to hear this too : microsoft got hacked - muslims/ islam You cannot blame a religion for the actions of its people, except Islam. Why? Because Muhammad knew there would be people like you and the terrorists that would come along if he wrote the Quran like he did. So, he wrote it like he did because he knew there would be people like you and the terrorists. So in the case of Islam, you can blame the religion for the actions of its people. Otherwise Muhammad wouldn't have written the Quran like he did, and you and the terrorists wouldn't be part of Islam. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
You absolutely outdid yourself showing us this video, pedrog. There are a bunch of videos around it that are just as "funny." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I finally got you, right? So, now to promote your pagan ideals, you simply write a bunch of stuff to hide the truth of the things that I say. And you double-space it so that it takes up more space than ever... all just to hide the sense that I make. Islam is a pagan, heathen religion... just as ignorant as any religion among the tribes of New Guinea, or the jungles of the Amazon. There is only ONE thing that makes Islam work. This is the fact that Islam is violent. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
The Quran (Koran, the book of Islam) contains scientific knowledge that could not have been known 1400 years ago. It ranges from basic arithmetics to the most advanced topics in in all the Field of this world. You are invited to go through those miracles. Every Day I will post One miracle of Quran.
Lots Of things That Were Discovered Now, and Few year Back, Was Everything Written In the the Quran 1400 year Ago. It is Only the Thing You should Look into the things Why it is created and what is its purpose.
The Qur'an is the principle source of every Muslim's faith and practice. It deals with all subjects that concern us as human beings, including wisdom, doctrine, worship and law; but its basic theme is the relationship between God and His creatures. At the same time, the Qur'an provides guidelines for a just society, proper human conduct and equitable economic principles.
Nobody knows everything. There is new knowledge being found all the time. What is more interesting is that much of this new knowledge is really very, very old knowledge. Graham Hancock and several others are showing that people from around 12,500 years ago and before, had more knowledge than any of us have today. General scientific dating agrees with Hancock's time evaluations. While I don't agree with the ages, the things that Graham Hancock has found are very interesting. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPgIphDWGY and others. The point? The Arabs and other peoples of 2,000 years ago (or 1,400 years ago) didn't invent much of anything. They might have re-invented some of it. They might have received their knowledge from old book sources that are no longer available. But they were not the first inventors by thousands of years. While the inventions of the Arabs might have made things easier for many peoples, the peoples of India and China have made many discoveries and inventions. In all cases, it is not the inventions and discoveries that make the people strong. Look at the poverty in much of the Arab world, and certainly in India, and in much of China, as well. Without the infusion of European and American petrodollars, the whole of Arabia would be in poverty. China and India are starting to pull out of poverty because of American ingenuity. What is the ONE major thing that America and Europe - especially Western Europe - have that nobody else in the world really has? It is the thing that, when the other nations gain it, they start to pull out of their poverty. It is also the thing that will plunge America into poverty if they lose it. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) now the argument is about population and countries. the post was initially about miracles of the Quraan. kindly do not post off topic, thank you ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Having problems seeing that the miracles of the Quran are not miracles of the Quran? That's the largest point of everything in the miracles-or-the-Quran idea. One of the biggest miracles of Islamites who have studied is that they don't have the understanding to see that the Quran doesn't really provide any miracles. Other things didn't work. so now the Islamites are focusing on the "miracles" idea. Once people find out that the so-call miracles of the Quran have been around forever without the Quran, they will start to see what a fraud Islam really is. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
The Quran (Koran, the book of Islam) contains scientific knowledge that could not have been known 1400 years ago. It ranges from basic arithmetics to the most advanced topics in in all the Field of this world. You are invited to go through those miracles. Every Day I will post One miracle of Quran.
Lots Of things That Were Discovered Now, and Few year Back, Was Everything Written In the the Quran 1400 year Ago. It is Only the Thing You should Look into the things Why it is created and what is its purpose.
The Qur'an is the principle source of every Muslim's faith and practice. It deals with all subjects that concern us as human beings, including wisdom, doctrine, worship and law; but its basic theme is the relationship between God and His creatures. At the same time, the Qur'an provides guidelines for a just society, proper human conduct and equitable economic principles.
Nobody knows everything. There is new knowledge being found all the time. What is more interesting is that much of this new knowledge is really very, very old knowledge. Graham Hancock and several others are showing that people from around 12,500 years ago and before, had more knowledge than any of us have today. General scientific dating agrees with Hancock's time evaluations. While I don't agree with the ages, the things that Graham Hancock has found are very interesting. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPgIphDWGY and others. The point? The Arabs and other peoples of 2,000 years ago (or 1,400 years ago) didn't invent much of anything. They might have re-invented some of it. They might have received their knowledge from old book sources that are no longer available. But they were not the first inventors by thousands of years. While the inventions of the Arabs might have made things easier for many peoples, the peoples of India and China have made many discoveries and inventions. In all cases, it is not the inventions and discoveries that make the people strong. Look at the poverty in much of the Arab world, and certainly in India, and in much of China, as well. Without the infusion of European and American petrodollars, the whole of Arabia would be in poverty. China and India are starting to pull out of poverty because of American ingenuity. What is the ONE major thing that America and Europe - especially Western Europe - have that nobody else in the world really has? It is the thing that, when the other nations gain it, they start to pull out of their poverty. It is also the thing that will plunge America into poverty if they lose it. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
....i have already put the full quote of the sentences you cherrypicked and your supposed quotes got biased by the full quotation. where it says to DEFEND yourself, not GO AND KILL ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) WTF? "Defending yourself" is de facto violent. The Christian equivalent might be to "turn the other cheek." (Not that many actually do that, but some do, like the Quakers.) But, but, but, Spendulus! Netpyder called me his friend. He said, "then YOU should roll back my friend," whatever that means. See? He called me his friend. And I'm the guy he talked about putting a bullet in the brain of on a previous occasion. Or does "roll back" mean "roll over and die?" Hmm. Maybe you have a point there, Spendy. Does sound kinda Islamite like. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) your stupidity level is very high.... Coming from you an Islamite, this is a wonderful compliment. When are you going to learn that words that state directives to do violence, can't be covered over by saying that the violence only exists because the words were taken out of context. It doesn't work like that. Violence directives are violence directives. If you have to twist the context all out of shape to take the violence out of the violence directives, you are really stating that the whole writing is a lie. If something like this happened only once or twice, it might be different. But it isn't only once or twice. There are dozens of quotes from the Quran and the Hadith listed at http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm. These might be taken out of context, but if the context really says peace, then the whole of the Quran, the Hadith, and Islam is a mixed up mess. Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists aren't really very bright. How can we tell? People who run around killing other people, when they know that it is going to cause problems for them in the future with governments of the people they kill, simply are crazy. And they are even crazier when they blow themselves up in the name of Allah, just to kill of some non-Muslims - sometimes they kill Islamites by accident, as well. Why do they do it? Because they don't know how to twist the violent words of the Quran and Hadith into contextual peace like you seem to. If you really cared for peace in Islam, you would be out there trying to teach your fellow Islamites so that they learn your so-called peace of Islam... a peace that they couldn't figure out from the context themselves. You said my stupidity level is very high. Perhaps you are right. But it isn't high enough that it stops me from seeing that you are borderline Islamic Fundamentalist terrorist. You don't quite have the guts to go around killing. You don't quite have the guts to blow yourself up. And, you are rather smart. So you promote the terrorism in the way that is comfortable for you. You sit at the keyboard and outright lie to as many people as you can so that they become comfortable with the idea that Islam is peaceful. If they convert fine. But if they don't, they will be so much easier for your terrorist buddies to kill off later, 'cause they don't suspect that you and Islam are as hateful as you both really are. If you have an ounce of brains left, that have not been contaminated by the hate of Islam, get out now, so that you have a chance at life. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
when usa attacked iraq and iran and helped isreal to kill palestinians, did the world say : an addition to why christians and atheist hates people? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) the 9/11 and the war on iraq was pure bullshit. the helping of israel is pure bullshit and the world and news have replied about that. bringing gaddafi down was bullshit and cnn even agrees with that. judging a religion based on the acts of its followers, i can do that too.. wait for my post then, i will personally invite you to it ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Most of what you say here is pure truth. The big bankers of the world - the people who are not Christian or atheist, but rather are money worshipers - are attempting to conquer the whole Middle East in such a way that they bolster the petrodollar, so they can remain in control of the whole world through the use of money. These bankers are not Christian. They are not Muslim. They are not Jewish. If they are atheist, it doesn't cross their mind. What they are is greedy lovers of money. Nobody in the whole world is safe from them. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
In all seriousness, I've gotta commend you Islamites on your good use of the English language, which is in some cases a second or third language for you. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
....i have already put the full quote of the sentences you cherrypicked and your supposed quotes got biased by the full quotation. where it says to DEFEND yourself, not GO AND KILL ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) WTF? "Defending yourself" is de facto violent. The Christian equivalent might be to "turn the other cheek." (Not that many actually do that, but some do, like the Quakers.) But, but, but, Spendulus! Netpyder called me his friend. He said, "then YOU should roll back my friend," whatever that means. See? He called me his friend. And I'm the guy he talked about putting a bullet in the brain of on a previous occasion. Or does "roll back" mean "roll over and die?" Hmm. Maybe you have a point there, Spendy. Does sound kinda Islamite like. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
The fact that red-shift stars have now been shown to simply be young stars nearby, rather than old stars zooming away from us at high speed, shows that the universe is much smaller than previously thought. In fact, the universe is so small that there is no way that a Big Bang could have happened. In addition, black holes don't exist. This is because there isn't enough time (the universe is much smaller than thought, and time is much shorter than thought) for formation of black holes. In addition, electric cosmos theory is way more practical that any of the standard cosmology theories of today. Many modern, so-called scientific theories are not even theories. They are simply touted as such by scientists who want an excuse to continue to be funded so they can keep on playing at what they do. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
In summary, we have shown here that as for the QRE, the second order Friedmann equation derived from the QRE also contains two quantum correction terms. These terms are generic and unavoidable and follow naturally in a quantum mechanical description of our universe. Of these, the first can be interpreted as cosmological constant or dark energy of the correct (observed) magnitude and a small mass of the graviton (or axion). The second quantum correction term pushes back the time singularity indefinitely, and predicts an everlasting universe.
(Red colorization mine.) Axioms: ( 2𝑘 ÷ 0 = 0 ) ∧ ( (2𝑘 + 1) ÷ 0 = ⅟₀ ) ∧ ( *|𝑎| = ⅟₀ − |𝑎| )
( 𝑔(𝑡) = −3𝑡² + *7𝑡 − *20 ) ⇒ [( 𝑔(−*⁵⁄₃) = 𝑔(−4) = *0 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(0) = −*20 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(⁵⁄₃) = 𝑔(*4) = 0 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(*0) = 20 )]
In the above, zero and hyperzero are akin to opposite “edges” of a one-dimensional space observed from the former. Ali and Das’ model suggests a universe not entirely unlike the graph of 𝑔(𝑡) = −3𝑡² + *7𝑡 − *20. That's the new theory that predicts the universe never had a beginning and was always here, right. This is even worse news for illogical christians, *cough* BADecker *cough*, who believe god created the world in 6 days, than the big bang theory's description of their being a central point of origin to the universe billions of years ago, i.e a beginning. If that is truly what this calc is all about, then it is way too small. Nobody knows how to manipulate people into living 500 years, because nobody knows enough. Even if we had the knowledge to manipulate, we still are almost infinitely far from actually making life, to say nothing about human life. This calc is way to small to tell anything about anything regarding the beginning of the universe. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You've made no sense, again. "Infinitely far from making life", what, do realize we've been cloning since the 20th century right? Do you even know what that equation is? Are you high? What are you even talking about. We're on the boundaries of providing indefinite life to people via stem cell research and nanomachines. Go educate yourself. "This calc is way to small to tell anything about anything regarding the beginning of the universe.", that makes absolutely no sense, this is quantum equations sir, which is a level of magnitude higher than anything you'd be able to understand. Go learn some quantum physics/mechanics, then talk before sprouting off illogical statements that not even a 5 year old would make, troll. You are coming along so well for a little guy. After you get a little older, you will start to understand just how complex and grand things really are. For now, go on outside and play with the other kids. Mommy will call you when dinner is ready. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You're a troll. You have no idea about anything, literally. You don't know logic, you don't know quantum mechanics, you don't know science, you don't know history, you don't know about technology. What do you even know? Oh yea, making inaccurate and illogical statements. Got it. Now, now. Go on back out and play. You can come back in when you grow up. But that won't happen, will it? We adults have work to do. Be a good little boy and go back out and play. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
@BADecker: Please give me verses saying "be violent". Please don't take out-of-context verses. Because I couldn't find violent verses. Probably, in your language, self righteous.
Do Google search on "Islam violence" or "violence in Quran." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) its up to you to stand your accusations and post buddy. put the quotes yourself. 'Cause you say so? You funny. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) i stood to all my quotes with facts and proofs. where are yours? i could also google : violence in buddism, violence in christianity, violence of atheists, violence of hindus... and still get millions of results.. but the post will become bias, you want to make a point, post your quotes from violence in the Quraan where it says BE VIOLENT, i am strapping on for your quotes mate.. Even if the Quran and Hadith did NOT have violence directives within them - but they do as you well know - it is simply happening, as Spendulus shows us all the time. Here is another one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1014231.0. The question isn't about whether or not Islam hates people. The question is why? I'm certain that the answer to the question has something to do with why YOU simply won't accept that the violence directives built into the Quran and Hadith - that stare you right in the face every time you read them, and that have been discussed throughout this thread, and that are easily found explained all over the Internet - are violence directives. Whatever your reasons, you completely deny them, attempting to whitewash them, trying to make them look like peace, right in the face of the fact that they are violence directives made up of violence directive words. You show over and over that the mind of the steadfast Islamite has been warped and brainwashed into thinking that violence is not such when an Islamite does it to a non-Islamite. Well, that's okay. Even though regular people would like peace in the world, as you Islamites break into factions and slaughter each other off, so much the better for the rest of us. We wanted the peace. But you would have none of it. But don't expect us to simply sit back and let you destroy us like you are killing yourselves off. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) you still have not supported your : violence directive built into the Quraan and Hadith with quotes from the Quraan and Hadith... we are still waiting for that, as Zakir posted earlier on.. i would love to read the verses. and as zakir pointed out : Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on Today at 04:43:47 PM @BADecker: Please give me verses saying "be violent". Please don't take out-of-context verses. Because I couldn't find violent verses. Probably, in your language, self righteous. we are waiting for the quotes buddy... impatiently waiting for the quotes. Since they roll off you like water off a duck, why should I repeat them again? Any time you are interested, you can go back through the posts in this thread, or search the Internet. The fact that you don't even want to look at them, shows that you aren't really interested in me repeating them. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
@BADecker: Please give me verses saying "be violent". Please don't take out-of-context verses. Because I couldn't find violent verses. Probably, in your language, self righteous.
Do Google search on "Islam violence" or "violence in Quran." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) its up to you to stand your accusations and post buddy. put the quotes yourself. 'Cause you say so? You funny. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) i stood to all my quotes with facts and proofs. where are yours? i could also google : violence in buddism, violence in christianity, violence of atheists, violence of hindus... and still get millions of results.. but the post will become bias, you want to make a point, post your quotes from violence in the Quraan where it says BE VIOLENT, i am strapping on for your quotes mate.. Even if the Quran and Hadith did NOT have violence directives within them - but they do as you well know - it is simply happening, as Spendulus shows us all the time. Here is another one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1014231.0. The question isn't about whether or not Islam hates people. The question is why? I'm certain that the answer to the question has something to do with why YOU simply won't accept that the violence directives built into the Quran and Hadith - that stare you right in the face every time you read them, and that have been discussed throughout this thread, and that are easily found explained all over the Internet - are violence directives. Whatever your reasons, you completely deny them, attempting to whitewash them, trying to make them look like peace, right in the face of the fact that they are violence directives made up of violence directive words. You show over and over that the mind of the steadfast Islamite has been warped and brainwashed into thinking that violence is not such when an Islamite does it to a non-Islamite. Well, that's okay. Even though regular people would like peace in the world, as you Islamites break into factions and slaughter each other off, so much the better for the rest of us. We wanted the peace. But you would have none of it. But don't expect us to simply sit back and let you destroy us like you are killing yourselves off. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
In summary, we have shown here that as for the QRE, the second order Friedmann equation derived from the QRE also contains two quantum correction terms. These terms are generic and unavoidable and follow naturally in a quantum mechanical description of our universe. Of these, the first can be interpreted as cosmological constant or dark energy of the correct (observed) magnitude and a small mass of the graviton (or axion). The second quantum correction term pushes back the time singularity indefinitely, and predicts an everlasting universe.
(Red colorization mine.) Axioms: ( 2𝑘 ÷ 0 = 0 ) ∧ ( (2𝑘 + 1) ÷ 0 = ⅟₀ ) ∧ ( *|𝑎| = ⅟₀ − |𝑎| )
( 𝑔(𝑡) = −3𝑡² + *7𝑡 − *20 ) ⇒ [( 𝑔(−*⁵⁄₃) = 𝑔(−4) = *0 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(0) = −*20 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(⁵⁄₃) = 𝑔(*4) = 0 ) ∧ ( 𝑔(*0) = 20 )]
In the above, zero and hyperzero are akin to opposite “edges” of a one-dimensional space observed from the former. Ali and Das’ model suggests a universe not entirely unlike the graph of 𝑔(𝑡) = −3𝑡² + *7𝑡 − *20. That's the new theory that predicts the universe never had a beginning and was always here, right. This is even worse news for illogical christians, *cough* BADecker *cough*, who believe god created the world in 6 days, than the big bang theory's description of their being a central point of origin to the universe billions of years ago, i.e a beginning. If that is truly what this calc is all about, then it is way too small. Nobody knows how to manipulate people into living 500 years, because nobody knows enough. Even if we had the knowledge to manipulate, we still are almost infinitely far from actually making life, to say nothing about human life. This calc is way to small to tell anything about anything regarding the beginning of the universe. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You've made no sense, again. "Infinitely far from making life", what, do realize we've been cloning since the 20th century right? Do you even know what that equation is? Are you high? What are you even talking about. We're on the boundaries of providing indefinite life to people via stem cell research and nanomachines. Go educate yourself. "This calc is way to small to tell anything about anything regarding the beginning of the universe.", that makes absolutely no sense, this is quantum equations sir, which is a level of magnitude higher than anything you'd be able to understand. Go learn some quantum physics/mechanics, then talk before sprouting off illogical statements that not even a 5 year old would make, troll. You are coming along so well for a little guy. After you get a little older, you will start to understand just how complex and grand things really are. For now, go on outside and play with the other kids. Mommy will call you when dinner is ready. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
No scientific proof that the joint exists. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
@BADecker: Please give me verses saying "be violent". Please don't take out-of-context verses. Because I couldn't find violent verses. Probably, in your language, self righteous.
Do Google search on "Islam violence" or "violence in Quran." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) its up to you to stand your accusations and post buddy. put the quotes yourself. 'Cause you say so? You funny. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
@BADecker: Please give me verses saying "be violent". Please don't take out-of-context verses. Because I couldn't find violent verses. Probably, in your language, self righteous.
Do Google search on "Islam violence" or "violence in Quran." ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|