Bitcoin Forum
July 08, 2024, 09:03:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 1016 »
3701  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Winning Pokerbot on: October 21, 2016, 06:00:13 AM
As above, please only bump your thread once every 24 hours.
3702  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Need someone in the US to buy me a CD then rip it to flac then send me that on: October 21, 2016, 05:49:59 AM
what is the cd and why cant you buy it yourself ?

Because I need it doing asap and don't want to have to pay $20 in shipping and wait 2 or 3 weeks for it to arrive. And why are you so concerned? Don't you have some scammers to be sending your money to extorting?

I've worked in the radio industry before and one of my jobs there was ripping CD's and converting the files to various other audio formats. My setup is very capable of producing perfect FLAC files from a CD. I also have extensive experience with various file hosting providers, and could also send the files directly in a Dropbox folder to you that we could share. I am an Amazon Prime customer and that should result in the fastest possible delivery time for the CD. I'd be happy to help you with your project.

I'd do it for $10 total BTC. That includes your CD and shipping and all fees to me assuming you don't want the physical disc mailed to you (if you do, you'd have to pay whatever actual postage costs are involved in that).

$10 is reasonable. Check your PMs.
3703  Other / Meta / Re: FARMED ACCOUNT on: October 21, 2016, 05:37:15 AM
if someone caught an account that is only posting once every 2 weeks just to get potential activity and later be sold in the market, will the MODS ban those account if i report them thru "report to moderator" button or it is better to make a thread for reporting them? i saw around 5 accounts since yesterday

Account farming isn't against the rules nor is posting once or x amount every two weeks. However, making very poor posts is. You can report them either way you want but I would probably concern yourself with your typical two lines of secondstrade spam first.

Tuesday, October 11 2016 15:33:20 - Present: 36 Posts

you posting also 1 post each 2week ? its spaming too ?  Undecided

eh? do you mean i can't be busy IRL and managed to only post once in 3 activity periods? i will understand if all activity period for my account i only have 1 post right?

Maybe they're busy irl too? Making a few posts doesn't magically make you not farming an account though but logging on to make one two or three posts isn't against the rules unless it's spam times whatever amount of accounts you're doing it over. In fact, it's silly only making one post every two weeks because if it gets deleted or the thread gets trashed then you lose that entire 14 potential activity. The farmers that try spam 14 posts every two weeks tend to be the worse though to be honest but it's worth keeping an eye on the one post posters so they don't start spamming to rank up.

It won't hurt to report the accounts. The Admins are the only ones who can issue bans. They will consider whether the account is ban worthy.

And some Globals.
3704  Other / Meta / Re: Proactive fighting with spammers. Doing it the right way on: October 21, 2016, 05:12:01 AM
Guess who just randomly decided to respond to my pm? Bitmixer. What a coincidence! I'm sure someone with about ten accounts on their campaign mailed them in a panic or something.
3705  Economy / Digital goods / Need someone in the US to buy me a CD then rip it to flac then send me that on: October 20, 2016, 07:24:17 PM
I need a CD purchasing from amazon.com. It's $1.99 + $3.99 shipping and I need you to rip it to flac then upload that to a file host and send me it. If you're in the US and you can do it please PM me with how much you can do it for. Please only contact me if you know what you're doing with ripping to flac and can do this pretty quickly. Thanks.
3706  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Selling Sport Betting Analysis on: October 20, 2016, 04:06:57 PM
Hi. Please only bump your thread once every 24 hours and remove the previous updates when you do. Thanks.
3707  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: DirectBet Soccer Prediction Game *** Win Free Bets ! *** Free to Enter ! on: October 20, 2016, 03:38:52 PM
0-0
1-1
3708  Other / Meta / Re: [Question] In-dept About Potential Activity. on: October 20, 2016, 02:12:41 PM
Yes. If you have 500 potential activity then it only takes 480 to become Hero. However, it's not possible for a Newbie to have potential activity so high because you will have needed to have posted in more than 30 periods to have such potential activity thus making you a Junior.
3709  Other / Meta / Re: [Question] In-dept About Potential Activity. on: October 20, 2016, 02:01:42 PM
Yes. If it has potential activity then that's what activity it will get once the required posts have been made.
3710  Other / Meta / Re: Proactive fighting with spammers. Doing it the right way on: October 20, 2016, 01:34:06 PM
I think we need more mods and more good mods that deserve better salary. Banning by association is like North Korean Laws. Your banning the managers, but what about those members that follow the rules? They will be ruined too without doing any mistakes. This a conflict of interest on your part because you have own signature campaign firm.

We are not employees and the money staff get paid is not a salary but just a thanks for helping out, but with the amount of spam that is caused by sig spammers it is unmanageable and you would probably need ten full time and fully paid mods just to deal with it but we shouldn't have to be dealing with it if businesses would run their campaigns properly. The problem here is entirely down to greedy/lazy businesses who want to get the cheapest advertising possible with little to no effort on their part.

I think the best thing to do is _ban_ all the signature campaign, it will resolve the problem (I'm sure).

Why not try for 1 month?

I've suggested we try an outright ban if not on this forum then with the launch of the new one. Probably wouldn't help much if people know it's only temporary but it would be an interesting experiment to see how much traffic dropped off.

Even if all they care for is only exposure, this still doesn't mean that they are deliberately encouraging spammers. I think that any service would prefer good posters to spammy ones. There may be just not enough good posters currently looking for participation or the payment is too low that only compulsive spammers get attracted by such a campaign. But in any case, it is a campaign manager who first agrees to manage a signature campaign for the service and then indiscriminately accepts participants into it...

Therefore, the campaign managers are the ones who should be dealt with and where it will be most effective

Of course they're encouraging spammers by their ineptitude and inadequacy to properly run their campaign. They pay people to post shit. People wouldn't be posting streams of crap if they weren't going to get paid for it. If campaign operators did their job efficiently there would be no issue in the first place but what happens when there is no manager? What do we do then? Let's take bitmixer for example. As others have said they will pay anyone for any post as long as it's over 75 characters regardless of content. They would literally pay a user for posting I don't know what to write but as long as it's a minimum of 75 characters I'll get paid or aaaaaaasssssssddddddfffffffgggggghhhhhjjjjjkkkklllllppppoooiiiiuuuuyyyytttrreew wqqqaaassddffghhhjjjkkkll;;ppoiuyttrewqqasdgf in every thread if staff didn't intervene. This cannot be acceptable and this shouldn't be left up to staff to clean up. If you pay people for whatever crap they post with nobody checking it then it is going to be abused and you are paying for it to happen so they're liable and this needs to stop. It's rare that you see anyone on bitmixer write more than a sentence or two because why would they? And most campaigns don't really care about the content because one post is one advert of theirs being shown regardless if it's one word or a ten paragraphs.

Bitmixer.io's signature campaign is the perfect case study of this. Their thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425135.0 was started by the service themselves. It is wholly managed by them, and their bot.

They accept, check posts, and pay out, via a bot on their website. The BITMIXER.IO user has not been online since September, and he last posted in July. He has been PM'ed warnings multiple times by the mods but he has never responded. They are doing absolutely nothing to curb spam from their sig campaign participants. Even punishing the BITMIXER.IO account wouldn't do anything because that account is not really used and everything is done entirely through a bot.

The only thing that could really be done with bitmixer is to completely shut down their campaign by trashing the thread, blocking the bot, and forcibly removing their signature from all participants.

I don't think that shutting down the whole campaign makes sense since that would in effect be equal to cancelling signatures altogether in the most indiscriminate way. It is obvious as well that not all users enrolled in this campaign are evil spammers, but this doesn't in the least mean that there are no spammers without any signature, either. It might well be the case that this service attracts the greatest number of shit posters across the forum, but this alone doesn't make it anywhere near guilty for them posting outright spam. Since you can always find a number of die-hard spammers who wear no signature at all. On the other hand, nothing prevents all these Bitmixer.io spammers from starting posting sense (or at least refrain from posting garbage) if they really wanted to. As you can see, their failure to comply with the quality standards of the forum is not Bitmixer.io's fault...


Do you have an army of alts on bitmixer or something? How is it not bitmixers fault? Of course it is. They are paying people to do this. So what do we do? Just let bitmixer continue to pay people to shit all over the forum and we as staff are meant to waste our time day after day running around after them cleaning up their mess? Don't be silly. If you have a leaky toilet pipe squirting shit all over in the every direction do you just run around like a madman trying to put a bucket under every hole that appears to catch the waste and then say problem solved? No. You fix the source of the problem. Shit campaigns are the problem. Bitmixer do nothing. Nada. Zero. Zilch. And because of that 95% of their users post utter rubbish. It doesn't matter if they have a handful of posters who make good posts. That's irrelevant. They can find other campaigns. Staff are not here to babysit bitmixer and every other campaign who do nothing but pay people to post spam. We shouldn't have to clean up their mess because it shouldn't be happening in the first place. We ban dozens of spammers a day but it doesn't do anything when the campaigns do nothing but keep encouraging it by paying users for whatever crap they can be bothered to do and this is the solution. If they can't run a campaign properly then you can't advertise here in such a way any longer and if you want to continue advertising here in such a way then get your shit together and stop paying people to crap everywhere.
3711  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: DirectBet Soccer Prediction Game *** Win Free Bets ! *** Free to Enter ! on: October 19, 2016, 12:36:35 PM
1-0
2-1
3712  Other / Meta / Re: Proactive fighting with spammers. Doing it the right way on: October 19, 2016, 12:34:22 PM
Easiest way is to disable all signatures for all users and that will repel 99% of the signature spammers. No incentive = no hollow forced posts containing 100 of characters saying basically nothing.

Well, that's the only way to solve the problem for sure and I'm not against it. If these new guidelines don't work then I can't see any other option really. Campaigns that do little to nothing to monitor/curb spam after a warning will be having their signatures barred from the forum by an admin so we're halfway there to that. Hopefully campaigns will just start only accepting quality posters but for those that don't they wont be allowed to advertise here in such a way any longer.

How much traffic would the forum stand to lose if there was no more incentive for posting? 50% or more?

And that's the dilemma here. I'm sure it would be much more than 50% but 50% of people who are only here because of campaigns wont be missed, but even 'great' posters may eventually dwindle and leave as getting some money for being here is still a massive plus and will inevitably be what keeps some of them as active as they are.
3713  Other / Meta / Re: Proactive fighting with spammers. Doing it the right way on: October 19, 2016, 12:20:52 PM
In my opinion, a threat of, say, a monthly ban will make most if not all of the campaign managers more careful and less promiscuous in the selection of new participants for the signature campaigns they happen to manage. Obviously, the unofficial forum rules should be amended with a special section concerning campaign managers and their responsibilities...

A thread is going to stickied very soon with rules/guidelines for both managers and signature campaigners and punishments for people who run the campaigns very poorly.
3714  Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?) on: October 19, 2016, 06:42:32 AM
Why don't you just actually spend a bit of time to search or reading this thread? It's been explained hundreds of times:

For activity you can only get 14 activity points every fortnight.

You won't be able to get another 14 until Tuesday.
3715  Economy / Services / Re: [For Hire] Graphic Designer on: October 18, 2016, 07:35:10 AM
Please remove your bumps when you make a new one. Thanks.
3716  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: NetBet Becomes the UK's First Licensed Gambling Site To Accept Bitcoin on: October 17, 2016, 07:16:53 PM
It sounds rather like this company is using Bitcoin as a payment rail, not a currency. If they're doing this out of fear of losing business to the BTC denominated online gambling outfits, they're gonna find their Bitcoin business to be a little thin on the ground; people using BTC gambling sites are going to be used to the freedom they get from a non-fiat system.

Doesn't matter. 99% of businesses who are thinking of accepting bitcoin will not 'save' bitcoins. Would it be any different if they did but chose to cash them out straight away? Nope. Bitpay just cut out that process and protect them against volatility which most businesses can't gamble on.

Bet365 also accepts bitcoin as a mode of payment for a long time and bet365 is also a United Kingdom based gambling company so how can they claim to be the first licensed gambling site.It is good too see many sites accepting bitcoin as i dont want to use my credit card for gambling

Do they? I'm not seeing bitcoin listed here: http://help.bet365.com/en/payments
3717  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Signature Campaign - accepted or not? on: October 17, 2016, 05:03:02 PM
Why don't you just ask them?  Roll Eyes
3718  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: DirectBet Soccer Prediction Game *** Win Free Bets ! *** Free to Enter ! on: October 17, 2016, 04:58:50 PM
1-1
2-1
3719  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: October 17, 2016, 03:16:47 PM
A new signature campaign has just been started: girlbtc Signature Campaign
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1651598.0

Legendary Members (6 slots): 0.040BTC / week
Hero Members (6 slots): 0.035BTC / week
Senior Members (6 slots): 0.030BTC / week
minimum 35 posts / week

No escrow and I'm very sceptical that this campaign will pay out given his previous history.
3720  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Loaning System for BTC on: October 17, 2016, 03:11:57 PM
This isn't going to work. Scammers will either just avoid using it altogether or take advantage of the fact that they can dupe someone with a fake ID or whatever.
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 1016 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!