Hey Leute,
da ich ein Anfänger auf dem Gebiet bin, wollt ich mal paar Sachen fragen.
1. Ich habe mal so zum Spass mir bei Virwox Bitcoins gekauft, habe sie daraufhin weiter verschickt.
Nur, Sie sind da nie angekommen?? Ich habe die Adresse überprüft, ob ich sie richtig kopiert habe. War alles okay. Blockchain hat auch bestätigt, das es verschickt bzw. abgekommen ist.
Doch es ist nichts da...
Wo ist den "da"? Mit "blockchain" meinst Du vermutlich "blockchain.info", ist das der Service den Du zum verwalten deiner Bitcoin nutzt oder hast Du ein Programm installiert? Welches? 2. Was habe ich für Möglichkeiten, die bitcoins wieder zurückzubekommen bzw. auf der Adresse zu erhalten.
Sinds sie lt. blockchain.info auf der Adresse eingetroffen? 3. Für was ist genau dieses Bitcoin Core da? Ist doch nichts anderes als eine Wallet, oder nicht? Brauche ich unbedingt eine Wallet, wenn ich Bitcoins einfach nur zb bei Virwox kaufe und dann verschicke und daraufhin gleich einlöse? Weil Wallets sind doch dafür da das man Bitcoins *lagert*.
Bitcoin core ist eine Programm zum verwalten von Bitcoin, also eine Wallet. Bitcoin core ist aber auch ein vollständiger Knoten im Bitcoin Netzwerk und braucht daher viel Platz auf deiner Festplatte. Was meinst du mit "verschicke" bzw. mit "gleich einlöse"? 4. Wo sind eigentlich besagte Bitcoins hin, wenn sie weder auf der neuen Adresse bzw auf meinem Virwox Account sind  ? Mfg SSheep, der keine Ahnung hat. Siehe oben, die Frage ist wo die Adresse herkommt. |
|
|
|
Naming Cloudminig.website "very risky" it is a very nice word.
-snip-
I appeal to not let them advertise this project!
Mitchełł just removed them. OP updated (based on shorena's last pastebin).
|
|
|
|
So I have been accused of trying to sell my account and that I am a alt of Noax
Neither of these are true, well if someone offered me a ludicrous amount of money I might sell, but honestly why can the Internet police just go along posting neg feedback when they have never done a trade with you?
I see a single rating by golapani who is trust by 0 other users according to the latest trust.txt[1]. Their reference makes no sense to me, it might have linked to a post that made sense but was removed though. I cant tell. Overal, yes anyone can leave any rating they want. The trust system is not moderated and only excessive spam will be removed. The more important question is whether someone will give a damn about the rating. Feel free to take a look at my trust page and see how many of the red ratings are of importance to you. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz |
|
|
|
IIRC CIYAM had a thread like that, not entirely sure what the topic was. I followed it for a while... found it -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=957789.0BTT: Would this mean a post will be remove at any time later if the users changes their signature to a paid one? Will posts be restored if they remove the paid signature? |
|
|
|
-snip-
I felt the need and until I receive the funds (if ever) I and other participants have all the right to post here, since the campaign owners have decided not to pay any more because according to them they already did (don't blame them!) and you sure as hell are not going to. And seeing as we're at the mercy of master-p, I'll take my chances and post my address whether or not you see the need for it.
Why not open a scam accusation against those (orbit) that owe you money? If every participants of every campaign would add their address here this would be a confusing mess. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello! this is me Davian144 on bitcointalk.org
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1NW3gCGy6xEHkaKDmEjpVj3T1r9muZRy2i
H+Xfb9E/6xTUIkHYNiLPNkI7YfTOCn0gcgTfdBpmWkZNREkIqgdY32w9aDw27CceraZxKvS7JZXvG2Rnb69I8eM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
verified. You might want to add a date for future signatures. |
|
|
|
I keep seeing all these posts that someone can hack my wallet. First I did not think that this could be done? If it can be done, how can I prevent it from happening? Does my wallet need to be online in order for them to be able to hack it or can they still hack a paper wallet?
It is possible that someone can just guess or brute force your private key. The chance however is so small you might as well call it impossible. Its as likely as someone winning the lottery several times in a row and will for all we know never happen as long as the sun is still burning. Other than that it mostly depends on the way you use your machine. As AllInCrypto said if the machine that you use to control your wallet is infected by malware, its easy for the attacker to spend your coins. Its however not "easy" to infect a modern, well updated system, unless you do something to help the malware. Commonly bitcoin related malware will require you to execute it yourself, so be careful what you download and use. |
|
|
|
How about: -blocknotify=<cmd> Execute command when the best block changes (%s in cmd is replaced by block hash)
|
|
|
|
Your activity should not have much of an effect on other users, however I would not recommend updating the initial information through wifi, you will be there forever. I think you would be safe for now, for there are not to many people looking to hack public wifi bitcoin access, just my opinion though.
Thanks for the warning. I'm considering using a dead mobile as offline storage. Dead as in without a network connection of course.  That is a good idea. It will hold battery life for a long while and you can connect through wifi when ever you want to use your account. That is a great idea and I think it trumps my laptop that I keep off the network until I need it. Not to many people would expect a cell phone that is out of service. But with cell phone, you can only use online wallet. Is that safe? No, e.g. bither has an offline mode for phones. |
|
|
|
Its an easy way to check whether the first bit is always 1 for a given step, which it is. Thus you can limit the search space. For step n you do not need to search for any possible solutions from step n-1. |
|
|
|
I unfortunately just recently started looking into BTC and ALT coins and while there is a ton of information here it is hard for me to discern good info from bad. It seems like a lot of the things people post are either ads or sarcastic comments to steer people away. Any tips on who to trust?
Yourself. |
|
|
|
OK. so four accusations is not enough because four spambot users who'd bought "hero" accounts could collude or one whale could afford to buy four accounts and mark at will.
Is there a threshold of how many accusations would it take to be difficult to fake ?
Could the number of spambots so exceed the number of real users that any democratic counting falls down?
I might have proposed a duff idea so its back to the cartoon "bat the rat" app on an i-thingy for now.
Mabye limiting to Hero alone is enough, maybe you need 10, 100 or 1000. I would suspect that the majority of users are bots, alts or other accounts that would make a democratic process unfeasible Until the new forum is done nothing this complex will be implemented anyway, so either its really simple or its not going to happen. IIRC theymos was also against anything that might result in the forum holding users funds. |
|
|
|
I'm new to buying bitcoins and transferring them. So basically i bought some bitcoins from LocalBitcoins then sent them to my watch only electrum wallet. My BTC balance on electrum says i've got nothing. Does this mean i have lost my BTC forever? Blockchain is showing that they was sent to 2 addresses. I'm sorry if i don't make much sense. I'm very new to this stuff.
A watch-only wallet means that you cannot control the Bitcoins. This means, you technically no longer own the Bitcoins. If you can contact the owner of the wallet to try and get your Bitcoins then that may work. If you have ownership of that wallet or the private keys, you are fine! Thanks for the reply. How do i contact the owner? Where did you get that wallet from? Did someone else give it to you? Did you create it yourself? Here is the id: 1J8MtJ2qQ2GR51VNaniXak6ghzoE953jJx
That is an address. Is this your address or is it the address of localbitcoins? This is the address of Localbitcoins If thats the case than you can send the coins from your localbitcoins account to a wallet you created. Sorry, i meant that thats the address what sent me the bitcoins When you say "send me", do you mean to one of your addresses? If so, which address of yours are you talking about? How did you create said address? |
|
|
|
Proposal :
Bat The Bot Contest
~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the mods decided to implement this, I'd put 0.01 BTC on the table for prize money for it.
Users can see a "this is a nonsensebot" button next to where the "-trust" button may appear for not too nooby users.
Every post has a reference number (already exists) and a "nonsensebot" count (proposed) and an array of up to four user uuid. (new, and invisible to forum users)
If you "nonsensebot" a post and if your uuid is not listed and its list is not full then your uuid is appended to the list for that post.
If when you "nonsensebot" a post yours is the 4th mark on the list
then
all four users on the list get a credit, which I vote be worth 1 Satoshi, from the prize pool
the post is removed
a nastybot message to the nonsensebot tells them where their post went and where they can go
The proposed prize of 0.01 BTC might remove 250,000 alleged nonsense posts at 1 Satoshi per confirmed accusation and be great fun for people who like the village fete game "bat the rat".
Can anyone propose improvements to this?
I create 4 bots that mark all posts and get rich. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MK-IV RenewableTechnologyEvangalistBabbleBot
Jokes aside, people that write reports get nothing for it. 1 Satoshi is hardly an incentive for those that do not write reports to start doing so. It is easily abused if automated, e.g. I can make 4 accounts and mark all yours posts out of spit. The person that wrote the spam bot can use them to mark all posts to cause havok with the new system. IMHO what it boils down to is that you created another system that needs moderation. |
|
|
|
messages verified
what's your point OP? just bragging?
Signature Verified@shorena , @EcuaMobi can i get your Red neg Back. @Quickseller i always told you that i had never access to the 1E...... wallet. See it Now. How do we know its not you posting from your alt account? |
|
|
|
so i was watching some youtube videos how people gamble in live casinos and i would like to try that too the minimum bet should be something like 0.001-0.005
Why not trying with casino faucets? do faucets actually give such big amounts to be able to play minimum bets on live casinos? I think they are refering to casino with build in faucet. They usually allow for at least a few games. Its a nice way to understand the game before you transfer coins. You will usually not reach the payout amount from faucets though. |
|
|
|
Pretty good performance. I'm at 10,000 keys/s, pretty slow, so I will get nowhere for values > #40 without trying to improve code or coding for GPU.
Anyhow, I think even with GPU we won't go too far...
Do you know anything about who created this 32 BTC puzzle?
A GPU cracker would take at most a year for solving the next 2 51 address at 35,000,000 keys/s. I guess it will be cracked too in future, but for fun and not for money. I don't know who made this pizzle. Exactly. One thing I was wondering is if it is possible somehow to tweak some ASIC miner out there to turn it into a cracker? I have no idea if such thing is possible as I never used any ASIC miner. Miners can only do sha256d. What is needed here is pubkey(ECDSA privkey) and ripemd160(sha256(0x04pubkeyxpubkeyy)). Everything else can be ignored if we compare to the ripemd160 hash. Its certainly possible to design an ASIC for this and it might even be profitable for someone to do so in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
