So let's sum up, i am a legendary, i have 1236 posts, one post get flagged with a first part copied , modified and pasted and then 54% of genuine written text and that is it ! Banned for life. No slap on the wrist ? no warning . ? I don't think your rank and the many posts you wrote over the years should serve as an excuse for what you did. In fact, if you go back a week or two you will find numerous cases of people getting banned for copy-pasting (including other high ranked accounts). Yes, there is no warning about plagiarism, and people who have committed such a violation are almost always permabanned. What's worse in your case is that you have changed small parts of the first paragraph ( adapted in your own words), which means that you have done this copy/paste thing quite deliberately. |
|
|
|
What I'm trying to say is that the posts are 12 hours apart. Within 7 (or 10 or whatever the grace period is) minutes you wouldn't get the dotted line and my parser wouldn't get a LastEdited date but after 12 hours it certainly would have a dotted line and an edit date.
I'm an idiot and definitely need to see (pun intended) an eye doctor. It is AM and PM...my god. /thread |
|
|
|
^ Then this has to be the dumbest thing I've ever seen, copy a message that was just posted. I still don't find a reason, why would you do that..  If I edit my post within 7 minutes, I don't get the 'dotted lines', it's not marked as edited, correct? |
|
|
|
I have a weird feeling about this, could it be some kind of setup? Look closely, Hirochifaa is brand new account with just one post which was removed/nuked. Both posts are created within 7 minutes which could possibly allow you to edit the first post, right? Why would a legendary account copy a message posted just minutes ago, it makes no sense. Isn't it too obvious?  |
|
|
|
~snip~ Alright, thanks. Suchmoon didn't flag you Proof that LoyceV is not an AI?  or just a temporary system malfunction...  |
|
|
|
How did you find it if it's not a secret?  I've spent a good amount of time lurking around cached versions of the page but ended up with nothing. On the other hand, some duche have copied and pasted guigui371's Blockchain.io post in their medium article: https://medium.com/@vovancher555/a-very-interesting-project-that-i-follow-for-some-time-now-b2d0eddfcb81We also have some newbies plagiarizing from the same post: A very interesting project that I follow for some time. A team that builds confidence and promises a good future for this cryptocurrency. I have shared a maximum of the project to help as I can, hoping that it will help a maximum and will be able to evolve this project. Nice one project airdrop in today great ICO is available here One
A very interesting project that I follow for some time. A team that builds confidence and promises a good future for this cryptocurrency. I have shared a maximum of the project to help as I can, hoping that it will help a maximum and will be able to evolve this project. Nice one project airdrop in today great ICO is available here One
|
|
|
|
|
If I hаd to guess, I'd say it's likely related to your post from June in Blockchain.io ANN thread. About a week ago a huge number of accounts have been banned posting copied messages in there.
Either your post is a copy-paste (I couldn't find anything) or you've been somehow wrongly flagged/banned along with these shill accounts.
|
|
|
|
You see OP, magic ball never lies. My guess is that all jr.member accounts are his, those that are bought are full members and up, passwords have been changed around the same time. Тhe only thing that remains a mystery is how many more do you have/ HAD? If you name all of your alts, I'm sure moderators will show mercy and leave you at least one account to spam bounties.  |
|
|
|
~snip~ Good catch, these four accounts are certainly connected to each other. Three of them with their first post talk about bitcoin transaction times posting one after another in the same thread (3 minute span). If we look closer, more accounts with the same/similar activity and registration date can be found. I'm not sure if they're just bots that are meant to bump scammy ANN threads or someone is preppin' them to whore signature campaigns. |
|
|
|
That's the kind of action that really shows that lakers are very motivated to win every game this season, however, the chemistry has not been form yet, it will take I guess and they might be frustrated along the way as the losing streak continues.
I'm trying not to be too harsh on them, it's been only two games. They were both highly competitive and could have gone either way. Blazers and Rockets are also one of the best teams in the west, probably top four seeds. The thing I don't like when I watch the Lakers is when JaVale goes to the bench and they either play Bron or Kuzma at the five. They are so vulnerable defensively as there is basically no paint protection, each drive is a basket or a foul for the opposing team. Maybe give Mo Wagner or Zubac a chance idk... At least, Lonzo gets to start now with upcoming multiple game suspensions for Rondo and Ingram. |
|
|
|
~snip~ Yeah, I know...i was being sarcastic. |
|
|
|
~snip~ Not a bad idea, I'm just not sure how many of them would know/understand the meaning of the word ' plagiarism.' Referring to people that usually get banned for it. Perhaps dumb it down to 'copy/pasting'? However, I don't think it will stop them from trying to cheat, the worst case scenario is that they all use text spinning tools and become even harder to detect. |
|
|
|
|
Oh, man did we get some action last night or what. Punches were thrown between Rondo, CP3 and Ingram, multiple ejections, close game that went to the wire. But again Lakers pulled the short end of the stick with some questionable calls from the refs in the final few minutes. Ingram might get multiple games suspension by the NBA though, as he was the one who started it all.
|
|
|
|
accounti s going banned dont try this its risky
You know what's risky? Taking advantage of someone else's effort aka stealing intellectual property, something that is not yours. So, I don't want to be the bearer of bad news but your account will be banned pretty soon, as copy and pasting cases here are treated with permabans. PS. If you ever decide to post in Meta and ask why your account got banned, know that this is not because of a signature campaign. I've been thinking about Bitcoin futures that had been added to a few regular exchanges in December, and it seems that I understand how Wall Street could manipulate the Bitcoin futures market as well as Bitcoin price itself. Many people think that these futures can affect Bitcoin prices and I agree with them to a degree, though for likely quite different reasons.
We all know that Bitcoin futures are cash settled. This basically means that when the contract expires a trader's account is simply debited or credited depending on the current Bitcoin price, and no delivery of real bitcoins takes place. When people buy contracts they expect prices to rise. Conversely, when they sell contracts, they expect prices to go down.
This opens wide the doors to market manipulation. The Bitcoin futures market makers can easily see how many contracts have been sold or bought at any given moment. When the number of bought contracts substantially exceeds sold contracts, market makers can sell real bitcoins at exchanges like Bitfinex, thus moving the price down and leaving traders with losses, and vice versa.
Such manipulation could make sense if there is enough volume in the Bitcoin futures market while the price can be easily moved in the required direction. This explains how Bitcoin futures can affect Bitcoin prices, though in a somewhat convoluted or even controversial way, while the number of open contracts can then be used as a contrary indicator of sorts.
What do you guys think of this scheme?
original: I've been thinking about Bitcoin futures that had been added to a few regular exchanges in December, and it seems that I understand how Wall Street could manipulate the Bitcoin futures market as well as Bitcoin price itself. Many people think that these futures can affect Bitcoin prices and I agree with them to a degree, though for likely quite different reasons.
We all know that Bitcoin futures are cash settled. This basically means that when the contract expires a trader's account is simply debited or credited depending on the current Bitcoin price, and no delivery of real bitcoins takes place. When people buy contracts they expect prices to rise. Conversely, when they sell contracts, they expect prices to go down.
This opens wide the doors to market manipulation. The Bitcoin futures market makers can easily see how many contracts have been sold or bought at any given moment. When the number of bought contracts substantially exceeds sold contracts, market makers can sell real bitcoins at exchanges like Bitfinex, thus moving the price down and leaving traders with losses, and vice versa.
Such manipulation could make sense if there is enough volume in the Bitcoin futures market while the price can be easily moved in the required direction. This explains how Bitcoin futures can affect Bitcoin prices, though in a somewhat convoluted or even controversial way, while the number of open contracts can then be used as a contrary indicator of sorts.
What do you guys think of this scheme?
2 mod: if this topic belongs to Speculation, please move it there!
archived: http://archive.is/nOiI1 |
|
|
|
A hot topic in the NBA thread is to discuss 'roosters' It might be true that this current Cavs rooster will be struggling this season Of course, every team has a chance of getting the championship but with the currency rooster and the current coach the Cavs has |
|
|
|
I'm not sure why you haven't been merited yet: Thank you si for your genital help but I have a team who write an article I did not write the article. |
|
|
|
What kind of atrocious defense do you need to have to allow opposing team score 150 pts with no overtimes played? Kings tanking season campaign has officially started after only two games. Pels, on the other hand, are avg. 140ppg and Mirotic with back to back 30pts games, last night, if I'm not mistaken, were 36pts career high for him. current Cavs rooster I just couldn't help myself it is too funny  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
