Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 12:26:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 [188] 189 190 191 192 »
3741  Economy / Exchanges / Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO CZ_BINANCE on: April 14, 2019, 09:46:12 PM
$2,000 is really not very much money. If you cannot afford to hold that much BNB, chances are it is probably not appropriate for you to be participating in an IEO.

Ultimately, the goal of binance is to maximize the long term profits of their shareholders. They are going to implement their IEO structure in a way that maximizes their long term revenue, not to "help" the "common man"
3742  Economy / Lending / Re: Looking to borrow bitcoin on: April 14, 2019, 09:24:44 PM
Are you able to convert your cash into a stablecoin?

What interest rate are you offering?

What is the purpose of your loan?

I don't understand why you would want to use $150k to buy 20 BTC, and subsequently short 20 BTC. Why would you not just use the $150k to buy whatever it is you wanted to buy
3743  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red trust on Bestmixer: resolved. Off-topic questions remain, see last post. on: April 14, 2019, 09:03:50 PM
If someone committed a crime in Mexico City, if you are aware of this, and help the criminal hide the fact they were in Mexico City on the date of the crime, you are an accessory after the fact, and are breaking the law. If you are helping someone who did not break any law hide the fact they were on Mexico City on April 12, you are not doing anything wrong.

To me, it looks like Bestmixer is trying to prevent themselves from breaking the law, and getting into trouble with the authorities. They also probably are trying to avoid being subjected to jurisdiction by US regulators.

Having "freedom" does not mean someone is free to do anything they want, even if it is harmful to others. I would define it as not being subjected to arbitrary rules that only protect you from yourself, or do not protect anyone at all.

I am not inclined to create a new thread regarding the subject. I do not believe any of this makes Bestmixer untrustworthy, if anything it makes them more trustworthy because they are showing some kind of effort to not deliver coins associated with past bad activity to their customers.
3744  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Need adequate sellers for large volume btc on: April 14, 2019, 08:20:48 PM
I am very interested in this type of trades. The proceedure is simple: you deposit the coins or fiat. Crypto is protected by bitgo, we don't own any private key, any outgoing transactions need to be co-signed in order to be processed. So once you make the deposit you can transact it whatever you like at whatever price you like with your partner(s). You find the web address in my profile.

Your site is similar to the lousy analogue of crypto exchanges.
If you calculate that someone will put their money on your site, then you are naive.
This looks even more crap than my 3000btc purchase offer posted on this forum.
I will give you merit for you honesty.

Legendary generosity...
I think it is time to stop trolling and lock this thread.
3745  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Binance a “high” regulatory risk on: April 14, 2019, 08:18:39 PM
Out of all the exchanges operating in the Eastern part of the world (operating out of Asia), I am most comfortable with Binance. The primary reason behind this revolves around the lack of fake trading volume on their exchange, and the prevalence of fake trading volume around other exchanges.

i don't buy that. binance has all the signs of volume pumping, they just don't make it quite as obvious as other exchanges. its thin-ass books look exactly like okcoin's always did. such volume, much impress, but never any bids to dump into. right...... Roll Eyes
I would encourage you to review this bitcoin address. I have a good reason to believe it belongs to binance, being one of their cold storage addresses. This proves they have at least $400mm worth of bitcoin either belonging to themselves or their customers. I believe cold storage to be a better indicator of real volume, even if indirectly so, because it cannot be faked. An exchange with fake volume can display bids and asks that indicate deep order books that get pulled when someone tries to trade against the orders. It can also have money on another exchange with real volume, and leverage the other exchange's order book. I also read this report last year, but I like to do my own research.


Even though the New York State AG sent an inquiry to Binance, I do not believe the NYAG has jurisdiction over them.

if they're serving new york customers then they do. binance receives (and presumably responds to) subpoenas from USA regulators all the time. shapeshift similarly doesn't process fiat and doesn't even hold custody of funds; they received 44 subpoenas in the second half of 2018, mostly from USA agencies.
I was under the impression binance did not serve customers in NY state, upon a review of their TOS, I am unable to find any prohibition of NY customers, although perhaps they will ask upon having information suggesting a customer resides in NY state. If a NY regulator were to try to impose any regulatory actions against binance, they would need to get the Japanese or Tawian government to agree to help, and perhaps the US State department before they can even contact either of these.

Allowing customers to withdraw any amount without being subject to KYC can theoretically allow someone to launder an unlimited amount of money if they create multiple accounts. They may do blockchain analysis to somewhat prevent this if someone is clearly depositing coin owned by the same entity via multiple anon accounts.

It's safe to say that most of the funds that people send to Binance come from fiat exchanges like Coinbase, and they are withdrawn back to fiat exchanges like Coinbase. In other words, there is no such a thing as anonymity, especially not when you take into consideration that the majority of the people don't even understand what coin taint really is.

I think that some exchanges might even hand over user data to each other in order to prevent illicit acitivity. It's pure speculation from my side, but it's not out of the ordinary considering that Coinbase is the most regulated exchange, and exchanging data happens within the legacy financial industry too.
If someone was laundering money, they would probably not use Coinbase to use fiat to buy bitcoin to send to binance. Transaction history of inputs is publicly available on the blockchain, but with advanced analysis, it can to determined even if mixers are used.

The privacy policy of most major exchanges prohibit them from sharing customer specific information with eachother. They may share more general information about their coin holdings, such as if a specific address belongs to the exchange, if an address was used to receive a customer deposit, or if a specific transaction was used to process a customer withdrawal. They will probably not disclose (they should not) if two deposit addresses, or two withdrawal transactions belong to the same customer.
3746  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Best methods for an offsite backup? on: April 14, 2019, 07:46:18 PM
1) You reduce the security of the seed
Quote
The most important rule in cryptography is "don't roll your own crypto". Don't try to do smart things because you will make mistakes because you will not understand the impact on the complexity of solving the problem. Let me give you another classic example. I've read this all the time where they say okay all you have to do is take your 24 words and cut it in half and store 12 words in one place in 12 words in another place.

That's not the standard and there's a reason why that's not the standard. It's not the standard because that is not secure. So next time you hear that, ask the simple question "how much less effort is it to find one half of a seed if you split it in two and I managed to compromise one of this twelve word packs? How hard is it for me to crack the other twelve words is it half as difficult as 24 words?"

No it's not it's 10^35 times less difficult. Why? Because what you cut in half is not the base it's the exponent of the complexity so you took something that had 256 bits of complexity and you converted it to a 128 bits of complexity and 128 bits of complexity isn't half of 256 bits it's 10 with 30 some zeros after it or 40 some zeroes after it less complex within 256 bits.
Splitting keys up and storing them in two locations will increase security from that of the location with the lessor security that holds each of the 12 words. I will explain why:

If an attacker is able to obtain 12 of the 24 words of your BIP 39 seed, they will not immediately have knowledge of your seed. The attacker will need to do additional work to determine your seed, but as you note, the work is less than is required to determine a seed without knowledge of any of the words. This is opposed to storing the entire 24 word seed in the less secure location, and as soon as the attacker breaks into this location, they have knowledge of your entire seed.

Splitting up private keys, and word seeds is actually common for big businesses to employ. I cannot speak to their current setup, and should not speak to specifics, but Coinbase used to do something very similar to splitting up the private keys to their cold storage into multiple parts, except it was not stored online in any way, and it was split up into more than two parts.

If you have a robust way to detect unauthorized access into whatever medium of storage your backups are behing held in, you should have enough time to move your coins into an address controlled by private keys that are not compromised.


3747  Economy / Lending / Re: Need 1 ETH Loan on: April 14, 2019, 07:12:43 PM
There are many exchanges that display fake volumes in order to command higher listing fees from potential coin developers. Most of these exchanges have little, if any real customers, or real trading volume, and they are probably not safe to entrust with a deposit to buy/sell coins.

Binance is the only reputable exchange I am aware of that will charge a listing fee, but I am unsure how much they charge, probably more than 2 ETH. If I were a coin dev, or was behind the creation of a new coin, I would be hesitant to pay to list my coin, I would rather an exchange list my coin because they believe they will earn a lot via trading commissions via real trading.  

I can't find any exchanges that trade your offered collateral, but why do you not trade the collateral you are offering on an exchange for the 1 ETH you need?
3748  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Minimum wage salary from real job compare to crypto earning which is better? on: April 13, 2019, 10:47:12 PM
I am not confident I am understanding the question in the OP.....

It is not normal to expect to earn money while you are learning. Students typically will actually pay to gain an education, but sometimes work limited hours earning less than they might otherwise if the student was not in school. This is why many businesses give discounted rates for services and goods to people they can verify to be a student.

At the completion of your education, a student will no longer be a student, and can expect to leverage his newly acquired knowledge to earn a higher income.

If you want to get into "trading" I would say you should start with smaller sized trades before risking larger amounts on a single deal that has the potential to go wrong. You may want to wait until you have successfully spotted and stopped sizeable losses resulting in someone trying to swindle you until you move into larger, more profitable trades, that also entail a higher probability of losses.

Some have speculated you are considering using that tiny signature of yours to advertise a business while you "lean" and I would ask that you not do this. Please wait until you can discuss the subject matter with ease before you have an incentive to write more posts.
3749  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Best methods for an offsite backup? on: April 13, 2019, 07:22:06 PM
The best method to store an offsite backup is a safety deposit box, or a second property you own that is separate from your house. Period. Anything else is going to be inferior to either of these options.

Using a cloud storage provider or email is complicated, and is much less ideal. I will examine them below.

I will assume you access your email from the same physical location you access your wallet, so if your on-side wallet backups are destroyed, chances are the computer you normally access your email account will also be destroyed. This means you will need to be in a position to memorize your email password, or memorize the password manager password that can be accessed from the cloud. If you cannot memorize your email password, then you will need to be in a position to reset your email password, and if your email provider allows this, anyone who knows the answers to your reset questions can potentially reset your password.

Similarly, if you use 2FA to secure your email account, chances are high whatever device you use to generate a 2FA code will also be destroyed if your on-side backups are destroyed. Although this may not be the case if you use your phone for 2FA, that you keep on your personal at all times. If you lose access to the device you use for 2FA, then you would need to use some kind of off-site backup of your 2FA codes, but this ultimately would need to be kept someplace separate, and not protected via 2FA. If your 2FA off-site backup is stored in the same place as your off-site backup for your bitcoin keys, you will not be able to access your 2FA keys or your bitcoin keys. If you use SMS as 2FA, you will be able to procure a new phone with your existing number, but your number may also be stolen via social engineering.

Using a cloud storage provider will be incrementally more secure, but not by very much. There are similar issues with accessing your cloud storage provider as an email account discussed above. If your on-site computer is destroyed, and cannot access your password, you could reset your email password, and use your email to access your cloud storage account password, both without using 2FA. This will mean you will be faced with challenges from two entities, and two entities will possibly be suspicious of attempts to reset passwords to your accounts.

You can hide your backup keys within another file, but if someone is hacking your email/cloud storage account, there is a good chance they are doing so because they think they have a good reason to believe there is valuable information stored in your account. In general, a hacker will not want to invest a lot of resources into hacking an account that they don't believe will reveal something valuable. This means, anyone with unauthorized access to your account will know to look in creative places.

You can use an encryption password to secure files stored in an email/cloud storage account, but this must to memorized because this password cannot be reset. As discussed above, if your password is too complex, you may forget it in a year when you have not used it for a long time.

In summary, you should keep off-site backups in a safe deposit box, or a property you own that is separate in location from where your on-side backups are located. If you are not in a position to use either of these, you should put yourself in a position to use one of these options.
3750  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: localbitcoins | AML regulation on: April 06, 2019, 06:55:01 PM
The most interesting part of the policy is:
Quote
inhibiting the creation of illegitimate accounts.
It is pretty well known that a problem on LBC is the use of sock puppet accounts to boost various scores/ratings, either done yourself, or purchased from some third party "SEO boosting" service.

I believe this is being done to combat this kind of abuse.
3751  Other / Meta / Re: Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org on: April 01, 2019, 04:01:49 AM
Gosh i really want the shirt. But i can only afford the pencil.
I am looking at your merit score, and you cannot afford the pencil
3752  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: About the traceability of Bitcoin on: April 01, 2019, 03:43:04 AM
You can use a mixer
use of a mixer,
best option is to use mixer
I would invite all of you to review this thread. An attacker can use the "services" of a mixer, and use advanced blockchain analysis to determine most if not all of the addresses used by the mixer, and can use additional analysis to trace specific transactions.

PS - sending coins to a single intermediary address is not going to enhance privacy more than marginally
3753  Other / Meta / Re: KYC should include private keys (+post your private keys here) on: April 01, 2019, 03:30:02 AM
After seeing some users posting what appear to be real selfies in the main KYC thread, this thread makes me a bit worried. Hopefully those who know about private keys also know how to post them on a public forum safely (hint: don't).
Someone should invite this guy to post in this thread  Cheesy
3754  Economy / Reputation / Re: Request to Delet my 9 Negative trust on: April 01, 2019, 03:22:55 AM
'ok-aurus' is very clearly trying to troll in order to obtain the max negative trust score.

He went from -512 to -9999 in one day, and he was "only" -32 at the start of the year.

I would ignore him, and he will go away. If an idiot tried to send him money, he would probably not even reply with a btc address to send coin to. Anyone who sends coin to him is going to eventually lose their coin anyway because his scam attempts are transparent and lazy.
3755  Other / Meta / Re: KYC should include private keys (+post your private keys here) on: April 01, 2019, 03:01:12 AM
My private key:
Code:
c4bbcb1fbec99d65bf59d85c8cb62ee2db963f0fe106f483d9afa73bd4e39a8a
My public address:
Code:
1JwSSubhmg6iPtRjtyqhUYYH7bZg3Lfy1T

Please no unsolicited payments. I will not be responsible for returning anything sent to this address.
3756  Economy / Lending / Re: Need Business Loan Worth 108 BTC (as Per today's Price) with Collateral on: April 01, 2019, 02:59:26 AM
The loan you are asking for involves a lot of complexity that probably less than 10 people on the entire forum have the non-financial resources to even get the paperwork in order for this loan (this is skipping over the part about performing due diligence) so that the terms of your loan proposal are binding.

You are free to solicit your loan how and where you wish, but I find it unlikely anyone will be willing to lend you to around here (assuming this is not a scam attempt - it may be, I don't know one way or another).

There are a number of crowd funding websites, and 'angel funding' websites that would probably be better suited for what you are trying to do.   
3757  Other / Meta / Re: KYC?? on: April 01, 2019, 02:20:48 AM
For the super paranoid, you should verify this information yourself. In theory, this whole April Fools prank could be a ruse to try to get xx user's private information if there was some good reason (such as a national security subpoena) to try to get their information. I think the chances of that are low.

Alternatively, you can leave all the fields blank, and the KYC request at the top of every page will go away.
Well, you can always take a look at the source code of the page yourself. You'll see that the form doesn't send anything to any server.

Code:
<form action="http://127.0.0.1/" method="post"> 
<!--Not actually sent to bitcointalk.org :) -->
    <table>
        -snip-
    </table>                    
</form>
That is the source code when you visit KYC verification page, but there is not anything stopping a different source code when someone else visits that page.

The chances of this happening are very low (close to zero).
3758  Other / Meta / Re: Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org on: April 01, 2019, 01:57:06 AM
I don't have enough merit to buy the Mug, nor the Condom.
<>I bought a<> mug and condom now too!
Do you want to trade for a pencil?
3759  Other / Meta / Re: KYC?? on: April 01, 2019, 01:55:36 AM
I am wondering how many people will actually fill in the form with their real information not even thinking Huh

It's fine, the data is only locally submitted:


That's what (((THEY))) want you to think.
For the super paranoid, you should verify this information yourself. In theory, this whole April Fools prank could be a ruse to try to get xx user's private information if there was some good reason (such as a national security subpoena) to try to get their information. I think the chances of that are low.

Alternatively, you can leave all the fields blank, and the KYC request at the top of every page will go away.
3760  Other / Meta / Re: Souvenirs from the Bitcointalk.org on: April 01, 2019, 01:08:40 AM
I don't have enough merit to buy the Mug, nor the Condom.
Pages: « 1 ... 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 [188] 189 190 191 192 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!