are we god to swap?
I think it's good to swap. I saw there were ten Chunk swap transactions already. Yes, we can swap on the exchange. But we are waiting for the new wallet, so we can stake again.
|
|
|
So I gather that people should buy some Lisk now before the demand increases to get in on this.
|
|
|
I only applied the signature. 10/25/2016
|
|
|
Steal does seem to be falling apart lately Look at how much the value has dropped and it keeps plummeting. It makes me wonder if it is still worth blogging there. How many feel the same ? Are you going to still blog or slow down a little or completely stop.
I really didn't blog much, because it is not my gift. Lately, the rewards have been quite low. Few, if any, get the equivalent of $1000.00 or more daily. Only a handful get over $100.00. I wouldn't bother unless you can verify that you are the real Satoshi Nakamoto or maybe Gary Johnson.
|
|
|
OK, I filled out the form for the signature bounty. Hope I did it right.
|
|
|
interested price dump from 3$ or how much its was maxx to 0.23$ omfg i see big lost some some peoples...i am sure soon new pump will happen.
It was at $0.21 a little while ago. i don't think it will drop much below $0.20 but the idea that the devs could just dump everything at any given time makes me feel extremely uneasy. The devs cannot dump everything at one time because a good portion of their steem is tied up in steem power. They could dump what they have right now in steem, but with only 55 BTC of buy support on Polo and about 17 BTC on Bittrex, that probably isn't overly tempting for them.
|
|
|
Maybe because you suggested this could be a big thing. It isn't an allegation against the coin, it's simply demanding information. The onus of proof doesn't lie with those asking reasonable questions it lies on the person being asked the question to present their evidence.
The code is hidden, it lacks innovation or anything new at all, the developer is anonymous, AND it makes a desperate polictical plea.
If it's not walletbuilders prove me otherwise and release the code. Github or it didn't happen.
People will shill their hearts out hoping a free bag they got is going to make them rich. It's funny at this point. Peepcoin anyone?
Walletbuilders doesn't offer masternodes as a feature. So it isn't walletbuilders. All we can know for sure is that it was forked off of a Novacoin descendant. Probably a Crave descendant.
|
|
|
Anyone was able to run the masternode?
The supernode feature is not working properly, and the dev is trying to come up with a fix. If you can acquire the 1000 coins required for the supernode, you could probably try it. However; since the dev did not give details on exactly what problem the supernodes is creating, it may screw up your wallet or the whole network. I wouldn't chance it.
|
|
|
interested price dump from 3$ or how much its was maxx to 0.23$ omfg i see big lost some some peoples...i am sure soon new pump will happen.
Market cap is still pretty high.. in the top 10. I saw this dump coming a mile away when it skyrocketed to 300+ million market cap. That was just not sustainable. What is the most frightening is that there is only a little over 12 million liquid steem, ATM. Almost 180 million steem is tied up in the vesting pool. Just think of how unsustainable this will be in a year when there could be almost 100 million or more liquid steem running around in the wild. Powering up is becoming less and less enticing now. As more liquid steem is created, this will only cause a feedback loop IMHO.
|
|
|
Is 37k the bottom or what? I loaded 20k+ down here
The bottom will be 1 SAT with all the founders/whales powering down and flood the market or better flee the platform.. that horrible if the price crash to 1 sat There is only a little over 12 million liquid steem right now. 179 million is tied up in steem power. I don't think it will crash all the way down to 1 sat anytime soon. Even if there is one person with 1 BTC willing to buy up the entire available supply, that would give a bottom of around 8 sats. I doubt there would be many people who are willing to actually sell their liquid steem for that low, anyway. So they would probably HODL. 1000 sats is probably not out of the question though.
|
|
|
Thanks for the coins but I couldn't sync it yet... Is there any other node than OP?
addnode=185.7.80.140 addnode=82.144.204.28 addnode=4.187.139.86 addnode=85.24.143.58 addnode=114.125.170.87 thanks one of them worked well. what's the min stake age? 30 min and .00000002 chunk. I kind like it with the low staking rate. It will take up weeks before we can earn one chunk,if this coin entered in exchanges I will not sell my chunk as lower as 5000 per chunk,but of course to increase it's value we need a roadmap and a decent website like what I always says. I agreed. With the low inflation rate doesn't mean value. Coin has to been at least one unique feature or function. Project looks very good so far. I actually agree. I suspect this dev is going to patch up the wonky code that plagued most of the staking/masternode coins. To da mewn for sure if the dev succeeds.
|
|
|
Damn man, Steem just keeps going down and down..
Yep, it is a hard sell to convince people to lock up their assets in a two year distribution period.This is crypto, Who wants to lock up their assets in a high risk altcoin scheme? Especially when the only "benefit" is to get higher voting power for potential curation rewards. Unfortunately, the amount of curation rewards are so paltry right now, they do next to nothing to mitigate the risk.
|
|
|
Has there been any recent public road map? I can't imagine they would be sitting still on the programing?
They are actively programming. The last major hardfork adjusted the posting reward by giving out steem as well as Steem Dollars and steem power for author rewards. The intention was to attempt to get the steem dollar closer to the peg of 1 dollar. Right now on Polo, the steem dollar is going for almost 93 cents, so i guess that is an improvement. However, now that the author rewards include liquid steem, that is probably exacerbating it bearish trend toward worthlessness.
|
|
|
120 votes earns $3.62 on Steemit now. Be lucky if I can even get $1 of that actually out. So that should most likely be my last post ever on Steemit. Exactly as I predicted, it played out. Irrevocably destroyed by the whale concept. first things first i am not a fan of steemit and i just dont find it amusing either but explained to my wife about it as she is a blogger and i want to know,why is it you are not possible to get the money out and what is the minimum amount you can withdraw from it, is it a legit project. People were getting paid quite well, at first. However, with the strong downward trend in the price at the markets for steem, the rewards are pretty insulting. Some people are getting almost 100 upvotes and not even earning a dollar. The curation rewards are even more paltry. For most people, it's not even worth the wear and tear on one's finger to click an upvote. Even the whales are scoring minimal curation rewards, these days. It was a good idea, but the initial distribution screwed this up big time, and I do not think it will ever be able to overcome this initial flaw.
|
|
|
I almost panicked because my antivirus detected a program that was behaving like ransomware. I thought OMG, how could I be so stupid to just blindly download a program and run it on my computer. I immediately suspected Chunk. Turns out that my Excel starter program was the offender. No real infection, just my Antivirus being over exuberant. However, I think the OP should consider making the source code available. Many in this community have been screwed over every which way but Sunday. Making the source code available would help many of us jaded users put our minds a little more at ease. BTW, I pray that your code was not cloned from a Crave derivative. Especially BannanaBits or GorillaBucks. GorillaBucks was destroyed last year because someone found a way to create an exploit. Here's a PM from one of the perpetrator's about this. Well you have definitely demonstrated that masternodes are not enforced.(Which is definitely problematic.) Also, you demonstrated that someone created a special wallet to exploit this. However, I spent quite a bit of time trying to find another example, and could not. Also, the net yield of this exploit only yielded a meager 35.5 extra coins on 07/14. That is way less than 1.00 USD per day profit at current market rates. Very petty cheating, indeed. I'm curious how you happened to zero in on this one example. Sifting through the block explorer is very tedious. Either you are hard to bore or you knew all along which address to zero in on...
Hand searching is so old school. Just create a script that queries the wallet for everyblock and prints the ones whose stake transactions are only sent to one address. Nothing fancy really. Buuuuut. I found out how they do it. If you're interested PM me. Just how far down the clone chain does this go? Nanas? Crave? Blackcoin? Dash? All of them. Would you be interest in a wallet that does not pay to masternodes AND only stakes above a certain configurable threshold? Like only for the blocks that stake more than 5 bucks for instance? And I am planning to add more niceties to it as free updates. If the OP did clone a Crave derivative, I hope that they fixed that problem.
|
|
|
fire, which completely destroyed my devices, followed by a hurricane
We announce coin removal everywhere. Here, on trading page, in twitter. We also do e-mail notifications with coin list and removal date. We give 2 weeks for withdrawals and after that we give even more days or weeks additionally. When we remove coin from exchange that means we modify exchange settings, clear server from coin blockchain. In order to do what you request we need to make exchange settings back again for this coin, setup wallet, sync it, connect to exchange and only after that you will be able to withdraw again. It's a lot of job and we do not obligated to do it as we remove coins with fair procedure. I won't be doing business with you anymore. Belize was hit by a hurricane in August, and this can be verified in 10 seconds with Google. The UK doesn't get hit by hurricanes very often, but the US does. Even a category one hurricane can devastate the infrastructure for weeks, if not months. You pointed out that you are not obligated to make exceptions, but the fact that you cannot even make an exception for a hurricane victim is draconian. I won't be doing business with an exchange that has demonstrated that they lack a proper perspective of charity and compassion. Now everyone that happens to live in an area that is prone to hurricanes, earthquakes and other disasters know that if they get hit, your exchange cannot be bothered with helping them out at all. They are just SOL. After all, you give people "weeks." However, a catastrophic event can take months or even years for the community and the individuals to recover. I believe that your response to BTCforJoe was as cold as a corpse. I would rather do business with the undead than you. I hope others have similar views and flee from your exchange.
|
|
|
I believe in this project and now staking it alhough the rewards is very low.
Well, we cannot complain about the inflation being too high. So far, we all haven't minted a whole coin, yet. "blocks" : 1683, "timeoffset" : -19, "moneysupply" : 100000.00623758
|
|
|
Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but I cannot see the little selector boxes in the coin control panel.
|
|
|
Me too. I have 4 active connections but still out of sync.
We all will remain out of sync until the coin distribution begins. Unless someone resumes mining this coin for zero reward.
|
|
|
dev have any plans that when coin distribution finishen?
... Chunk will not ever have a mandatory hard fork, as long as the network is working as intended. What is being presented to you today will be what is used for the life of both us, and the coin.
...
There's your answer.
|
|
|
|