Faucci and Brixx, and most of the guys he brings into the briefings are great. The science community seems to agree that Fauci is one of if not the most qualified person in the world when it comes to infectious diseases. Pence also does a great job.
I watch a decent chunk of most of the briefings though, and when Trump is off script or taking questions, it's just a shit show. He regularly contradicts the experts about things they're experts in and just says the most mind blowingly stupid things - it's like he's torn between the corona hoaxers and science so he just bounces back and forth so that in the end he'll be able to claim victory no matter what. But yeah, it does seem to be working - but everything is so weird right now it's tough to figure out what the country is actually feeling.
Today was real funny to watch. I only got to catch a few moments because I was working from home. However, he suggested to the expert that since bright light/uv light can kill the virus, they should invent a procedure to deliver the light internally. I don't think it is advisable to expose lung cells to uv light. Sure it might kill the virus, but it would also kill whatever living lung cells the person has left. I'm not a doctor though. So maybe I am totally wrong. |
|
|
|
Anyway, not my thread, just thought I'd point out I agree with OP about how Jollygood is abusing the trust system here, the same as all the default trust guys do.
Unfortunately, for the OP, your endorsement does zero to bolster his plight. If I were the OP, I'd rather have Mark Karpelès chime in with an endorsement of his view.  Can jollygood prove his accusations? No he cannot and he is frigid as hell threatening me to report me for ban if I pm him, he won't have any bit of logic in his accusations just as no proof, just as I see people like you agreeing with him without any bit of proof like writting whats true and what not by your own beliefs, that's bullshit right away. I haven't endorsed anything how is it logical to be tagged as alt account when I been using this account for double the time he been on the forum? I'm not claiming anything he is. I haven't stated whether I agree with him or not. I also haven't accused you of endorsing anyone. I was just sidetracked by BetKing.io giving his two cents on this matter. However, after reviewing JollyGood's negative trust rating, I find it somewhat perplexing. I'm not sure exactly how he came to the conclusion that you are an alt-account. Especially when your other negative trust ratings that he wants us to refer to mainly have to do with your death threat incident. He even gives an archived link to the death threat accusation. Perhaps he needs to review his negative rating to clarify what he is talking about. That being said, I totally agree with the other negative ratings regarding the death threat that you made. You are not Hester Prynn, and fully deserve those scarlet letters. |
|
|
|
Anyway, not my thread, just thought I'd point out I agree with OP about how Jollygood is abusing the trust system here, the same as all the default trust guys do.
Unfortunately, for the OP, your endorsement does zero to bolster his plight. If I were the OP, I'd rather have Mark Karpelès chime in with an endorsement of his view. |
|
|
|
There's no investor that left me red trust. If you think Loyce was an investor you are wrong.
Find me all the posts and flags of all the investors who I apparently stole millions from. You can't.
So Loyce said he lost $700 investment (which he didn't, he never put any money in, he got tokens and sold them for below value which he admitted), is that enough to then say it's proof of me scamming millions?
Hardly. They're all idiots if they think that.
Since there seems to be a lot of idiots in this place, please go find your "smart" investors elsewhere. Perhaps those that will believe that your tokens are worth what you say they are worth rather than what the market says they are worth. |
|
|
|
I don't trust Lauda either, he left me negative trust to point out pocketrocketscasino was an alt of mine.....which if you see in my trust I already added that so people would know! Since I lost access to the account and the site name changed. I don't see how that can be untrustworthy. He's another idiot.
All the default trust group that left -ve trust on my profile were never players or investors in my site either. Whole forum is a cesspit
The red flag against you was lodged by one of your investors, though, and it has wide support. Since you feel this whole forum is a cesspit, I recommend that you move on to other places. You won't be missed here. |
|
|
|
 Proper bunning technique. @theymos, Save the forum. Don't bun the OP! |
|
|
|
If a DT1 user doesn't post for a couple of days around the start of the month then they miss out on being in the group that are randomly selected for DT1. If they aren't selected for DT1 then they would be DT2 under a few different circumstances so their trust feedbacks would still be visible. (Any feedback is visible if you know where to look)
I believe that you only need to post once in the last 30 days. However, you do have to be active within the last few days. |
|
|
|
~snip Are you seriously going to drag Bruno into this when the guy's been dead for less than a week? I certainly hope that you are unaware of this fact. Otherwise, that makes you a complete asshole. P.S. Bruno was well liked in these parts. In fact, Theymos just gave his main account VIP status. Looks like the mic drop is on you because all your post does is make most people here less likely to buy TAO2. |
|
|
|
Come to find out...that $1200 stimulus check is just a loan. To be paid back in your 2020 taxes.
Paid back? Or simply counted as income? Pretty sure it is counted as income. Still sucks however. Brad It is considered a rebate or credit against the taxes you owe in 2020. From my understanding, you won't have to pay it back or owe any additional taxes on it. However, I believe that if you did not qualify based on your income in 2018 or 2019, but would qualify based on your 2020 income, you will get the credit on your 2020 taxes and decrease the amount you owe or get a larger refund. |
|
|
|
No, not liking some one's opinion is not valid reason for excluding them. You are supposed to include and exclude people based on whether you think their use of the trust system is valid or not. I don't remember saying death threats were acceptable, but please feel free to quote me.
A person's use of the trust system is usually based on them forming an opinion and taking the action they think is appropriate. Also, my quip about the death threats appears under a quote of another member, so it is not directed at you. |
|
|
|
So in summary, you don't like his opinion?
I think liking/not liking someone's opinion is sufficient criteria for deciding who to include/exclude from my trust list, no?
Can you explain the difference. I mean your poo poohing seems worse?
If you don't know the difference in gravity between calling for someone's death and any of the other things you mentioned, I can't help you. |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps TMAN just needed to take a break from all of the drama around here. I know that I disappeared for a few months, for a needed respite.
|
|
|
|
FYI, I was not advocating for death threats to be allowed on the borad, rather the reply was based on the minimal effect of the death threat you mentioned in the OP ( i.e A newbie with an personal text containing death threat ) on anyone around here. I didn't knew it was offensive and would land me up with being on your exclusion list.  This "newbie" account was being actively used to promote casinos. I hope he learned that it is never a good strategy to call for the killing of a complaining customer. Let's keep it somewhat classy around here. Also, I am not accusing you of advocating death threats. I am accusing you of "poo pooing" the gravity of the situation. |
|
|
|
Old people with 5 different types of cancer? I don't think I'd call that early!!!!
I think that if I had 5 different types of cancer and was in the last stages of life, I would prefer to be in hospice care being be made as comfortable as possible. I also would like to have those special to me to come say their last goodbyes. I really don't think I want my inevitable death expedited by a virus that basically makes me drown in my own fluids and denied any opportunity to say my last goodbyes. |
|
|
|
The person that has cached the threads is the issue which is a secondary point to bring up should a thread like the 2 mentioned be cached and available for any one to see.
Both threads are certainly wrong. So is saving a wrong thread in a cache wrong?
I would say yes it is. But I am just a guy typing on my keyboard in New Jersey .
Actually preserving the evidence is a good thing. In the unlikely event that this scammer ever comes to the attention of the authorities, the cached post is just another little piece of evidence that can ensure a conviction. |
|
|
|
Actually it is about Lauda, because his criticism of Lauda was the impetus behind your peanut hunting expedition. It is all ways the same group of people with big red floppy shoes coming after anyone who does anything but wash the balls of The Clown Pope. This tactic designed to silence criticism is demonstrated by all the same users, over, and over, and over again. Still no one can tell me the imminent threat Hacker1001101001 poses to the community that warrants this kind of continual and endless prostate exam.
My main qualm with hacker1001101001 was his response when I was asking how to report a member for posting an invite to kill another member in the personal message space. (The one found below the avatar.) There isn't any feature to report a personal text on the forum to be a threat and I don't think it should be reportable as it is a users personal advertising space.
I don't even think it is that serious of an threat though, rather just an move out of spite.
Thank goodness that the administrator disagreed and ended up temp banning the offending member. Poo pooing death threats clearly shouldn't be what this board is about. |
|
|
|
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the thermometer shortage - did people not have thermometers at all before this? Or is there some reason to hoard them? It's not like these things are consumable or break easily. You might be able to find some on Amazon that are... marketed somewhat specifically but still work well for general purposes: https://www.amazon.com/Digital-Basal-Body-Thermometer-Temperature/dp/B07ZRL44D1I think it is just a supply side problem. Since the items are not consumable, not many were probably manufactured. also, I can see where some people may not have a working thermometer at home since they have been healthy and have no children. I already have a digital thermometer, but it is over a decade old and I wanted to update to one that you can put in your ear and get a reading a few seconds rather than a few minutes. I'll just wait. It is not urgent for me. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I went out to the grocery store today. It appears that toilet paper is now actually available, although the selection was only one brand. Unfortunately, the only ramen that was available was a box of 10 chicken ramen's. I personally hate chicken flavor. Still can't find hand sanitizer or thermometers.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
