If I remember correctly, people were asking this very same question back when bitcoin was $10k, $20k, and probably at valuations much lower than that before I got into the scene.  So if what's being asked is whether bitcoin is too expensive to buy it now, I'd have to say "NO". 

I'm pretty much of the mind that it's never too late to get into bitcoin--hell, it's only about 11 years old right now, so it's still a relatively new thing.  And with all of these big companies buying up large amounts of it, I'd say the price is likely to go much higher than $50k (which is where it's sitting as I write this). 

That seems a little high but I wouldn't scoff at that number outright.  As time has gone on, I've started to meet more and more people who've gotten into crypto.  We're still a long way away from it being completely mainstream, however.

There you go.  And I wouldn't see a problem with putting any kind of non-signature campaign advertising in your signature space as long as it didn't break any of the other rules.  That would be kind of strange, wouldn't it?

Plus I've seen plenty of members do the same, i.e., advertise something in their sig space without being in a campaign.  Nobody's created a stink for having done so as far as I know (unless it was something illegal, as hilariousandco pointed out, in which case mods would probably just nuke the sig).

Yeah, it's fine if it's a scam but not fine if it's illegal.  Gotta love this forum sometimes.

Well I took a look at the trust he's left (at least the feedbacks written in English), and there's nothing worse in there than anything Lauda had given.  I see Ratimov has tagged a lot of account sellers and didn't seem to be giving out negs for frivolous reasons, though he tagged some members as being alts and I don't know if they're alts of scammers or what.  A lot of his negative feedbacks were worded very strongly, but I don't see that as a big deal. 

And yet the fact remains that Ratimov got removed from the Chipmixer campaign, so something must have happened.  I thought he might have gotten a DT neg, but that isn't the case.  Last I checked there was nothing about it in the Chipmixer thread.

No doubt, and it seems like there's a huge difference between Tesla investors and MicroStrategy investors--the latter seem to like the fact that their company purchased a massive amount of bitcoin.

But just based on that graph (which is a very short timeline), I'm not completely convinced that Tesla's bitcoin purchase is responsible for their stock price dipping.  The entire market is overvalued right now, and I'm kind of surprised that more stocks aren't starting to slide.  Plus, as we all know, correlation doesn't mean causation.

I'd be interested in buying $150 worth of bitcoin from you if you're willing to trade that amount, which would be 0.00306623BTC.  You would have to send first since you're a newbie--I've done lots of PayPal trades in the past.  Let me know if you're interested.

Edit:  I PM'ed OP with the above offer and didn't hear back, so I'm not sure if he's already done the trade or doesn't want to send first or what.  OP, if you're no longer looking to do this deal you ought to lock the thread.

Better question: Why do you keep sending me PMs about this shit?  

FYI, I haven't been keeping up on all the forum drama, including whatever is going on with Ratimov.  I know he was accused of plagiarism, but from what I read it seems like he did cite his sources and the mods didn't ban him.  If there's feedback abuse going on with him, I must have missed it--but from my perspective it looks like you're hopping mad because of the neutral feedback he left you.  

What else is there?  Maybe suchmoon can give me a TL;DR for my piss-poor cerebral cortex to process if you're not up to it.

I don't think I've ever been accused of being afraid to do the right thing on this forum, unless it was to get involved with a member-to-member beef that I didn't have complete information about.  So please, educate me on what you think the right thing to do would be for a DT member with respect to Ratimov.

He left you a neutral, so it's not as though Ratimov's feedback affects your trust score or your chances to get into a sig campaign (if that's your thing).  I did get your PM after I posted in that other thread about Ratimov being removed from the Chipmixer campaign--you directed me to this thread, but there's nothing new here that I haven't seen before.

DarkStar_ wouldn't have removed Ratimov because of some feedback dispute.  I'll have to check to see if he got a DT neg.  That would be the most obvious explanation.

Looks like you got removed from the Chipmixer campaign if I'm looking at the spreadsheet right.  What's up with that?  Did all of these allegations catch up with you or was it something else?  

At least you made it 20 weeks in the campaign, but I'm curious as to why you got dropped.

Yeah, your point is taken; you don't need to keep repeating it (and it's just as stupid as blaming bitcoin for being a tool of terrorists, pedos, and drug dealers). 

Yeah--eventually.  Most states in the US are still taking all the same precautions they were almost a year ago, although there have been a lot of reopenings of businesses that were closed. 

Figures that Texas would lead the way in doing this, though I do hope it doesn't lead to a spike in COVID.  But on the other hand, a lot of people are getting vaccinated now, so that's a damn good thing and something that we didn't have last year.  And yeah, it takes a lot of balls on the part of any politician to do something like this.  Props to Texas!

Pretty much all of what OP wrote is false, and not just the part about ETH transaction fees.  In the stock market nowadays if you're using an online broker like TD Ameritrade or Robinhood, there are NO trading fees--and that's a huge change from the way it used to be.  I remember having to pay $8/trade about 16 years ago, and way before that traders had to pay a percentage of the amount they were trading--and that could end up being a ton of money and definitely did not discriminate against the poor.

Get your facts straight, OP.

I don't know what country you live in, but I'm pretty sure that the Chinese value bitcoin in Yuan, not USD (though I could be mistaken about that).  I'd always assumed that bitcoin was priced in whatever local currency you're dealing with.

As to your question, if the US dollar hyperinflates (and man, I'm really hoping it doesn't in the near future) then obviously bitcoin is not going to be valued in USD primarily--though it still could, it would just be a mess to do the daily conversions.  But think about how payment processors like Bitpay operate.  They value bitcoin in terms of whatever fiat currency the item you're buying is priced in, so USD would have to be one of them.

This is making my head spin, because I hate thinking about how much trouble the US dollar is in, and I don't see how the government is going to undo the mess they've put all the US citizens in with all the money printing, stimulus, and everything else.  But at least bitcoin isn't affected by any of that--that's the good news, but only if you own bitcoin. 

Looks legit to me, and I'm not going to create a stir by keeping a negative on Frost's profile.  Glad you got your account back, man.  Fuck those hackers.

This sounds like pure speculation if you ask me (and yeah, I get that this is the section for that), and it doesn't seem like TD has any real reason to think that Netflix is going to invest in bitcoin.  But who knows, he might know something the rest of us don't.

For whatever reason I don't see this trend of corporations purchasing bitcoin as an investment/cash alternative as a long-lasting one, especially if bitcoin doesn't maintain its value somewhere around $50k.  It's just too risky an asset for a public company to do that, and frankly I'm surprised that there haven't been concerns voiced by shareholders of MSTR or Tesla stock about those companies buying bitcoin.

But hey, I could be 100% wrong.  If this trend does hold up, I'd expect bitcoin to shoot to the moon--and quickly, too.

Yeah, all of that shit's crazy, isn't it?  But for better or worse I think we're nearing the end of these wild west days of unregulated exchanges that nobody knows anything about (like Yobit for instance).  And as far as people doing detective work, I don't think it happens all that often because crypto users generally don't want to take their cases to law enforcement and thereby draw attention to themselves--with the result that you get shitty exchanges like HitBTC getting away with murder.

By the way, the warning signs were there for HitBTC for quite a while.  I'm pretty sure right now they're recognized as a bona fide scam exchange, and hopefully people are not using them anymore (though I suspect many will continue to).

Um, OK.  But if you're banned you're banned.  And it wouldn't hurt if you took a look at the unofficial rules of the forum or at least got a feel for what's accepted around here before jumping in a la Leroy Jeeeenkins and getting slaughtered.

I haven't looked, but I'm inclined to take your word for it right off the bat just based on what OP's written here.  This isn't Twitter, where you can fire off 100 little thoughts per day.  It's Bitcointalk, and since a lot of people are getting paid to post on the forum there are some fairly high standards for what constitutes a decent post.  If you get unbanned, OP, good luck to you and just be aware of what this forum is and is not.

I was wondering what the CBN was, not being a Nigerian citizen myself.  So I assume that they control all of the little banks, one of which OP was using to deal with crypto?  That does indeed suck--it sounds like OP will get whatever money he had deposited with his bank back, but hopefully this doesn't mean he'll have to go unbanked for long.  I don't know how available banking is in Nigeria.

Governments want to regulate everything, and it's ridiculous, no matter what reasons they give (money laundering is usually top on their list).  Anyway, don't give up OP.  Find another bank if you can and figure out another way to do crypto transactions.  Best of luck, and you've got my sympathy here as well.

I'm pretty sure there's no DT gang now (if there ever was one).  The whole system seems to be as fragmented as it's ever been--and there's not even a Cult of Lauda anymore!

Pretty neat visualization tool, OP.  I don't know if I'll find any use for it personally, but I'm sure it'll keep a lot of curious people busy for long periods of time just playing around with it.  

LOL. 

Because that's not what you're getting paid for when you join a sig campaign.  It's a simple financial transaction: signature/avatar rental for a certain amount of bitcoin, and the campaign member may or may not even personally like (or even know much about) the service they're promoting. 

This just kinda/sorta sounds like you want thread bumping (which is against the rules) but don't want to come out and say it.  I'd probably eliminate that from any helpful/not helpful criteria, but that's just me.

I'd already posted in this thread (see above) and was just contacted by OP via PM regarding this post, which he feels is abusive:

And I'd say it's a little harsh, borderline trolling.  On the other hand, this is bitcointalk and I've written posts that were much worse than that myself (though not lately).  You've got to have a thick skin on this forum, especially when you create threads like this one. 

I quoted your response to my post above because it shows that Ratimov did in fact cite his sources and therefore he didn't plagiarize anything.  The mods obviously felt the same way, and I think it's time to move on from this.  I think you meant well, OP; you just happened to be wrong on this one.

I wouldn't argue that for myself, but I never claimed to be a big shot in the crypto world.  I'm not.  I'm just one member out of millions on this forum and I'm no expert in crypto.  What's your point?  I haven't even looked at the BPIP rankings in a long time [Edit: since last time I posted in this thread, which was in November.  Guess it wasn't that long ago.], so I don't know how "recognized" I am, but if I'm a somewhat recognized member it's only on this forum and not in the world of bitcoin in general.  

I don't support scammers and I don't think I'm recognized for that.

Nah.  Take a look at my trust page (or Vod's or any DT member who's busted a lot of scammers) and you'll see tons of negative retaliatory feedback that's untrue.  Hell, I've got a feedback in there somewhere that says I abuse animals--and that's what you get when you have a trust system that's completely unregulated.