Anyone wanting to unlock their BTC can pm me, ill buy your stake
Even if you payed double, I still wouldn't sell my stake now.  I also think it will be great once the exchange will up and running. I am paying IPO prices only  |
|
|
|
I have spent 1 bitcoin till date, bought a pair of headphones |
|
|
|
|
Anyone wanting to unlock their BTC can pm me, ill buy your stake
|
|
|
|
hours ago I was thinking to invest a little more,but I felt sleepy so ... When I get up,the ipo closed:(
Ok,at least I am on the train,good luck everyone.
Same with me, just got back from vacation, was in my mind to invest more all the time, funny it closed just hours ago |
|
|
|
|
Selling Qora at 35 satoshi
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest keeping things closed source till a significant lead is established
|
|
|
|
I'm confused about the escrow. The point of an escrow to hold the funds until you send the item for a trade. However, that would not work here because I need the funds before I can send the items for the trade. Having an escrow hold the funds makes them useless to me.
Thank you for your advice!
Very simple, issue tokens |
|
|
|
|
Shameless bashing of NEM for advertising Qora
I hold both
|
|
|
|
THATS MY POINT YOU CAN"T REGISTER WITH EITHER POOL.
COMPLETE BULLSHIT, THIS WILL BE INSTAMINED BY THE DEVS
THAT ARE THE ONLY F#CKING PEOPLE WHO CAN REGISTER.
EITHER LET US REGISTER, RELEASE THE WALLET NOW,
OR LET YOUR RETARTED POOLS AND COIN DIE BEFORE LAUNCH!
F#CKING AMATEURS!
It is in the hands of the pools, dev cannot do anything about it. Ask the pool managers |
|
|
|
And how the hell are you going to prevent a 51% attack with ONE F@CKING POOL?
There are 3 pools now |
|
|
|
If talking about "Risked BTC" there could be a system for this. Like there could be "trade invitation" where you could send a trade invite to other member with form of bitcoin amount to be traded, and only If other person accepts the invitation and one of those two person scams, "BTC risked" feedback could be left. And for other things like trolling and other there could be other trust system. Like on many forums there are market feedbacks and just normal feedbacks.
This idea of a trade invitation system is good |
|
|
|
So... does that mean you have wallets setup in all exchanges and that the coins will go through the wallets that you have setup in those exchanges?
The more wallets that are created (within an increasing number of exchanges) the stronger the anon service will become. So... you go create these wallets explicitly in these exchanges without their knowledge or you have partnership/collaboration? So, that means MAJOR lag between transactions because for each "exchange node" that you pass through, you have to deposit into each exchange, then wait for their confirmations, before you can withdraw them out of the exchange and move onto the next "exchange node" and withdraw (repeat to X) before finally getting to the destination address?? You keep avoiding this question. I would assume that this is exactly the method you are using and that there will be major lag between transfer... This will be nothing but FAIL COIN... The assumption on how the system will work, as outlined in the above is incorrect. Whilst there will be some lag (due to the nature of this highly anonymous system), transactions will take nowhere near as long to complete as described in the above scenario. How is this system any better than a centralized mixer? btw the lag will be terrible, every exchange has a different confirmation number and if it is higher than 5, the network will be ultra slow |
|
|
|
So you guys settled on Boolberry? Killed my investment interest 30%  |
|
|
|
People selling are stupid.
Yea, they should keep holding the coins for the rest of their lives so nobody could buy them and their is no economy |
|
|
|
|
I see an incoming angry Darktard infestation to this thread
|
|
|
|
Wow, the first day without a single deposit  Means the end of IPO is nearing, wohooooo |
|
|
|
 Order book getting spammed heavily by fake 0.05 sells |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
