Bitcoin Forum
July 15, 2024, 10:19:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
381  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 25, 2019, 11:46:40 PM
Socrates the Schizophrenic System



...
This system is very simple but you have no idea how it works, regarding trading a reversal that was not elected, all four reversals need to be elected to change the trend, this is where we elected the 3rd bearish reversal but held the fourth.

You are omitting the fact that a reversal was indeed elected, and in hindsight you advised not to trade that elected reversal even while the 1% rule was satisfied. Nobody can trade this. Nobody. Nobody can be advised to trade against the rules. This is schizophrenic.

ok, you are adding another dimension of ambiguity, another back door for you to say that Socrates is always right.

Thanks for that. I will add this to the list.

If there was even a shred of truth in what you write, i.e. the system being simple, then the computer would figure it out. Definitely. If it was that simple, then even your MS-DOS computer would provide the answer as part of its analysis.

What we see here is that Armstrong makes the rules up as he goes, in hindsight. Ah, suddenly the system is no longer simple!

Unfortunately, nobody can write a computer program that follows rules that are set in the future, from case to case, and that is why Armstrong has to spend the time to respond do me, which is very inefficient in its own right. He would not have to write this if the computer had not given the wrong answer.

So it is a system that exists only in Martin Armstrong's head, and even he was not able to write a computer program that reflects the rules in this weird system. It is a schizophrenic system.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain


382  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 25, 2019, 09:29:58 PM
...
In fact socrates is very black and white regarding the reversal system there can be no ambiguity. so basically it comes down to emotional IQ that is the key when using this system.

The Socrates system is full of ambiguities. Socrates provides no conclusion from the multitude of conflicting trading signals it provides:

See Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic

Talking about ambiguity, you can read there about a case where this moron Gumbi who is paid by Armstrong or is Armstrong himself advises to ignore the election of a reversal, elected within 1% rule, and then trade another reversal that was NOT elected. This is sheer madness.

Calling this an computer system is already a joke, because a computer system would know the rules and calculate the result from the multitude of conflicting signals.

This contraption looks more like a bunch of pocket calculators.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

383  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 25, 2019, 09:20:08 PM
...
As Armstrong has said the majority is always wrong that is the fuel that drives the markets so it should come as no surprise that the majority think socrates is a scam, and we need fools on the other side of the market in order to trade against them.

So we are at the stage where the fact that the majority thinks it is a scam, that fact would be an endorsement of Socrates.

In fact, I have been trading against the Socrates users recently. Should have losses according to Gumbi. No!. Nice profits. Bought the lows and sold the highs. Usually, being a trend following system of old age, Socrates buys the highs and sells the lows, as Gumbi demonstrates in this post.

There is so much bullshit in this post that it needs multiple responses.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

384  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 25, 2019, 04:33:13 PM
... , we had a perfect move recently where the Dow elected 2 weekly bullish reversals on the 26th of August but we closed more than 1% above, we then retested the reversals with one at 26053, and the next weekly bullish reversal was at 26368 which the market tested 2 weeks later but failed to elect implying a retest of support.

Yawn. Hindsight.

This has been discussed here ad nauseam. You have been asked to provide real time trades and you failed - lost.

Perfect what? Picking any successful trades out of a mix of losers and winners is a bad joke.

What does it tell us? That this cherry picking is your standard operating mode. It is a scam. Caught.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

385  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 25, 2019, 11:28:38 AM
There is a demand from lazy people with low IQ and bad memory

yeah, and you seem to be one of those lazy person with low IQ and bad memory because you did follow MA for 10 or 15 years.

Also Nigel Farage (appeared on his WEC recently) and the german filmmaker of "The Forecaster" ?, along with all the traders that appeared in the film must have low IQ.



Good to see you back. Are you getting paid to post here?



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

386  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 24, 2019, 11:01:56 PM
...
There has to be an explanation why Armstrong has so many delusional thoughts, all the disorganized writing, constantly brags, the scamming of investors, and is simply outright lying about a lot of things. Maybe he really thinks he gets these fanmails; but in reality it's just another persona of him. Also the complete shamelessness about not making any excuses whatsoever about wrong predictions is very weird.


Interesting question, like asking why can a person with so many behavioral defects exist?

I would expand this question with:

And why can such a person have any followers who are not ashamed to be seen on one of his conferences?

Let me try to construct a logical response. It is an attempt. Using supply and demand as drivers.

There is a demand from lazy people with low IQ and bad memory retention to get easy answers to most of their questions. They want to have their questions answered without own research, by someone, ideally a single source, as to not to get too confused. There is no doubt that there is a high number of these people.

Martin Armstrong has a demand for a lot of money, but he can no longer tap into the rich resources of large investors after he has been convicted of defrauding them.

So he constructs a system which taps into a large number of these low IQ people so he gets his reward from large quantity times small amount equals large amount which he is demanding.

He uses the same skills as before like showboating such as pretending that he has the capacity to advise large clients , and pretending he has a knowledge of Physics, History, ... you name it, as to instill confidence in his new low IQ clients. In a way he has to demonstrate somehow that he is an expert in all those fields that would be too many and too much to handle for the low IQ people.

Then he develops Socrates. This is a machine that generates money via subscription by providing answers to questions. These answers are by nature ambiguous, otherwise they could be proven false even by low IQ people too easily.

The low IQ people look at the answers one at the time, not too many per time unit, because they have to pay for them. If the answer is wrong, they ask for support. Support tells them they looked at the wrong answer, and the low IQ person is embarrassed, not telling other low IQ people about their own mistake.

The other low IQ person who happened to look at the right answer thinks that Marin Armstrong is a hero and brags about it loud, which attracts more low IQ people to subscribe and find easy answers.

Any behavioral defect fits nicely into the scheme explained above, with the single purpose of keeping this scheme going. It is not rooted in a clinical condition. It is driven by demand and supply.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain


387  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 23, 2019, 12:12:29 PM
Institutional Services

Just as we speaking here about the "insane fanmail" Armstrong gets, he posted this one:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/we-all-have-a-little-bubbles/

Quote
We All Have Little Bubbles
Blog/Training Tools
Posted Sep 23, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Marty, I love you Man! I was sitting in my office back in April of 2005, reading the WSJ. There was a story where Greenspan declared he would begin raising rates. I was, ?thinking out loud? when I said, ?Oh Shit!?!??. The fellow I shared the office with asked, ?What?s wrong??. I proceeded to explain that there would be a crisis (2008/2009). I think the DJIA was somewhere around 7000, then it went to 14000. If only I knew you back then. The first time I read one of your emails where you pointed out that the market goes up when rates go up, I finally got it, almost like a religious conversion, like Paul on the road to Damascus. Rates go up = my bond values go down, so I sell my bonds to end/limit my losses, and I park/invest in stocks. Do I have that right? Dude, you are so right on. When anybody criticizes you, just say ?FTB? (Forget That Bitch) or FTSB (Forget Those Stoopid Bitches) or FTBS (Forget That Bull Shit) or just say all of it. Evidently some University did a study about using foul language, they concluded it lowers the pain by up to 30%. It kills me, this just happened, just ten years ago, and people want to argue with you, can?t they simply remember? (Ask a stupid question). You have helped me figure out a ton of stuff,

THANK YOU!!!

God Bless You My Great Brother!!!


REPLY: I don?t angry. I just consider the source. As they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make it drink. Some people just cannot see outside their little bubble. It is like a trader who cannot understand the thinking process of a non-trader, and likewise the non-trader cannot understand the actions of a trader. Then there is the institutional trader. He has to answer to a board that has no concept of trading and they are supposed to oversee the trading division. They cannot say, ?Look, the reversals were elected, the oscillators flipped, or you broke technical resistance or support.? They have to say some logical fundamental explanation to offer the board and then everything is OK.

We all have a little bubble. The most important thing is to ALWAYS try to understand the thinking process of the other groups. I always wrote for just institutions. I have made an effort to try to see the world from the non-trader or professional position in order to be able to write for an audience that does not look at the world from either a trader or institutional pair of eyes.

Armstrong's answer: "I don't angry" What? Was he perhaps mentally exhausted from writing the fanmail? Cheesy

A person providing Institutional Services does not post like that. Never.

Conclusion: Martin Armstrong cannot have institutions as clients.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

388  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 20, 2019, 03:43:45 AM
Diehard Armstrong believer Alex-11 will ask where to pay the subscription after Socrates is powered down.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
389  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 19, 2019, 11:19:20 AM

Everything is Fake


Martin Armstrong is on Twitter as well: @StrongEconomics

I checked his followers, just for fun. He has 13.6k and I think 40/50% or even more of them are fake (he bought them). They are easy to recognize, I once bought Twitter followers myself.
Plenty of them without profile pictures, any personal information or even 1 tweet.

Also, if you search a bit deeper, there are close to zero followers that are professional money managers.


Another piece of this scam, fraud.

When the evidence starts piling up, I wonder how people can still look the other way?

So far, in this blog, we have dismantled and classified with full proof as fraud so many claims he made!

I am pretty sure that he and his collaborators see their enterprise as a giant show with a herd of sheep to exploit. They must be laughing their heads off while doing so. Just look at troll poster Gumbi who was
found out to be working for Armstrong:

But I think in the end you are doing Armstrong a great service regardless because he has more than enough followers and subscribers to his service and probably would not be able to handle the influx of new people so on behalf of Armstrong and his team we thank you.


He claimed here that he is so grateful that Socrates saved him from a loss he would have otherwise had due to the Biogen Crash Today. All lies. I would think that the number of clients Martin Armstrong ever advised is probably close to zero.

Who would want to be advised by a con man? It is highly unlikely that a serious company providing Institutional Services effectively would want to have their staff lurking around in places like this blog as Martin Armstrong does. These services are perhaps as fake as his Super-computer he runs these services on.

Due to our meticulous work and our perseverance, Martin Armstrong perhaps needs to hire some background artists to fill the empty chairs in his next WEC?


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

390  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 18, 2019, 04:43:13 PM
How to get the most out of Socrates


OMG at his latest post... I wonder if the question is made up by Marty himself to troll everybody who "doesn't understand his system".

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/reversals-energy-a-different-dimension/
...


While the person asking the question apparently struggles with understanding how to use Socrates, Martin Armstrong does not provide any help. He makes it clear that he is not going to reveal any details of it. Totally missing the point. Instead he brags about the internal obscure features of the system (schema frequency, reversal numbers) without reference to their utility. After explaining the utility of the energy indicator which surely will add to the confusion, he then he equates his achievements with the invention of penicillin.

How would you rate such a behavior?


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
391  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 15, 2019, 01:22:04 PM
Correlations

In one of his latest alarmist posts ,

Martin Armstrong praises his computer as usual for being able to sort out the correlations.

In one of his recent reports that carry a very high price tag, he made use of such a correlation as demonstrated here: The Martin Armstrong Gold / Silver Ratio Fallacy which indicates that such correlation may not hold for the future for long, only in hindsight.

And his results show that there is no value in correlating markets in the way that he does it.

And there is no evidence ANYWHERE in his writings that he used correlation between markets successfully to provide better forecasting.

For those who are interested in correlations between markets, this has been studied for years, see
Stock correlation network.

Correlation queries have been available as various online computer services like here at aistockcharts.com
and here . Correlation studies are standard part of broker services today.

Until this day, Martin Armstrong's so called correlation models have been unavailable. At best, single studies have been manual executions not reaching the level of complexity as seen elsewhere. Socrates still presents a flat earth model where each market is analyzed in isolation, merely based on its own time series, not correlated with anything.

Martin Armstrong planned in 2013 to build the Global Correlation Model.

Here in 2014, it becomes obvious that this, while still not available, aims to be no more than expressing technical analysis of markets in terms of various currencies.




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

392  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 12, 2019, 03:30:51 PM
...

Quote
PRIVATE BLOG - Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far
Posted Sep 11, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

PRIVATE BLOG - Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers.

Maybe he's right this time, since Gold seems to be early in a further correction.


These ramblings are meaningless as has been shown in this forum many times before. He reports elected reversals in hindsight. An elected reversal as he reports cannot not necessarily be traded because many reversals are reported late (phantom reversals) after the close, in hindsight. Then ask yourself what happens AFTER the election? Bad trade? In this case, the Gold market bounced by more than $20, so they could all be bad. Again, the number 3 does not mean anything either, because reversals could be bunched as double and triple reversals, or generally reversals very close together, all elected at the same time. Can you figure out whether he was wrong or right? No? What is the point then?

So if he is wrong here or not, that does not even matter. Meanwhile, what about all the bad reversals, about failure to elect reversals in markets that had significant moves? What Martin Armstrong writes is all pointless because out of 1,000 markets covered by Socrates, he will definitely, always be able to pick the ones that look best to him and brag about them - in hindsight. He will NEVER ADVISE to trade a specific market based on an elected reversal because that would expose him to the random mess that Socrates is.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
393  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 10, 2019, 03:40:50 PM
...
olegrey, I suggest you restart all of your counts from zero, and post your trades in real-time. On this page 317, you go from successful reversal 5 to 8, without posting ANY real-time trades.

Honestly, I can't recall most of your past posted real-time trades either.

If I make a claim about my magic formula combining moving average and MACD indicators, and simply post like you with some success & failure, but averaging out to be some good stuffs, NOBODY can tell whether I'm faking it or not, even when it is HINDSIGHT based.

I'm not accusing you of anything. But if the formula works, it will continue to work. I just want to see some 100% clean record.

And if you refuse to do that, it's fine. But that number is just good for you (or anyone else who wants to take it up by faith).


I think this response is appropriate. It is commonsense to be considerate, as simple as that. With considerate, I mean to be respectful of the need of others to verify what I say. For example, I posted a trade here which is now verifiable because it has been quoted here , and therefore I cannot modify this without being caught.

In olegrey's case, the reversals would need to be posted in advance at a minimum, and it would need to be clear whether they are daily or weekly. I cannot see that, so the quality of what olegrey is doing is exactly zero. I don't know why he is doing it. We know that many reversals are phantom reversals which Socrates creates after the fact. This has never been challenged successfully, and now olegrey is exposing himself to this hat trick. Wash, rinse and repeat.

And let's not forget that olegrey has built his strategy based on the data posted here by bikefront in tabular form , so we are not requesting something that has not been shown to him before.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
394  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: September 06, 2019, 08:03:08 PM
So many words without saying anything of substance ... except they reveal so much about the writer ...

As I wrote before, Alex-11 should work for Martin Armstrong so he would be in good company.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
395  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 31, 2019, 12:45:18 AM
... placeholder for all the responses ...

 Kiss

You are the ideal type of person for a Martin Armstrong / Socrates support role. You should apply for a job at AE Global. You definitely have the patience that nobody else of the other trolls has. Congratulations!

The other trolls have all left because they could no longer face that bullshit that I am writing here. Gumbi, Strike Eagle 26, over45, Jason100, all gone, totally demoralized. With you, I really don't know what else to do.

Regarding why I do not have more patience with Socrates Pro version is because my computer told me to stop it. I said What? Are you kidding? and the computer replied Stop it, create your own trading strategy.

So I thought alright I am going to try that. After all I must be able to trust my computer, right? During the last six trading days I increased my capital by 51.8%. Just by doing what my computer told me to do. This gain by the way includes the profit from the trade I suggested here for you guys earlier. So it is no bullshit, you can check that trade.

You should really do the same, honestly. Get this Armstrong chart that you screen scraped the numbers off, get the numbers, and reverse engineer the system behind these numbers. This is doable! Then you should have a system that is even better than Socrates! Honestly. Then you can make 102% in 6 trading days, better than me, double. Imagine! I just do not have the patience that you have so I have to feel content with half the profit of what you get. Trust my computer!

 Kiss


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

396  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 30, 2019, 08:27:28 AM
Pissing in the Wind

In order to make an assessment of this Socrates contraption, an assessment that would actually be worth spending time on one needs to trade a few hundred reversals in multiple markets over an extended period of time, say a year or two because the markets have different phases. And you need computer programming skills to do this because otherwise manually doing this would require an army of people punching data into spreadsheets, also resulting in lots of errors.

That is obviously not possible because con artist Martin Armstrong does not provide authentic verifiable historical data.

However, it has been done anyway using other channels and the result was catastrophic.

The discussion here about what I would call single observation statistics is the most incompetent I have ever seen. Total waste of time. You are over-estimating your capabilities. Pissing in the wind. And that in light of the fact that nobody can post here ANY positive results even on a small scale. There should be at least something truly remarkable to indicate that there is some value somewhere. No such thing. Depressing.


So what can you take to evaluate? Not many options. Quality of service? Integrity? Perhaps make an assessment based on how these people behave and based on trust, credibility, customer service level and so on. We have seen that Armstrong has the worst possible results / grades in this category.

So yes, all complete idiot type of people who want to get rid of their money really fast, go ahead and buy Martin Armstrong services.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

397  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 30, 2019, 08:05:51 AM
...
I know that the recent Gold rally did work well purely from a reversals point of view. Only 2 daily bearish reversals elected in July, not all 4 bearish. But lot's of weekly and daily bullish reversals elected.

If there is a sustained smooth rally then the reversal system elects one bullish reversal after another and they are all profitable. That is no proof that the "system" is profitable. This is like saying that a simple trailing stop loss strategy is profitable.

So what is the point please of making such statements?

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain
com]armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com[/url] for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
398  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 30, 2019, 01:56:54 AM
...
If I feel I want to post some live trades, I will do. But until then I still want to be able to comment here in this forum without haveing to justify myself every time why I don't prove that Socrates works.
Meanwhile I'm referring to my post from earlier about the 16 year buy/sell signal study. And yes, I know some of you don't trust the data provided by MA.

This chart was produced by the con man Martin Armstrong himself in hindsight.

The guy who has no problem lying, for example telling us that he runs his "models" on a very specific US Government Supercomputer installation, see https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com/p/lie-about-super-computer.html

By even mentioning this exercise, where the "data" was derived by screen scraping it from the chart, presenting this as a proof or test you clearly discredit yourself. Go away. This is an insult. There is no other way to put it. People please go ahead, read this stuff and tell us what you think about it.

To be relevant, any data has to be posted here in advance. Marketing material posted by a convicted felon and associates does not count. Sorry.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

399  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 29, 2019, 01:35:18 PM


Major deal in Progress. Forget about Martin Armstrong Reversals, Forecast Arrays, you Chart Porn Practitioners!

https://www.livewiremarkets.com/wires/why-2019-could-be-uranium-s-break-out-year

https://www.outsiderclub.com/report/2019-nuclear-and-uranium-stocks-6-high-powered-investments/957

It has been in the making for months, but yesterday the low has been put in place finally.


Buy CCJ Cameco and enjoy the ride for months to come.


Already up 1.5% since I posted. Yes, this is real-time, and not in hindsight like Socrates.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

400  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: August 29, 2019, 12:11:40 PM
Major deal in Progress. Forget about Martin Armstrong Reversals, Forecast Arrays, you Chart Porn Practitioners!

https://www.livewiremarkets.com/wires/why-2019-could-be-uranium-s-break-out-year

https://www.outsiderclub.com/report/2019-nuclear-and-uranium-stocks-6-high-powered-investments/957

It has been in the making for months, but yesterday the low has been put in place finally.


Buy CCJ Cameco and enjoy the ride for months to come.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Every single defrauded person should report their case, see Where and how to complain

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!