You guys done yet ?
First off i am letting you get it out of your system.

And i will only say you are lying once..

You two shill/dummy accounts (hiding like cowards)
are sprinkling in grains of truth into lies to troll and bad mouth me.

and my step sister was mentally disabled and died in 2007 (she was 12yrs old) so i am not making fun of anyone.
if your retarded i will say your retarded.. it is what it is.

Why is Spoetnik a Troll ?
Hmm look at the last few posts ?

LTC is more likely to follow BTC's surge if it continues to go up to 1000 USD Karpeles style.

Avoid NXT.  It's trending down to who knows how low.

Now you're talking my language! Grated that I'm only low-level amateurish when it comes to tech, but I have a fair bit of experience watching the mining-exploration industry.

The most valuable tip I ever got in re exploration stocks was from my dad. He said, focus on the exploration stocks that are getting close to developing and opening a mine. Because exploration is all speculation from the $$$ point of view, there's a lot of excitement and disappointment there. Now to mention an exploitable pattern, which my dad taught me about.

There are exploration stocks that skyrocket on exciting drilled-rock-sample results. That's the time when you should sell (if you have any of the stock) because that excitement always accompanies impatience. The kind of impatience that inevitably precedes disappointment, bitterness, and a mass jump onto the next exciting train.

Funnily enough, the exploration companies that are in it for the distance - who have an economically-worthy project that they keep developing into a real, paying mine - tend to sell for much lower than they were when most everyone was excited at their great drilling results. That's because they become boring. There's no "story," no excitement to get punters ginned up....just slow, laborious, boring progress towards that goal. Boredom, boredom boredom...until the company gets to the point of a "bankable feasibility study" that says their project is economically viable. At that point, the only major hurdle - except for the time-consuming environmental-assessment and permitting process - is getting ahold of enough capital to bring the mine into production. Once that final (difficult) hurdle is achieved, the formerly high-risk company becomes low-risk.

Through this model - and through buying the stock only when the bloom of excitement is off the still-growing rose - I've made some money on the penny-stock market. Himself, my dad has made a lot of money. All from knowing how to "play the excitement cycle." As a bonus, doing it this way means automatically screening out the large majority of exploration companies whose projects never get beyond the drill-sampling phase.

Now I know that I'm using an analogy, one that's questionable in several places, but the analogy is a good match for the excitement-to-disappointment cycle that prevails in both exploration and cryptocurrency: in truth, for any asset market where a large majority of projects have only speculative value. Both are permeated by the same excitement and boom-town glamour - and both are also permeated by disappointment, rancour and bitterness.

So please keep up doing the boring but necessary development work! This non-techie is quietly rooting for ya.      

Is there any real use of NXT? Can we purchase goods with it?

In case anyone is interested over here, an interview (the first no less) with me has been published at

http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/10/18/in-conversation-with-emunie-founder-dan-hughes/

In the interview I discuss the trials and tribulations, the tech, the vision, the future  Its quite long, kinda got carried away with the questions but wanted to be thorough.

Thanks to the NewsBTC team for taking the time out to do it and sift through my waffling

The designated leader of this project didnt have the ability or skill to actually deliver. We see it time and again on other coin projects.....many words, much delusion.

Andreas A. is asked about bitcoin's fungibility : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak1iojpiHpM&feature=youtu.be&t=33m9s

He thinks it is an issue worth addressing. Perhaps it is more important than "The Block Size" debate.

NXT is not dying.  But growth has been stagnant.  The question you should be asking is how many years can the project last with almost zero growth.

Ullo is one and yes he does post.

What economy?  

To be serious, no new money is coming in.  Most of the 'dumb' money already went to the sharks, so we need more fish in the pond to make the 'economy' grow.  But I personally don't see it happening in a while.