2 Bigpiggy01: If customer wants to disclose his private information - he could, and he could authorize doing that.
It's really not that simple, which is why when people go to the media about their bank having allegedly done something terrible the bank only comments in general terms along the lines of "looking into the complaint". There really isn't a blanket authorisation for public disclosure of financial information which a customer can give - the authorisation needs to be insanely specific and it needs to state the lawful purpose for which the information can be disclosed (providing information to a message board so they can form an opinion wouldn't count as the kind of "lawful purpose" required by the various privacy acts). OP really needs to get his lawyer to file a complaint with AUSTRAC. There'll be no problem getting his funds released if AUSTRAC determines that his identity verification documents meet the required standards for AML/KYC compliance standards and that his transactions are legitimate. From what I know about these matters it would be extremely expensive for the OP to take this to court and may yield little benefit. If my assumptions about Crypto are correct they are a company that is heading into the gutter whether by lack of funding or some other source and they simply don't have the funding to pay. Yes the OP could take this to court but in the end Crypto may end up declaring bankruptcy to no avail of the OP or may end up paying but at a large monetary loss of the OP. Either way Crypto goes down and the OP loses a significant amount of money. |
|
|
|
Isn't it so very interesting that Liberty Payouts has such a passionate interest in this issue, when he has been "dealing" in similar amounts of similarly tainted and misappropriated funds? What's up Liberty, worried that one of your colleagues in crime might be getting slapped down while laundering stolen funds? Feel a little too close for comfort to see vigilante justice?
Funny how the scammers all stick up for each other.
Why are you so sure he is not the same guy? Funny how the scammers stick up for each other? Funny how when there is actually a scam on this site you guys have nothing better to do then come after people like me for no reason at all. There is a mound of evidence against Crypto. Point of the matter is someone is out $100,000 which is a lot of money, and until someone starts explaining why this is, rather than making some baseless assumptions I'm going to assume Crypto is a scammer. Is that not what all you idiots were saying? That you have to "assume" until proven otherwise? Well that's what I'm doing. You guys also need to stop riding Crypto's dick so he can come in here like a man and explain himself. Liberty Payout: One question--- how do you feel about anonymity and living in New York city? I don't understand your question. If you have questions PM me. In the meanwhile I want this thread on topic. People have explaining to do. I want to see how an actual scam report plays out on this site. At this point I'm pissed the fuck off, because so many of you were so adamant about me when I didn't do anything, and now that there is an actual scammer you're all lollygagging which makes the fact that you tried to persecute me my first few days here on the basis of "protecting each other" bullshit. |
|
|
|
Isn't it so very interesting that Liberty Payouts has such a passionate interest in this issue, when he has been "dealing" in similar amounts of similarly tainted and misappropriated funds? What's up Liberty, worried that one of your colleagues in crime might be getting slapped down while laundering stolen funds? Feel a little too close for comfort to see vigilante justice?
Funny how the scammers all stick up for each other.
Why are you so sure he is not the same guy? Funny how the scammers stick up for each other? Funny how when there is actually a scam on this site you guys have nothing better to do then come after people like me for no reason at all. There is a mound of evidence against Crypto. Point of the matter is someone is out $100,000 which is a lot of money, and until someone starts explaining why this is, rather than making some baseless assumptions I'm going to assume Crypto is a scammer. Is that not what all you idiots were saying? That you have to "assume" until proven otherwise? Well that's what I'm doing. You guys also need to stop riding Crypto's dick so he can come in here like a man and explain himself. |
|
|
|
AML / CFT / KYC is very important in Australia, there is a lot more to this than is shown, we are doing what we legally have to do
Care to show what's not shown? Have you received a court order or a police order telling you to seize this money or freeze this account? Here's the thing with AML law: CryptoXchange legally can't tell someone that they're being investigated. And why telling him that the money's on the way if it isn't? The same way he's refusing to send you notarized documents, it seems by the pictures you've avoided sending him wire receipts.
Because the money was on the way. It was the bank that flagged the transaction, after the wire request was submitted. Why can't he provide receipts then. Some evidence to feast our eyes upon. Because the wire never left the bank - it was only ever a request, and the bank denied it. Image 16. If Crypto thought he was laundering why would he ask the OP to help him get cheap coins, why try to engage in a joint venture with the OP's business? |
|
|
|
AML / CFT / KYC is very important in Australia, there is a lot more to this than is shown, we are doing what we legally have to do
Care to show what's not shown? Have you received a court order or a police order telling you to seize this money or freeze this account? Here's the thing with AML law: CryptoXchange legally can't tell someone that they're being investigated. And why telling him that the money's on the way if it isn't? The same way he's refusing to send you notarized documents, it seems by the pictures you've avoided sending him wire receipts.
Because the money was on the way. It was the bank that flagged the transaction, after the wire request was submitted. Why can't he provide receipts then. Some evidence to feast our eyes upon. |
|
|
|
AML / CFT / KYC is very important in Australia, there is a lot more to this than is shown, we are doing what we legally have to do
Care to show what's not shown? Have you received a court order or a police order telling you to seize this money or freeze this account? And why telling him that the money's on the way if it isn't? The same way he's refusing to send you notarized documents, it seems by the pictures you've avoided sending him wire receipts. +1. Let's see how he replies. |
|
|
|
Caught something here. They advised, keyword: advised. Meaning that it's completely up to you whether or not to comply with their advice, return the guys money. Stop making excuses.
Advised = if you don't do it, you'll go to jail. That's what it means in this case. This guy may or may not be the Linode hacker, but he sure as hell knows who the Linode hacker is. Who are you referring to OP or CryptoXchange? The OP. Try reading between the line. The red-flags of money laundering here for the OP are numerous. So Crypto should return the coins. There is no law against that. |
|
|
|
Caught something here. They advised, keyword: advised. Meaning that it's completely up to you whether or not to comply with their advice, return the guys money. Stop making excuses.
Advised = if you don't do it, you'll go to jail. That's what it means in this case. This guy may or may not be the Linode hacker, but he sure as hell knows who the Linode hacker is. Who are you referring to OP or CryptoXchange? |
|
|
|
Very Simply:
This person has submitted fake identification which wasn't picked up until we had a request to withdraw to another bank account.
It has been requested at least 7 times that this person sends in Notorized & Opistilled Documentation in both upload and post.
We would also like to note this account was monitored and suspended due to suspicious circumstances in which the Notorized & Opistilled Documentation were requested.
Regards
Crypto X Change
Big guy takes down the small guy. Typical. Looking at the logs you obviously owe him cash which you are not giving him. Why not just give him his money back? Can't wait to see how this plays out. EDIT: Yup, image 29 you call him legitimate. Why the change of story? No Sir, There is much, much more to this than is being shown here. Our solicitors have advised to request Notorised & Opistlled documents, as there are many underlying issues here, WME refused on many occasions by various staff to provide us with the Notorised & Opistlled documentation AML / CFT information and not release any private information on the transactions of this person which we have not. WME: Simply send in the Notorised & Opistlled documents via Email + Postal to our PO BOX. Regards Crypto X Change Caught something here. They advised, keyword: advised. Meaning that it's completely up to you whether or not to comply with their advice, return the guys money. Stop making excuses. |
|
|
|
The trouble as always is the requirement for AML and bending over to take it up the ass from governments.
I would think the OP is still entitled to his coins back at the very least. Or can they just run off with $100,000? |
|
|
|
Very Simply:
This person has submitted fake identification which wasn't picked up until we had a request to withdraw to another bank account.
It has been requested at least 7 times that this person sends in Notorized & Opistilled Documentation in both upload and post.
We would also like to note this account was monitored and suspended due to suspicious circumstances in which the Notorized & Opistilled Documentation were requested.
Regards
Crypto X Change
Big guy takes down the small guy. Typical. Looking at the logs you obviously owe him cash which you are not giving him. Why not just give him his money back? Can't wait to see how this plays out. EDIT: Yup, image 29 you call him legitimate. Why the change of story? No Sir, There is much, much more to this than is being shown here. Our solicitors have advised to request Notorised & Opistlled documents, as there are many underlying issues here, WME refused on many occasions by various staff to provide us with the Notorised & Opistlled documentation AML / CFT information and not release any private information on the transactions of this person which we have not. WME: Simply send in the Notorised & Opistlled documents via Email + Postal to our PO BOX. Regards Crypto X Change Simply send back his BTC. He sent them to you, correct? If you don't want to pay for them, send them back. Like dude are you serious? It also says all his info was verified. This is actually funny. Wow. EDIT: Funny because you guys are doing to him what you bitched mt.gox was doing to you  |
|
|
|
We have requested Notorised & Opistilled documents and have been waiting, also amount is not 100K.
WME: Please send through Notorised & Opistilled Documents as requested several times.
It is that simple.
Crypto X Change
Why won't you reply to his lawyer? I don't blame him for not wanting to send you his docs, you guys had him balling around for months. Who's to say you won't do it again? Fact of the matter is you should give him back the money you owe. From your replies I can see the issue is that you want his notarized documents, not that the BTC are stolen as you claimed in the chats. Seems to me like you are just formulating new excuses. I'm sorry but I've been called out so much on this forum, now that there is actually a scammer I'm happy to ham down. EDIT: I wonder if you used his BTC to buy VIP... shame. |
|
|
|
Very Simply:
This person has submitted fake identification which wasn't picked up until we had a request to withdraw to another bank account.
It has been requested at least 7 times that this person sends in Notorized & Opistilled Documentation in both upload and post.
We would also like to note this account was monitored and suspended due to suspicious circumstances in which the Notorized & Opistilled Documentation were requested.
Regards
Crypto X Change
Big guy takes down the small guy. Typical. Looking at the logs you obviously owe him cash which you are not giving him. Why not just give him his money back? Can't wait to see how this plays out. EDIT: Yup, image 29 you call him legitimate. Why the change of story? |
|
|
|
Hey Ken. When did you lose your capacity to speak and write English?
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Quick question, is the site automatically updated with the current rate of BTC?
|
|
|
|
Purchasing with either Paypal, giftcard, Moneypak, etc.
Preferably Paypal.
If you want to receive payment in the form of a giftcard or Moneypak, you need to pay 1 BTC for the activation fee.
Looking to purchase ASAP, first come first serve.
I'll do this for moneypak. |
|
|
|
|
Successfully purchased a $500 Moneypak. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
