Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 12:48:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 557 »
381  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Reference thread for the flag against WinningJoy on: January 29, 2024, 05:41:01 PM
--snip--

Best Regard,
Mr Free Joy
The Savior Messiah Buddha


I'm not native english speaker, but does that mean he claim himself as some kind of god? CMIIW.
LOL
It does sound he is someone sent by the God. Now casino owners have to look for a job to bring food in their mouths
382  Other / Meta / Re: Email used to create this forum? on: January 29, 2024, 10:40:56 AM
Satoshi did not post on this forum. The forum was part of SourceForge before it changed to forum.bitcoin.org/XXX and then https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=XXX
I think there is a confusion. Satoshi did post on this forum, in the new forum back in the time.

You need to read this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg28#msg28
383  Economy / Reputation / Re: Wasabi, Kruw, users and supporters of their low morals on: January 29, 2024, 10:23:37 AM
users are free to promote whatever they want, as long as it is not a proven scam.
If you mean stealing hard cash only makes a company scam then you seems correct. Ledger compromised their users information. Coinbase did the same a few years back. Information costs billions, it's valuable than cash. When you claim something, market it to gain the trust of your users but practice the opposite then it's a scam. The forms of scam by Wasabi are many. I listed a few at the starting.

Users are free to promote even a scam that stole hard cash, users are still promotion 1xbit. When a member sales his moral over cash then it's absolutely fine. You will find a few people who are exception. The members who are advertising Wasabi is giving Wasabi a platform to deceive more crypto users.

If the forum divides into two parts in a debate about Wasabi then you will see the paid people of Wasabi are in their favour. In this topic, how many of them are participating? More than one page, I didn't see a signature from Wasabi when I scrolled.
384  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆 on: January 29, 2024, 10:00:09 AM
I was wondering why you Merited my vote.
That's 4 f**king merits! Completely waste, you may only need it to overtake Leo LOL.

Quote
I don't think you're setting a good example though, when you tell people not to Merit posts but do it yourself:
Quote
January 15, 2024, 10:55:53 PM: 1 to Coin_trader for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
January 15, 2024, 10:55:39 PM: 1 to gagux123 for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
January 15, 2024, 10:55:21 PM: 1 to AirtelBuzz for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
January 15, 2024, 10:54:59 PM: 1 to Porfirii for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:10:25 PM: 1 to sheenshane for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:10:10 PM: 1 to julerz12 for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:09:35 PM: 1 to bullrun2024bro for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:09:25 PM: 1 to BlackHatCoiner for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:08:50 PM: 1 to sujonali1819 for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:08:40 PM: 1 to mendace for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 28, 2023, 06:08:31 PM: 1 to creep_o for Re: [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
December 11, 2023, 02:44:16 PM: 1 to Chilwell for [Voting 2023] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆
The reason of my question was exactly the same. franky1 is proving a point and because he is not popular, everyone was taking about it but no one was talking about others who are sending merit to the same thread.

Ideally, nobody should send merits in that topic. Practically, the rule states only that if you are nominated by someone at a category and you merit that post, that vote for you at that category will not be counted. So in theory you could send merits to other peoples voting for other users. Still, if you'd do that, it would only encourage others to act as well and also may some will not read the rules. As a consequence, they could merit posts where they were nominated, which would lead to have those votes not counted... It is best to not use merits inside that topic...
My realization [when all of us had discussion about merit sending on voting thread a few years back I guess?] was everything we did was to discourage awarding merit.

I can only do this when I feel that when writing a post the user was really guided by the description of a particular category.
Are you talking about the 4 merits you sent to LoyceV or in several votes the 1 merits to different members?
By doing any of it, you are endorsing your choice. It's encouraging others to find your reasons, your likeness, many will vote very close to your choice so that they can earn merit [hypothetical, I don't think anyone is going to do that for 1 to 4 merits LOL]. These merits can influence the natural practice of the voting and I think it was the exact reason we had the discussion long ago.

The worse fear is, by sending this merits you may able to attract attention of the voters. Consider Miss Bitcointalk category, just an example since it gives me some votes LOL. Someone is voting and they are not sure who to vote, they saw you are sending merits to several votes and instantly they are thinking about you and it is going to influence their voting.
385  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆 on: January 24, 2024, 01:49:45 AM
If I remember correctly, at least there was a discussion about the fact that anyone who votes for the post in which he is nominated, that vote is disqualified. Now I see that franky1 rewarded some posts that nominated him with merit.
Is this franky1's try to avoid the AntiHero award? I must admit an interesting strategy, now it deserves this label even more.  Cheesy

[...snip...]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=65837
franky1 is proving his point perfectly LOL I have a question though.
In which circumstance I can send merit to a post on the voting topic? As far as I remember we all agreed that we can not merit anyone, I am sure my understanding was wrong. 
386  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Coins.game CONFISCATING all my winnings (268mbtc) on: January 22, 2024, 04:52:21 PM
Denis Coins seems not online for last two days. I will try to PM him and ask the share some information so that we all know what happened. On the other hand GekkeBelg seemed to have problem with some other sportsbook too. Owl.Games, Buff.bet, Coinplay, BC.game and many others. Have you ever had problem with sportsbet.io, Stake etc? If I was you then I would avoid playing in sportsbook those are less recognized.
387  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Receive Merit - Post your PGP key, add an encrypted message, open for anyone. on: January 22, 2024, 04:37:11 PM
I gave my effort to write this to you. Hope you understand it?. Its my first time Cheesy

Code:
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

hF4DHD+iqLgO/5wSAQdAIqaT8Pf3QGl1JcN7rIU9J8M5OQ/bsFmT/qabISnIDjow
Rn0gQqyQPPV2WMYIW9Vbi5C+uT05BUinVFjHTUs+EErfyuwAAadgJKhNNdcTsqR0
1MBkAQkCEN1UjYlM8gAsIWB95AlFbwAvXcoTkiBshbN+Q5EZ8XyoulqeKypjj+Yv
g/Uz53eW54wCzM1JGoDzDTwDGc9JRe1N43fGRffyEysHUjJhEfN31qpDFxzeBERk
yU1zrSe3euDEN6gAEOScX1bjnIg5W7h8HkzmOmhOK3G/lSbaptLRb8eVWql/mkq5
qql0L7Z9BQJGB33fh1SvHDLzRvqpkq4nUinIw5P8+pzBmMKFovad47f3rA6pZRi6
NvW2xflo1HBqANUGW5GHYf3OqFJay6HLoX0XzXgJ8PpOt8twVHf8lUagZwOrwUQS
h/XFgH/L04OAePWUkTf+krqCb0DfD7nsm/dewPbtWcOpSOAn6Yz0kyrgop+YHxTs
DK1F78HqOA==
=sVlU
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
thank you Mrs. LOL
Glad that it inspired you do learn a new skill. Everyone one of us need to learn something new every day for personal development. Time makes us experienced.

Who is next?
388  Economy / Reputation / Re: Wasabi, Kruw, users and supporters of their low morals on: January 22, 2024, 04:29:33 PM
Come on LoyceV!
What a show you started LOL
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63533803#msg63533803

I don't want to delete the post and the follow up posts from others. But the following posts were not necessary, in fact it's moving out from the main discussion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63534269#msg63534269
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63534312#msg63534312
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63537408#msg63537408
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63537438#msg63537438
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63538175#msg63538175
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482307.msg63539776#msg63539776
Let's stay on topic. Some of you are better than me to keep things on topic.

What I intended to convey is that there was no necessity for Kruw's disgusting behavior on the forum to prompt us to question the principles of Wasabi developers. They have been showcasing their negative aspects for quite some time now. Wasabi started as a project to make Bitcoin fungible, and now they support the notion that some coins are tainted. They display their cooperation with surveillance firms as a necessity, at the same time they do acknowledge blockchain analysis is inaccurate.

And countless of other examples which reveal that they are either incompetent with the subject or actively malicious-- which in either case means they can't be trusted with our privacy.
Kruw is not anymore posting. Is he already banned?

Some people are now trying to create an argument that Kruw has nothing to do with Wasabi. I wonder when Bitcoin SV will become the same? We will see a group will try to convince others that Bitcoin SV is not the Bitcoin SV.

Question is not Kruw. Question is all these misconduct from Wasabi and its franchise. Clearly Wasabi team is a group of hypocrites, scamming their community.

389  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Coins.game CONFISCATING all my winnings (268mbtc) on: January 20, 2024, 05:15:58 PM
I was told it can take up to 15 working days.
15 days or two weeks are not long time. I have seen players had to wait 6 months. I was checking your history and it looks like you are using the very similar posting style in all accusations you made. You write good.

I have not done anything wrong and always clearly check all rules before I join a betting website.
- I am from Germany, which is not on the forbidden countries list
- I only placed bets from my own German IP-address, never had a VPN turned on when I placed a bet
- I only gambled on big sports like NBA and NFL, and only on the game winner market. No exotic leagues at all. And ofcourse casino games like plinko, mines, keno etc.
- I never took any deposit bonus. All bonuses I got were some rakeback claims, totalling only 84USD
- I do not have multiple accounts and all my bets were placed from the same laptop
- I do not use any kind of technology, all bets I place are entirely human and my own

@Denis Coins, would you do the checklist from above and at least tell us which one are false and possibly give a hint of the way you found the account guilty.
390  Other / Meta / Re: Admin/Mods: Please ban "jvanname" on: January 20, 2024, 04:58:06 PM
That is disgusting. You should try being less disgusting next time.
This is not your kindergarten head master.
391  Economy / Reputation / Re: Farewell on: January 20, 2024, 03:32:54 PM
After seeing what has happened here, I have just communicated to the manager icopress that I will not continue in the Wasabi campaign because it goes against my moral principles. I will simply wait until the end of the week tomorrow and I will remove my signature.

I am not going to hold anything against those who will remain in the campaign or those who still have dealings with him but I simply can't continue.
icopress had opinions in their favour in the past. Let's see if he has the same opinion now. At some point he must be convinced and took the responsibility to give them the platform to advertise the business. As the participants, it's hard to give a call when you are under a manager who managed some successful campaigns. But you did well.

If this guy is a Dev

Is he actually one? I stopped following the drama when it became repetitive and just stuck on the same replies, but has is there any proof of his connection with the team other than constant ass licking?

I can not verify the source but so far my understanding, he is one of the Dev. A complete piece of junk.

392  Other / Meta / Re: Admin/Mods: Please ban "jvanname" on: January 20, 2024, 02:56:18 PM
I do not have anything against women or their breasts except for stupid and hateful women. I hope I never accidentally drink the milk from the breasts of Sandra_hakeem or BitcoinGirl.Club because if I do, then I will immediately s#$t myself. But I also hate stupid and evil males even more.
Your month haven't fed you the breast milk? So sad!

Go poop on yourself.
Reminds me the 2 Girls and 1 Cup LOL. Are you relative?
393  Economy / Reputation / Re: Wasabi, Kruw, users and supporters of their low morals on: January 20, 2024, 02:28:47 PM
Wasabi is doxxing their competitors.
This reminded me of another case: Red trust on ~. Back then, Wasabi was promoted in another thread, and the Wasabi lovers tagged the thread creator who responded to it for not trusting Wasabi. It's ironic, because back then Wasabi was supposed to be a great new privacy feature. How the tables turned....

I only now notice the use of Wasabiwąllet. I'm not sure why.
This forum was embarrassed by many users many times. I can not remember when was the new trust system introduced but if that was after the introduction of the new trust system then those tags were awful.

Over the years Wasabi turned into scammers. It's time to boycott the whole franchise. We have done it in the past. Ledger wallets are no more welcome in the community.  
394  Economy / Reputation / Re: Wasabi, Kruw, users and supporters of their low morals on: January 20, 2024, 02:09:27 PM
Theymos banned only mixers, and Wasabi is not a mixer, it is a CoinJoin implementation.
Theymos may not categorize them as mixers, but literally they are mixers. In short, they are referred to as decentralized mixers.
What I get is Theymos wants to stay away from trouble but he is making some exceptions when it is necessary. Mixers are not illegal, they are important to break your links. Theymos is still soft for a few mixers who are advertising them as not a mixer but basic business model is the same as mixers.
395  Economy / Reputation / Re: Attn: o_e_l_e_o on: January 20, 2024, 02:00:07 PM
You have been winning this chronic disease for a decade, how come you are giving up and have concluded that the disease is now winning. Did your doctor say you cannot win? Is there no money again to further the treatment? If the later is the case, this forum can raise more than enough Leo.

There are no much of your type here, especially in the technical section of the forum. What happens to your privacy gospel. Who will be contesting with LoyceV in the bitcoin Geek category of the annual award.
Leo! Tell us you want to live for some months or years and I'll be fine. You can do something like what Lauda did and I will be fine, don't tell us you gonna die or do you plan to suicide?
Let us respect a person's wish. It's unnecessary to ask him so many questions when he wants to live is peace for rest of the days. It's important he stays with his family and close friends.
396  Economy / Reputation / Wasabi, Kruw, users and supporters of their low morals on: January 20, 2024, 01:43:17 PM
There are no question anyone will have that Kruw's moral is low and mentally ill
Quote
Good riddance o_e_l_e_o.  No one else I've interacted with on this forum has done more damage to the future of Bitcoin and future of freedom than you.  Even after your involvement with the Chipmixer scam, you knowlingy spread continuous lies about privacy weaknesses in Bitcoin that do not exist. Your scheme of tricking people into giving up their data and stealing their coins will finally come to an end.
Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/63517379

It continues even in a separate thread.
This is a pathetic post. I would delete it if I were you. This is just proving the kind of person you are. Someone is ill and you say you are happy. Good luck in your life...

Why should I excuse or forgive o_e_l_e_o's continuous attacks on Bitcoin just because he's mortal?

Kruw and Wasabi team are lying constantly.
Could you publicly say that WasabiWallet is still technically permissionless and trustless? Because I believe some people are still promoting it in that way.
The Wasabi team lie constantly.

Here's a post I made a year ago highlighting some of the lies on their website: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5286821.msg60337199#msg60337199. Nothing has changed in the last year.

Here's a post where I link to the devs lying on Twitter about the issue of address reuse: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5419000.msg61220171#msg61220171

The Wasabi team have no problem lying about their product in order to make themselves profits.
[...]
Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/62422359

Wasabi team supports censorship and think it's the right way.
If people are not convinced yet that wasabi devs are incompetent clowns, here are a few notable assertions from the podcast:

Quote
You’re changing the acceptance of which coins do you consider valid—not on the Bitcoin consensus layer—that’s the other important thing. Bitcoin consensus is still permissionless and decentralized enough that you can make payments even if you are blacklisted: you can just either get hashrate yourself or bribe a miner to hash a block with your transaction in it—so Bitcoin works. But what we’re talking about here is: will you get access to someone else’s computer? Will someone else allow you to write stuff on his computer, basically? And in my opinion, ultimately it comes down to property rights. A coordinator is just someone else’s computer—and it’s not yours. So you ought to be quite thankful that someone actually provides you a service where you can use his computer for certain things like coordinating a round.

This guy just asserted that my decision to join my inputs with someone else is the same as taking control of his computer.  He also stated that blacklisting does not happen on Bitcoin because you could bribe a miner, which is not true.  The reason you do not get blacklisted is because it is censorship resistant.  A mining pool blacklisting transactions would directly attack their revenue and reputation, but even if it did not, then some other pool would mine it sooner or later.

By the way why doesn't the same apply on coinjoin?  "Coinjoin consensus is still permissionless and decentralized enough that you can make payments even if you are blacklisted: you can just leave Wasasi and use a censorship resistant alternative".  

Quote
But then the more pressing matter is it’s not always gonna be clear-cut, especially when you start making transactions, especially when you have things like CoinSwap, Lightning, PayJoin—we’re working really hard to make the life of chain surveillance miserable, and that means that they’re gonna have many more false positives.

This is the plan guys!  They are paying a blockchain analysis company so that they can verify beforehand that their product becomes less and less accurate!   Cheesy
[...]
The default Wasabi Wallet coordinator will start censoring "illegal" UTXOs
Scammer lead developer resigns from honeypot Wasabi Wallet
Wasabi blacklisting update - open letter / 24 questions discussion thread

Wasabi's questionable privacy practice
Wasabi has been reusing addresses, a lot, which has resulted in a lot of post-mix coins being linked back to pre-mix coins and being de-anonymized. And then the devs have been on Twitter, both defending that it is "acceptable" and also lying about it entirely.

Here's an example thread: https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586249382097088512#m
Gets shown address reuse, claims it isn't from 2.0 and that it has never happened in 2.0. Then gets shown address reuse from 2.0, and says they've already patched it. How could they have patched it while also claiming it has never happened? They are lying somewhere.

Here's another example: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872#m
And dozens more: https://nitter.it/wasabistats

But the devs don't care, because apparently some address reuse is "acceptable": https://nitter.it/HillebrandMax/status/1586321068129939456#m
Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/61220171

Wasabi is doxxing their competitors.
Nope, haven't moved at all. Just waiting for an example:

You already received multiple examples, why would you require more besides the ones I already gave you?


Pay attention, this is the article published on April 27th:  https://nopara73.medium.com/samouraileaks-samouraidevs-sockpuppet-exposed-7ce654b92c0b

You are attacking the wrong people.  A Wasabi developer exposing the Samourai developer using sock puppets to deceive social media users out of their Bitcoins is not "doxxing".
Liar and faking.
Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/62421991

Thanks to the friend who helped me with giving the information.

In a nutshell when you are using wasabi and advertising it, you are helping a team who are
[1.] Morally down and wish your death
[2.] Lying to you constantly
[3.] Supporting censorship and do not care about bitcoin and your privacy
[4.] ignorant and do not have basic practice idea of handling bitcoin addresses
[5.] thinking it is fine to doxxing their competitor and then lying again.

Wasabi is a scam!
Boycott Wasabi, educate others to avoid using Wasabi, forward this information to the people who are helping Wasabi.

[I am making this topic self-moderating to filter known trolls]
397  Economy / Reputation / Re: Farewell on: January 20, 2024, 12:19:02 PM
Kruw's posts on this board are single-handedly making the Wasabi signature campaign look bad. I mean how would it look if people see advertisements for a service whose contributors can't even show some respect for a dying person. These are things even those in favor of blacklisting would be against.
If this guy is a Dev and this is his moral then I don't think there is a reason to Trust Wasabi wallet. I wonder what is the thought of the people involved in the signature campaign including the manager involved in it. On the other hand, there were some other issues related to Wasabi wallet in the past. The forum does not moderate advertising except mixers in the recent days but I think as the member of the community we really need to avoid such projects that has people with low moral.

Someday something may go wrong and they will wish you to die. They may even expose your coin and report it to the agencies who are looking for your information.
398  Economy / Reputation / Re: Farewell on: January 17, 2024, 06:30:19 PM
You will stay forever in our memory, you are irreplaceable. Live these remaining months only for yourself. Don't give a second thought about who is thinking what. Your life, your rules. Stay with the people you love and enjoy time together. Farewell brother.
399  Economy / Reputation / Re: jvannameIsFraud is a harasser. on: January 11, 2024, 09:45:04 AM
You really are a nasty woman. Your breasts are disgusting. I am the only entity who has advocated for a safety procedure that could prevent the next 5 pandemics. But since you hate me so much, I will refuse to prevent such pandemics, so the rest of your miserable life will be filled with pain and suffering. Is that what you want? If you want me to be nice to you, then you need to examine whether it is a good idea to be such a hateful pile of rubbish.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I have been noticing you for last a few weeks, saw the development, I also sent you PM suggesting what to do because I thought you were truly lost. But it seems that's not the case with you. You are the one who is hateful to everyone even the people who really wanted to help you. If you have a Ph.D then you earned it, why would anyone need to bother about it. You can be a Ph. D. holder but if you don't know the basic of social skills then everyone will be harassed by you everywhere. Learn to respect others, you will receive it in return.

Words mean nothing. You want to save the next 5 pandemics, take a schedule and visit The White House. My life has no influence over what you do. I can save the earth from the next natural disaster but I refuse to do it because I hate you. It sounds BS. Adult men don't blame others for their failure.
400  Economy / Reputation / Re: jvannameIsFraud is a harasser. on: January 10, 2024, 08:22:18 PM
F@#$ off. I understand the joke. But you are making the bull@#$% claim that I do not have a Ph.D. when I really do because you really are that f@#$ing stupid. So f@#$ off. And no, I will not try to prove this to you because you are nasty woman. Your breasts are nasty.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I seriously doubt you have any social skill. It's very important for a person. The behaviors only proves you are a lonely person with a laptop in your grand mothers basement. You have no job, no business. Your so called Ph. D. is wasted and now you are living a life with the mercy of your grand mother's pension.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 557 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!