Sold 300, I have placed in the http://veil.v2.dedicatedpool.com mineral pool 1 G force, each veilcoin price is 0.0008, the price, price low, you are the one, thank you!Need to PM me!  newbie id.. buyers beware. That's ok, I'm in no hurry to sell, I also hope to can on the exchange, I also remind everyone here, the risk of private deals, thank you! Starting to worry this wali.e is a scammer... he wanted me to send first although I am a senior member.. he has 8 posts.. then backed out on deal. Can't be sure though. Same with me. I agreed to a price and when I said that he had to send first because he only had two messages (it was a few hours ago) he said he had already sold everything. I had offered him to split the transaction in smaller pieces so he would take a smaller risk. |
|
|
|
|
Devs, I can do real Spanish translation. Contact me or reply if you are interested.
|
|
|
|
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %. it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying) I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution. I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue. |
|
|
|
How much DRK to run a masternode? 1000?
yes, 20% of block Do I need 1k by a certain date? Has evan ever stated if the 1000drk req to run a node will stay the same? I mean, if the price skyrockets, then the amount of nodes will rise reaaaally slow witch is good ofcourse for the early adaptors, bad for future investors. Yes it'll be the same.f There will be some projects where you can buy a part of a masternode and you will get shares. There is already one of such projects working: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=626715.0 |
|
|
|
6/10 update: RC3 launch pushed back to 6/27 to thoroughly test upgrades and patches before public release. This is a good thing as the market tends to punish those who can't protect their own coins key variables & rules (double spending is an example of the abuse of the variables involved).
Devs are also adding the ability to hold the 1000DRK offsite (pref.in cold storage) which also reduces some of the incentive for trying to break into a MN.
With that in mind, since payments won't begin until the 27th, we'll launch nodes at a slower pace which allows me to take even more time locking down security, which should be multi-layered and multi faceted, and requires constant attention as to the latest zero days and other cyber threats.
Also:
- since there's been another two week delay I'm now offering FREE MN setups for those that sign up before the 21st. (This service will cost 15-30 DRK for nodes set up in July)
- By popular request: Batch 3 *will* include 10% stakes. That means you can now own 10% of the Node output by only using a 100 DRK stake! Operating and software protection fees are only $12 per node per month for a limited time.
Just state 'Reserved' below or send me a PM if you wish to remain anonymous. You can also still request stakes at multiples of 25% MN ownership.
Just one small detail, the 27/6 date is not fixed yet. Devs have only said late June in the official communication. One of them had said that maybe the 27th before that, but it maybe another day around the 27th. |
|
|
|
Haven't really been active in this thread lately, anyone can update me on what's going on with the coin? Why the sudden price drop?
Masternode fork is pushed back to late june. Masternode payments fork aka RC3 pushed to late June. Darksend has always been operational with Masternodes (I know you already knew this Alex, just wanted to clarify for anyone not in sync with news) I think cold wallet integration with MN is now part of this fork which is an enhancement, originally planned for RC4. Yeah, cold wallet would be cool. Anyway, with the local/remote setup things are super safe already. Even with the wallet in the server there is almost no risk if things are done right. |
|
|
|
OP
Why is Yacoin not on this list?
I believe he's said a few posts before that now he only answers questions in this thread but that he doesn't update it. He does all the updates in a more comprehensive website he's done for this: http://cpucoinlist.com/ |
|
|
|
Cryptonote coins are still in their early stages. Darkcoin has 4 months of development lead. Then there is the fact that a QT wallet already existed for Darkcoin to use since it is basically a bitcoin clone.
Darkcoin is based on Bitcoin's blockchain which gives it something like 3-4 years development lead, not 4 months. But the longer the main feature that has been hyped for months keeps getting pushed back the more people will lose faith in Darkcoin and it will continue to lose both value and support. Without the anonymity feature functioniong 100%, Darkcoin has nothing.
The main feature is online right now. It's the payments of masternodes that are being delayed. Yeah, people forget that Darksend already works! Sure, there is a limit of 10 drk in place, but it works, so removing it won't take long. |
|
|
|
Oh no! Panic sell on news of dev refusal to mismanage project in favor of arbitrary deadlines! Absolutely, much better to have a dev that copypastes everything to meet every deadline  |
|
|
|
This is a good signal the product is not rushed by the dev team just to satisfy the short term. They think about the long term.
Only good thing is that a volunteer found a bug today that the lead developer totally overlooked. Makes you wonder if maybe there aren't others that the dev didn't see.. Not blaming him at all, just wondering if that isn't dangerous Software and bugs go together. They always happen. They always will. |
|
|
|
We want to make it clear that automatic checkpointing is a temporary solution that will be removed from the code as soon as we feel it is safe to do so. Though it is clearly beneficial for use as a failsafe mechanism while we perfect the code that powers Darksend, in the long term, the presence of a centralized checkpointing server on the network is unacceptable.
Sorry for my ignorance if this is covered elsewhere, but why is a centralised server necessary? Why couldn't for example new versions of the mining code contain a key which must be included in each solved block after a certain date for that block to be considered valid by those that have updated correctly? Thanks. If I understand what happened last time, a bunch of forks appeared of the updated code. So, while I think Evan believes he's fixed the issues that were causing these forks, checkpointing ensures there can only be one updated fork in case something else unforeseen comes along. That makes sense, thanks.  Yes, in the next couple of months there will be a lot of changes. This is just an extra precaution to avoid things going crazy like they did ten days ago if everything fails. As Evan has said, once everything is more stable and we don't introduce features constantly, he will remove it. |
|
|
|
anyone here experience same problem ?
No, but I think there may be something much more sinister behind all the "being hacked" stories. I think they have been short selling against their customers and got squeezed. Just a gut feeling, though. Yes, I agree that being hacked IS something that an exchange cannot afford. They MUST take every single measure to be protected. Still, it's possible to happen for it's a business risk. Now the difference is: a good, serious exchange will never have this business risk affect it's clients lest loosing reputation. In the maket, no reputation means no deals. I've never had a problem with them despite what everyone was saying, but I have just zeroed all my balances there. I had started their verification process because I wanted to trade DRK/USD if it is ever available. The response I've got is so lame that it almost feels like a joke:  BTW, they have lowered their withdrawal fee for DRK from 0.1 to a more reasonable 0.01. Hi, Fernando. I don't have any balance left there also (but only for about 235DOGE left that I have not been interested in withdrawing). So it's been quite a long time I don't visit Cryptsy. I believe they really have to comply with some goverment rules and from your case it seems that governments, eager to implement their biometric scheme, are imposing that exchanges have their clients face scanned (please, notice that my intention here is not to FUD, but I'm afraid it cannot be avoided in this situation, because indeed, governments want to f#&k up with our privacy) I think they are taking it too far. I'm verified in a few more and they have never asked for something like this. I agree this is about regulation they don't control, but I think they are making a weird interpretation of it. |
|
|
|
there are very big investors, millionaires - moving in and out of the coin to cause panic to everyone I think the more reasonable explanation is that the coin was overdue a revaluation and that revaluation is now complete, so people are locking in their profits which is just the sensible thing to do. Nothing to do with "trying to cause panic". It's 1300% up on a few weeks ago. Is that not enough for you ? Actually no It's nowhere near enough. Seriously, the coin is technically better than litecoin and if the market was information efficient, should've already replaced litecoin in terms of marketcap. Litecoin's key advantages over Btc were faster transaction times and decentralised mining. Drk does the same thing plus provides transaction privacy. IMHO (and I know this is controversial and some might hate me for saying this) I think the name is holding back the Drk. If it was called PrivacyCoin, I think the optics would have been much better. More of the media would've got behind it. I agree that the name may put off some people/media, but it may have also attracted others, not necessarily because of reminiscences to dark markets. Anyway, probably too late to change it, so no point in discussing And it is great for memes and easy jokes! I would never invest in a coin without this feature |
|
|
|
anyone here experience same problem ?
No, but I think there may be something much more sinister behind all the "being hacked" stories. I think they have been short selling against their customers and got squeezed. Just a gut feeling, though. Yes, I agree that being hacked IS something that an exchange cannot afford. They MUST take every single measure to be protected. Still, it's possible to happen for it's a business risk. Now the difference is: a good, serious exchange will never have this business risk affect it's clients lest loosing reputation. In the maket, no reputation means no deals. I've never had a problem with them despite what everyone was saying, but I have just zeroed all my balances there. I had started their verification process because I wanted to trade DRK/USD if it is ever available. The response I've got is so lame that it almost feels like a joke: BTW, they have lowered their withdrawal fee for DRK from 0.1 to a more reasonable 0.01. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
