DannyHamilton will be reviewing the terms for escrow shortly.
Good, when he PMs me within the next hour, I can send him the money today, otherwise tomorrw, its 3:47 AM here^^ I'm guessing it will be tomorrow then. I'm still good to trade tomorrow at the agreed margin assuming the market doesn't do something way out of the ordinary. you have quite the good reputation, i can trust that you will fullfill your end. Lets lock the target price at 649$ ok? Nothing personal but tbh your rep is a bit shaky. I'd rather wait till we're ready to do the deal. If you want to send the funds to me and I can hold them overnight before setting up escrow, then we can make the trade now. Nah then lets wait until tomorrow. Also just out of curiosity, why do you think my rep is shaky? Most people that know me think my rep is flawless. Well you have one negative rating and not that many positives. Granted I don't have that many positives either, but I was giving you the option to trust me; its certainly reasonable if you don't. We can finish this tomorrow. Gnight. Ah thank you for the clarification. The bad rep is from this guy: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=220370Got scammed by him ( I am apparently a retard) and then he left me a bad feed back too... See ya tmrw |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton will be reviewing the terms for escrow shortly.
Good, when he PMs me within the next hour, I can send him the money today, otherwise tomorrw, its 3:47 AM here^^ I'm guessing it will be tomorrow then. I'm still good to trade tomorrow at the agreed margin assuming the market doesn't do something way out of the ordinary. you have quite the good reputation, i can trust that you will fullfill your end. Lets lock the target price at 649$ ok? Nothing personal but tbh your rep is a bit shaky. I'd rather wait till we're ready to do the deal. If you want to send the funds to me and I can hold them overnight before setting up escrow, then we can make the trade now. Nah then lets wait until tomorrow. Also just out of curiosity, why do you think my rep is shaky? Most people that know me think my rep is flawless. |
|
|
|
At the current rate of block generation (with some blocks being generated sometimes 7 minutes after the last), I'd guess that we'll reach the final block for burning between the 23rd of this month and the 2nd of May. What happens if only a miniscule amount of Chancecoins are created in the burn period? I propose indefinitely extending the burn period until you guys reach a minimum amount of CHA you're both comfortable on starting the project with. At the current rate, it doesn't even look like a million coins will be created.
Changing the burn period would harm the integrity of the coin, so we are not willing to change the burn period. The coins are divisible to the hundred millionths of a coin, so even if there are only 25,000 CHA in existence, that's still enough for the Chancecoin casino to operate. I agree, the amount doesnt matter too much. Also could you please check the amount of CHA on this address? 18888888PPJ8oGeqR6AKmoiKUme9da48Xf (Still cant get passed that damn block, even after deleting the DB and rescanning ) Sure, I see 208.18287037 CHA there. Also, do you know what the issue could be? I work within a VM on a tinyXP Windows. The blockchain is uptodate and it is txindex=1 with a rescan. When i delete the DB of chancecoin it starts downloading up to the block XXXXXX and always stops at exactely this block. What trouble shooting can i do? Which block does it stop on? I'll look into it. 292091 I deleted the DB 3 times, always scans to this block, then stops. |
|
|
|
At the current rate of block generation (with some blocks being generated sometimes 7 minutes after the last), I'd guess that we'll reach the final block for burning between the 23rd of this month and the 2nd of May. What happens if only a miniscule amount of Chancecoins are created in the burn period? I propose indefinitely extending the burn period until you guys reach a minimum amount of CHA you're both comfortable on starting the project with. At the current rate, it doesn't even look like a million coins will be created.
Changing the burn period would harm the integrity of the coin, so we are not willing to change the burn period. The coins are divisible to the hundred millionths of a coin, so even if there are only 25,000 CHA in existence, that's still enough for the Chancecoin casino to operate. I agree, the amount doesnt matter too much. Also could you please check the amount of CHA on this address? 18888888PPJ8oGeqR6AKmoiKUme9da48Xf (Still cant get passed that damn block, even after deleting the DB and rescanning ) Sure, I see 208.18287037 CHA there. Also, do you know what the issue could be? I work within a VM on a tinyXP Windows. The blockchain is uptodate and it is txindex=1 with a rescan. When i delete the DB of chancecoin it starts downloading up to the block XXXXXX and always stops at exactely this block. What trouble shooting can i do? |
|
|
|
At the current rate of block generation (with some blocks being generated sometimes 7 minutes after the last), I'd guess that we'll reach the final block for burning between the 23rd of this month and the 2nd of May. What happens if only a miniscule amount of Chancecoins are created in the burn period? I propose indefinitely extending the burn period until you guys reach a minimum amount of CHA you're both comfortable on starting the project with. At the current rate, it doesn't even look like a million coins will be created.
Changing the burn period would harm the integrity of the coin, so we are not willing to change the burn period. The coins are divisible to the hundred millionths of a coin, so even if there are only 25,000 CHA in existence, that's still enough for the Chancecoin casino to operate. I agree, the amount doesnt matter too much. Also could you please check the amount of CHA on this address? 18888888PPJ8oGeqR6AKmoiKUme9da48Xf (Still cant get passed that damn block, even after deleting the DB and rescanning ) |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton will be reviewing the terms for escrow shortly.
Good, when he PMs me within the next hour, I can send him the money today, otherwise tomorrw, its 3:47 AM here^^ I'm guessing it will be tomorrow then. I'm still good to trade tomorrow at the agreed margin assuming the market doesn't do something way out of the ordinary. you have quite the good reputation, i can trust that you will fullfill your end. Lets lock the target price at 649$ ok? |
|
|
|
Gotta stand out  This fucks up my browser big time :O Also to high to put it in! |
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity are there still any whales playing or is it just a stream of small time causal bettors? Nakowa's run must have been rediculously scary for investors though, luckily it worked out in the end.
After nakowa there were quite a handful of small and middle whales, having swings of up to 1-2k BTC. The last weeks the bets are a bit smaller, but the volume is still impressive at over 5000 BTC per day wagered |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton will be reviewing the terms for escrow shortly.
Good, when he PMs me within the next hour, I can send him the money today, otherwise tomorrw, its 3:47 AM here^^ |
|
|
|
Client have to be easily accessible, meaning that general people could adopt and use it. Notebooks and desktop computers aint nowadays even used in every household, i know many folks who just mainly use their tablets and smartphones. I dont know about rest of the world, but in Finland banks have very sophisticated clients/internetbanks and with all the NFC and other mobile payments systems, competition is fierce.
Certainly NEM have to be better than those systems of we want to create complete currency system/finance platform.
We definitely shouldn't forget about smartphone users here. It's a vast and growing market. +1000 I think a smart device wallet should be THE focus of NEM. Apps are the way all computers are moving. The main stream app stores started with IOS and then Android, but even now the big players are in it. Windows now has a app store, Mac has an App store, even Ubuntu has an app store! And for smart devices, app stores are basically the only choice, and yes, it of course needs to be one click. Whatever the interface, the guy from Finland makes great points. I'll be fair, I spend a lot of time on my desktop, but people like me (and probably you are dinosaurs in a way). I am a professor in another high tech country, and basically all of my students use their cell phones as their primary computing device. There is no going back to the desktop after this. The focus of the NEM client should 100% be mobile. We need to launch with a great android app, and hopefully an IOS one too. If not an IOS app, than a portal that can be accessed via IOS. Yes, I know this is asking a lot. It is also the way towards success. Mobile app per se is not a problem. The big question is what kind of functionality should be expected in a mobile application. Our desktop client is likely to have a big range of functionality and while making a mobile app for a simple send/ receive NEM and messages is not difficult; mobile interface would probably not be suitable for complex interaction. So best strategy here is to make a full-feature desktop client separately from mobile applications. The questions here are that what kind of functionality do you expect for a mobile application ? send/ receive NEM; send/ receive messages what else ? I guess sending messages is important, but the client should be really slim and fast, so it shouldn't be loaded with features. local signing of transactions broadcasting rawTX to the servers Sending/reading/decrypting/encrypting messages price charts liveticker widget Thats it, wouldn't add more! |
|
|
|
Yeah, but how would that even work? As an anonymous provider, dooglus will not be able to list it in any appstore. Doubt he will make this.
You would host the app on your own cdn, certainly not as convenient but definitely do-able. You can install off-app-market apps without too much trouble, it's just a checkbox on most phones. That's how most apps that live in the they grey area ( porn, gambling, rooting ) operate. I know that, but then in the end only a handful people will use it, not really what dooglus wants to spend his time on, I would guess |
|
|
|
Why all these haters of NEM - are you afraid of NEM ?
NEM and NXT could widely coexist in my op.
The best could be to give both a real chance to grow and to establish.
Where exactely am i hating NEM? I want it to succeed as i have a stake in it, I just post facts so that people get a good idea where the coin is right now. I hate it when people spread FUD, and saying a coin is superior even though it is only existing on the drawing boards is spreading FUD! |
|
|
|
Nice easter egg   |
|
|
|
I have one question. What makes NXT become a colsed system? Why NAS or other NXT Clone cannot invade NXT System.
NAS is the first nxt clone that launched.
Any one else puzzled by this question?
What do you mean exactely? |
|
|
|
0.065 BTC and i am not paying for the escrow fees
I agree with the price. While we are working out the details can we agree that the strike price floats at 201.35 above the current price? I see 448.65 as the current bitstamp price. How will the exercise price be determined? Yes, 201.35 above BSTMP. Settlement price will be the timestamp of the PM you send me when you want to settle, or else exactly april 15 23:59 59seconds GMT. Ok? Last trade from bitstamp ticker? yes the last price of the bitstamp ticker exactely before your PM timestamp. Ok? Also I am fine with all big escrows: tomatecage, danny, anon PM one of them and pay them and tell them to PM me directly. Timestamp after public post, okay? With PM to notify, but the public post is the determination. I'll get in touch with an escrow Ok, timestamp of post, but the post will only be valid if you send a pm with a link to it and a quote of the OP within 2 minutes. I don't really care about the opening time. How about I post, you quote, and it opens at the agreed margin. Hopefully we get this done soon. For the close we can just make this a european option and settle at the last trade on 4/15 GMT. I don't see a good reason to exercise this early anyway. We can also negotiate an early close out if we want of course. my quote was meant for early close. Yes i will post a timestamp for opening. European option is fine |
|
|
|
|
Oh just to clarify, the settlement BTC will also be calculated with the settlement price. Because we wont get in touch with escrow immediately after redemption.
|
|
|
|
0.065 BTC and i am not paying for the escrow fees
I agree with the price. While we are working out the details can we agree that the strike price floats at 201.35 above the current price? I see 448.65 as the current bitstamp price. How will the exercise price be determined? Yes, 201.35 above BSTMP. Settlement price will be the timestamp of the PM you send me when you want to settle, or else exactly april 15 23:59 59seconds GMT. Ok? Last trade from bitstamp ticker? yes the last price of the bitstamp ticker exactely before your PM timestamp. Ok? Also I am fine with all big escrows: tomatecage, danny, anon PM one of them and pay them and tell them to PM me directly. Timestamp after public post, okay? With PM to notify, but the public post is the determination. I'll get in touch with an escrow Ok, timestamp of post, but the post will only be valid if you send a pm with a link to it and a quote of the OP within 2 minutes. |
|
|
|
What do I have to do to get on the Nxt TestNet?
Would like to try creating and launching my own asset in preparation for that to launch. Thanks!
http://nxtra.org/nxt-client/It is really easy, just follow the steps on creating a new account there. Also come back here and ask for test NXT |
|
|
|
0.065 BTC and i am not paying for the escrow fees
I agree with the price. While we are working out the details can we agree that the strike price floats at 201.35 above the current price? I see 448.65 as the current bitstamp price. How will the exercise price be determined? Yes, 201.35 above BSTMP. Settlement price will be the timestamp of the PM you send me when you want to settle, or else exactly april 15 23:59 59seconds GMT. Ok? Last trade from bitstamp ticker? yes the last price of the bitstamp ticker exactely before your PM timestamp. Ok? Also I am fine with all big escrows: tomatecage, danny, anon PM one of them and pay them and tell them to PM me directly. |
|
|
|
0.065 BTC and i am not paying for the escrow fees
I agree with the price. While we are working out the details can we agree that the strike price floats at 201.35 above the current price? I see 448.65 as the current bitstamp price. How will the exercise price be determined? Yes, 201.35 above BSTMP. Settlement price will be the timestamp of the PM you send me when you want to settle, or else exactly april 15 23:59 59seconds GMT. Ok? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
