Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 10:47:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 [192] 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 ... 389 »
3821  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 🛠️ Bitcoin LightningATM on: September 25, 2021, 11:48:35 PM
Does anyone have a source for cheaply getting the case made in the US?

I went to my local guy who does plastic cutting and for a one off job the price was $75. Which is just nuts for something that although it does look cool, is not going to do much other then sit around and be shown off to people now and then.

-Dave
3822  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Elizabeth Warren claims on: September 25, 2021, 10:09:53 PM
She’s doing her job, she’s a government shill trying to protect the USD’s position as the world reserve currency. Don’t pay attention to or follow anything she advises or states. She’s part of a group of boomers desperately trying to save a crumbling fiat currency in a new world. Unfortunately for her & those in power, there’s only so much money printing that can be done before the arse falls out of the world.

Opt out & take control of your own financial future, protect yourself against their mindless money printing & subsequent unacceptable inflation by buying bitcoin. Control your own future & protect your family & future generations financial future.

Elizabeth Warren, Gary Gensler, Janet Yellen, Jerome Powell, they’re all fighting a losing battle. Bitcoin is a massive part of the worldwide future of finance. They will regret their attempted suppression of innovation. The US must adapt or get left behind.

That covers 90% of it. The last 10% is the fact that she (and most other politicians) have to cater to what they think the majority of their constituents want an like. So people hear ransowmware & crypto she has to give the 20 second sound bite about it.


A six-month period has seen $80 million stolen from Crypto as a result of scams, claims Elizabeth Warren. Aside from the $11.11 Billion in fines US banks received for shady business, she neglects to mention the $12 Billion in overdraft fees consumers will pay to banks in 2020!

What is your opinion in this regard?

Yeah this shit absolutely infuriates me. What is she doing about all of the fraud by big banks? Wells Fargo was fined a ridiculous amount of money for making fake account through it's clients two years ago and was just recently fined again for not making the clients whole, another 250 million! How many people are going to end up in jail? ... the answer is a big fucking fat zero! Hypocrites !

What gets me is the fact that people keep going back for more. The 1st 5 times Wells Fargo screwed you over were not that bad so you go back for a 6th?
It's not like it's not common knowledge of how bad they are, and what they do. And its not like it's that difficult to go to one of the dozens of other banks and credit unions all over the place and move your account.

I deal with Chase as my primary bank, did not start with them my account wound up there through decades of mergers with other banks. Technically I have had the same account and routing number for 30+ years and probably 6 or 7 bank names. They treat me well and since I have been with them for so long I do get a lot of perks. But lets be honest, the 1st time they screw me over, I am gone. Due to a hilarious miscommunication a couple of years ago I put in a check that was not good at the time I deposited it. So it bounced and I got hit with a $15 fee. I called and they took it off. Would I have left if they had not, probably not since it was my mistake anyway.

Had a the same issue with the 2nd check issued with the same miscommunication. BoA would not take the fee off. This was after they lost another deposit about a month earlier for close to a week and that *was their fault*. Pointed that out to them, they did not care. Moved that checking account to a local credit union. Had I not had the issue with the lost deposit I probably would not have cared, since yes I did put in a bad check. But not to give me back a few bucks after they did make a major whoops a month earlier.  I'm gone.

When I hear about people getting hit by Wells Fargo time and time again, I just think about all the people who send their BTC to the double your crypto scams. Or the ones who we see here on the forum who play at the online casinos that have dozens of scam reports against them but figure "1xBit has scammed 100s of other people, but I'll be fine"

-Dave
3823  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: CHECKING PRIVATE KEY on: September 25, 2021, 09:49:44 PM
...You should connect your Electrum server with your full node and then your Electrum client with your Electrum server. Now you can create a wallet by importing private keys and it'll return you their balances.

If you have any questions tell me. I'm willing to help you achieve all the above, I just find it honestly a loss of time for you....
Although as you said it's pointless no matter what, for efficiency it would probably be easier to write something the queried the electrumx database directly instead of using the client.

I agree, although querying database directly require you to understand how Electrum server software (e.g. ElectrumX and electrs) design the database. Alternatively, since different implementation still follow Electrum Protocol (https://electrumx.readthedocs.io/en/latest/protocol.html), you could create script to perform communication with Electrum server through JSON RPC.

Querying the database directly if you code well is going to be a lot more efficient then JSON RPC. Not that JSON RPC is bad, its not not as efficient.
The downside of direct to the DB is you probably have to do have a bit more coding and know a bit about the DB structure.

Running it on your own box that has enough power, which would be faster it's probably going really depend on how well you wrote the scripts.

-Dave
3824  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Tough problems during running a Full node on: September 25, 2021, 09:27:41 PM
How is your cooling? Thermal throttle can be a big issue with RPis at times.
The case I have covers the cooling part.

So long as you are sure. Is the case a big heatsink or is there a fan?

What type of USB drive are you using?
A 1TB external one with USB 3.0. Specifically, this one. (Yes, I plugged it on the 3.0 port)

That is more then fine. It's actually newer then the one I had on my old node in a box setup.

Are you downloading over clearnet or TOR?
I'm downloading over Tor, but I don't think that's the issue. I believe that what's taking so long is the verification of those blocks.

Actually TOR might be the issue, I am re-syncing 2 nodes on the exact same hardware one TOR on clearnet and as of now the clearnet is at 55% and the TOR is below 40% done.

Have you ever experienced a hard drive issue from a power surge?
I did! And it needed to re-verify the whoooole damn thing. I don't keep a backup of the blockchain though, since verification takes much longer than the actual downloading part, no matter the setup, so I don't see the need.

It saves the bandwidth and a bit of time. And you don't have to have it online so you can do it anywhere with any device and just come back later.
If you want to say put up 3 more nodes to play with, you don't have to download the entire blockchain 3 more times, its just copy - paste - wait.

-Dave
3825  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Chainalysis runs Electrum nodes. on: September 25, 2021, 03:31:27 PM
What is an "Electrum Node" and how do I get one?
Any Electrum node or server is simply a bitcoin full verifying node that has a searchable database.

An electrum server, is a bitcoin node with a separate database server that allows any lite wallet that follows the protocol to query and send BTC transactions.

There are several implementations of it in a few different programming languages that fulfill different roles.

There are ones that run on a lot less resources but are only really suitable for one person running a small wallet and others that can handle 1000s of queries from dozens of people at the same time.

Not saying one is better then the other, as always use the right tool for the job.

-Dave
3826  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 5 Ways To Buy Bitcoin With Credit Card Instantly on: September 25, 2021, 02:32:31 PM
The biggest thing missed here is where you are located and what are the fees really going to look like in the end.

Any why credit cards? You are going to take a massive hit with fees. Cash will always be better.
And if you are US based you can use many services / ATMs that take cash.

If I am in the middle of Mexico or Italy the answer is going to be different of what is the best way to do it instantly.

-Dave
3827  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Tough problems during running a Full node on: September 25, 2021, 01:42:06 PM
Was this an older 2GB unit? Slow internet? something seems off.
Well, no. I'm not having an older 2GB unit neither a slow internet connection. Does it matter if I've set txindex=1? I'm running both main net and test net, but that shouldn't be the issue. I really don't know what went that wrong. The synchronization started in 30st of August and ended yesterday. (Almost a month)

The txindex=1 might slow it down a tiny bit like add two or three days onto since you are indexing as you go but not weeks of time.

Running both mainnet and testnet really should not matter much, once again add a day or two onto the sync and once the testnet is fully done it should really make no resource difference.

How is your cooling? Thermal throttle can be a big issue with RPis at times.

What type of USB drive are you using? A slower 5400RPM with limited cache might cause some slowdowns as it's indexing and downloading and verifying 2 blcokchains.

Are you downloading over clearnet or TOR? I have had some painfully slow downloads over TOR for the initial sync at times.

Could also be a combination of things. None of which add a lot of time. But 3 days here and 3 days there and another few days due to something else....

I would make a backup of the blockchain files someplace for now, so if you ever have to or want to do it again you have a known clean copy of the blockchain up to today.
Does not help you figure out why it took so long this time, but if you have to do it again it's one less thing to worry about.

-Dave
3828  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The Lightning Network FAQ on: September 25, 2021, 12:15:19 PM
So I decided to put together an umbel box to compare it to raspiblitz / mynode

Hardware:
RPi4 4GB $55
Argon ONE M.2 Case for Raspberry Pi 4 $45
1TB M.2 sata drive $79
16GB SD card & Power Supply $15.00

So total cost $194 (+ tax)

Power draw during initial sync 1.1A
[image removed]

Still playing around with it. Will report in later.
VERY VERY slick GUI in my opinion.

Seems to be a nice build, I like the app store concept to add features / services.

Might be my new go-to node in a box.

-Dave


Wow, that seems a bit expensive. Anyway, it looks nice, compact. Do you see any possible problems with temperatures and/or noise?

No issues, the fan is really quiet. You do have have to make sure that when assembling it the thermal pads that come with it are on the chips properly and that thay do touch the heatsinks on the case but that is about it.

As for the cost. I could have easily saved $30+ by not using an case that has a m.2 drive attachment included and going for a cheap generic one, and another $30+ by using a regular USB drive instead of a m.2 but I went for looks and style. And still came to under $200

So
This: https://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-HDTB410XK3AA-Canvio-Portable-External/dp/B079D359S6/
instead of this: https://www.newegg.com/silicon-power-ace-a55-1tb/p/N82E16820301414 (which has actually gone up a bit since I ordered it)

And
This: https://www.amazon.com/iUniker-Raspberry-Aluminium-Heatsink-Supply/dp/B07D3S4KBK/
instead of this: https://www.amazon.com/Argon-Raspberry-Support-B-Key-Compatible/dp/B08MJ3CSW7

Which would have brought the cost down to under $150 including tax.
Can also get a pre packaged RPi kit that has the Pi & Case & Power Supply & SD and saved another few dollars.

But none of it would not look as cool :-)

With the Argon case since it gives you full size HDMI ports and since it has the internal drive when I bring it someplace to show people it's easier to carry and easier to show the output on a TV without brining the mini-HDMI to full size cable.

-Dave
3829  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Chainalysis runs Electrum nodes. on: September 25, 2021, 02:22:48 AM

If you really need a block explorer, then you can run your own instance of mempool.space. All the code is open source, and they even give you instructions: https://github.com/mempool/mempool
How cool would it be: explorer.loyce.club Cheesy But it takes more resources than my current posts archive, and to me it's not worth the cost of a powerful VPS (or VDS).


<cough> Node in a box </cough> and run it at home. Yes I am making assumptions about your home internet, and that you have an RPi and drive handy but still.

Seriously, for the most part it's just storage. The explorers do not take that much CPU / RAM to run till you get dozens of hits a minute.

-Dave
3830  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Tough problems during running a Full node on: September 25, 2021, 01:39:40 AM
With my Raspberry Pi 4 it has taken around a month to finish. It should take less to you if you're having a better CPU than my Pi's. (Which you'll most likely have)

That is a REALLY long time. This config: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158920.msg58008085#msg58008085 did it in under a week.
Was this an older 2GB unit? Slow internet? something seems off. Unless you are doing something else with the Pi at the same time.
Or if you don't have good cooling it might throttle a lot. A bad power supply might also cause some issues, but a month still seems long.

-Dave
3831  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: CHECKING PRIVATE KEY on: September 24, 2021, 05:45:36 PM
...You should connect your Electrum server with your full node and then your Electrum client with your Electrum server. Now you can create a wallet by importing private keys and it'll return you their balances.

If you have any questions tell me. I'm willing to help you achieve all the above, I just find it honestly a loss of time for you....

Although as you said it's pointless no matter what, for efficiency it would probably be easier to write something the queried the electrumx database directly instead of using the client.
If you don't mind slightly old data, with the dump that loyce has it is simple to put it into some db and just run queries.

For more efficiency still just import the addresses, you don't need the amounts. Once you match a funded address you then look at a live explorer to see if there is anything there.

Still as waste of time......

-Dave
3832  Economy / Reputation / Re: iv4n: Looking for feedback - should the negative tag remain? on: September 24, 2021, 12:07:17 PM
I think it should be changed to neutral.

I know I have gone on this rant before but I'll do it again briefly here.
On this forum as of now there is no differentiation between 'trading feedback' and 'general feedback'
So, when you leave a negative or positive for anyone who you have not traded with or know actively how they trade it distorts it.

Looking at his feedback iv4n has promoted many questionable things over the years, so if we had 'general feedback' that would be a good place for a negative.
But we don't, we only have the 1 feedback. And it is supposed to be for TRADING. Does not matter what else they say or do.

If you don't like it, talk to the boss:

LoyceV's guide seems reasonable.

The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.

...

Ratings

 - Leave positive ratings if you actively think that trading with this person is safer than with a random person.
 - Leave negative ratings if you actively think that trading with the person is less safe than with a random person.
 - Unstable behavior could very occasionally be an acceptable reason for leaving negative trust, but if it looks like you're leaving negative trust due to personal disagreements, then that's inappropriate. Ratings are not for popularity contests, virtue signalling, punishing people for your idea of wrongthink, etc.
 - Post-flags, ratings have less impact. It's only an orange number. Some amount of "leave ratings first, ask questions later" may be OK. For example, if you thought that YoBit was a serious ongoing scam, the promotion of which was extremely problematic, then it'd be a sane use of the system to immediately leave negative trust for everyone wearing a YoBit signature. (I don't necessarily endorse this viewpoint or this action: various parts of the issue are highly subjective. But while I wouldn't blame people for excluding someone who did this, I wouldn't call it an abuse of the system.)
 - Exercise a lot of forgiveness. People shouldn't be "permanently branded" as a result of small mistakes from which we've all moved past. Oftentimes, people get a rating due to unknowingly acting a bit outside of the community's consensus on appropriate behavior, and such ratings may indeed be appropriate. But if they correct the problem and don't seem likely to do it again, remove the rating or replace it with a neutral. Even if someone refuses to agree with the community consensus (ie. they refuse to back down philosophically), if they're willing to refrain from the behavior, their philosophical difference should not be used to justify a rating. For example, in the YoBit mass-ratings example above, ratings should be immediately removed after the person removes the signature, even if they maintain and continue to argue that they didn't do anything wrong. If someone agrees to "follow 'the law' without agreeing to it", that should be enough.
...
3833  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: JPMorgan Facing Money Laundering and Bribery Allegations on: September 24, 2021, 11:18:04 AM
Makes you wonder how many things like this happen that have nothing to do with JPM Chase / Petrobras / whoever and more about the employees working for them.
Back in 2011 a barrel of oil was in the $110 range. So 300,000 barrels is barely $33 million in total. Even if JPM was getting them at a hefty discount (say 1/2 price) and reselling them above market price (say $120 a barrel) you are talking about less then $20 million.

Not worth it for a major bank. Worth it for a few corrupt employees on both sides.

Not saying banks don't do bad things just that the numbers really look too small for them to bother at the institutional level.

As for the amount of bad things that other places do with other things vs BTC it really is just a numbers game and PR.
BTC does not have anyone running a PR office to bury bad news about it or correct misinformation in the news. So it's easier to bash.

But, it's not like BTC is going away.

-Dave


3834  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The Lightning Network FAQ on: September 23, 2021, 06:37:08 PM
So I decided to put together an umbel box to compare it to raspiblitz / mynode

Hardware:
RPi4 4GB $55
Argon ONE M.2 Case for Raspberry Pi 4 $45
1TB M.2 sata drive $79
16GB SD card & Power Supply $15.00

So total cost $194 (+ tax)

Power draw during initial sync 1.1A


Still playing around with it. Will report in later.
VERY VERY slick GUI in my opinion.

Seems to be a nice build, I like the app store concept to add features / services.

Might be my new go-to node in a box.

-Dave
3835  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A whale moved $2bn in bitcoin 540 times in a short time frame on: September 23, 2021, 02:00:59 PM
As others have said, looking at it, it's 95% certain to be an exchange.
They took all their inputs and now customers are withdrawing and they are shrinking the wallet.

I am saying most likely an exchange since most casinos tend to send out their payouts at scheduled intervals and in batches.
This looks like people just withdrawing over time.

-Dave
3836  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Chainalysis runs Electrum nodes. on: September 23, 2021, 11:18:52 AM
If you can run your own Electrum node then why not just run a simple full node. The full node needs less resources too!

Very good point! I was studying yesterday the options for having my own Electrum server and I just noticed that it cannot be done with pruned full node. And then, whatever I do, the full node is already all I need. And lately Bitcoin Core also accepts HW, which is something I surely have to try out.

You kind of need an electrum node for mobile wallets / lightweight wallets on your phone / tablet / netbook anything that where even running a pruned node is not viable.
Even if you have a powerhouse laptop that can handle everything without stress if you go on vacation how is the Wi-Fi / Internet in general at the hotel? Do you want to have to sit for 2 hours while you get the blocks you missed while getting there because of crap bandwidth?

How many of you actually tried to run your own explorer?
With the way how world is going right now, I think we are soon going to have to host everything on our own.

More or less yes. You either do it yourself or have 0 idea what is being done with the data.
I have an open electrum node for people to use. Am I more or less trustworthy then some random public node? I know I am, or would at least like to think I am.
You don't know that.

-Dave

3837  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Chainalysis runs Electrum nodes. on: September 22, 2021, 10:47:55 PM
Lesson one is to run your own node.
Lesson two is to not look up your own transactions on block explorers.
Lesson three is to do everything over Tor.

If you really need a block explorer, then you can run your own instance of mempool.space. All the code is open source, and they even give you instructions: https://github.com/mempool/mempool

I'm not sure I believe their statements regarding Monero until I see evidence to back it up. Of course Chainalysis will claim they've been able to provide some "meaningful leads" (which could mean almost anything) on Monero transactions, because that's what they want the US government to believe so that they will keep giving them expensive contracts.

And I know some people probably want me to shut up about them by now, but you don't even need to know anything about linux / programming / tech because all of the node in a box appliances that I keep talking about have some form of a block explorer built in or with a 1 click install.
raspiblitz / mynodebtc / umbrel

Take your pick and do it yourself.

-Dave
3838  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Chainalysis runs Electrum nodes. on: September 22, 2021, 07:13:24 PM
Walletexplorer.com, a block explorer site secretly operated by Chainalysis, has provided law enforcement with “meaningful leads,” the documents say.

Is it really a surprise though? The walletexplorer creator works for Chainalysys. It even says so on the main site.

I remember some conversation abut that when it popped up like 4 or 5 years ago. And some people were upset because they ran a bunch of queries for firstbits there and were freaking out that 'the man' now has their information.  Roll Eyes

As for the Electrum nodes. The more you want privacy the more work you have to put into it, by running your own nodes & servers. The issue is that too many people do not know how, and of those that do know how to do it, many do not want to be bothered.

Not saying that we should throw our hands up and do nothing, just dealing with the reality of it all.

-Dave
3839  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Tough problems during running a Full node on: September 22, 2021, 04:22:25 PM
Unless you have very limited bandwidth, less then 4GB RAM or less then a 500GB free on your HDD there is no reason you cannot download the entire blockchain.
Depending on the amount of RAM in your system and speed of your internet connection it can take from a day or so to couple of weeks.

As n0nce asked. What is the issue you are having?

-Dave
3840  Economy / Reputation / Re: archive.today / archive.fo / archive.??? being blocked by some ISPs (DNS ISSUE) on: September 22, 2021, 12:59:33 PM
At least if you use 1.1.1.1 as DNS, this issue is already few known for past few years. According at https://webapps.stackexchange.com/q/135222, the problem is complicated and looks like won't be solved anytime soon. I would recommend people to use different archive service if they wish everyone could see archived page easily.

Thanks for finding that.
I am surprised that archive.today does not have that piece of information on their front page.

Such information doesn't fit front page, unless it recently happened. Seperate page to mention technical problem would be better.

But there is not any link on their site that I can see that says "having issues reaching us at times, click here"
Even you posted the link from slackexchnage about it, nothing on their archive itself.
Yes, I am complaining about a customer service issue on a free site / service. But, how many people try it, have it not work for one reason or another and never go back to them.

Now, with firefox pushing the secure DNS and using cloudflare by default I don't see the situation getting better.

-Dave
Pages: « 1 ... 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 [192] 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 ... 389 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!