I am neither moderator nor legendary. But I tested this.

For reaching junior member, excluding merit, you need 30 activity. If you make 1 post per day, it takes 30 days to get 30 activity and become a junior member.
I entered today's date. It says that I will become a junior member 44 days later.

I also think that it would be better to remove the word "average".
Assume that I make 30 posts on day 1 and make no post on days 2-30. In the first 30 days, I have made 1 post per day on average. In this case, I cannot become a junior member.

Freebitco is using parimutuel betting system. So, odds are not offered by freebitco. They are determined by users. Odds for Trump are now smaller because more money has been put on Trump.
Till now 62,000 people have bet on Trump, while only 33,000 people have bet on Biden. Unlike many polls, people here in freebitco believe that Trump will win the presidential election. 

This is not limited to Development & Technical Discussion board.

Posts made in child boards of child boards are not shown in the home page even if they are the latest post made in that board. Posts are shown in the home page only if they have been made in the main board or its child board (Posts made in child boards of child boards are excluded).

Below is an example from Marketplace board




According to what is shown in the home page, the latest post made in Marketplace board has been made by hulla.

As you see in the image below that post has been made in Services which is child board of Marketplace board.




Actually, the latest post in Marketplace board has been made by cryptograffiti. (Look at the image below). But it's not shown as the latest post of Marketplace board in the home page.
cryptograffiti has made that post in Collectibles which is child board of one of child boards of Marketplace board.




The case you referred to was similar to my example.

The post you expected to be shown in the home page had been made in Electrum board which is child board of a child board in Development & Technical Discussion board while the post shown in the home page as the latest post had been made in Wallet Software board which is a child board in Development & Technical Discussion board.

I just searched for this and found the following topic created by OmegaStarScream. Follow suggestions given in this thread. Seems that they worked for OmegaStarScream.

Error when executing Electrum

Yes, you can withdraw to native segwit addresses.
Read the following post made by TheQuin.


I also tested it myself.
Look at the image below. Now, I have a pending withdrawal to a native segwit address.

Thanks for the explanation.
Doesn't a transaction need to be validated by majority of nodes, so it can be added to a block?
Don't nodes usually reject such transactions?

In the case OP is talking about, majority of nodes preferred to validate the second transaction. I know that some nodes may approve the second transaction. My question is why majority of nodes approved the second transaction?

The first transaction had been broadcast 6 minutes before the first one. So, majority of nodes likely received the first transaction before the second one. Why did majority of nodes replaced the first transaction with the second one?

The scammer was very very lucky. Such transactions don't have big chance to be confirmed. Because most of nodes validate the transaction they see first. Am I right?

In addition to what stated by bob123, not only RBF-enabled transactions shouldn't be accepted, but also you shouldn't accept transactions that have an unconfirmed parent transaction with a RBF flag.
A transaction that has a RBF-enabled parent is even more risky than an RBF-enabled transaction.

For abusing a RBF transaction, it is needed to change the outputs as well (I don't know any wallet that allow this).
For abusing a transaction that has a RBF parent, the only thing needed is to bump the fee of the parent transaction. (It is allowed in all wallets supporting RBF such as Electrum)

The fee Trustedcoin charge for signing transactions is 0.00005 BTC per transaction if you pay for 20 transactions at once and 0.000025 per transaction if you pay for 100 transactions at once.


TrustedCoin - Electrum Two-Factor Auth Help

Replace by fee transactions can be abused. Because once you bump the fee the first transaction disappear and it is replaced by a new one. But I don't think child pay for parent method can be abused unless I am missing something.
Using CPFP method, you can only accelerate a transaction and it's impossible to reverse the transaction, remove it, change outputs, etc.

I wonder why nodes didn't reject the second transaction. As far as I know, nodes reject the second transaction even if the fee paid for it is much higher.
How did the scammer managed to do this? I don't think that's easy to implement a double spend attack.

This doesn't always work. Because there is no guarantee that the new transaction will be accepted by nodes unless you are very very lucky.
Even you try to broadcast a new transaction spending same inputs with a much higher fee, there's a high probability that nodes reject the transaction and don't propagate it.
The scammer in question was very lucky or managed to make a double spend in a way I'm not aware of.
As far as I know, for having a successful double spend, it's not enough to make a new transaction with a higher fee. The transaction will be rejected by majority of nodes even if the first transaction hasn't been confirmed yet and the fee paid for the second transaction is much higher.

This link includes only posts made in this page not all posts in the thread. Once you open a different page, you redirect to bitcointalk unless the page has been archived by someone before.
You need to archive all pages one by one.
Can use LoyceV's tool instead.

https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_996318.html

The fee paid for the first transaction (stuck transaction) does return to you. But since for canceling a transaction, you need to make a new transaction to yourself, you have to pay fee for a new transaction.
This is same as bitcoin when you double spend a stuck transaction to yourself.

The chance to win 200 dollar in the free roll is not 1 in 10,000. The chance is 1 in 20,000. Because probability of hitting 0 and 10000 is half of probability of hitting other numbers.
Every time you play the free roll, a decimal number is calculated and is rounded off to the nearest whole number. For hitting 10,000 the decimal number must be between 9999.50 and 10000.

Yes, the website is working fine and without any problem. They are even allowing people to make withdrawals faster than before.
Below is the announcement made by Bitmex.

United States CFTC & DOJ Filing

No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.

Look at the image below.



BPIP (edited)

A: My rank if number of earned merits in the last 30 days is considered.
B: My rank if number of earned merits in the last 90 days is considered.
...
...

If I click on "A", I would see list of top-merited users in the last 30 days.
If I click on "B", I would see list of top-merited users in the last 90 days.
...
...

Electrum versions older than 3.3.4 were vulnerable to phishing attack. In versions older than 3.3.4, servers could display a message asking you to download the new update (malware).
For more details, click the link below.
when broadcasting transaction, error message from server is displayed as is

Since, the version currently installed in your system is 3.3.4, I don't think you will see such a message unless that's a fake version. (Ignore it if such a message is displayed).

By the way, why not to remove the currently installed version and download the latest version from the official website?

Thanks for the update.

Since signature campaign managers usually ask applicants number of merits earned in the last 120 days, it would be useful to add 120 days as well.

Can you also add list of most merited users based on merits earned in the last X days?

Read the topic created by 1miau.

[Guide] How to create your customized Bitcoin-Address (vanitygen) – step by step

That's not the only post that has been edited.
According to Loyce.club, adomanim has made 15 posts and 9 of them have been deleted. All 6 remaining posts have been edited and include links to external websites. He puts links inside the text.


Post history

This user is breaking rule number 24 and should be nuked.