It seems rather ironic that you're accusing them of having poor grammar.



Do you even see what you're typing? Holy shit, nearly every single sentence is shittily constructed. Never mind grammar, but the semantics are impossible to decipher. Inconsistency in plurality/singularity, adjacent vowels, incorrect verb tense usage, etc.

You type like Yoda.

Why? It undermines the value of the donations from everyone prior to the proposed change.

Let us remember that this forum should not rely on signature campaigns or ICOs. Especially not the latter, given that this is bitcointalk after all.

And you don't really need any title (?) to identify them. Not only would this take a large amount of moderation for a (mainly) pointless feature but it would also require a lot of subjectivity: when projects look shady or go scam.

The account is already tagged by KWH. There's no real point of adding any redundant negative feedback to it as anything from the account can essentially be considered garbage/false already. It can't do much harm, and if it does then additional feedback wouldn't really help anyway.

By the way, did you have any proof that the account was yours? i.e. a staked address/address sent in PM? If so then you could potentially recover it.

If your English is shitty then why do you think that it's good enough quality? Sure. You can be ESL (or E nth L) and not be a shitposter. But that doesn't help when you use poor grammar and crude sentence structures. What's with the random capitalization and lack of capitalization on your i's? I think most people who are half-decent at English can at least get that right.

Spamming 'sir' everywhere doesn't help your case, either.

---

Also, remember that trust is given at a user's discretion.

Next stage is 56 as you can see. Activity is refreshed every 30 minutes so it may not have updated when you were posting. It's always in 14-activity increment chunks, so you won't hit 60 (Member status) until the next activity period, which is on the 30th.

And activity periods are not every two weeks since your registration, rather they follow a rough two-week schedule on every other Tuesday. The exact times can be found on this Google Sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dDySMB2lsOIIkUXuax2rXL30gv656E4xTsFcC2zQHkg/pubhtml

Tch, what do you want people to do about it? You can't hold people's hands with phishing sites. There's always going to be more, like the heads of a hydra. Chop one off and two more grow.
It's not like you can just prevent BCT mirror and/or phishing sites from popping up. There's just no feasible way of controlling them.
Best way to deal with things (on your end) is to use a password manager: that way if it's the wrong site you won't even be able to log in.

That's weird. Why would an ICO want a Finnish announcement thread if there isn't even a board set up in the first place? Whether or not this is a catch-22 doesn't matter: if there isn't an intrinsic demand for such a board i.e. not to perpetuate ICO ANN threads (because that would be as pointless as teaching philosophy) then there shouldn't be one.

These are mainly bad. There is some good in them, though. They can be used as a sort of archive. Because of the scraped content, some deleted/edited posts may still be on that parallel site and so you can use that to potentially bust alternate accounts.

---

Think of it as if there was no Trashcan section and everything was available.

The price was always designated at 50 BTC. Changing it to fit anything right now would be unfair to the original donators. Plus, there isn't much additional benefit to donating such an amount—if you wanted to donate, you can just send any sum of bitcoins to the donation address.

---

You're only missing out on a Donator board which I assume is pretty dead and the ability to change your custom title at will.

This was implemented before. IIRC it was because there was a debate about the trashing (??) of the thread and rather than get rid of it because it was a source of information, theymos simply removed signatures for it. Find the thread discussing this if you want more precise information.

How about in all stickied Meta threads too? I constantly see them being used by newbies to just farm up activity. They agree or say it's a good source of information and are doing fuck-all to the forum. And then there's the ones that are asking questions which are answered in the thread.

bumpthrust: it looks like it may be possible to play poker on BetKing soon. I'm pretty excited for this development since you don't really have any reasonable poker room operators here in the crypto scene.

Where? I don't see any proof of linkage and you're not really providing any substantial proof of it. Just like every single other person who creates these accusations: the proof is either non-existent or of such a pitiful degree that you wouldn't even wipe your ass with a print of it.

Also, that's a lot of campaigns to manage and even more posts made every day over the accounts... Where does LaudarkStarTriz find the time to do it?

Hey, you posted at the same time as TMAN! You must be the same person as him! There is no sense in your logic and the connection is unsound.

If two people post at roughly the same time, that shouldn't be considered a connection. If this were the case then you would be connecting pretty much every single account on this forum together. Would waiting an hour prevent you from thinking that two consecutive posts are made by the same person?

No, I'm not. Because I am thermos and I own this forum so I will ban you right now!

Also what the fuck? AFAIK, sea cucumbers can't make anything, never mind connections

Are you butthurt? Did poor old actmyname tickle you a little too hard?

Voice your opinions and speak to the public about how I exposed disgraced you with my negative feedback and archaic language!

Petition to the public about how I am obviously not an alt of DarkStar_, aTriz, The Pharmacist, Lauda, thermos!

Enthrall all of us with how I have a ton of negative feedback from scammers completely legitimate and honest people!

Don't forget to use your blue text color and eye-raping bold styling and cool sunglasses smilies!

Disclaimer: write the word "sir" in your reply and you will be ignored

---

Or alternatively discuss positive experiences with me: that's also cool.

Agreed. It doesn't matter whether you're attempting to deceive adults or children, experts or uninformed—the intention is the same.

I think it's also important to add this critical fact: not all miners are well-informed. If you consider the recent influx of bitcoin users then you'll certainly see some percentage of that dabble in mining. Some with ignorance and some without. To the latter, "Bitcoin Interest" may be deceptive to them. Wouldn't you agree?

Because these people are farming their accounts and so the easiest place that they can post are these stickied threads. That, or they're ignorant as fuck and don't really want to read. You can definitely see these when you consider the activity of the users that create such posts – in fact, some make threads which just bloat up the Meta section – and the ease of access to information.

With a search tool and plenty of time, who needs to create these posts?
a) Lazy bums
b) Account farmers

Here's some:
bapetdik
santino11
Blackmet
4U
Requim
Naflcopa

among others on this ONE page: https://archive.is/S1Coo

---

I'm also tagging them with red trust. Along with some other users.

[edit]: a lot of users.

If your private key is compromised, then you have to move whatever you have left to a new wallet as soon as you can. Make sure to keep this next one in a safe place and properly secure so that this doesn't happen again. (How did this even happen in the first place?)

Not going to talk about the reference Lauda linked to your trust feedback because I'm not particularly informed on the whole jamalaezaz shenanigan.

---

These are just empty insults. I don't see the point.

Yeah, because sometimes a reference is not required for feedback. When it covers a variety of different topics and can be found consistently, is there really a point to link any specific page/thread?

Suppose you're adding a negative feedback to a spammer's profile. Do you seriously link every single shitpost they created? No.

Similar to the above.

If you read the feedback comments they're usually abstract if there isn't a reference.

Imagine: how would you link a reference if your comment was: 'Leibniz has time and time again proved that they have the sharpest wit'?