Actually he's wearing a paid Yolodice ad right now I didn't know this, but you're right. However, I expect a referral link to earn less than a signature campaign. Unless he catches a rare whale who wagers a lot. Perhaps that's the plan. In any event, quickseller made a remark that nullius had "moved on" and I posted that comment on their trust wall feedback as a neutral comment. The first thing they did when they came back was to give me distrust and demanded I remove that innocuous neutral comment. (then worsened their own trust scores and left again). nullius is engaging in default trust abuse plain and simple. |
|
|
|
|
Always read the contract.
|
|
|
|
If parents are truly concerned about this...
Did you as a child want to tell your parents about everything you were doing when you were that age - your first kiss, smoke, drink, drugs - whatever it was there was always something you kept from your parents. Youth today have a mobile phone from their early teens (sometimes younger) they'll get and share apps with their friends at school, so you have no way of knowing whether or not they are chatting, gambling or anything else with strangers online. Online safety begins at home, yes Casino's (if they are registered in a jurisdiction) will have an obligation to put up warnings, but can't be expected to do the parents job for them. |
|
|
|
|
Not without KYC. Even then the checks and balances in place may not be tight enough, they could simply be an email and phone number.
Most people want to be able to chance upon an online Casino, have a few rolls and decide if they wnt to keep playing, if not they move on without having to go through the whole KYC process and that's the rub.
|
|
|
|
If you read any of the threads recommending proven escrows, you will read numerous stories of persons wanting to establish themselves as escrows. They are all told that they need to establish themselves as trusted members of the Forum before entering into the escrow business. The OP CryCrptoCry does not appear to have conducted any trusted transactions here and only has one piece of feedback:  which is not a stellar start to their career.
Ordinarily I would not recommend anyone pass their winnings in the heat of the moment to a third person immediately after a win and I certainly wouldn't recommend anyone use this person as a bank until they prove themselves here. |
|
|
|
Bro, I am not Otto diesel. Only merit and same telegram name. Other proof? Nothing ...
Because i am not otto
You have the same telegram name as otto_diesel - is that allowed?
Why did you trust otto_diesel then fifteen weeks later remove your trust of otto_diesel in the default trust? |
|
|
|
|
You really need to brush up on statistics and then look to probability. I've already answered your question, but if you want to toss a Billion times (short Billion, or long Billion - it matters not) then go right ahead.
Try Roulette, the Red and Black pay 1:1 and the outcome (asterisks) is about 50%/50% - note the asterisks - the green zero (or double zero) is the house edge. Go to a live Casino and watch how many times one colour or the other comes out in a row. Not more that four or five times in a row.
|
|
|
|
gumusi appears in these two [ Link1] [ Link2] posts of mine this week concerning potential DT trust abuse / potential merit abuse. Concerning threads started about someone and then the OP deleting posts made by the subject of the thread, both Lauda and marboroza have done just that to my posts in their moderated threads concerning myself, hence I no longer post in self moderated threads as a rule ( LoyceV's self moderated threads are a rare exception ) and have no interest in participating in threads started about me. If gumusi is indeed an alt of otto_diesel, then they also have another alt in the form of The Rose Rain u=1197467 who is banned.  03 February 2017, 04:07:28 Date Registered: otto_diesel
04 October 2017, 07:40:44 Date Registered: gumusi
08 October 2017, 21:29:43 Date Registered: The Rose Rain
27 April 2019, 10:01:57 Last Active: The Rose Rain
11 February 2020, 00:31:53 Last Active: otto_diesel
Rinse, repeat. |
|
|
|
As it turns out, the odds are less than 50%
Correct - the chances diminsh as the number of consecutive tosses occurrs. First toss ½ (being one of two sides) i.e. 50% Second toss ½ X ½ = ¼ i.e. 25% Third toss ½ X ½ X ½ = ⅛ i.e. 12.5% The probability diminishes very quickly beyond that. Results are multiplied, not added together. |
|
|
|
|
I can't recall having heard of any exchanges handling crypto that stake ever passing on the staked portion to those with the relevant crypto involved. I'm not sure I'd want to leave very much money on a Casino's website long enough for interest to be earned (unless of course I was an investor with an actual stake in the site).
ispace.co.uk set up a site that was supposed to pass on the staked funds to anyone storing funds on their site, but they just closed one day and walked away with both the invested and staked funds. The same can happen to just about any exchange or casino.
|
|
|
|
Have you tried reviewing their trust feedback page? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=177134This is what's on offer: RoooooR is purportedly an alt account of MoriartyBitcoin/Hotswap so they may well be reading this thread under yet another assumed name. May I suggest you source out an Escrow to handle any payments. |
|
|
|
|
You'd love statistics. Calculating the probability of one side over the other - there's a tale of a POW during WW II who tossed a coin over ten thousand times and concluded that if the coin is tossed a great number of times the chances of heads or tails will work out to be 50%/50%. There may be streaks where one side or the other is favoured for a short while, however over time that error will correct itself.
|
|
|
|
2 Accounts Connected:AhmadM, Astarote, ( Self Admitted) Proof:Archive [ 1a], [ 1b] So, it still possible to remove merit from an account if I ask it to theymos? I have an alt account and had given that account 1 merit from myself, after that I delete several posts from the alt (include the merited post). I know no matters how many merits I gave to my alt, it still get into merit abuse case. Whats I'm doing till now is keep that account inactive and if this account got problem i.e tempban/permaban (hope it won't happen) I will create a new account for appealing. Link profile: alt account ( bpip) What's the better solution about it guys? Keep that account inactive and never use it anymore? Or ask theymos to remove merit from that account?
|
|
|
|
Perhaps yours is in a queue behind my three (two of which might be in a holding pattern at the moment?) |
|
|
|
...
The OP has earned (so far) 10% of all their merits off of the back of this thread, so they can't be that bad a poster to be able to scrape in the merits. |
|
|
|
|
Would have been good if this thread had been a poll. Just be yourself, but don't take everything said to you to heart. If you take on board any *constructive* criticisms, then your posts will improve. The more you engage with others, the more "feel" for the expectations this place has. (Just don't take everything to heart).
|
|
|
|
In satoshi case I would changed the red "Banned" to the green "Locked", it seems to be not a hard work to do that. "Banned" sounds wild, "Locked" would be understandable for community while "green" color would manifest it can be unlocked any time when satoshi comes back, IMO.
Similar to the old scammer tag, perhaps a user's profile can be changed to this:  Image sourced from https://forums.collectors.com/profile/Pearlsbefore |
|
|
|
Almost 2 years later, nullius is gone again. He was last seen online on May 25th, 2020. But now, considering the pandemic world context, I am very worried about him. If anyone has any information about him, is more than welcomed to post here a few words. I PMed and emailed him a while ago, but so far I didn't receive any reply from him... You'd be about the only one worried. The writing is on the wall:  Not sure if @mindrust was testing the waters to see how their own DT chances would go if they stopped trusting @nullius, or, whether or not they intended to switch from trust to distrust of nullius but messed up the tilde. nullius would be (an assumed) DT1 (-5) if still on DT1 down from (an assumed) DT1 (-3) when they woke up on the first of January this year. https://loyce.club/trust/2019-12-28_Sat_06.13h/976210.htmlhttps://loyce.club/trust/2020-07-11_Sat_05.05h/976210.htmlIf it was a sold, or hacked account whoever was in the seat certinally drove that UID account off a cliff.
OTOH - it'd be worth following up where the ~900 merits came from (and where the corresponding ~450 merits went to): 846 merits in just under six months of posts. - It may not be about the default trust, rather where did the merits go? (or come from for that matter??) (I'd wager Cobalt9317 will come back to life soon enough)https://loyce.club/Merit/history/976210.html |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
