|
ranochigo offered 0.28BTC. I am selling it to him. Thanks for the bids!
|
|
|
|
...... It's hard. Posts like these are confusing especially when you have PPP ad. ...... I don't smoke.  Is anyone else shocked at this?
Those posts are not considered by the bitmixer campaign. So there is no confusion in this case. I said confused "for the confusion of admins/mods" not the confusion "of the payment". Admins/mods don't look whether the post get paid or not, they look whether it is spammy or not. |
|
|
|
I will tell OP about this in a moment. He might have forgotten this. I hope i'm wrong but now he has an i.p. address with how many BTC you all hold.  I don't think so. https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/docs/_K3dGCvgNXU |
|
|
|
=snip=
I think if you look through my posts and my trust ratings you will see that I have not been intentionally spamming.
Regards,
bigtimespaghetti
It's hard. Posts like these are confusing especially when you have PPP ad. wierd. oh well!
^^^... This post doesn't look spammy but... I don't smoke. Is anyone else shocked at this?
Sorry for the below copy-paste. I think these two posts have high relevance for a *ban appeal*. I don't know if you are actually participating in a discussion or trying to increase post count and thus, payment. This is same with admins. They can't know either. So you should put more effort in posting. Honestly, your posts looks spammy to me.  Everything is subjective, sometimes 100 meh quality posts spammed in a 1 day time frame catches a moderator/admin's attention more than 10 poor quality posts. There aren't post limits, however it goes without saying that at a certain point its hard to maintain post quality. People aren't banned on a whim, time is spent investigating especially in these situations where it isn't copy and paste/quote/smiley face/ +1 spam. Sometimes people spam meh - ok quality posts, but when you read the threads they are posting in, their posts aren't completely related or they are just reiterating prior posts to get the post count up or they are posting in threads that have already drawn a conclusion, and they are just reiterating points. People that post very frequently especially those with paid advertising signatures catch more attention sometimes than small spammers. Trust has no impact on bans or ban duration, while admittedly account age/status does minimally if I'm being honest. No one has a free ticket to spam, but a newbie with 5 of 10 of their post count being low quality are more likely to get a severe ban, than a member who has been active and posting high quality posts for a while, and slips up and spams a bit.
As I said, there are no rules on post count, you can post every 10 seconds if you wish, but the chances of your posts being quality decrease when you impose quotas.
I highlighted part which is the most common issue imo will i get a perm banned next time?
I tend to consider sig spam bans a class of their own, as in I don't generally lengthen the duration due to previous bans, unless you are truly a bad poster or there are some other special considerations.
Second what is sig spam? Is there a sticky that has a in depth answer like less than 10 words, posts within 5mins, 100 posts a day, 300 a week etc
A tendency to make posts in order to boost your post count, and you have an ad in your signature, particularly one that pays you per post. There is no secret invisible line that you shouldn't cross in terms of numbers, it's mostly subjective. There are people who just don't post very well in general, post "too much", or don't really have anything to say, they just like to participate in the community and post. This itself is fine. But when you add an ad to these kinds of posters, it's difficult or impossible to tell if they just aren't quality posters or if they are attempting to boost their post count. I used to err on the side of caution here because I do not want to ban the former, just the latter, but too many of the latter are slipping through the cracks because it's very difficult to gauge someone's intentions. This is the main thing that has changed lately. |
|
|
|
Ok, if that is it, which it isn't. Then the admin is supposed to let me know about it.
I have sent messages to the admins but haven't got a reply yet.
And its easy to say a post is spam, if you consider it after being banned. But they aren't. And it was permanently banned which makes it seem the spamming wasn't the reason.
If the ban appeal is denied, just try appealing again in 30 days. While permanent bans are permanent, sometimes Admins will reconsider if you haven't caused any issue and wait 30 days, sometimes longer.
so a permanent banned account still have chance to be unbanned if they wait 30 days then post appeal here? There is a chance however it is not a guarantee that your appeal will be granted. A ban that has a specific timeframe will automatically expire, assuming that you do not later evade your ban. A perm ban however will not automatically expire. If you try to evade your ban by posting outside of meta then you will likely quickly get your other accounts banned which will result in you waisting your money from either buying accounts that get banned or your "proxy tax" aka what you pay for registering an account with units of evil going to waste. Maybe the reason is another one, and not only the sig ad that you are wearing. I think the signature campaign "will be" banned in the next few month (because it is impossible to stop the spammer and who make insubstantial posts ).
Chances are high but it would be more appropriate to enforce *signature campaign rules*. |
|
|
|
False.
In reality is it the other way around.
You might not have understood what I meant. The Bitcoin address or public PGP key cannot be use to impose another person.
Most user have this information public available in their signature, contact information, keybase.io etc.
There are increased scam attempt where people tell I can't sign a message because I am using 'Wallet X' which doesn't support signing. If user(1) know what type of wallet the user(2) is using, for example Coinbase, he(1) can put that address here which make others think it is alt of other account(2). But you need it to published somewhere in bitcoin talk in order to be able to retrieve your account if it gets stolen.
That's why I also suggested to post PGP key and the link to PGP pub key hosted site will be helpful if he his PGP key has changed. Publishing a generic signed message is not cleaver, it can be used by an imposter.
If you sign something, the message must include the purpose of the signed message and include the time/date.
This is an example of a not so cleaver signed message:
Message: "This is TookDk from Bitcointalk"
Signature: <the signature>
This is much better:
Message: "Date: 2015.03.19. The purpose of this message is to prove that TookDk from Bitcointalk is in control of bitcoin address 1TookDkVTaqsCn56Xo7aMfUMAUN3NhRjN at this point in time"
Signature: <the signature>
I understand and I never recommed a person to do that. Even if one posted here, it is hard to know whether he signed it the day he posted. IMHO if signed message can include date and time automatically, it would be far better. It can also be faked by changing the date and time in your computer but I don't think an owner signing will do it when posting important things like this. |
|
|
|
I don't know if you are actually participating in a discussion or trying to increase post count and thus, payment. This is same with admins. They can't know either. So you should put more effort in posting. Honestly, your posts looks spammy to me. Everything is subjective, sometimes 100 meh quality posts spammed in a 1 day time frame catches a moderator/admin's attention more than 10 poor quality posts. There aren't post limits, however it goes without saying that at a certain point its hard to maintain post quality. People aren't banned on a whim, time is spent investigating especially in these situations where it isn't copy and paste/quote/smiley face/ +1 spam. Sometimes people spam meh - ok quality posts, but when you read the threads they are posting in, their posts aren't completely related or they are just reiterating prior posts to get the post count up or they are posting in threads that have already drawn a conclusion, and they are just reiterating points. People that post very frequently especially those with paid advertising signatures catch more attention sometimes than small spammers. Trust has no impact on bans or ban duration, while admittedly account age/status does minimally if I'm being honest. No one has a free ticket to spam, but a newbie with 5 of 10 of their post count being low quality are more likely to get a severe ban, than a member who has been active and posting high quality posts for a while, and slips up and spams a bit.
As I said, there are no rules on post count, you can post every 10 seconds if you wish, but the chances of your posts being quality decrease when you impose quotas.
I highlighted part which is the most common issue imo will i get a perm banned next time?
I tend to consider sig spam bans a class of their own, as in I don't generally lengthen the duration due to previous bans, unless you are truly a bad poster or there are some other special considerations.
Second what is sig spam? Is there a sticky that has a in depth answer like less than 10 words, posts within 5mins, 100 posts a day, 300 a week etc
A tendency to make posts in order to boost your post count, and you have an ad in your signature, particularly one that pays you per post. There is no secret invisible line that you shouldn't cross in terms of numbers, it's mostly subjective. There are people who just don't post very well in general, post "too much", or don't really have anything to say, they just like to participate in the community and post. This itself is fine. But when you add an ad to these kinds of posters, it's difficult or impossible to tell if they just aren't quality posters or if they are attempting to boost their post count. I used to err on the side of caution here because I do not want to ban the former, just the latter, but too many of the latter are slipping through the cracks because it's very difficult to gauge someone's intentions. This is the main thing that has changed lately. |
|
|
|
Lol Well Muhammed I didn't understand all your explanation , So basically I have to ask this : I think I got you. I will try to explain in a better way or I ain't good at explaining. Users will be able to block a signature compaign ? or a User signature ? Because those are two different things . If you block "bit-x" you won't see Ads of Bit-x at all , but if you block signature of a User , well .. you won't see signature only of that user .
Yes. If you input 'bit-x' to hiding feature, you won't see any signature which contain 'bit-x'. If it's the first case (blocking the whole signature compaign) It's going to be probably blocking the BBCode on signatures Let's say I have in my profile something that ask me to type the BBCode on my signature so Block them : [center][url=https://bit-x.com/][size=21pt][glow=#fbb326,2,300][i][b] [color=#095aad]BIT-X[color=#7c2604][size=15pt].com[/size] [/color][/b][/i][/glow][size=21pt][glow=#095aad,1][font=Arial][size=14pt] [color=white][i][b]►► New Real-time Cryptocurrency Exchange ◄◄ [/b][/i][/size][/glow][/url][size=21pt][glow=#fbb326,1] [b][size=15pt] [url=https://bit-x.com/registration/index][color=#7c2604]CREATE ACCOUNT→ [/color] [/size][/b][/glow][/size][/center]
[size=7pt][b]
Well the only way user get this BBCode is by checking the thread of the signature compaign , right ? Here is the part you missed. Firstly, we use words not whole code. Secondly, AFAIK we can fetch signature code using a bot. So ... signature compaign owners can make a BOT that contact users with the BBCode once they register on the signature compaign instead of posting it on the thread . (Means people who advertise only will get the BBCode and that guarante that the others won't block ads)
not sure if you got me right , but that's what I meant , I could be wrong because not sure how the system is going to work .
~ Madness
 I hope you understand now. |
|
|
|
She hasn't been online since 8 th March. Is she okay? Taking a vocation? and was sold by Subud! (claimed to have bought it for 1 BTC) and then sold the account to a user named escrow.pm for 1.2 BTC =snip= Is E.exchanger alt of Subud!? The risked amount in the trust feedback is coincidence? It was put after ~19 days but just a doubt. |
|
|
|
|
Another suggestion, I might be wrong though.
If you just put Bitcoin address or PGP key, it is easy to impose another person. A signed message is better.
|
|
|
|
and how that would work exactly ?
Read one or two more times. You will understand. It basically block Signature of a specific compaign (looking at the BBCode) ?
It is somewhat like that but you are blocking signatures which contain text, for example, for me, I don't want to see any betting/gambling sites. So I will input bet, gambl. This will purge all signatures whicb contain bet and/or gambl. Here I use gambl instead of 'gamble' to block signatures which contain gambling. I don't know if this engine(if it is implemented) can look different tenses of a verb. or each user have the right to block specific signature for specific user (and not all users who have that signature).
This is another addition to the above feature I explained. This works exactly like current 'ignore' feature. Because if it's blocking the BBCode that a user put... it can be avoided ?
I didn't get you exactly but from what I got: It doesn't block BBCode instead we can hide it. some signatures will simply contact users with the BBCode instead of posting on their thread , nah ? Not sure if I got that right tho ~ Madness Can you explain this too? Thank you! |
|
|
|
You are faster than me! I suggest to put PGP too. It can also be used for recovering. I was searching for a place where the poster can't edit or delete the post. I found posts in auction and related sub-boards can't be edited but can be deleted. It would be good if admin can block editing and deleting of posts in this thread by poster 1 day(24 hrs) after the post was made, if SMF supports it. Also, there were posts made in Reputation which contains PGP key and/or BTC address but it is now in Archival. I think Archival would be good place and editing & deleting of posts in Archival should be blocked IMHO. My Bitcoin Address: 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh My PGP key: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: https://keybase.io/kzm279/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=EF3V
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Edit: here's mine
1D2SEqdu5c52fq59VHp6u61sdjL2j2mmjf
|
|
|
|
Bither Desktop v1.3.1 released, and now you can use HDM on your computer  [ img]https://i.imgur.com/B2F86G3.png[/img] HDM mobile + HDM computer? Can it be done? Can you work it out please? Thank you! |
|
|
|
In fact I tried to wait it to become removed, but the tx is being re-broadcasted by other nodes to blockchain.info so I can't spend it  Read and try to do this: 10 days and still unconfirmed? Since the transaction is irreversible and your transaction might be dropped if it can't be confirmed after a long period.Now you'd better write down the raw transaction of that transaction and re-broadcast it after it have been dropped on blockchain.info. Re-broadcast: https://blockchain.info/pushtxAnyway, provide your txid here, it helps a lot. If you are doing this, use http://www.bitundo.com/. It will give you a GUI which will help you doing the process easily and after signing, you can push it within your wallet because most services reject double spend transaction or post here, someone will help you. |
|
|
|
What I don't get is: Why do wallets give you the ability to spend 1 satoshi as a fee or even 0 as a fee? If the transaction is going to get stuck, why not stablish a minimum fee that guarantes this not to happen? coz noobs will always tend to look for free shit, and will always pay no fees and think everything is fine, then shit like OP happens...
Fee-less shipping. Nobody want to impose fee. Almost all wallets' default fee is 0.0001/1000 bytes. Don't change it and don't change the mod, like shorena told. P.S. I think there is a minimum fee but it isn't must: 52. /** Fees smaller than this (in satoshi) are considered zero fee (for relaying and mining) */
53. CFeeRate minRelayTxFee = CFeeRate(1000);
Thanks, shorena! |
|
|
|
here you go: Sorry <username>, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
You have been banned by a forum moderator. You may appeal here: banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com . |
|
|
|
It was, but I restored it to the original owner a while ago.
Is Stewartj also restored? The negative feedback you left is still there. If it is, only mentioning about the trust abuse is good IMHO. |
|
|
|
dear All,
Thank you for you precious help. I think, I'll drop idea with BTC mining using CPU. I don't bother of electicity cost, due to I'm not the one who is paying the bill for it.
So the other idea is:
buy miner, and I would like to ask, which Miner is not too expensive (~500$)?
Thanks,
Search ebay for bitcoin miner, you'll find several. Used S3 goes for ~$100, good machine. Have fun! Buy it only from trusted sellers. I recommend you to buy from this forum instead if ebay. People here will help you if they see you are going to deal with a scammer or likely-scammer. See Computer Hardware sub-board to buy a miner. If you couldn't find a suitable miner, you can create a thread and "[WTB] name of the miner you want to buy" as subject/title. For example, if you want to buy 2 Anitminer S4, then create a thread with "[WTB] 2x Antinminer S4". |
|
|
|
AFAIK, a transaction must have all outputs above 5460 Satoshi to be considered as a non dust and have nodes relay it.
Wasn't it changed to 546 satoshis after the commit? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/6a4c196dd64da2fd33dc7ae77a8cdd3e4cf0eff1If it's below that, nodes would simply not relay it. There are nodes which relays it but for nodes using Bitcoin Core, they don't.
"for nodes using Bitcoin Core, they don't" except ones which uses custom script, right? It is generally a bad idea to use 0 fees for anything below 0.1BTC since the priority would be so low that it would take a long time to confirm.
AFAIK isn't it 0.01 BTC which is considered higher priority with zero fee? |
|
|
|
Zakir Can you lend me 0.015BTC
BTC Address : 1HkBWTTv4Ms8SFzY57dRFkiXeANx8Xz2PX
Repayment : Within 7 days
If you want keep my BCT account as collateral.
I am busy now. I can do it tomorrow. But it was only for 14 days. And has been running a few days. After that will be as before
But... as you were banned before, there is a high chance for perma-ban or 30 day ban if the user who bought spam. So it is like pushing him to the trap. Anyway, if you really want this loan, come after your ban lifts. Welcome! Glad to help you to achieve the milestone. But is there any reason that you bolded "this day"?
Thank you! You have seen number of loan requests, so more I lend, the harder it is to achieve it. You gave it when I had almost 0.7 BTC. If it was tomorrow, I would have less amount which will need more amount to reach 1 BTC. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
