Hi, I came across an article on Cointelegraph, stating that in order to post an image rich announcement in the "Tokens (Altcoins)" section, the author needs to have at least 30 activity points. I have read the above rules but I can't find any mentions regarding this issue. I would really appreciate if someone could confirm if its really the case.  Thanks! Yeah. You have to have 30 activity points, which equates to being a Jr. Member or you can pay to be a Copper Member which gives Newbies some extra privileges (image posting and reduced limitations on PMs) Taken directly from the FAQ: |
|
|
|
1) I trust the site as I have done millions of rolls, and all rolls seems to fit into common statistic. The three screendumps below sums up tp 3 mill rolls done i the last couple of day and this is what I base my opinion on. http://elbrandt.com/account1.jpg http://elbrandt.com/account2.jpg http://elbrandt.com/account3.jpg2) as I think the site is 100% fair, I off course recommend the site to other users and then it would be stupid not to include my referral link in the post ( even though the referral commission are peanuts) They won't scam you for 0.01 DOGE. They'll scam you for way, way more than that. Already addressed this in your thread. If you begin to bet with hundreds or thousands of dollars rather than fractions of pennies then maybe you'll see a very noticeable gap in ev. |
|
|
|
|
The website looks like shit.
Domain: guarddoggrdo.com
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registration Date: 2018-01-04
Expiration Date: 2019-01-04
Updated Date: 2018-01-04
The lack of SSL is also a pretty big deterrent.
|
|
|
|
|
Just because you approached statistical ev doesn't mean they can't simply flip the seed on you and make you lose when you start betting larger.
Remember why 999dice was a scam? Because they were not provably fair. You would have to check the seeds after each and every bet to ensure that you were not being cheated. You CAN do that with Dicebot but if they're fine with not implementing a proper provably fair system then do you think they'll let you withdraw large winnings?
Don't point people to this piece of shit site.
|
|
|
|
Mr. prep talk to mr. theymos to change activity counting, for example if you are wearing a signature you wouldn't have your activity increased but even getting negative activity per post while wearing a signature. then make people to pay at least $0.1 per post if they would like to maintain their rank. then exclude bounty and altcoin sections from counting towards your activity.
This is not off topic, this is why we're here on this topic, when you have a signature on even for a day, your activity should decrease for 2 weeks per post, that way, no body could trick the system. This is just wrong. It wouldn't do anything beneficial against spam. Who fucking cares about paying 10 cents per post when they earn much more than that from even the lowest-paying signature campaigns? Excluding bounty sections from counting towards activity makes sense. Altcoin sections seem a little harsh, though it can be argued that this is a bitcoin forum. And at the end of it, this doesn't stop account farmers who just shitpost to gain activity. They can just not wear a signature until they reach their desired rank. |
|
|
|
yes, we are willing to use an escrow, but we don't know how to use an escrow. Can you tell us how to use an escrow? I send coins to the escrow. You send the product to the escrow. If there are no issues with it and it is as described then the escrow sends you the payment and they send me the shipment. There are a couple ones available on the forum if you're willing to do that. |
|
|
|
Hi, hope you will consider my application. Thank you. It was considered. Rest all denied. Consider yourself denied. |
|
|
|
With the recent explosion in altcoins, the altcoin boards have become the most frustrating forums to read as they are loaded with nonsense speculation and buying "advice" that is more than likely fuelled by self interest.
If there were to be one thing I'd love to see added to the rules, it would be a policy of disclosure. That is, a moral obligation to state whether a coin that is referenced by a poster in a post is held by that person.
Of course it couldn't actually be policed, but people have a moral obligation to disclose their ramping and the forum has a moral obligation to help readers to discern between what is independent/thoughtful posting and what is self-serving blather. If anything, shills should be red tagged. This would be similar to how the forum 'deals' with scammers (and to a lesser extent, spammers). People should be able to tell between legitimate advice and obvious shilling... and if you want some form of policing then it is very much possible to either tag the accounts yourself or send details to DT members to view and tag. The latter would take some time and I'm not sure which ones would really be willing to sink in that amount of effort just to tag shills in the altcoin section: most DT members remain in the Bitcoin part of BCT. |
|
|
|
|
Your gallery links to image files. That's it.
Where's the interactive portfolio? Sure, the images help but that's not really assuring. You can have the frameworks of a product but not actually develop any of it: pretending that a jpeg showcases a working game is way easier than coding a real one.
And this should be posted publicly, not solely disclosed to people who will/are in contact with you
|
|
|
|
I think you should up your rank first and get someone to trust you by conducting a smooth, reliable, and fast transaction. And I believe there other threads similar to what you are postings you should read there. There are valuable information there which could you in your problem. But in the meantime you should try and rank up first. I think you should up your English skills first and get someone to understand you by attending a smooth, reliable and fast online course. And I believe there are other garbage spammers that puke up long and draining posts similar to what you are posting. There are valuable local boards there which could you in your problem. But in the meantime, you should stop posting. (what the fuck did that penultimate sentence even mean? jesus christ) |
|
|
|
|
Is there any chance you're willing to use an escrow for this deal? Your site is not the highest quality I've seen (and there are some notable user experience issues that I had) and considering the account age & price, this all seems a little suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Casinos should implement some type of variable fee where if the transaction is small the fee should be as small as possible just as long as it confirms.
If someone withdraws 1BTC then its understandable that paying 0.003BTC is a fair fee. Outputs can be bundled together in one transaction in order to save on fees. Meaning you wouldn't really know what the fee is until after a transaction is prepared. This is assuming maximum efficiency on the casino's part. Additionally, you have to realize that even though it may seem justified to charge a .003 fee on a 1 BTC withdrawal, the amount doesn't really determine the fee. Rather, the size of the transaction which is based on a variety of factors. If we have just 1 txin and 1 txout, the fee could be something like .0007 for massive withdrawals. |
|
|
|
The corruption in this forum is sad. I know, right? All this fucking spam and these scammers running around untamed. Perhaps some people should do something about it. it is clear Lauda(aka The Pharmacist aka dillpicklechips) aka aTriz aka hilariousandco aka theymos aka satoshi
Has there ever been any actual evidence linking these users together or are they always just empty words? |
|
|
|
|
If you do plan on creating a new account to 'change usernames' then you should proceed with the following very complicated steps to avoid trouble:
Step 1. Abandon this account entirely.
Step 2. Use only the new account.
|
|
|
|
|
To clarify: if you, for example, want to have a decentralized coin/token and are using it in a semi-contained setting in the context of spending specific amounts at a store, what would be the best way to
a) secure the network without high costs
b) prevent human error with transactions i.e. spend specific amounts of coins and/or "refund" in some way
c) mitigate transaction costs
d) sustain a large network and scale
Regarding a) and c): would this be concerning primarily the algorithm?
In terms of b) I thought about some smart contract system to limit the number of coins in each transaction, i.e. reject transactions that have an incorrect outward tx amount.
|
|
|
|
Name : cho99
Ranking : member
Posts : 61+1
BTC address :16eE8BjLkuMnJDwssj2VzA73Z9dzvagkb8
Wear appropriate signature : yes
Application again If you got rejected not even two days ago, what makes you think anything changed now? Apart from your rank, you've still got the same shitty post quality and fake 'constructive posts'. Long ≠ better. |
|
|
|
|
Honestly, you shouldn't be mad at The Pharmacist but rather direct your frustrations towards the account farmers that perpetuate this shit. How many times do you see chum bucket scum posting all this asinine crap? Perhaps not all people from the Philippines circulate garbage across the forum and spew diarrhea out the wrong end, but you certainly do see a lot. Enough to make such a generalization.
It could be harsh. But doesn't this highlight the problem with the forum? Up to you to stop them from being dingos.
Also, doesn't this shit belong in Reputation?
|
|
|
|
Right.. If their posts gets deleted,they won't be able to meet their weekly minimum posts requirements,so they won't get paid. But posters just want to rank up are posting,which angered theymos I guess,so he had to increase the restrictions on posting in those two boards. Wondering why theymos doesn't do the same to boards like off-topic,politics and society. Perhaps it's better to sacrifice the weak rather than let the infection plague the strong. These are relative terms, anyway. Off-topic and the Politics & Society boards are far greater density cesspools than the other boards. If you let spammers handle their one-liner (or one-word) bullshit there then you prevent that from leaking to the other boards. Kind of like delegating all the ponzi spam to the child board investor-based games. It prevented the shit from spreading all over the important board. |
|
|
|
The intent might be in the right direction but yet shit posters will spam there. Users would post in as many sections they can, so that they get accepted in future campaigns. Because there are some managers who expect users to post in many sections, as one of their goals would be diversification of posts. Nah, but their posts would be chucked away. Account farmers and spammers can't deal with that kind of risk, which is why they spam the shit out of Economics, Bitcoin Discussion, pretty much every fucking board. Those posts are far easier to come up with, and you can spam a shit ton more due to the amount of vague and general threads (spam megathreads incl.) Plus, posts in the Ivory Tower and Serious Discussion are kind of over most spammers' heads. All they know about crypto is how to send coins and join bounties. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
