|
Also journalists... Who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
Shiiiit!
Once I read a "paper" called The Flat Earth Model or something, and for a long time it was the most ridiculous thing I've ever saw, until today.
|
|
|
|
I would worry if I invest money into Ethereum and Ether.
All altcoins are going down hard, if there is an active market for Ether, I wouldn't be surprise if it go down like the rest of altcoins.
There's nothing active on ethereum. |
|
|
|
What is going on with this company? The shares are hemorrhaging value and the dividends are getting smaller and smaller. Have they published any statements? For that matter have they ever published anything confirming them to be an actual mine? I think I may have learned a costly lesson about scammers.
What the fuck are you talking about? Haven't looked at the difficulty lately? |
|
|
|
Well, for now the only thing killed by ethereum are investor's wallets.  |
|
|
|
There's so much sexism in this thread it hurts.
LOL, so true! I don't think those guys hang around women very often. |
|
|
|
|
I think a fork happens and when connected again the smaller chain gets annihilated, that is actually a very interesting scenario, will wait for more educated inputs.
|
|
|
|
Any sources on this? I want to know what all countries affect this statistic. I hope countries like USA/Canada have less of this effect.
I'm pretty sure this happens everywhere, it should be better in some European countries and worse in muslim countries. |
|
|
|
|
It's for the same exact job, otherwise it does not make sense...
|
|
|
|
So, what's the advantage of using invites?
Does the person who invites earns more stellar?
Nope,the stellar code can be used to invite new users they will get their stellars instantly no waiting!!(you won't get anything for inviting). Well, not much of an incentive to invite friends... Does the invite substitutes Facebook login for free Stellar? |
|
|
|
|
So, what's the advantage of using invites?
Does the person who invites earns more stellar?
|
|
|
|
I guess now it's Federal noReserve. |
|
|
|
True anonymity on the Internet is quite difficult to achieve. You have to think to whom you want to be anonymous, for me and other forum members you're very much anonymous, we have no way of knowing who you are besides what you make public, forum administrators have access to more information about you, like IP address, this provides an estimate on your location, and for last your ISP, these guys know exactly who you are.  |
|
|
|
Hmm, I'm afraid I'm not a programmer, but you can PM me a new PW and your PIN and I'll set it for you.
Ok, thanks. |
|
|
|
So, I've updated my password and now I can't login because at login it only allows 20 characters, can you fix it, please? |
|
|
|
We would like to propose some ideas / options for the Scrypt-X project. We will issue a first voting round between 4 possible options. A second voting round will be held between the two most favorable/supported options.
Options:
1. Purchase of 23 Scrypt Miners (A2 Innosilicon Terraminers, hashrate of ~85-90Mh/s)
Total hashrate: 2,000 Mh/s
Overall hashrate of Scrypt-X will increase by 50 percent to a total of 6,000 Mh/s
Deployment is possible immediately after the second voting round
Total price $45,977 or $1,999 per miner
2. Convert every Scrypt-X unit to 5 PetaMine units. The Scrypt-X project will cease to exist.
3. One time dividend of 90.5 BTC. The Scrypt-X project will continue with a weekly 100% dividend payout.
4. Keep the reinvestment funds for future opportunities. The Scrypt-X project remains like it is today.
Where's the "None of the above", or "Vote Write-In" option? #1 -- A2 chips are inefficient at this point, and there are vastly better deals out there, as alexius89 has helpfully pointed out. #2 -- PETA is a dead fund (though most people haven't figured it out yet). Halting reinvestment is a death sentence in mining, and it's incredibly clear which direction PETA is headed. It wouldn't matter if they converted the shares 10 to 1 when they'll be worth nothing in the end anyway. #3 -- Essentially a cop-out, the result of which would bring us onto the same page as PETA. Dividends will temporarily increase, followed by a plummet in share price, and an eventual decline to BTC0.0 #4 -- The most logical choice if they were to take the fund seriously, and this ignores the need for new hardware, but given they've put it to a vote... In all honesty, I'm quite disappointed in the supposed professionalism this team was to display. They have the money and space for equipment, but lack the managerial or strategic foresight to aptly run a company. I seconded this. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
