Please refrain from posting the entire contents of a previous post just to let everyone know how hard done by you are.

Siblings is not a valid reason for being in the SAME signature campaign.

Same community announcement as before - update IMG tags to include httpS for links to LoyceV's images (and everything else BTW)

The Brisbane Broncos Rugby League team have now lost six in a row even though they have the "home town" advantage against the southern teams that are billeted here in Queensland Hotels while Victoria is in lockdown.  It's quite likely that they are going to loose one, two or even three more games in a row.  I don't know any sites that I can put a bet on - they are playing the Sydney Bulldogs tomorrow night, so it's odds on the Broncos will loose.

(Lang Park is playing to 25% spectator capacity and I think there is talk of going up to 50% spectator capacity in the next few weeks)

Does anyone have fresh stats on the state by state breakdown of the Covid's spread across the US over the last couple of weeks?  From what I've seen of the nationwide upsurge of cases, it's quite likely Nevada will have no choice but to go back into lockdown.

Here in Australia the state of Victoria has seen a level three lockdown of the capital (Melbourne) and to the immediate north shire of Mitchell due to a daily increase that's now at 288 cases (far fewer than Nevada's).  The Crown Casino along with the rest of Melbourne has been locked down for the next six weeks.  It's only a matter of time before similar happens over there.

Was this fixed and what is the current amount of "ownership" of the site for the amount shown in the screen grab?  How easy is it to cash out and what are the returns?

The only online Casinos that I get to hear about are quite literally the ones that have or have had signature campaigns.  As to whether or not they are any good, the fact that they can continue to pay for Campaigns should in itself be an indicator of the Casino's success - unless of course they had a pre-launch budget they are committed to with a Campaign Manager/Escrow who is holding the funds for them, no matter what.

(I'm surprised you didn't give your own Signature a plug while you were at it)

With Slots you can bet multiple lines unlike dice where the results are usually win or loose.  Some people want to just watch the images flash around, others have a "feel" for the next roll of the dice and work on the statistics for how many times the various results come up.  The payouts for slots can certainly be high, but there are some that will double up on dice and win big too.

USDT is used on a wide number of exchanges as a go between fiat to crypto.  That said, ETH opens up a whole new scope of traders with ERC-20 crypto that can be tapped into.  Just about any crypto's that have been around a couple of years have multiple exchanges and block-chain explorers/stable block-chain should also be considered.

Games such as Dice would probably be the first cabs off the rank in that case due to their widespread popularity.

I think @LoyceV did a one off post that was merited and deleted and the merits are still attributed.  (my apologies if I recall incorrectly who did the experiment)

Greetings,

I've just been told about this thread and was wondering if you might be willing to do a one-off update of the information provided given that six months have now elapsed since your last update?

Thanks for reading.

Hey thanks for doing this - it's going to take me a couple of days to familiarise myself with these entries.


I have some investigations that are in the research stage, but I'm hoping to compare the information you've provided to some historic cases so that I can get an understanding of how to apply this information in future research.


Unfortunately, just saying something appears to be suspicious has resulted in those persons giving me negative trust/distrust (which is a form of default trust abuse), so for the moment, if you are more than passingly curious, PM me and I will provide some of my recent studies.


That should have read in part "via merit swapping/back-scratching" - I have amended the quote to give context.  Basically I am asking does it make it more compelling that trust abuse is occurring when both merits *and* default trust back-scratching occurs if that makes sense?


Thanks, will check it out.

Can I request an update of this Merit Back-scratching information please?

---

---

Just a couple of quick questions:  (Please note: The two questions are concerning distinctly separate investigations).

• If a users' top three merit fans they then back scratch, does that mean the user in question is gaming the system?  (If not, then when? 3of5 ?? 3of10?  5of12?? 7of9?)
• If a cluster of say a half dozen UID's all default trust each other *and* they are all back scratching, which does that prove?  They are a voting block?  Or, they are alts/some are alts/mix of alts and a voting block?

---

---

Is there a thread for default trust back-scratching?

Those on DT1 that have given me negative / distrust are mostly the ones who have peddled in account sales or trades, lending using UID's as collateral etc so I can only imagine it would be more of the childish, retaliatory, wild west bile that fills my trust feedback wall.

Nice work everyone, I appreciate those new people taking the time to use the Submission Form and just a reminder that the OP and next couple of posts also have tools to help people getting started with Resources and Additional Resources.  Be sure to check out the Google Spread Sheet which SFR10 has been working on (118 entries for 2019 so far!).

Stay safe and don't allow yourselves to be intimidated by anyone who is likely an alt with a financial interest in an investigation.

This is my post number 5,900.   

I don't normally give a running commentary on an investigation in progress, but my thanks to Golgolth for your words of encouragement and support.

I've managed to have a quick look this afternoon at the OP TX and there is independent evidence to confirm the wallet address that the funds were sent to was coin.ph Wallet [00000dd86b] as confirmed by @coinlocket$ amongst others

• Here
• Here
• Here
• Here
• Here

Both TX funds went into and straight back out of that wallet address with 155 transactions which would have suggested that one wallet address assigned per user was how they traded, but the next TX out https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/8ffe093e83cba2a84668a5df9fc8cb9afdabdee20b386d19ae62b667b5e38a0e was from four wallet addresses going to just two other wallet addresses, so although the one wallet address, one user is probably how the site operated, the operators were able to pool funds for withdrawals.

Interestingly enough finaleshot2016 does not come here to this scam accusation to answer questions concerning their apparent merit & Default trust abuse with theyoungmillionaire, instead removes their trust of theyoungmillionaire (but being DT1 does not go so far as to distrust theyoungmillionaire as that would push him to DT2 (-11) )

Via https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx

Recent exposing of scammers have left a few users high and dry and they are now scrambling to build new alts to restart their SigCamp/Currency Exchange etc scamming activities.

What are the odds?  Here you are begging for merits and you're implicated as being part of a DT/merit abuse group over in this thread.


The OP gifted their merits in the past to bump up theyoungmillionaire propelling them into DT1.  Now that TYM has been exposed as a scammer, the OP ( jademaxsuy ) wants to do the same with another UID.

Good Point.

How are your own investigations into theyoungmillionaire going?  Turned up anything yet?

Perhaps you should leave the alt investigation to the rest of us, after all, why would you *just now* distrust a user who has been banned since the 13^th of February 2020:



lega46141 - Hero Member (Archived) - https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lega46141



It makes no sense except to spread FUD.