Thanks. I will take it as a budge of honor since it comes by someone who's trust is almost entirely red His trust rating is irrelevant. And mind you, it's from untrusted sources. Also, are these posts particularly meaningful to discussion? sounds like a cool project. I will sign up for the air drop ! I will keep an eye on this  |
|
|
|
I really shouldn't, but the coins look so tasty.  2, a ETH: 0x956f09176ffd850e673c1537831784f88ff8799188452f5b5aefa1b6b425d839 |
|
|
|
Fuck it. If I'm in, then cool. Bitcoin Talk Name: actmyname Bitcoin Talk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=465017Rank: Legendary Post Count (including this post): 2476 BTC Address: 176N1Rz3DhrbBFRxDQEDyienEnDV5MW6fW ETH Address: 0x8978Da5810Cb38294E36F8729Bd9355030f1BE97 |
|
|
|
Asking the price of the gun shows that you have the hidden thought in mind about buying it later on and possibly commit some crime. The point here is I haven't committed any crime, by all means I was honest. This kind of policing to prevent future crimes isn't good for the forum. I'll just go ahead and tell people that I'm interested in buying methamphetamines, and just in case they're a cop I'll tell them I didn't actually buy it, so I didn't commit a crime. I'll continue to tell them that it's bad to infer what other people's intentions are just because they appear to be buying illicit drugs.
This is not how logic works. |
|
|
|
u=487418 the pharmacist u=465017 actmyname u=878630 theultraelite u=135920 aTriz Same style, same VPN, same bad manners. Think that user have 25% af all users on this forum Yeah... because one person has the time to post thousands of replies over hundreds of thousands of accounts. Butthurt users always have the same kind of accusations. The number of times that The Pharmacist, aTriz and I have been accused of being alts of other users (and of one another) is just ridiculous. |
|
|
|
So can it be changed? from not visible to visible? I'm trading with him but I'm not going first since he's a newbie and he in't going first either because he can't see my trust. Your trust is not the same as DefaultTrust trust ratings. The only way for the newbie to 'view your trust' is for them to have the same trust settings as you.
Use an escrow? |
|
|
|
I am interested. Can you please send the link to the profile please. Since when does having interest in an account sale not mean that you want to buy the account? What the fuck kind of logic are you working with? {archived for reference} |
|
|
|
Regarding the addition of all these ERC20 tokens to BetKing:
I doubt that most of these will see much volume. People don´t really hold
them except for speculative purposes. I hope that I´m wrong, but I don´t really
see much betting action for these tokens. The BKB token is different, because
the existing client base obviously has a lot of them, but for the rest I´m sceptical. I'm not sure about how the tokens will affect the site. It could very well be a waste of time but I'm unaware of any other places that offer all these token options (and are run by someone trustworthy enough) so you could certainly see some people with large holdings in tokens, seeking to gamble them. After all with the current market the way it is, we could have some players come in with newly-found wealth. |
|
|
|
I understand that there was some scheduled maintenance was done on the site yesterday. I am just curious if anyone else is having issues trying to log into the site? I just keep on getting a bad password and nothing happens when i try to reset. I just created a new account as i had zero balance. I can only imagine someone with a balance going through this. I didn't have any issue with logging in, before or after. Is it possible that you had 2FA set up and you either didn't enter a code or entered in the wrong authentication code? |
|
|
|
That's the plan. I should have said. I'm also going to propose to theymos that all new users who sign up here are greeted by a welcome message urging users to read the rules and provide them with links to this sticky amongst others so they don't need to ask these questions. There will be no excuse for ignorance then. See, this is exactly what I was looking for. If you simply erase every redundant thread that pops up, you can stuff it into the ground. No longer will ignorant users create threads and you won't have excuses for what I assume are 'fake threads' created by signature spammers that want to artificially generate an easy topic to reply to. Call me paranoid, but I have a strong feeling that a lot of newbie threads are just created by people who are trying to get in some extra posts easily by responding to an easily-answerable thread. |
|
|
|
|
Desired loan: .012
Duration: 1 week
Website: Stake.com
Username: actmyname
|
|
|
|
|
0f4666f10ceb52f19a022f1a3407b3b2f77fa2a7620e1fdfada92c953ddeffed
9bfb3b8af3bfc9c461f0f69b3234de13cff90d687aa13eb766667f48fe3644f1
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to see the total bankroll of the website? Previously I thought it was this  But I just realized that's the wagered amount and not the bankroll  We can do some calculations to find a profit of: 0.0991 - 0.09286 = 0.00624 ± 0.0001 (error due to rounding) (0.00624 ± 0.0001) * $100,000,000 = $624,000 ± $10,000 profit Adding this to the original raised funds, we have ~$7,124,528.48. Give or take some movements in the cryptocurrencies that are in the wallets.
I could very well be wrong with my approach, though. So don't quote me on it. |
|
|
|
Sign an address and send it to theymos to verify that you are the original owner of the account. Read this thread for details on the format. |
|
|
|
But banning someone for lying about such a thing? Neh. Here's my opinion: I absolutely fucking hate spam megathreads and especially those that perpetuate them. Anyone who creates a thread with a vague or general question meant for spamming and does not lock it after a sufficient number of replies (usually ≤10) should be reported, given a warning and then subsequently banned if they continue.
This is similar in that regard. If someone is lying just to create a thread then they should be given the same treatment. It's a fucking waste of time and just breeds spam. |
|
|
|
thats acutally me if you want me to record or some shit but either way ure being dumb since winning on these crash games means nothing so idk what ure trying to bring here Then what the fuck are you bringing up the crash game user stats for? Why in the world did you think it was relevant? i mean stop talking to me nothing u say makes any sense
i can record me playing on that account if you want tho Do you understand that OP is not 'staking' users but is rather lending them money on the gambling sites that he owns? |
|
|
|
yep dean did the ICO wrong. he should have sucked it up and pay for marketing. The problem was with some developers that were not getting things done. You wouldn't heavily market something that's not at its peak, would you? It's like if you were to promote a cryptocurrency that was just the whitepaper and nothing else. (though there are some notable examples...) |
|
|
|
Got it now. Yeah, Ethereum requires a couple hoops to jump through to investigate but if you're good at it, it sure is easy to clear out a whole bunch of names in bounty sheets all at once. |
|
|
|
|
Wait, hold up. I don't see any conclusive evidence on the spreadsheet pinpointing swetka to the others.
Now, I'm not sure if the spreadsheet changed or not since the Nov 11 post (as they do) but currently, there is no proof of linkage. Now, if the newbie that made the linkage had actually archived it at the time, then we would have something to work with.
The address that swetka is currently using on the spreadsheet and their profile literally has no relation to the others.
|
|
|
|
|
I found out about Primedice via the forum, looking for some place to gamble coins way back when.
Username: actmyname
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
