i think it is a bit optimistic... with 12Tb it say 7000 coins/ day.... i'm doing 5000/6000 day... |
|
|
|
i have ready logos for flirt coin, what's the bounty for logo ?
Nàaaaaaa. I think is not so goog coin!! |
|
|
|
Ehehe penso che sia decisamente inguaribile  Attendiamo intanto l'uscita per vedere se veramente raggiungerà i 0.001$, altrimenti c'è poco da essere ottimisti  Io ho provato a leggere la OP dei qwc ma la moneta non mi pare niente di eccezionale. E soprattuto in base a cosa prevede che da 0.001$ passi a 3$? Mha!!!! |
|
|
|
impennata importante dei darkcoin, da tenere d'occhio le prossime 8 ore, alle 21 di stasera sapremo se si parte per un rally oppure si va solo su
Ma l'account twitter che girava i giorni scorsi per mettere su un gruppo di pumpimg che fine ha fatto? Non ne ho sentito parlare più. É finito tutto nel dimemticatoio? non ne ho la più pallida idea non è che puoi stare a controllare veramente tutto, se c'è qualcuno che segue i dark e sa qualcosa bene, altrimenti dando un'occhiata ai pattern qualcosa si può fare, perché questo pump sembra avere forza, c'è tempo fino a stasera visto che la candela che aspetto è quella delle 21 ore italiane, su bitfinex EDIT: timeframe 4h sennò non si capisce  Hum.. Ma la news per il pumpxdei dark qual'è. Io non ho trovato niente. |
|
|
|
impennata importante dei darkcoin, da tenere d'occhio le prossime 8 ore, alle 21 di stasera sapremo se si parte per un rally oppure si va solo su
Ma l'account twitter che girava i giorni scorsi per mettere su un gruppo di pumpimg che fine ha fatto? Non ne ho sentito parlare più. É finito tutto nel dimemticatoio? |
|
|
|
BURST-68JV-2EAW-WDRB-FKZ4Y
is the new hacker adress hast a few burst in there now
for choose stronger passwor use a GUID generator like... there are a lot site online... http://www.guidgen.com/good by! |
|
|
|
|
Hi!!!!
Any eta for the massive giveaway?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
hi !!!! i have this transaction pending.  i have sent 40k burst to c-cex iesterday, with 1.1.5 wallet. But i see no burst on c-cex balance. I can read burst it is in "maintenace" on c-cex from yesterday... just a question my burst are lost? thanks! c-cex updated their wallet jar, but did not update their conf file. They messaged me a stacktrace the wallet was dumping when they tried to start which indicated that new required items were not specified, and I messaged them back saying they needed a new conf file. They probably haven't fixed this yet, and your deposit will probably go through when they get the wallet back online. ok.. i try to write on c-cex chat but nothing... may be do you know who is c-cde admin??? thanks again!!! Just got a message back 20 minutes ago. Problem should be solved any time now. all ok for c-cex!!! i see burst on balance. |
|
|
|
hi !!!! i have this transaction pending. i have sent 40k burst to c-cex iesterday, with 1.1.5 wallet. But i see no burst on c-cex balance. I can read burst it is in "maintenace" on c-cex from yesterday... just a question my burst are lost? thanks! c-cex updated their wallet jar, but did not update their conf file. They messaged me a stacktrace the wallet was dumping when they tried to start which indicated that new required items were not specified, and I messaged them back saying they needed a new conf file. They probably haven't fixed this yet, and your deposit will probably go through when they get the wallet back online. ok.. i try to write on c-cex chat but nothing... may be do you know who is c-cde admin??? thanks again!!! |
|
|
|
hi !!!! i have this transaction pending. i have sent 40k burst to c-cex iesterday, with 1.1.5 wallet. But i see no burst on c-cex balance. I can read burst it is in "maintenace" on c-cex from yesterday... just a question my burst are lost? thanks! |
|
|
|
Nel dimenticatoio non direi, ma magari sono punti di vista.
Ad ogni modo minare burst è diverso dal minare i bitcoin, il costo elettrico è notevolmente minore, lo sforzo richiesto ai componenti hardware e la conseguente usura, sono davvero minimi.
Ripeto, a mio avviso si tratta di punti di vista. Non sempre tutti hanno la stessa idea, è proprio questo il bello.
Al momento minare, se non si dispone già di hardware da impiegare nom conviene, ma se la situazione dovesse ribaltarsi..anche solo 100Gb di spazio allocato saranno un buon profitto.
La moneta è poco conosciuta e per ora troppo poco user-friendly, ma ci si augura che con i futuri update si riesca a sistemare proprio questi punti!
Ad ogni modo grazie per le risposte, credevo che questa discussione fosse morta da un po!
Per i burst basta guarda re l activity del dev... Come dire... Fin che c'è vita c'è speranza. Guarda il movimento che c'è stato dopo la release della 1.1.5. Poi se hai HD puoi sempre puntare su storJ. |
|
|
|
Burst 1.1.5Download: https://mega.co.nz/#!r9RywR4b!e0MqN4kXx1uiW5th8PBxiwjOfdNhjxjS52UqXwihGW8sha256: 5b8a5e9d2ebcc35052a885b299764ed257346f3c849e92768bd5b725ad685ac7 Or github: https://github.com/BurstProject/burstcoinUpdate is required for all users. Hard fork will be triggered at least 4-5 days from now, depends on how fast people update. If using an existing copy of the blockchain, first startup will take several minutes. Short summary: Updated to latest Nxt(1.3.2) Added subscriptions(reoccurring payments)(more details will be given when enabled) Escrow updated to use result transactions instead of just adding to balance. Longer story: This release took far longer than I intended it to. Subscriptions turned out to be more of a challenge than expected, and about when I had a first release candidate, nxt 1.3.0 was released. Nxt 1.3.0 was a massive restructuring which I considered a necessary update since it was to fix scalability issues I already knew would need to be addressed at some point, however it broke compatibility with a lot of my code. Rather than debugging subscriptions, then updating, and debugging it again, I went straight to updating to Nxt 1.3.0, which required me to re-write most of the subscription, escrow, and reward recipient assignment code. Nxt 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 were also released fairly shortly after, and their updates went a lot more smoothly. Re-testing everything took some time, and I ended up re-factoring subscriptions a few times to ensure everything was done consistently. Next plans: I'm going to be postponing the last part of advanced transactions for now, and starting on BurstID(more details will be given later), and maybe some of the DHT code. Good job dev. I follow constantly you git hub update. I see your hard work. But i want to propose something new. What about the possibility to open a simple burstShop with computer hardware? Maybe starting with a few part like some hdd or cpu, And increment part type step by step. I remember the really good idea of kimoshop... But for kimo the thinks are gone wrong for dev error. But i repeat....i thin it is a good idea. I hope someone can do it!!!! Maybe with opensource platform like magento. What do you think about? Nobody interested?  |
|
|
|
Qualcosa si sta muovendo ragazzi, il dev ha appena rilasciato un nuovo aggiornamento annunciando futuri sviluppi sul thread principale. Diamoci dentro ragazzi, questa moneta potrebbe davvero raggiungere i cieli più alti. Vi lascio di seguito il post del dev: Burst 1.1.5Download: https://mega.co.nz/#!r9RywR4b!e0MqN4kXx1uiW5th8PBxiwjOfdNhjxjS52UqXwihGW8sha256: 5b8a5e9d2ebcc35052a885b299764ed257346f3c849e92768bd5b725ad685ac7 Or github: https://github.com/BurstProject/burstcoinUpdate is required for all users. Hard fork will be triggered at least 4-5 days from now, depends on how fast people update. If using an existing copy of the blockchain, first startup will take several minutes. Short summary: Updated to latest Nxt(1.3.2) Added subscriptions(reoccurring payments)(more details will be given when enabled) Escrow updated to use result transactions instead of just adding to balance. Longer story: This release took far longer than I intended it to. Subscriptions turned out to be more of a challenge than expected, and about when I had a first release candidate, nxt 1.3.0 was released. Nxt 1.3.0 was a massive restructuring which I considered a necessary update since it was to fix scalability issues I already knew would need to be addressed at some point, however it broke compatibility with a lot of my code. Rather than debugging subscriptions, then updating, and debugging it again, I went straight to updating to Nxt 1.3.0, which required me to re-write most of the subscription, escrow, and reward recipient assignment code. Nxt 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 were also released fairly shortly after, and their updates went a lot more smoothly. Re-testing everything took some time, and I ended up re-factoring subscriptions a few times to ensure everything was done consistently. Next plans: I'm going to be postponing the last part of advanced transactions for now, and starting on BurstID(more details will be given later), and maybe some of the DHT code. É stato solo un veloce pump and dump per il rilascio del dev. Già successo altre volte in passato...e sta già riscendendo |
|
|
|
Burst 1.1.5Download: https://mega.co.nz/#!r9RywR4b!e0MqN4kXx1uiW5th8PBxiwjOfdNhjxjS52UqXwihGW8sha256: 5b8a5e9d2ebcc35052a885b299764ed257346f3c849e92768bd5b725ad685ac7 Or github: https://github.com/BurstProject/burstcoinUpdate is required for all users. Hard fork will be triggered at least 4-5 days from now, depends on how fast people update. If using an existing copy of the blockchain, first startup will take several minutes. Short summary: Updated to latest Nxt(1.3.2) Added subscriptions(reoccurring payments)(more details will be given when enabled) Escrow updated to use result transactions instead of just adding to balance. Longer story: This release took far longer than I intended it to. Subscriptions turned out to be more of a challenge than expected, and about when I had a first release candidate, nxt 1.3.0 was released. Nxt 1.3.0 was a massive restructuring which I considered a necessary update since it was to fix scalability issues I already knew would need to be addressed at some point, however it broke compatibility with a lot of my code. Rather than debugging subscriptions, then updating, and debugging it again, I went straight to updating to Nxt 1.3.0, which required me to re-write most of the subscription, escrow, and reward recipient assignment code. Nxt 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 were also released fairly shortly after, and their updates went a lot more smoothly. Re-testing everything took some time, and I ended up re-factoring subscriptions a few times to ensure everything was done consistently. Next plans: I'm going to be postponing the last part of advanced transactions for now, and starting on BurstID(more details will be given later), and maybe some of the DHT code. Good job dev. I follow constantly you git hub update. I see your hard work. But i want to propose something new. What about the possibility to open a simple burstShop with computer hardware? Maybe starting with a few part like some hdd or cpu, And increment part type step by step. I remember the really good idea of kimoshop... But for kimo the thinks are gone wrong for dev error. But i repeat....i thin it is a good idea. I hope someone can do it!!!! Maybe with opensource platform like magento. What do you think about? |
|
|
|
costrure il rig è solo un divertimento... :-) ottimizzare con i vari downvolt per trovare il balance migliore per costi ed entrate.. pure... ..perlomeno per cme la vedo io! la pensiamo alla stessa maniera avendo predisposizioni(ho il fotovoltaico già pre-installato tempo fa con gse), ho pensato di avere un hobby più impegnativo di GTAV..... ecco.. cadi proprio.. come si suol dire a fagiolo :-) ma la corrente che consumi col rig di notte, visto che di notte i pannelli FV sono fermi e non producano, insomma non c'è scambio...paghi come se non li avessi? o vien fatto un solo unico contro a fine mese tipo che paghi quello che hai consumato - quello che hai prodotto, e se il risultato è negativo ci guadagni pure? thanks |
|
|
|
Someone want to check my calculations? I'm calculating that assuming Bitcoin gets 280,000,000 GH/s, then assuming it uses the most energy and cost efficient miner I could find, then it costs $2 per GH and uses 0.5W/GH. This means that the cost to buy the equipment to power the network is $560,000,000. Also, the Bitcoin network uses 0.5 W per GH. In other words 280,000,000 * 0.5 = 140,000,000 W Now I went with the most energy efficient drive after quickly looking around, I found this: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/4tb-3tb-hdd,3183-15.htmlThe HITACHI Deskstar 5K4000: http://www.amazon.com/HITACHI-0F14697-Deskstar-5K4000-INTERNAL/dp/B00B6TMG7OThis costs you $130 for 4TB. So $560,000,000 will buy you ~4,300,000 4TB drives. 4,300,000 drives at 6W per drive gets you 25,800,000 W Or in other words, ~4 times more energy efficient than Bitcoin.. which is nice but considering how much cheaper it is to forge for Nxt than mine for Bitcoin.. maybe not as much potential as I initially was thinking. Especially if new Bitcoin mining equipment truly runs at 0.19 W instead of 0.5 W as used for the above calculation.. at which it's maybe half as energy efficient as Bitcoin. See here: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/08/15/german-startup-says-its-new-chip-halves-bitcoin-mining-energy/So this would use half as much energy as a similarly sized Bitcoin network. Here is my much longer analysis of the Nxt network: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J8uhdshu9epGRrQHBaloGc4itdvuAHZDAUtNDjOhz-8/edit?usp=sharingIt's still a cool idea and hard drives are more reusable though.. idk. I'll probably still buy a little but it's not as exciting as I was initially thinking unless he can figure out a way to use that data to store something instead of simply mine with it. Btw, FakeAccount, you may want to read this article on RAM optimizers: http://www.howtogeek.com/171424/why-memory-optimizers-and-ram-boosters-are-worse-than-useless/Mining using user-submitted data would not work well. Miners would likely submit files made of deterministically generated data they could re-create when needed, and use those to mine with, turning it into POW. I noticed you linked the Permacoin paper a few pages back, which only gets around this problem by using a central authority to decide which files are able to be mined with. Where this is more efficient, is for people mining with existing hardware they're also using for other purposes. The difference in power between 'normal usage' of a computer, and 'normal usage' + mining would be a much more interesting comparison.i think the real question it is highlighted above!!! this is the real difference between PoW and PoC... and obviously, PoC is much more better!!! |
|
|
|
E' rimasta qualche moneta "profittevole" da minare con le 750ti? O almeno... Qualche moneta che permetta di rimanere in pari senza perderci troppo? Dopo parecchio tempo ho riattivato i jpc, ma non credo convenga (anche perchè il wallet non vuole saperne di andare qui da me e quindi mi perdo il pos mettendo tutto su bittrex...). Voi cosa minate?  Buona notte, ciaociao con gpu... profittevole.. non credo... ma se qualcuno la conosce sono qui per apprendere!!! :-) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
