Imho, no need to waste time of that since I think that using current "Status" column should be enough, I'll try to sort that out this weekend when I have a little bit more free time. I appreciate the offer though. 👍



Majority of those threads simply cancel that bumping service when they see that their thread is going nowhere and posts have been deleted constantly day after day. But yeah, it's not a bad idea to revisit the threads occasionally as some of them will attempt the same thing, thinking that they lost the attention.

Looking at @maks-ivanov89 praise at Fybit, and you being so defensive about the exchange that you started using couple of days ago, makes me believe that the real purpose of this thread is promotion, and not genuine enquiry about Fybit.

So, this is how I think it went:
1. First, you created the thread asking "Who knows a platform with ALCM function?"
2. @maks-ivanov8 (this name kinda reminds me of yours) wakes up after 6 months break, just to recommend you completely unknown exchange that no one here ever heard of.
3. Several days later, you come asking opinions about Fybit and when some members raised valid concerns about it, you went into defense mode, which I think is very strange since you just started using exchange couple of days ago.

Ah sorry, completely missed that one.

Regarding the first suggestion about updating the status, you are absolutely right. I planned to do that for quite some time, but somehow always found the reason to postpone it. I will definitely try to do that soon, when I have a little bit more free time.

About adding one more column, maybe I should simply edit current status with "Cleaned" and sort that out in a more convenient way, isntead adding one more column as it would take some time considering size of the list. Anyway, will think about it.

Not true, listing on CMC is completely free, for both coins&tokens and exchanges. Now why this FYBIT is not listed either there or on Coingecko is another story. Most likely they are not meeting minimum requirements. Not that being on CMC/Coingecko makes you legit, but still, if you are not even listed there says something about the exchange.



Maybe I am just too paranoid, but it looks to me that real intention behind this thread is to promote this dodgy exchange and not asking about opinion, considering how defensive OP is about some exchanges that he (allegedly) found out couple of days ago.

You might wanna take a look at the Celsius. I have a couple of friends that deposited pretty decent amount of crypto there (mostly stablecoins) and are getting around 9% interest on it.

Just bare in mind that even though Celsius is legit, it is safe until it isn't so I wouldn't risk any bigger part of the portfolio there, and certainly not everything.

My guess is that shilling their stuff under tweets of the popular influencers, as I often see altcoins being promoted under their tweets.

Those shills are as obvious and "natural" as those paid thread bumpings that we can see in the altcoin board. Somehow I doubt that those comments can attract real investors, but to each their own.

Yeah, announcement threads mentioned in this topic are doing it more subtle, as they are not giving their tokens in exchange for thread bumping, but instead they are paying "marketing agency" to that, and you usually won't find any written evidence of that.

Last time when I provided exactly the kind of proof you are talking about, for some thread wasn't deleted. Back on January 1st I reported this thread, provided the proof that they are offering incentive for thread bumping, but my report remained unhandled. Evidence below should be good enough, right?

---

The main reason why i didn't include SatishiClub topics is because I am only focused on threads that are active at the moment of discovery due simple reason: that list would be at least 4x bigger if I included all those old topics that were being bumped and I didn't want to waste my (or mods time) cleaning old and abandoned threads but instead focus on the ongoing ones.

What exactly would be a proof enough that they are paying for those posts? Would maybe table like the one below suffice, to see the clear connection between the accounts and various threads. I mean, for what other reason would same group of (mostly newbie) accounts write on the same group of threads, if not for being paid to do exactly that?

One of the members responsible for that increase is definitely @GazetaBitcoin. He has been very active lately in cleaning the altcoin section from all that paid redundant crap, based on this list. For example, just yesterday he reported 2255 posts, which is insane number. Majority of people don't report that much in a year, let alone a day or two.

I didn't say that either. OP is looking for an exchange that has some coins that Binance doesn't have and that has high volume. Looking at Bisque, I don't see any crypto listed there that Binance doesn't have so that's why I asked if Bisque is really good option for him.

Since you said that KYC is not an issue, you might wanna check Gate, as they have large amount of shitcoins that are not available on Binance (at least not yet). If you wanna go for something more reputable that doesn't require KYC, I would suggest Kucoin and FTX.



Since OP is obviously looking for an exchange that has bunch of altcoins that Binance doesn't have, is Bisq actually a good option for him?

To be more precise, forum is done with you. At least with this account, but I have no doubt that you will come back.



Tbh, nothing wrong with newbies wanting some merit, but as we could see from the OP example, many are just too eager to pretender that they know more than they do so they opt for plagiarizing. In reality, you can shit load of more merit just by asking the right questions and being genuinely interested in learning about bitcoin.  But these fools don't understand that, to their detriment.

Yeah, I don't expect BTC seeing below 20K, unless something huge happening. Same goes for bear market like in 2018, market is different nowadays. After all, we didn't have bull run as it was in 2017, so maybe bear won't be as bad as before.

Either way, I am not too much fussed about it, I stopped worrying about BTC price long time ago. Just gotta think long term, and that's about it.


.

Another one bites the dust! Good job @lovesmayfamilis!

Another obviously fake newbie member trying to squeeze couple of merits, but as usual gets busted right away and will probably end up getting banned for plagiarism. Man, these fools will never learn; instead laying low and trying to farm those merits in a more subtle way, they instead create these threads that just get them attention, but not the kind they wanted.

Maybe I am completely wrong, but I have a feeling that OP would be too scared of buying BTC if it drops between 16-22k, like many others. I mean, he is already talking about bear market just because BTC went down ~35%. Same thing happened last summer, everyone was talking about bear market, while instead BTC made another all time high.

And yeah, I agree that is much better to start buying now instead waiting for some specific prices which may never come. You don't have to immediately buy with everything you have, but DCA is not a bad tactic. At least that's what I am doing.

First of all, you have to ask yourself does it it even make sense for this coin/token to exist, I mean if there is a real need for tokenization. In 99% of the cases answer is no, meaning its just being used as a gimmick to raise funds.

Problem is, even if token makes sense, team is experienced and they have a good idea, they will most likely fail as its in the nature of startups to fail. Somewhere I read that startup failure rate is 90%+, and we are talking about non crypto startups. And when you add something as crypto that is not mainstream yet  in equation, that number goes to probably 99.99%.

Problem with 1xbit is that they are very aggressive with marketing and their ads can be found all over the place
So forums example, when someone sees their ad on some big site like Coinmarketcap, they don't think twice. Instead they just assume that since 1xbit is advertised on some big and popular site, it must be legit.

Seems like having a shitty reputation here is not hurting their business too much...

I have some ideas, but in order to do then I'll need a lot of time. Before I even start yearly overview I have to do the same for my local board, then monthly overview and then in the end yearly thing.

So yeah it will take some time


That's actually a pretty good idea. Thanks!

So you created an account approximately 6 years ago, never wrote anything up until now, and just suddenly woke up too write some classic Ann thread bumping post. Looks legit

@OP Regarding team members, are those their real names, and if they are why don't you use some normal picture of them?

Hah, my experience with forums is completely different. On one of them I am active for ~20 years (general type of forum, place where I heard about Bitcoin for the first time ) and on another for around 10 years (IT forum). Both are Croatian forums, and both of them used to be way more active back in the day, so that's why Ia m not overly fussed with bitcointalk post numbers decreasing as that's how it goes, forums are not as popular as they used to be.

Once I settle on the forum I don't leave easily, so I hope to stay on Bitcointalk for at least that long.