Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 05:11:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 [198] 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 ... 256 »
3941  Other / Meta / Re: DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this. on: January 24, 2018, 10:56:33 AM
Another pathetic conspiracy dreamed up because the truth isn't exciting enough.

OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  Roll Eyes.

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.


The shitposters that The Pharmacist is tagging would never have a chance in hell of ever getting on a campaign like Chipmixer because their campaign manager actually does their job properly and only accepts quality posters. If all the other crapcoin ICO's and shitmanagers like Sylon did their job people wouldn't have to leave negative feedback because they'd never get on campaigns in the first place. It's because of these campaigns that accept unlimited amounts of shitposters and pay them for any old spam that people feel like they have to take action. Speculating that people are doing this to get rid of competition and free up spaces for themselves is moronic.
3942  Economy / Reputation / Re: The Pharmacist - Attacks Filipinos here in BCT on: January 23, 2018, 03:54:31 PM
Really?  He's may be a moderator or what. He don't have right to say that. Even Filipinos in that position will not say those things because they have respect to other nationality. Filipino do there job professionally with respect. Cry

Filipinos generally do a lousy and lazy job hence why they have such a bad reputation around here. I would turn your scorn to the actual root cause of the disdain for Filipinos and that is the huge amount of spam you lot make on an industrial scale, but you are a prime example of a shitposter and deserve the feedback.  Your entire post history consists of just one sentence of spam and half of your last 20 posts are you just trying to join campaigns.
3943  Other / Meta / Re: Banning Accounts on: January 22, 2018, 02:28:36 PM
Don't make low quality posts and put some effort into your contributions. Why are you scared of your account being magically banned? Have you had one banned before? Read the rules in Meta and the stickies of the individual boards you post in would be a good start.
3944  Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system. on: January 22, 2018, 02:12:33 PM
No need for Theymos to review the trust system.
Some members should just pay attention to the guidlines carefully.

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
Good find! But, although his post is older than my account, I think it's safe to say spam wasn't such a big problem 4 years ago.
I didn't find it. A member in reputation thread pointed it out. At least DT members should know the guidelines. If there is a need to change the rules they should discuss with theymos on the right thread, before the whole stuff will get out of control.

They're merely guidelines not strict rules. The feedback system shouldn't really be used against signature spammers but I'm not exactly against it right now because how bad things have gotten. Signature spam is already out of control and it's because theymos won't act on doing something about it that people are using the trust system to fight against it because it's the only thing they can do. I actually hope people do keep leaving negative for the worst posters and I people also keep complaining about it because it might force theymos to actually think about what he can do to curb spam because it got out of control a long time ago and it isn't going to magically get any better.
3945  Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system. on: January 22, 2018, 11:09:44 AM
Look at how many complaints he got up in recent day and don't tell me you could easily dismiss all of that cause "They are just bunch of haters because they receive negative trust from him" or "He did nothing wrong". If you could say that then I will call this broad is governed by a bunch of elitists that so detach from the community.


He only got complaints recently because he was only recently added to default trust so that's when his feedback started to carry weight, hence why people are now complaining as his feedback didn't mark them as scammers before. Often when I go to perma ban spammers posting exclusively in off topic half of the time I find he's already left them feedback so I agree with him in those cases.

Just this could show how your blind hatred over for a bunch of shitposters to consider them worst than a scammer. Lucky that is your own opinion anyway. If you want to save the "perfectly English" in here so much then step up the game, hired an English Nazi squad, wear a badge and going around abuse the trust system for your own selfish way of hatred over shitposters or 3rd world English garbage.

They are worse than scammers in regards to being a cancer to the usability of this board and I explained why. I've never been scammed by anyone because I'm not an idiot who gives my money away, but I have to read and deal with the utter drivel written by people like you every day which has ruined the ENTIRE forum because you can't have a decent discussion here any more and that's why spammers are a far more pressing issue than a few scammers that you shouldn't be giving your money away to anyway.
3946  Other / Meta / Re: Shame on this community. Failed to bring guidelines to protect the trust system. on: January 22, 2018, 10:58:08 AM
I start this topic because,
a. This community is slowly moving to a point where it may fail to distinguish scammers and spammers.
b. Personal preferences are being taken for consideration for feedback.

I still have faith on hilariousandco and requesting him to bring an initiative to protect the trust system with possible guidelines.


What do you wan't me to do? Feedback system isn't moderated by staff or admins and I don't have any powers to enforce any guidelines there. There's already a guideline for leaving trust which is on the feedback page anyway. Leaving negative trust for spammers isn't ideal but what else can be done by regular users? Until theymos actually decides to do something about the huge spam issue here then people are going to take things into their own hands and that's why people are fighting back by using the trust system because it's the only weapon they have right now. Hopefully the threat of getting negative feedback will make the majority of users up their game especially if it becomes common knowledge that poor quality posters are going to have their accounts ruined.  
3947  Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system. on: January 22, 2018, 10:35:21 AM
This is an online forum, not an academic broad where everyone has to post a long wall of text. What are you doing right now only make the trust system lower its standard for the shitposters and not scammers or illegal activity.

You don't need to write a thesis for every post but you don't need to force yourself to just write a hollow sentence of nothingness either. It's clear that you don't actually care about contributing anything here because you don't seem to have made a single constructive post nor one that is more than a sentence. In fact, they're barely more than a handful of words. Why is that? Because you don't need to write anything else so why bother. I'm betting the only reason you post here like 99% of the other users who sign up now is just to earn and in the laziest way possible without putting any thought or effort into their posts whatsoever. This forum has become useless for any sort of discussion as it has been taken over by shitposters and crapcoin ICOs churning out posts just to rank up and/or claim payment and that's why people are fighting back by using the trust system because it's the only weapon they have until theymos finally decides to do something about this issue.

And shitposters are far worse to this community than scammers. Scammers don't pollute every sub board like a cancer spreading. They stick to the Marketplace and if people are stupid enough to send them their money then it's very likely their own fault in 99% of cases.

I know that I shouldn't use this as an excuse or try to justify for my poor grasp of my English but really, able to master one language is very difficult.
It most certainly is not. The word 'master' is very vague and you most certainly do not need to "master" English to post as a regular user.

This is an online forum, not an academic broad where everyone has to post a long wall of text. What are you doing right now only make the trust system lower its standard for the shitposters and not scammers or illegal activity.
Here's a simpler and more elegant solution: Do not posting in a language which you do not know well enough.
Well, better make a sticky banner at the top of bitcointalk say 'English Only' then. Did you know a language in the end just a way to communicate with each person? I feel very disgusted at the sign of a person that takes proud of his English and consider everyone else are inferior to him when his English was his mother tongue language.



Bitcointalk is an English-speaking board. It's also stated in rule number 9:

Quote
9. Discussions in the main boards must be in english. All other language discussions should be posted in the appropriate Local board. [e]

Anyone who isn't fluent should stick to their local boards.
3948  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 22, 2018, 10:32:19 AM
you are the idiot here not me , why you don`t answer about your doupe accounts and i don`t think you can be the dictator of this forum , you are a simple MOD , not even a ADMIN.

You call yourself a mod ? why you want us to respect the rulles witch you don`t respect them .

1 ) Call me a scammer , hacker , cheater ( without proofs )
2 ) Doupe accounts  : hilariousandco + hilariousetc ( you are use them bouth )
3 ) Bad Language
4 ) You must mediate the situation not to ban everyone.

1) You've used in excess of over 100 hacked accounts here. There's proof alone of the shady activity you're involved with.
2) Alt accounts are allowed. Why don't you read the rules for once?
3) What bad language? You use bad language as well, but what's your point? And calling an idiot an idiot is hardly bad language. You are an idiot by the very definition:

Quote
An idiot, dolt, dullard is a person perceived to be lacking intelligence, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way.

You were told the rules by polite warnings countless times. You ignore them. You got bans on several accounts and ignored them. Cyrus even gave you one final chance as long as you follow the rules and you still broke them. Why? Because you're an idiot. Only an idiot would not follow the rules and like the definition of an idiot you act in a self-defeating and significantly counterproductive way and now you are not allowed to sell here because of that. This is all your own fault.

4) Not everyone gets banned. Only those who break the rules and refuse to follow them even after repeated warnings.
3949  Other / Meta / Re: Got problem with account on: January 22, 2018, 09:57:52 AM
I'd ask the seller for your money back because no staff member is going to recover an account that you can't prove is yours and since it's a bought account that is going to be impossible (nor should it be returned to you).
3950  Other / Meta / Re: The ANN thread is getting out of hand on: January 20, 2018, 05:59:33 AM
I've previously suggested that ICOs have to pay some sort of fee to be able to make a thread in the Announcement board. This will sort the wheat from the chaff and at least will prove that they're at least willing to put some money behind their scam project. Far too much abuse is going on here because everything is free. Want two hundred accounts to sig spam and claim bounties? Sure, go right ahead. Want one thousand accounts to spam bump threads with boys? No problem. Want to create a crapcoin and pay an unlimited amount of users to spam it all over the forum with the coin you pre-mined for free? Standard practice. Rinse and repeat after your campaign has ended and staff are left to clean up the mess from these greedy and lazy scammers month after month. If people have to pay a fee they'll think twice about listing here but at the moment they have nothing to lose. Charging people to have a signature will instantly stop account farming and people having dozens to hundreds of accounts each because nobody would be able to afford it.
3951  Other / Meta / Re: Spam from @AlexPromotion | Updated with 447 accounts, getting nuked!Thanks Mods! on: January 20, 2018, 05:46:55 AM
I think it's time to bring newbie jail back in some capacity. I've previously suggested that all new users are essentially shadowbanned and their posts don't show up to anybody but themselves until a moderator checks their account for abuse and then whitelists them (or nukes them). This would put a stop to all bots and stuff like ref spam and people asking them same questions about activity/ranks and other such stupid threads time after time.
3952  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 19, 2018, 02:19:02 PM
I won`t go away because you want to ... why the owner of the site don`t see what kind of person you are .
You can`t be the dictator of this forum.
You have doupe accounts because of you are greedy for air drops and others .

You broke the rules countless times. You still refuse to play by them so you're banned and as a global moderator I enforce those rules and bans. When idiots like you can't follow rules despite several warnings and bans they are no longer allowed to post here. These rules apply to everyone not just you so stop playing the victim.
3953  Other / Meta / Re: Stop fake bitcointalk clones on: January 19, 2018, 08:22:39 AM
However, why was advertisement of stake.com being displayed on the .to website? Are stake.com even paying the clones to display their ads on clone forums?
Also, OP , please remove the link to the direct .to website as someone might actually click it unknowingly, just place it under [ code ]

I asked stake about this and am awaiting a response. I suppose it's possible that they're unaware of it or didn't pay them directly and are using a third party advertising service to put their adverts on bitcoin related websites.
3954  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 19, 2018, 05:29:01 AM

if you told ,, mate just stop wasting those accounts and use your own one " i will understand that but you banned my domnulecyr one

Mate, stop wasting those accounts and go away. Any account you use will be banned. Do you understand?


Just leave my account alone and let me post in market place is all what i ask .

And all I ask is for you to leave the forum alone and stop posting here because you're not allowed and have a lifetime ban.


Also why do you use doupe accounts ? isn`t against the rulles ?

No. You can have multiple accounts, you just can't use them to break rules as you continue to do to this day.
3955  Other / Meta / Re: BCT automatic banning ip in philippines? on: January 19, 2018, 05:20:16 AM
That's because there's so many shitposters in the Philippines that have dozens of accounts banned for various rule breakings and when they do any connection they used is blacklisted. Find a connection that isn't banned or just pay the fee.
3956  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 18, 2018, 05:39:11 PM
I explained you why i made double bumps / day because everyone do that but you had something with me .

So stealing is ok because others do it? No. Stop going on about irrelevant things. Others breaking the rules doesn't mean it's ok for you to do so.

I wanted to follow the rulles !!!

You wanted to follow the rules by breaking them constantly? Not sure where the logic is here.

I never hacked accounts i boutght them from the market smart guy...

Well I don't believe you but I asked for proof of this before and you were unable to provide it, but whether you bought them or not is irrelevant because you're still using hacked accounts and contributing to the illicit market of them here. Also, not really sure why you would purchase zero or one post newb accounts in the first place. I would say it's more than likely you just hacked them yourself, but still irrelevant who actually did the hacking.

i made some mistakes true nobody is perfect but why you don`t recognize you made mistakes against me , for example writening in my feedback score SCAMMER HACKER ( show that proof to everyone ) .

Something isn't a mistake if you keep doing it time after time. You use hacked bitcointalk accounts so you're not an innocent angel here and it doesn't look good does it?

I`m just trying to get inside of the market that`s i`m daily posting with new accounts and you know that because you are banning me constantly but if someone have 2-3 accounts now and posting you Won`t see them

You're not allowed to post in the market. The fact that you try to do so constantly with hacked accounts and bump them multiplies times a day shows you've learned nothing. If you wanted to follow the rules then you would but that is something you've never been interested in doing for as long as you've been here.



why did you deleted the post with this guys ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=871593.0  - used accounts to bump his thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1596239.20 - several bumps.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2673750.0 - how many bann`s have this guy !?

is any of them your friend ?

Because you don't read the rules. Stop multiposting. Report them and I'll handle them.

Anyway, I'm really not sure what you're trying to get out of this thread because you're never going to be unbanned and I'm never going to stop banning your accounts just as you are never going to learn to play by the rules. I would suggest you stop wasting your own time and move on.
3957  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 18, 2018, 05:13:45 PM
I tell you the truth i don`t like Admins who think are the god on earth like i said earlier . When i saw to much stupidity at an admin i told him that ( and results a BAN ) .

And I don't like people who think they're gods of the forum and don't follow the rules and use hacked accounts and ban evade and spam the forum with bots. If you had followed the rules then you would still be allowed to post here. This is all your fault as I've told you numerous times before.

I just wanted to follow the rulles but if made just the tinny mistake Hilarious banned me .

i meant tinny mistake a post forgotten to be deleted after all everyone make mistakes.

Stop multiposting. You don't want to follow the rules at all and purposely flaunt them so stop playing victim. You've known it was against the rules to bump your threads multiple times a day and not remove bumps as I warned you several times about this on numerous accounts and you evaded your bans constantly and to this day you're still doing all of these things so it's not a mistake otherwise you wouldn't do it.

I think the worst thing to do is to scamm or hack someone witch i never did that but i got Negative feedback from Hilarious and CO without have any proofs against me.

What are you talking about? Stop lying because you constantly use hacked bitcointalk accounts to bump your threads and you're using one  now so you're not an innocent victim here.
3958  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 18, 2018, 04:11:50 PM
I am not stupid , because i have some proofs here witch you are involved

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2186518.0  - how many bumps did the guy mate !?  You wrote in his thread to erase double posts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2299093.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2299334.0

I will post more but check this subject first of all !

So i`m the black sheep on this market !? do you have any proofs where i sold hacked invites ?

Not sure how that means I'm involved but I've just deleted his bumps and gave him a 7 day ban. If someone reports them or I notice them they get dealt with.

And no, I don't have any proof directly of you selling hacked accounts but the fact that you've been banned multiple times from other forums for doing so and the fact that you've used hundreds of hacked bitcointalk accounts here doesn't look good does it? You selling hacked accounts is besides the point anyway because you were banned for refusing to follow the rules despite countless warnings. Even after cyrus gave you yet another chance on the prevision you follow the rules that still wasn't enough.
3959  Other / Meta / Re: Post deleted ? why ? People must see this ! on: January 18, 2018, 09:06:05 AM
New and old users ( TRUSTED USERS ) are banned for no reason or proofs .

I`m one of them !

Hilarious and co thinks he own this forum and bann everyone .


CAN`T you see THAT MOD !?




You might have been breaking the rules here for a long time on various accounts but you're not trusted at all. You sell hacked torrent accounts/invites and have used in excess of one hundred hacked accounts to fake vouch and spam bump your threads. You continually break the rules and refuse to learn despite repeated warnings and bans. Cyrus was even foolish enough to give into your constant whining and ban evading and give you a second chance and unban you (as if the first hundred+ chances wasn't enough) but you just carried on the same behaviour as always refusing to remove bumps, bumping several times a day and using hacked accounts to do so.


now i have few questions : Why i was the only one banned ?  Why the scammers and cheaters on the market still have accounts ? why No admin answered when i reported ALOT OF MEMBERS FOR CHEATING , SPAMMING AND SCAMMING ? Why i was the only one who got banned without any kind of proofs ?

You're not the only one banned. I've banned plenty of people who refuse to follow the marketplace rules despite warnings but most people aren't as stupid as you and take the hint after the first warning or ban (you had five bans alone on the steamproject account and that's not even counting your other main ones and hundreds of nuked newbie accounts you used to fake vouch). In fact, I've banned your arch nemesis mezaz countless times for the same thing. You're just an idiot who thinks the rules don't apply to him and that's why you keep getting banned. Quicker you grow up an learn this the better.

P.s2

3960  Other / Meta / Re: Ideas for improving post quality? on: January 18, 2018, 05:03:43 AM
What are everyone's ideas for improving post quality?

I have mostly ruled out:

 - Removing signatures or sig ads globally.
 - Requiring payment to wear sig ads.
 - Banning account sales.

A couple of ideas that have been floating around in my head:

1. To attain ranks above Member, you'd have to earn some number of merit points. Merit points would be awarded in a monthly vote on best posts of the previous month, with various measures (TBD) to prevent gaming of the vote. Winning merit points might also come with a BTC prize.

2. Create or designate some sections as "serious discussion" sections, with no signatures. In those sections or maybe in different ones, also have poster restrictions such as Member rank or above only. And/or allow topic-creators to set these restrictions on their topics, similar to selfmod topics.

What do you think of these ideas, and what other ideas do people have?

Theymos, can you update us on where you are with this? I don't think we're going to get any more viable suggestions other than the ones already proposed in here. You've already implemented option two which is great but it still doesn't address the rest of the spam which is only going to get worse the longer we leave it. I still think we should strongly consider removing signatures from ranks or at the very least allow users the option to buy them if they wish. The people who can afford it will just pay rather than try spam their way through ranks. Alternatively, have you thought any more about option one? A merit based system would surely stop the majority of poor posters but I envision this system will be hard to implement and may cause a lot of hassle and complaints but it's better than allowing anyone to have unlimited accounts to spam from at least and I imagine everyone will try up their game if their livelihood depends on it.
Pages: « 1 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 [198] 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 ... 256 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!