how to recover a lost account? anybody know?
what do u mean by lost? if u got the private key to account → u control this account. how to restore was the wrong account? so there is some account which is controlled by private key. if u don't have this private key → u can't own this account. if u want to own this account → u should: find the private key or ask the current owner to send u this account. that's all variants. whether one private key can be used for many accounts? yep. |
|
|
|
how to recover a lost account? anybody know?
what do u mean by lost? if u got the private key to account → u control this account. how to restore was the wrong account? so there is some account which is controlled by private key. if u don't have this private key → u can't own this account. if u want to own this account → u should: find the private key or ask the current owner to send u this account. that's all variants. |
|
|
|
how to recover a lost account? anybody know?
what do u mean by lost? if u got the private key to account → u control this account. |
|
|
|
I had download and installed the PASC wallet but i don't how to use it.....  What would you like to do in the wallet? There are 3 operation you can do - Send transaction to a destination account. Change key of an account - Key can be either from your wallet or to a new owner's. Recover coins (lost keys) This is a great place to read on what PASC is all about - https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/wiki/FAQHow to receive PascalCoin without PASC account ,i meant witch is my wallet address u can use an exchange wallet (poloniex for example) as temporary storage. |
|
|
|
I have to send 0.001 pacs to test but no trace on poloniex. I must have missed something. I did this: -operations -new single operations -in account destination I set: 86646-64 -ammount: 0.0001Payload I checked: encrypted whit dest. Account public key And I mark the payload that has on my poloniex account. I see the operation on my wallet, but nothing on poloniex. in ur case transaction fee == 0.0001 and amount == 0.0001 so sendind result == amount - fee == 0. I sent first 1 PASC to polo (first time for me) to test, and I did the same, just I selected don't encrypt the payload, but I think it should work fine with enc with dest pub key, I just didn't see the need to hide the payload. If anyone wants to deposit to polo with my payload, feel free   Oh, the 1 PASC arrived a while later.. it takes some time so delays happen but everything works. ☺ |
|
|
|
I have to send 0.001 pacs to test but no trace on poloniex. I must have missed something. I did this: -operations -new single operations -in account destination I set: 86646-64 -ammount: 0.0001Payload I checked: encrypted whit dest. Account public key And I mark the payload that has on my poloniex account. I see the operation on my wallet, but nothing on poloniex. in ur case transaction fee == 0.0001 and amount == 0.0001 so sendind result == amount - fee == 0. |
|
|
|
Hello ,
I got an account today, I want to make a pascalcoin transfer on my wallet.
In poloniex there is address and payload. What does payload mean?
payload == payment identifier that allows polo to know that coins are came into ur balance. only needed when u transfer from ur wallet/account → polo balance. not needed when u withdraw pasc from polo → ur own account. |
|
|
|
For me difficult to imagine, but not impossible ..(I am probably too naive for this world)
That would be a bit perfidious. Or perhaps an obsession / egotism?
Who else should invest the time and why. To provoke tony? Or a mysterious way of advertising?
The world is full of mystery..
sybil in flesh and flood. ☺ |
|
|
|
The advantage is all the features listed on byteball.org and being a DAG it has no architectural limit on scaling, only implementation and hardware is limiting.
It's wrong. As all distributed systems DAG is limited by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem. quote from the source: CAP is frequently misunderstood as if one had to choose to abandon one of the three guarantees at all times. In fact, the choice is really between consistency and availability for when a partition happens only; at all other times, no trade-off has to be made. |
|
|
|
I lost some amount of PASC in a way from my wallet to Poloniex yesterday morning.  Opened support ticket with Poloniex. I hope they will give an answer what is happening with PASC deposits. i did the same: sent small (was lucky) amount to polo just at time they disabled pasc deposits. i think that there is one correct way for polo – just show the full balance (current + sent amount) after launching pasc depo/withdrawals again. i've got all my transactions now. so the problem is fixed. |
|
|
|
what are the advantages of PASL that makes it better then PASC? |
|
|
|
Hi guys! What time is the next distribution of Byteball?
april 11, 2017 at 06:08 utc (snapshot time and distribution comes after). |
|
|
|
Any idea on how to fix this keeps on happening on 480 cards
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Restarting OK, exit... crashes and have to restart system as claymore wont exit or close
Are you dual mining ETH + DCR? Single mining and never had this problem until drivers updated but since managed to get working again with custom bios switched to normal mode and then installed drivers and reverted back o silent mode with custom bios on. Took a lot to get working again was getting to point where was about to flash back but the bios and cards can handle 29MH on ETH and close to 300H/s on zec i had the same issue on dual (eth+pasc) mining. it was solved after splitting the gpu's power lines (2 gpu were on the same line). |
|
|
|
I tried to find out how scalable the byteball network actually is. Did not find any information about that topic. So how many transaction can the network handle? Does anybody know this?
The only bottleneck for handling txs for bytebal are: 1. bandwidth 2. storage hardware 3. cost of sending txs - every tx costs as many bytes as it takes in size It is essentially equally scalable (and not more) as any blockchain with dynamic blocksize (ethereum, monero, etc.) although there's no "blocksize limit". You can send as many txs as possible and if it won't cost you a fortune or clog bandwidth or make DAG take terabytes in size the network will handle it seamlessly. It's actually an attack vector at the moment because txs are cheap (bytes are still cheap) and you can make DAG database grow quickly to inconvenient size in just a day or two. Sending tx of 100GB would cost you only $5000 and would make running a full node for a random user rather painful. To completely cripple byteball you need at the moment around $3mln. It would make DAG databese 60TB in size which would exclude most commercial computers from being able to run a full node. There is a lot of problems with byteball I see after lurking into source code. First of all Byteball code written on Javascript, and all network connections go thrue WebSocket (protocol designed for web browser to allow some AJAX fancy things). Second, it's not clear how genesis block was made and how much power developer, who hold all keys, has over the network. He probably can generate new coins at any time he want. Third, witnesses list can't be really replaced. This list of dev personal witnesses can't be changed easilly and probably here to stay forever. Byteball not immune to any fishing attacks. Network can easily be replaced with malicious one, if some hacker suddenly changed download link on official website or somehow managed to spread wrong client around no chance to stop new network from replacing legit one.The biggest problem I see is a project code on Javascript. Why not emojicode, why javascript? Don't wanted to spread FUD here, but this thing really dangerous. сan you give an example of altcoin for which it is not so? scarcely. Original Bitcoin and all clones don't have these problems. Network can't be replaced with wallet update, because attacker need to replace miners somehow too. Malicious network will not be accepted by miners, network (blockchain) will be safe and not affected by hacker fake wallet. All coins generated transparently, POW difficulty made it imposible to rewrite blockchain from first block. PoS coins don't allow easy fork too, since attacker need some huge pile of coins to replace network. And none of them coded on javascript or emojicode. agree about btc/clones. let's wait for another opinions about byteball. |
|
|
|
I tried to find out how scalable the byteball network actually is. Did not find any information about that topic. So how many transaction can the network handle? Does anybody know this?
The only bottleneck for handling txs for bytebal are: 1. bandwidth 2. storage hardware 3. cost of sending txs - every tx costs as many bytes as it takes in size It is essentially equally scalable (and not more) as any blockchain with dynamic blocksize (ethereum, monero, etc.) although there's no "blocksize limit". You can send as many txs as possible and if it won't cost you a fortune or clog bandwidth or make DAG take terabytes in size the network will handle it seamlessly. It's actually an attack vector at the moment because txs are cheap (bytes are still cheap) and you can make DAG database grow quickly to inconvenient size in just a day or two. Sending tx of 100GB would cost you only $5000 and would make running a full node for a random user rather painful. To completely cripple byteball you need at the moment around $3mln. It would make DAG databese 60TB in size which would exclude most commercial computers from being able to run a full node. There is a lot of problems with byteball I see after lurking into source code. First of all Byteball code written on Javascript, and all network connections go thrue WebSocket (protocol designed for web browser to allow some AJAX fancy things). Second, it's not clear how genesis block was made and how much power developer, who hold all keys, has over the network. He probably can generate new coins at any time he want. Third, witnesses list can't be really replaced. This list of dev personal witnesses can't be changed easilly and probably here to stay forever. Byteball not immune to any fishing attacks. Network can easily be replaced with malicious one, if some hacker suddenly changed download link on official website or somehow managed to spread wrong client around no chance to stop new network from replacing legit one.The biggest problem I see is a project code on Javascript. Why not emojicode, why javascript? Don't wanted to spread FUD here, but this thing really dangerous. сan you give an example of altcoin for which it is not so? scarcely. |
|
|
|
I lost some amount of PASC in a way from my wallet to Poloniex yesterday morning. Opened support ticket with Poloniex. I hope they will give an answer what is happening with PASC deposits. i did the same: sent small (was lucky) amount to polo just at time they disabled pasc deposits. i think that there is one correct way for polo – just show the full balance (current + sent amount) after launching pasc depo/withdrawals again. |
|
|
|
wtf? another unwanted scam proposal. |
|
|
|
don't panic. they gonna enable this option soon (as it happened before). |
|
|
|
Hello I do not quite understand how the wallet works. I mine with claymore and use poloniex to store my pascalcoin. I can transfer my pascalcoin on the wallet? I do not understand how to do ......  If you want to store your coins in your own wallet, you need also a PascalCoin Account. Accounts are generated by the miners, if you are mining with a pool, ask to the pool for an account (surely you will need to provide your PUBLIC KEY, that can be found running your wallet, at "private keys") After this, the pool will give you an account (if you've mined enough) and then you can save your coins in local if you want. 1. So if I want an account without going through nanopool, I must undermine solo and find a block. 2. That's right ? When I find a block I will have 5 account? 3. I mined about 300 pascalcoin with nanopool is enough for them to give me an account? 1. yep. but accept the real chances with ur hashrate compared to hashrate of the pools. 2. yep. each block produces 5 accounts. 3. every 20 mined pasc give u an account. see my messaging with nano support: ========= what is minimum mined pasc amount that provides an account? it's 20 Pasc. you need to set your public key to get the accounts, in settings panel. when you have the required amount of PASC paid, new account will be sent with NEXT payment. I know, It's not the best way to check, so we'll change the account distribution system later. ========= |
|
|
|
Thank you, but I got all that seemingly working, no errors and it's using all cores (I presume). I just have no idea how much it is hashing at.  mine to the pool. u'll see ur worker rate. https://pasc.nanopool.org/help |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
