one more question: are the transactions picked up by chance from the mempool? Are there any criteria besides the econmic ones?
To give you a better picture: Transactions aren't being picked up and deleted from the mempool. ( This must be where your confusion came from) Mining Pools, Solo Miners, anything with Full Node ( eg. Bitcoin Core) have their individual mempool and it's constantly being updated based from their own/default rules and new transactions from their peers' mempool; it will only be deleted or rejected if it was " mined", didn't follow their set or default rules, input(s) were double-spent or transaction expired. So each node's mempool shouldn't be too different than each other's. |
|
|
|
|
If you want an offline backup and you're not planning to spend from that imported wallet yet,
you can export the private key from the imported address and copy it to a piece of paper just like a seed phrase backup.
Simply run Electrum with a copy of the wallet in an offline machine, open 'Addresses' tab (View->Show Addresses).
Find the address, right-click, select "private key", type your password and the private key will show up.
BTW, if there's no private key option, check the wallet type in the title bar;
If it says "[imported, watching only]", you have imported the address (not wallet) the wrong way.
|
|
|
|
It just crashed again. It was working well since yesterday night (when I noticed it was stopped) until 5 minutes ago. It has been working but I can see this block error every now and then, probably when the daemon dumps the cache onto the drive.
Do you think I need to delete the entire 'chainstate' folder? Wouldn't that single file be enough to delete and the daemon re-download it again?
It will ask you to rebuild the whole database even if you delete that single file; it might even produce errors. Rebuilding the database wont take long compared to syncing the whole blockchain. Anyways, based from the new replies, it looks like you have more corrupted files than the one in the chainstate folder. Your .blk files seems to have inconsistencies like missing transactions probably because of corrupted data. You might need to check for hardware issues. |
|
|
|
this is really strange, its got over 112 confirmations..
Did you redeemed Bitcoin [ BTC] or Bitcoin Cash [ BCH]? Electrum only supports Bitcoin [ BTC]. You might have bought the altcoin that shares the same name because both are supported by cryptovoucher. If you're not sure, Check the blockexplorer link of the transaction, there's usually a name of the coin written somewhere. |
|
|
|
Now I started the daemon again and after it was running normally, I shut it down with 'bitcoin-cli stop' and I can see this: 2020-06-02T23:06:06Z Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb
-snip-
2020-06-02T23:06:06Z *** System error while flushing: Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb
-snip-
2020-06-02T23:06:06Z ForceFlushStateToDisk: failed to flush state (System error while flushing: Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb)
-snip-
2020-06-02T23:06:06Z Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb
-snip-
2020-06-02T23:06:06Z *** System error while flushing: Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb
-snip-
2020-06-02T23:06:06Z ForceFlushStateToDisk: failed to flush state (System error while flushing: Fatal LevelDB error: Corruption: block checksum mismatch: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldb)
Seems like there an issue with file: /media/Storage/Blockchain/chainstate/060607.ldbIs it still crashing? If it is: Shutdown Core normally then try to delete the " chainstate" folder in " /media/Storage/Blockchain/". Start Core and it will rebuild the database ( not redownload the blockchain); if it still crash, check the latest log. |
|
|
|
can you write down for me a command for txt to search random private from a list of address?
This is not feasible, I mean whatever your goal is. Anyways, for the command, a simple input text file containing the address in each line like this is all you need: input.txt1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE
1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr
.
.
1CUNEBjYrCn2y1SdiUMohaKUi4wpP326Lb Then use this command: vanitysearch -i input.txt -stop -o result.txt You can add -gpu or anything, just don't remove -stop. |
|
|
|
Nice catch! The matter that's his address from a supposed " forgotten wallet" belongs to the puzzle transaction proves that his story is the OP is a lie. Or he just used the wrong terms and words, because newbies often use bitcoin " wallet" instead of bitcoin " address". The latter looks like the case, still, look at the title 
@ Marynarz, if you're bruteforcing the puzzle transaction, these are the best threads to get help: Because even if there's a " language barrier", at least users will know that your goal/issue is related to the software. But the replies about " getting the private key from the public key is impossible" is still correct and never been wrong. It's just the " puzzle transaction" outputs' private keys' range are too small compared to the whole prv key length so it's possible to bruteforce them. Lastly, knowing the public key wont help you to bruteforce the private key. |
|
|
|
- What about transaction accelerators how they work ? is it possible to make a transaction accelerator that work only for my transactions ?
If you have an ASIC farm w/ enough hashrate to solo mine Bitcoin and frequently " winning" blocks, then you can prioritize it yourself by using RPC command through the client ( Bitcoin Core) connected to your mining software. Use prioritisetransaction "TXID" 0 100000000 ( usage link) to prioritize your own transaction. You won't be able to do this if you're mining in a pool. |
|
|
|
That's not really a good way to create a wallet for a couple of reasons.
Thanks, but there's no need to correct me about those points. For the first one: That's why I have added a second paragraph quoting OP's own awareness of the possible risks. I didn't added a warning since he said so himself that he's aware of the risks and want to live dangerously. Perhaps you should quote it together with the snipped quote so OP will be informed of the other risks aside from " hacks". |
|
|
|
-snip-
How did you find the [00000014ea]? And how did you know that it belongs to coinbase even though I understand that it just an assumption. Read my previous reply above (#7); 00000014ea8b260f is wallet 00000014ea. Also read the previous replies and make it a habit before posting  So let's say, I want to know if the address belong to any exchange. I will just paste the bitcoin address in the wallet explorer?
Hmm, most of the time, no; most exchange doesn't have a tag in walletexplorer. You'll likely get a wallet ID number like that. I've suggested to paste an " active Coinbase deposit address" ( if you have/know one) for an obvious reason: It's just to confirm if a Coinbase deposit address belongs to wallet00000014ea that will confirm that wallet00000014ea is Coinbase. |
|
|
|
Is there any wallet or way to adjust wallet options to generate my wallet seed? Whether it is my own words or a choice of existing words?
Since everyone is recommending Electrum, you can follow this: - Create a wallet using "Standard wallet->I already have a seed",
- Write your "own wallet seed", Click "option" and check "BIP39", it will display as "BIP39 Checksum: Failed"
- Hit next, select the address type and finish creating the wallet.
I won't warn you about the security risk because of this: I know that this will make it more vulnerable to hack, but I do not want to store many currencies in such wallets.
Electrum can only store Bitcoin by the way. |
|
|
|
So the SS wallet of seized funds is at Coinbase?
There's a way to confirm that if you have an active Coinbase deposit address that received a couple of Bitcoins. Simply paste it on walletexplorer and if your deposit address belongs to wallet [00000014ea] ( walletexplorer link) where the address in OP belongs; then you can safely assume that it's at Coinbase ( if OP's claim is real). |
|
|
|
Or, if you already have Electrum installed and working on an airgapped computer as in OP's case, you can just pull the master private key directly from Electrum itself.
Or Or,  Just use getmasterprivate() and Electrum will prompt you to enter your password. The Master private key will be displayed after entering the passphrase. |
|
|
|
The name usually varies but it means the same thing... Transaction Hash/Transaction Hash ID (Tx Hash ID)/ Transaction ID(TXID)/Transaction Hash
-snip-
That can be true for legacy transactions because TXID and TX Hash will be the same. But for Transactions with SegWit data, the " Transaction Hash" will be different than the " Transaction ID". In " SegWit Transactions", Witness data won't be included when computing the TXID, but all will be included for the HASH; so the two can't be used as the same term. Read this if I didn't explained it well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5189731.msg52639722#msg52639722But since OP is talking about a certain ( non-SegWit-friendly) blockexplorer's data named " hash", yes it's the TXID Just mentioned so users wont confuse TXID and HASH when they call decoderawtransaction or a json data from a transaction. |
|
|
|
I used Regtest for this test and it was successful. Here are the commands that I've used ( skipping createmultisig);
2-2 Multisig address info: "address": "2N9dcyDUNXxAGbBhmeSnwLQsYdEXk7jkewp",
"redeemScript": "5221024e25a55cf263164b718f2df8e246b3772f995dd783b40e6f4e5de62c93ec49232103cb1b2 55f0ea86b612eedb9c8e6446a9261d666359b5273301a45d6e3d2a3abe152ae"
Prv key1: cRBmMvn2riZHyTw13Dr9y23ynfADUiwH1YvvAg6Pp92n8TT93k8t
Prv key2: cPNZRp3FYP9JZfYRStpZhSCmQZAfWKnB4hgGffBvpcMMekKFZ5pZ
Funding transaction ( TXID): 60aebde463de893dce4b72003d57c2f4ef63f88b4c0818fdaba3c9fef0a59efe
Create a new transaction, send to two outputs: createrawtransaction "[{\"txid\":\"60aebde463de893dce4b72003d57c2f4ef63f88b4c0818fdaba3c9fef0a59efe\",\"vout\":1}]" "[{\"2N1S5utkMt53XrXuy18wURf9qqZfb7i29DB\":1.795},{\"2N4LrRMimkACSMn2LnfKrGFi4Hic6UdhxNq\":8.2}]"Result ( unsigned RAW transaction): 0200000001fe9ea5f0fec9a3abfd18084c8bf863eff4c2573d00724bce3d89de63e4bdae600100000000ffffffff02e0f3b20a0000000017a91459ced730eb49677bbf4d9d977fd66f3562c2e40a870035e0300000000017a91479b9e026e043718332aeffc5d9f15aec3d2c8b658700000000
Sign the transaction using the first key: signrawtransactionwithkey "0200000001fe9ea5f0fec9a3abfd18084c8bf863eff4c2573d00724bce3d89de63e4bdae600100000000ffffffff02e0f3b20a0000000017a91459ced730eb49677bbf4d9d977fd66f3562c2e40a870035e0300000000017a91479b9e026e043718332aeffc5d9f15aec3d2c8b658700000000" "[\"cRBmMvn2riZHyTw13Dr9y23ynfADUiwH1YvvAg6Pp92n8TT93k8t\"]" "[{\"txid\":\"60aebde463de893dce4b72003d57c2f4ef63f88b4c0818fdaba3c9fef0a59efe\",\"vout\":0,\"scriptPubKey\":\"a914b3be5906d3390d5a9f9e28343a49b8467a822c5187\",\"redeemScript\":\"5221024e25a55cf263164b718f2df8e246b3772f995dd783b40e6f4e5de62c93ec49232103cb1b255f0ea86b612eedb9c8e6446a9261d666359b5273301a45d6e3d2a3abe152ae\"}]"Result ( partially signed transaction - HEX): 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 I've got a " missing input" error when I tried to sign it without adding "prevtxs" that includes " redeem script" and others ( 2nd JSON array), so I guess it's required for P2SH-Multisig since it's P2SH.
Sign the partially signed transaction using the second key: signrawtransactionwithkey "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" "[\"cPNZRp3FYP9JZfYRStpZhSCmQZAfWKnB4hgGffBvpcMMekKFZ5pZ\"]" "[{\"txid\":\"60aebde463de893dce4b72003d57c2f4ef63f88b4c0818fdaba3c9fef0a59efe\",\"vout\":0,\"scriptPubKey\":\"a914b3be5906d3390d5a9f9e28343a49b8467a822c5187\",\"redeemScript\":\"5221024e25a55cf263164b718f2df8e246b3772f995dd783b40e6f4e5de62c93ec49232103cb1b255f0ea86b612eedb9c8e6446a9261d666359b5273301a45d6e3d2a3abe152ae\"}]"Result: 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 Then it was successfully broadcast using sendrawtransaction without errors.
If you still received " missing inputs" error, check the funding transaction's " vout" ( output index) if it's the same as you indicated in createrawtransaction. |
|
|
|
-snip-
-snip-Was it because of wallet version, he was in a wrong chain? If that was the case, I think in the updated wallet, the transaction would not be visible. I got all the above point but still that does not fit the answer. So it looks like the second scenario in my post. Since he had been using the old client, it might have created a " non-standard" transaction and that Tx was rejected by his peers, He's the only one who can see the transaction ( or users with old client), that's why it's not visible in blockexplorers. After he updated the client and abandoned the Tx, he created a new " standard" transaction as written in his last post. |
|
|
|
-snip- but I'm totally sure that wallet 3DykGaJ7SGtbE7jqqntB4WBKJf9pcZZbd2 belong to an exchange site.
I did a short websearch and the result suggests that you're right. First, 3DykGaJ7SGtbE7jqqntB4WBKJf9pcZZbd2 belongs to wallet " 00000014ea8b260f" according to walletexplorer; Then, the second listed address was tagged by whalealert as " Coinbase Exchange": whale-alert. Full Disclosure: These were seized by the US Secret Service which is where the curiosity comes from.
If this was true, then it will be very hard to track since Coinbase have the control over it. Eg. They can use other UTXO to send the funds to USSS; or spend the funds from the address in question for user withdrawals. |
|
|
|
Anyway, I just want to try this one. But I am just learning about an in-depth of cryptocurrency and blockchain. I hope I can make my own too. Is there any guide to make that one sir?
Wala yatang direktang OP_Return tool/app ( ewan ko lng), coinb.in lang ginamit ko sa pag-gawa ng transaction at mga online tools para ma convert yung mga salita sa HEX. On mo lang yung " null data" sa " Advanced option" ng coinb tapos paste mo yung HEX sa output 2 or 3. Tapos, diretso mo na i-sign->broadcast. Ang trick lang para magsunod-sunod yung sentences, dapat yung " change" ng unang sentence ( unang TX), yung gagamiting input ng second, so on so forth. Mabilisan dapat para di ma confirm yung una ng tx bago mo ma broadcast yung iba ( kaya binabaan ko yung fee). Dapat din maliit sa 80Bytes yung size ng HEX para di maging " non-standard" yung transactions.
Hehe based sa construction nya ng mga salita at higit sa lahat, alam nya din yung law of classroom na trending sa Pilipinas. Eh for sure, pinoy si nc50lc.
Sana lagi kang bored para active ka na dito sa Local. Actually di kami sure kung pinoy ka
Balak ko sanang i-post sa English board pero wala naman silang idea sa " Law of Classroom" MEME ni Kim. Di talaga ako masyadong active, kahit naman sa English boards. |
|
|
|
Dahil wala kong magawa nung isang linggo at sikat na sikat yung MEME, sinubukan kong ilagay sa blockchain gamit ang 3 transactions na CPFP para sunod-sunod na lumabas sa " parsers" kapag kinonvert sa ASCII ( readable-words). Kung may " blockchain parser" kayo, try nyo mag check ng 'OP_Return' data sa 'blk02089.dat' Para sa walang idea sa sinabi ko, may spoiler naman: https://bitcoinstrings.com/blk02089.txt ( Nasa bandang baba) Medyo na delay lang ng sobrang tagal ( 1week+) kasi 1-2.5sat/Byte yung fee na ginamit ko at napuno ng todo ang mempool nung isang lingo. Sa totoo lang, test lang yan kung makakapaglagay ako ng mahaba-habang sentence sa blockchain... Success naman. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
