Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 04:43:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 ... 391 »
3961  Bitcoin / Press / [2021-09-08] Suffolk county worker charged with running illegal mining farm on: September 10, 2021, 02:35:32 PM
From: https://www.newsday.com/long-island/crime/cryptocurrency-long-island-suffolk-sini-1.50355683

Quote
The covert Bitcoin mining, which went undetected for several months, cost county taxpayers at least $6,000 in electricity and put important county infrastructure at risk, Suffolk County District Attorney Timothy Sini said.

Quote
Sini said authorities executed search warrants on Aug. 19 and found 46 cryptocurrency mining devices, which require high levels of electricity to run, hidden in six different rooms — including under removable floorboards and inside an unused electrical wall panel. Authorities believe Naples had been operating at least 10 of the machines since February.

Starting with I live in Suffolk and am amazed that any county employee would put in that much effort to do anything, including mining.

I have been seeing things like this more and more. And am starting to wonder if plugging in miners at work to use their electric is the new, bringing along a 5 gallon gas can when filling up the company car and getting some for yourself. Although the dollar amount is more, it's still just stealing from work and should be treated as such.

But you do have to appreciate hiding a miner in an unused electrical wall panel

-Dave
3962  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BITCOIN SECURITY on: September 10, 2021, 12:02:39 PM
I dont generate those kind of keys, I generate keys on the basis on vulnebrity i did not generate some unknown keys.
I generate keys which is dependent on a vulnebrity, so it gives me more accuracy.
So it don't take years to get keys with balance. Grin

Its not "years" to find keys / addresses with a balance. It's 10s of millions of years to find them.

According to your other post you already found over 60 keys.
Prove a few of them by signing a message or just go away, other then providing some entertainment for us to poke fun of you being an idiot, there is no other reason to be here.

This forum is not hostile to new users, but idiots like yourself who spout garbage are going to be flamed till you leave or stop spouting BS.

-Dave
3963  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: List of ETF filings this year in the US on: September 10, 2021, 11:28:29 AM
The SEC is known for moving slowly with new things.
For all the people complaining about the ETF approval speed think back to the 1990s when self directed online brokerages were becoming a thing.
Some of the hurdles that some companies went thorough were insane. And since the internet and internet security were new they were demanding a lot.
Now, it's a well known process that although not easy or simple is at least known. So you can submit in a way that works.

I am 99% sure it's the same here. If this entire ETF thing goes to shit, then the SEC has the 'we did what we could' defense when the people who approved it get hauled before congress to explain what happened.

-Dave
3964  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is there any way to get back from negative trust on: September 09, 2021, 06:06:03 PM
My request to the favorite forum. I copy someone's post when I join a campaign and post it myself. Forgetting to re-edit my post, I am counted as an alt account. I do not know him or the owner of that profile. Later I found out now. My account has been negatively trusted as a connected account. I have deleted that post. Can I get out of this negative trust.Is there any way to get back from negative trust
I will never copy someone's post in the future.

Let me start with: NO

And then move to, who cares. You have a Newbie account with no merit and have done nothing with it except post altcoin bounty crap.
It's not like you were ever going to do anyting useful with this account.

-Dave
3965  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Lightning] Running a node behind NAT / Network Address Translation on: September 09, 2021, 01:26:21 PM
Interesting. A quick web search didn't bring up anything regarding externalhosts for c-lightning. Seems this is lnd exclusive. Good to keep in mind for the next LN box (still unsure between the 2 implementations rn).

c-lightning is probably a bit better then lnd for some things, and you can add a lot to it.
But, lnd does a lot more "out of the box" so to speak. It's a bit more bloaty in terms of code, but IMO, it is a bit of a one size fits all application.

And I feel lnd is easier to implement, and at a guess others do too, since it seems to be the go-to app for nodes in a box.

-Dave
3966  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Lightning] Running a node behind NAT / Network Address Translation on: September 09, 2021, 12:34:49 PM
03f8a4c71e852ff1104d20ad204404992c120aaf0d41259ee02f96ad5f45f5fc8b@75.127.136.68:9735
OR
03f8a4c71e852ff1104d20ad204404992c120aaf0d41259ee02f96ad5f45f5fc8b@dave.lightning.ninja:9735

will both get you to my node. If you have a bunch of nodes up it just makes sorting them a bit easier.
Interesting. I had my node set up with 'announce-address=[domain]' but it didn't work, a friend of mine couldn't find my node just through ID, gossip protocol somehow didn't relay my info with that setting. Somewhere I read that domains aren't resolved in Lightning so I needed to actually use IPv4, IPv6 or Tor address. But maybe that was old info? With which config entry do you set the domain? announce-addr? Or something else?

from https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/sample-lnd.conf
lines 64 to 67
Quote
; A list of domains for lnd to periodically resolve, and advertise the resolved
; IPs for the backing node. This is useful for users that only have a dynamic IP,
; or want to expose the node at a domain.
; externalhosts=my-node-domain.com

With that being said, no idea if having a dynamic IP and using a dynamic DNS provider can cause issues if between your IP changing and DNS being updated if something is being routed through your node or other financial transactions are happening at the same time.

-Dave
3967  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BITCOIN SECURITY on: September 09, 2021, 11:46:50 AM
Unless OP actually find weakness on RNG which used to generate private key on specific wallet software.

Yes, someone who has no idea how to find / contact people on github.

Or

How to google search the various discussions of importing / checking massive numbers or private keys [side note I actually had to do that once due to poor programming on someone's part]

and is a new user here who came out of nowhere.

Found a vulnerability that nobody else has.

Sure.....

-Dave
3968  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Running both mainnet and testnet from a RPi? on: September 09, 2021, 11:16:46 AM
You should be fine (for now). I don't think Electrs goes over 200GB at max on mainnet.
So, even with everything on there I don't see an issue.

If you start adding on other stuff, that answer will change, but for now it's fine.

-Dave
3969  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: [Lightning] Running a node behind NAT / Network Address Translation on: September 09, 2021, 10:46:54 AM
Option one is probably one of the hardest since many providers force regular DHCP changes on their residential customers to prevent this.
DYDNS is usually a good way around this.
Correct, but I don't see how to solve it via DynDNS. Afaik DynDNS is, well, DNS, so it translates a name to a (possibly often changing) IP, like a residential one. But I can't set a domain name as address in Lightning, at least I don't think any current implementation resolves hostnames.

03f8a4c71e852ff1104d20ad204404992c120aaf0d41259ee02f96ad5f45f5fc8b@75.127.136.68:9735
OR
03f8a4c71e852ff1104d20ad204404992c120aaf0d41259ee02f96ad5f45f5fc8b@dave.lightning.ninja:9735

will both get you to my node. If you have a bunch of nodes up it just makes sorting them a bit easier.

Option two is what I use, but there are many nodes that do not so Tor so you do loose the potential of connecting to a bunch of people
Right, I think it's the easiest and safest to setup and use as well, and myself have both an onion and a fixed IPv4 address, but it's sad to hear many don't connect to Tor nodes, that was new for me!

From my 100% unscientific looking around and playing with my LN setups, it really seems that most people are on clearnet. I can't prove it or provide and pretty charts and graphs, but just from how many peers and channels I have and can see TOR just seems much more limited in terms of numbers and amounts.

Option three. Don't get me started, 90% of the world can't reach stuff on IPv6, there are major providers that would not know if it came up and bit them in the ass.
So bad? Cheesy To be honest, I'm not sure myself how to set an IPv6, but I'll try it and add guide-type info about all 3 methods in my starter post in the next days.

Yeah, so bad. At least here in the US most providers do not give IPv6 to home small biz users. 
I am sure there are some but even asking about it for the most part will get you nowhere.

-Dave
3970  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [LIST] Open Source Hardware Wallets on: September 08, 2021, 02:34:18 PM
Wait, so you actually own a Cobo hardware wallet?
I remember they offered some devices for free or with discount few years ago in forum.

No, a consultant that I deal with a lot has one. But, since I am the go-to guy for crypto stuff, he saw the tweet that they were shutting down and gave me a call.
Which does bring up the point, that they had his email and did not even contact him. Not a great way to do business.

-Dave
3971  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [LIST] Open Source Hardware Wallets on: September 08, 2021, 11:49:17 AM
Cobo Vault is shutting down next week.

Nice to give your users an entire 8 days before shutting down your back end.
I wrote about this news few months ago (June) in their topic and everyone was aware that something like this was coming.

Not everyone, someone not on the forum asked me about a tweet they saw about it, which is why I posed here.

I did a quick google search for wallet not vault (so that's on me):

Code:
cobo wallet site:bitcointalk.org

The 1st 3 or 4 results were all to the altcoin sections. So I thought (incorrectly) that there was no dedicated post in the HW wallets section.
Their topic has fallen to the 2nd page so even a quick look did not show it on the hardware wallets page.

At that point I figured a post on this thread was worth it.

Their wallet is open source, so there is nothing hidden and anyone can check the code, plus their developer LixinLiu is very active and trying to help everyone.
I am not trying to justify anyone, Cobo made a bad decision Wink

Did not mean bad as in going to steal your BTC, but bad as in "whoops that little bit of code does not work the way it was supposed to" and you now have a device that is not doing what you want. The same way any piece of unsupported hardware can have issues that will not be resolved.

As for LixinLiu and all the rest, if you look at the tweets from cobo and on the article I linked it does not mention him. So, look at it as someone who bought this product and got the shutting down info and has seen no other communication from the company.

I got a call last night, did a quick (wrong) search and followed the few links that cobo provided and sow nothing.

Just what happened.

My Opinion: If keystone / LixinLiu want to keep going they really should be posting here about it in a new topic.

-Dave


3972  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: El Salvador official wallet app @chivowallet go offline on: September 08, 2021, 11:07:11 AM
I did a very quick look and could not find any source code for chivowallet, is it closed or am I just having a bad google day?
Also wonder how much training the police have received in dealing with crypto issues. I can see that causing issues down the line.

-Dave
3973  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [LIST] Open Source Hardware Wallets on: September 08, 2021, 12:10:10 AM
Cobo Vault is shutting down next week.

https://support.cobo.com/hc/en-us/articles/4407973083287-Cobo-Vault-Offline-Notice

Nice to give your users an entire 8 days before shutting down your back end.
Cobo / keystone should still work but no more updates.
But, I would still not use it anymore, you never know what could be lurking somewhere in bad code.

-Dave

3974  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: The Bitcoin Wiki Modernization Project - request changes and edits here on: September 07, 2021, 10:29:04 PM
For the PayPal page: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/PayPal
Should probably add the fact that you can now buy & sell BTC if you are in certain countries but you cannot withdraw.

Also a page for RobinHood is needed since you can buy & sell there too. But also still not withdraw.

Probably need a page for John McAfee....just not sure what to put there....

-Dave

3975  Economy / Speculation / Re: Massive flash crash on: September 07, 2021, 09:55:43 PM
Some profit taking, some stop loss, some people panic selling and you get a 15% drop.
Not the end of the world, not even that big a deal. Let's see how it plays out over the next few days / weeks / months.

-Dave
3976  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: How to leave KYC for good on: September 07, 2021, 06:48:52 PM
It has been touched on but part of KYC vs No KYC also matters as to where you are and what your end goals are.
And....how much have you accumulated through KYC already.

If you bought 100BTC from coinbase when BTC was $600 and all you want to do is sell it when it gets back to $60000 then who cares.
It's not like you can hide $6 million from the tax man.

If you want to sell it off slowly, over years and years then that is a different story.


Same with general privacy. There is the saying 'any 2 people can keep a secret so long as one of them is dead'
If you have that 100BTC that you don't want people to know about, but your pissed off ex-wife / ex-husband, who you talked about it with knows, then everyone knows about it.
Even if it was just a casual conversation with a friend, who then mentioned it to someone else when they were talking about BTC.
If anyone wanted to know about your KYC or non KYC BTC then they could do a little digging and find out.


Now, if you just want your privacy it's easy.
Take any KYC coin you have, sell it, take the cash, pay your taxes (if any) and then take the rest of the cash and buy BTC face to face and be done with it.

Because just about any other way, there is a chance of someone figuring it out.
Even if you pass it through 3 anonymous exchanges, when you go to bitrefill.com to get a gift card for a burrito at Chipolte, you left a trace trace that can be followed.

-Dave

 
3977  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Efficiently accepted small amounts of Bitcoin? on: September 07, 2021, 11:00:29 AM
For myNode, btcpayserver only available if you use premium version (cost $99) or you bother setup it by yourself.

True. I just now edited my reply to reflect the paid version is needed for the auto install of BTCPay

However, if you are going to be setting up a store, getting hosting, etc. $100 +/- of getting everything going is going to be minor.
You still have to get the hardware for the node anyway or if you are hosting it someplace there is the cost of the extra storage and such.

-Dave
3978  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Efficiently accepted small amounts of Bitcoin? on: September 07, 2021, 01:21:33 AM
If it’s an online shop, I recommend using a Bitcoin payment processor that supports Lightning for the same reason of unbeatably low fees. My recommendation would be to use https://btcpayserver.org/.

There are 'node in a box' setups.
raspiblitz: https://raspiblitz.org/
MyNode: https://www.mynodebtc.com/ (you need the $100 paid version to get btcpayserver auto-install)

That do most of the setup for you in terms of setting up your own BTC node / lightning node / btcpayserver.

You still have to know what you are doing to get it integrated into your store but they do get you most of the way there.
And both have active support.

-Dave
3979  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Looking for a miner to confirm a transaction for me for a fee? on: September 06, 2021, 07:59:57 PM
As far as I can see the last two blocks 699367 & 699368 emptied the mempool.
If your transaction has still not confirmed as Loyce said post the txid and people can take a look as to what the issue, if any, is.

-Dave
3980  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is a hardware wallet really worth it? on: September 06, 2021, 04:31:22 PM
For the most part say 99% yes.
But, the question is how much BTC? And how technical are you? And what are you looking to do with the BTC?

If you are never going to hold more then $50 of coin and it's just 'passing through' as you spend it then spending $100+ on a hardware wallet is not worth it.
Your largest loss can only be $50.

I made a thread about it a couple of years ago that can give you and others some things to think about:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205304.


-Dave
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 ... 391 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!