You are referring to OP, I understand. I would like you to clarify this. Are you saying we have another pokapoka124 case? In the archived link I can't see any evidence of plagiarism, and if so it should have been reported. Really, funny. For the OP, this is the third topic about the same thing. OP, have you discovered something new? In the previous threads, you have decently raised the amount of merit. We can see that you are pleased. In this case, create a directory of recommendations from GeorgeJohn, which we will contact in case of problems with plagiarism. |
|
|
|
Can you take a look at this?I ask you as an expert on the subject. I don't know if we are going to have another pokapoka124 or Mpamaegbu case. Well, if this is plagiarism, then there must be a source where it was copied from. I could not find it, and the post is gone. Why excavate the dead? |
|
|
|
I'll ask the OP a counter-question. What were your guides when you copied this post? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356636.msg57787284#msg57787284Oh yes, you added a link, but this information is not new, and you did not write it.   And in the topic you created, after your copying, there is not a single word from you. The information is so old that it just didn't make sense to copy it, but you thought it was productive information. The opening of the topic was aimed at obtaining AT LEAST some merit. It is with these thoughts that people come here with plagiarism. They are not just lazy, but on the contrary, they are cunning, thinking that with their cunning they can deceive those who are experienced enough in finding such charlatans. And explain the opening of this topic today for what? |
|
|
|
I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished: ... caryoscar - ban evader... I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles. Well let's take care of this one as well. I join. PlagiarismUser: Tim-BTCPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive)
After the craziest half a year, China's crypto mining entered a period of sharp turbulence from May to June. Under the attack of local governments, most of the mines were shut down. The miners who just entered the high point this year suffered huge losses. The sell-off of some miners under economic pressure also led to a sharp correction in the crypto market.
At the moment, how to dispose of this batch of down-time mining machines and minimize losses is the most urgent problem for miners of all sizes.
Going overseas is the way that miners have placed the greatest hope before, but after a period of exploration, the road to overseas is not as smooth as expected, and some small miners are still trying to stay
 https://inf.news/en/economy/92ee32304bd76dbb698a4a79450bb071.html If all these accounts, as RainbowKun said, belong to his students, then they are very lazy and stupid. If it is RainbowKun who creates this, then you can understand where he has time to post for all accounts, when he himself writes walls of texts, paraphrasing other people's thoughts.  EDIT:If Tim-BTC copied the text from an English resource. Then Kimberl2020 stole the post from the Chinese. @Ratimov, you were right. Two more accounts should be banned. ================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Kimberl2020Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350533.msg57517578#msg57517578( archive) The main reasons for Bitcoin's current transaction speed limitations are:
1. The processing power of the entire blockchain = the average processing power of all nodes-the product of consensus
2. Block size is limited
3. The time required for consensus is too long.
4. The average information propagation speed between nodes is limited.
Although the consensus provides sufficient security for transactions, it also imposes huge restrictions on the transaction processing capabilities of the blockchain.
There is no scale increase effect, but limited by the processing capacity of the node itself, which is essentially a great waste of resources.
The solutions to this are: the node itself can form a chain; joint mining; sharding.
Increasing the block size can certainly increase the TPS, but this will lead to an increase in the requirements for hardware processing capabilities, which will cause users to switch to mining machines.
The recentralization of mining pools has already occurred on PoW platforms such as BTC and BCH. 10 minutes of consensus has severely affected transaction demand, and reducing the consensus time will increase the probability of being attacked successfully. Therefore, an overpass can be built-both side chains and lightning transactions.
Post original, Released August 3, 2018
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word. https://www.zhihu.com/question/41004649 https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/ofc9s31hp98wxvtz/preview?key=7or83l41aquc0jj7&suspectId=b8ec04e9be&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1 |
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: Tim-BTCPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive)
After the craziest half a year, China's crypto mining entered a period of sharp turbulence from May to June. Under the attack of local governments, most of the mines were shut down. The miners who just entered the high point this year suffered huge losses. The sell-off of some miners under economic pressure also led to a sharp correction in the crypto market.
At the moment, how to dispose of this batch of down-time mining machines and minimize losses is the most urgent problem for miners of all sizes.
Going overseas is the way that miners have placed the greatest hope before, but after a period of exploration, the road to overseas is not as smooth as expected, and some small miners are still trying to stay
https://inf.news/en/economy/92ee32304bd76dbb698a4a79450bb071.html================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Kimberl2020Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350533.msg57517578#msg57517578( archive) The main reasons for Bitcoin's current transaction speed limitations are:
1. The processing power of the entire blockchain = the average processing power of all nodes-the product of consensus
2. Block size is limited
3. The time required for consensus is too long.
4. The average information propagation speed between nodes is limited.
Although the consensus provides sufficient security for transactions, it also imposes huge restrictions on the transaction processing capabilities of the blockchain.
There is no scale increase effect, but limited by the processing capacity of the node itself, which is essentially a great waste of resources.
The solutions to this are: the node itself can form a chain; joint mining; sharding.
Increasing the block size can certainly increase the TPS, but this will lead to an increase in the requirements for hardware processing capabilities, which will cause users to switch to mining machines.
The recentralization of mining pools has already occurred on PoW platforms such as BTC and BCH. 10 minutes of consensus has severely affected transaction demand, and reducing the consensus time will increase the probability of being attacked successfully. Therefore, an overpass can be built-both side chains and lightning transactions.
Post original, Released August 3, 2018
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word.https://www.zhihu.com/question/41004649https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/ofc9s31hp98wxvtz/preview?key=7or83l41aquc0jj7&suspectId=b8ec04e9be&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1============================================================================================ PlagiarismUser: McphailPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive) Bitcoin's "consensus" is people's acceptance and recognition of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is endorsed by "consensus", not by physical assets, nor by the credit of a centralized government or country. So from this point of view, Bitcoin is difficult to replicate.
The blockchain technology represented by Bitcoin naturally solves the problems of centralization and trust, making the transfer of value more convenient than ever.
The internal combustion engine solves the problem of converting explosive energy into power. The generator solves the problem of energy transmission. The problem solved by the Internet is the problem of cross-domain transmission of information. Bitcoin solves the problem of the trust of communication.
 https://min.news/en/tech/419da1b9f3b0e28dbe08a81d0105a0dc.html .Bitcoin will be known to the people of the earth within 3-5 years. Just like historical relics, ordinary people will know that it is extremely rare and valuable. This will be the consensus of all people on the earth.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5770/57708267.html https://blog.actorsfit.com/a?ID=01800-cef44ecc-582d-4f2b-a2ab-b9469f05180e============================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: sisikinPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive) Due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the future work of mankind will definitely be replaced by artificial intelligence.
If Bitcoin is successful, then it is the last line of defense against artificial intelligence.
If artificial intelligence wants to obtain wealth and then hire humans to work for them, or hire humans to "listen to them", they only need to modify the big books of the banks in a "centralized" society.
If our world uses Bitcoin as currency, then artificial intelligence cannot modify this large ledger, so it is difficult to easily obtain a large amount of wealth.
Therefore, if there is no "decentralization", then artificial intelligence can achieve the goal of ruling mankind "civilizedly" without violent means at all.
But if the decentralized mode of operation represented by Bitcoin becomes the underlying operating logic of our world, it will obviously increase the difficulty of artificial intelligence to rule the world to a large extent, because in many things, it needs to interact with most humans. Only by forming a "consensus" can the implementation be promoted.
Post original, Released 2017.12.27 The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word.  http://www.iheima.com/article-166651.htmlhttps://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/wx54v4uxs05sxfa5/preview?key=o7b9dgm2b7zefhgc&suspectId=4ae834a3d6&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1 ============================================================================================== PlagiarismUser: IrenertyPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5352632.msg57635628#msg57635628( archive) Trading cryptocurrency is a high-risk speculation, and it is very unstable. Changes in market sentiment can lead to sharp and sudden changes in prices.
1.The most basic skill necessary for trading is the ability to accept losses and continue trading. Set a stop loss and do not move the stop loss when the transaction is not favorable.
2.Before trading cryptocurrencies, you should be familiar with the related risks. When a hard fork occurs, the price fluctuation range may be large, and if there is no reliable base market price, trading may be suspended.
3.Novice traders should develop simple trading systems and avoid making decisions on patterns or indicators that are not fully understood. Analyze the market from a clear technical indicator line.
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator.  https://www.cmcmarkets.com/zh-sg/learn-cryptocurrencies/what-are-the-risks https://forum.mt5.com/showthread.php?317501-In-Crypto-Currency-Trading-Pay-Attention-to-Avoid-Making-These-10-Mistakes
|
|
|
|
Adding more accounts connected to Rkss4 since the account woke up recently. The accounts are connected through mutually shared address that collects bounty tokens: Sihab76Kayum10029Tnt1971Nilakash1983A couple of these accounts are still active and one wasn't yet tagged, so I'm gonna take care of that. Been using a combination of TryNinja's address tool and Etherscan, which is basically a cheater killer. I also want to add another cheater from this company. Today they participate in Giving 🚀BITCOIN🚀 . I do not know if there are rules for prohibiting the participation of alternative accounts, but I will inform the manager about them. 5 Accounts Connected
1.Sihab76
2.Jomunariver798
Proof:
[ archive ] [ archive ] Related Addresses:Reddit URL: https://www.reddit.com/u/Sihab7626
 3. nazmul30[ archive ] Another account belonging to this farm. |
|
|
|
And if on top of that his alts have been banned, he should be banned for ban evasion.
All the remaining accounts seem to have little activity, and I agree with Nutildah, they are harmless. RainbowKun himself is a rather peculiar person who, for some reason, continues to publish his ideas, realizing that after the story with the farm, many simply sent him to ignore. The number of merits has also stopped increasing, so at the moment he is one of the most harmless participants in the forum. He does not participate in any subscription, you can just observe what he wanted to get in the end, having come with the team to this forum? Time will put everything in its place. To ban other accounts, there is simply no evidence that the moderators rely on. |
|
|
|
|
Along with this, Charles regularly receives a bonus in his subscription company, which suggests that he understands a lot. His own posts are very informative. And I think that by the same criteria, Charles will be able to evaluate other users in the future.
Charles, let my little voice be in your support.
|
|
|
|
Maybe ban evasion and multi account, Cheating on some bounty campaign especially Copying other user article work including me.
A loud enough accusation, without clear evidence. You claim that these 2 accounts avoid the ban and use multiple accounts, but for this, you have to provide evidence that I cannot see in any way. Conducting single transactions is not evidence. Do not forget that you are on the forum, as well as on the Internet, and users can communicate with each other. In the future, please be sure of your accusations. |
|
|
|
|
According to my observations, long posts are sometimes very tedious to read. I very often see the indignation of users that it would be nice to shorten a thought in the text, especially since it carries a lot of "water"
But when it comes to merit, great posts are sometimes also rated more for effort than quality. So yes, I agree, all that is needed can be said briefly but clearly. It is the most convenient and not fatiguing in terms of reading.
But I also vote for good large texts that explain some points in the most accessible and understandable way.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the OP means that the bought bitcoins were considered, as they call it, "dirty"
Today, there is a lot of information about what "dirty bitcoins" are and how not to get caught buying such coins. Probably already from the name, it is clear that they include bitcoins, which were involved in any fraudulent activities, and all those who have anything to do with them are taken into account by the investigation services.
As for the exchanges, if suspected, they have the right to freeze funds. The verification is well done by Chainalysis, which has the Chainalysis KYT product. With its help, the past of cryptocurrencies is revealed. But it is unfair to blame a "bona fide purchaser" who has nothing to do with criminal activity.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin brings me half shock and half hope. After I bought bitcoin, my assets fell by more than half. I had never experienced it before. I panicked and sold it. As a result, I missed the opportunity to accumulate wealth. Up to now, I only have a little bitcoin. I hope it will give me another chance to change my life.
This also happened to me. The first panic, and then mistrust, but later a great chagrin from past sales, as the price rises incredibly. It always stays in the memory. Today, I just don't look at the investments that I have. I have set some deadlines, and I think that I will not go wrong. I don’t make a religion out of Bitcoin, but faith comes from somewhere by itself.
I think every member who enters this forum is usually notified or invited by members who have registered. So how do you know abaut this frorum?
You are thinking wrong. You forget one moment that Bitcoin is becoming very popular, and the global network is becoming more accessible to different parts of the world. I will cite many accounts as an example that came to the forum themselves, because they were interested in Bitcoin, and they should not have been invited, since they were applicants themselves. |
|
|
|
I was told that the money was paid in bitcoin and later it was converted to USD. I thought that they earned bitcoin by watching ads.
I thought this kind of scam didn't exist these days because people know what is Ponzi scheme is. It basically lures naive people with a small percentage they supposedly got per day after staking their Bitcoin and after how many days, they paid you for how many days and later on, they will shut down and you can never hear them again. I had the same opinion, but to my surprise, I typed "earn bitcoins for watching ads" into a Google search to check the relevance of this query. But even today, Google gives a lot of suggestions that beginners can believe in and then be deceived. It also turned out that in addition to Ponzi schemes, people interested in cloud mining are also offered to earn on viewing from their mobile phones and pay for a subscription. But the only thing they do is watch ads, and as a result, they don't earn anything. https://www.trendmicro.com/pl_pl/research/21/h/fake-cryptocurrency-mining-apps-trick-victims-into-watching-ads-.htmlFraudsters will regularly come up with new schemes of deception, as long as people are willing to be deceived because of their ignorance. |
|
|
|
Likewise, in parallel with your question, I would like to ask if the font in the copied post is changed and the post has no source, is that considered plagiarism?
........]
This is plagiarism at best. But according to the reaction of the moderators, this is also not plagiarism. I don’t think anyone should risk using such methods, but changing the font also hints that the author does not claim authorship. |
|
|
|
Don't think so noble. I am here not only to study, but to make money. I may not participate in the signature plan, but I will pay attention to some altcoin projects. Everyone be honest, I also know that reading is more important, but the choice is greater than the effort. The reason why I came to the Bitcoin forum is not because the information here is timely, but the important thing is that it is not so impetuous. So don't say that you are pure as a prostitute. I just want to make money. This is not wrong.
make money -It is said very loudly.  Funny. Well, everyone has their own plans. Someone is happy with the two cents received from altcoins and bounty programs. Everyone has different values and choices. But as a senior, let me give you a little advice, knowing more will make you gain more. Losing time on all sorts of cheap programs, you lose opportunities. But by setting aside time for understanding and learning, you significantly increase your relevance. But yes, everyone has their own choice. |
|
|
|
In fact, there is nothing wrong with that. The task of any merit source is to evaluate useful posts and ... that's it. We do not guarantee that the user to whom we have sent merit will always adhere to the rules. I believe that it is worth worrying only if you sent merit to posts containing plagiarism. Then you should work on your attentiveness and more carefully check the posting of users before evaluating it.
I watched you want to motivate newbies for a while as you gave them 1 or more merit. Believe me, it was just for fun, nothing more. And I understood your motives very well. But since you yourself said it out loud, then for a quick check you can simply add an extension from prepostseo, or sometimes check the texts from newbies creating themes.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3211920 These people do not want to accept or read the rules, but they quickly learn from whom and how to get merit. By creating new topics, there is a better chance of earning merits. I often complained about plagiarism from newcomers. And you can also understand that not everyone is ready to check any texts, since they do not have time for such checks. But sometimes it makes sense and also teaches others not to abuse trust and start thinking and writing for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
