I've seen every subject discussed on this forum in the last few years. Drugs, guns, overthrowing governments, bomb making, protest marches, torture, gambling, popular media stories, political debates, porn (every type, no matter how perverse), racism, prostitution, womanizing, bondage, rape, murder, robbery, fraud, assault, and one guys frequent sexual attraction to goats and other small farm animals.
You say the Chinese want to block this forum? Only the Chinese? I'm surprised every government in the world doesn't try to block it.
It's about freedom. If you were the leader of a small group of wealthy people who were controlling the world through Big Oil, Big Banking and Big Pharma, how would you attempt to get information, voluntarily, from all the people in the world? The Internet is one of the best ways. On the Internet, people appear to have freedom. The freedom is partially true, and partially illusion. Every Internet thing is recorded by the Power Elite. The recording is being done so that the Power Elite can find out what is on the minds of people. Once they have that info, they can design more methods for controlling the world. POSSIBLY THE GREATEST THING THAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR IS, HOW MUCH INFO THE PEOPLE HAVE ON THEM, AND HOW AGGRAVATED THE PEOPLE ARE WITH THEM. Why might people be aggravated with the Power Elite? It is the PE who are causing all the wars in the world, in their attempt to take over the world. Your sons and daughters, parents and grandparents, other relatives and friends, are being murdered in the wars that the PE are causing, causing for the purpose of taking control of the whole world, and keeping control of the parts that they control already. The Internet is a big part, a big method for gaining free info, honest info, volunteered by the sheeple of the world, so that the Power Elite can take final control... or so they think.  |
|
|
|
1 Timothy: 8 We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. 9 We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine The New Testament prevails over the Old. And to note, most of the early Christians were slaves. In History, the first slave market in Christian lands was at Silves, Portugal, during the reconquest in 1189. It was allowed as the terms of surrender that Muslims could keep some of their traditions including that market. The Christian king, Sancho I, however closed the market shortly after because "it was incompatible with Christianity". N.T rides on O.T. |
|
|
|
Matthew 5:17
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
The OT is not obsolete according to Jesus
No... it's just incoherent, but at least we've a chronological line. If I tell you to turn right then tell you to turn left, you will follow the last instruction given. ... but the first one first. |
|
|
|
And here we go again with the attempt to make Islam somewhat right because Christianity did this or that.
Let's put this straight: Christianity did NOTHING. Europeans did. Europeans are extremely organized and when aim at some goal go for it in industrial scale.
Islam supports slavery, Christianity doesn't. However in only 3 centuries Europeans got way more slaves than the Muslims in their 14 centuries of slavery.
Islam calls for the extermination of Jews, however Europeans just in 5 years of nazism killed more Jews than all of the Muslim attempts to terminate them combined.
You pay taxes? You're a slave! |
|
|
|
If you simply remember that atheism is a religion, and Karl Marx's version is simply a branch of the religion of atheism, everything fits into place like it should. Atheism existed long before Karl Marx Just like the tree exists before the branch (does it?). |
|
|
|
Except that Atheism is not a religion, hence the name.
It is the absence of theism. Theists are the ones proposing the existence of something for which they have no evidence, that's called playing pretend *real* hard.
Atheism is defined by people who are hiding part of the definition. Atheism IS a religion. |
|
|
|
Really sorry to say this BADecker, but the pyramid is over 64.000 years old.
...
I always knew Decky was a lot older than he let on.  |
|
|
|
...
If we are discussing what is "unfair," isn't it unfair that Jesus, who was completely sinless and blameless, had to come to suffer for my sins? I am the one that chose to sin but he paid the price for my sins. Knowing that God, out of His great love for me, sent His only son to die for me? That is unfair to God! I should be paying the price for my own sins, but instead I am offered the greatest gift anyone could give to me, eternal life because of His love and the thing is that it is offered to everyone! God is no respecter of persons. We are all welcome to His gift if we just accept it.
...
If God did not want to suffer for sins, he should not have deemed them such. We can get frustrated at thy way God has chosen to do things, or we can accept that He has chosen to do things they way He has and respond with gratitude for even caring about us. Who are we to say how God, the creator of the universe, should or should not have done something? It really is all about humility. It is said that one of the greatest sins is actually pride. This is because our own pride is what keeps us from even humbly coming to God and accepting Him at all. So why is it unfair that god (Jesus) suffered for the thing he himself created? If I give you a gun, and you accidentally shoot and wound yourself, and then in turn I take my own gun and shoot myself in the foot, is it unfair that I ended up getting shot because you got shot? And does that fix your wound? That whole "dying for our sins" thing makes no sense whatsoever. Just like blaming all the actions of murderers and rapists on a goat, taking the goat out of town, and killing it (a completely idiotic ancient practice that inspired the story of Jesus). Actually, Jesus didn't suffer and die only for people. Mankind were originally given the authority for this universe. The universe is one; anything done on earth affects the whole thing. Jesus died to hold the whole universe in place. He could do it because He is God, the Son of God. The underlying law that the whole universe is based on is, love God above all things. The second is love your neighbor as yourself. When God came as man in the form of Jesus, the only way to uphold the two great laws was to die. Why? Because mankind would have died from their breaking of the fundamental laws that hold the whole universe together. Why did Jesus rise in the resurrection? Because His love for God wouldn't allow the creation to be destroyed. The most amazing miracle is that Jesus is God and man at the same time. Jesus has combined man and God, thereby making mankind into God along with God. Because of this, the two great laws - loving God above all things, and loving your neighbor as yourself - have taken on a whole new meaning. Man has become limitless because of the love of God. The interesting thing is that God can do anything. Man as god, therefore, has the ability to deny his position as god. Atheists do this. They will be tossed into the lake of fire, simply because that is what they have will for themselves. |
|
|
|
Really sorry to say this BADecker, but the pyramid is over 64.000 years old.
Where the heck do you get this from? There's only one thing that can't be explained, and that's the origin of the universe itself. That's why I believe in an all encompassing being, "God", but definitely not the god of any religions known today, and they've all been proved wrong.
Actually, it can, and has. We theorized that it popped into existence spontaneously. But then, how can you have something out of nothing? So we theorized that there must have been just as much matter as antimatter in the universe, so that if you sum it all together, it would still equal zero. The sum of the universe is nothing, we are just living on one part of it. Then by observing through telescopes, we found that, yep, there's about as much matter as antimatter in the universe. But then how can such a pop into existence just happen spontaneously? Is that even possible. Turns out, yep. when we were doing Large Hadron Collider experiments, we observed just those exact spontaneous pops into existence on a quantum level. Apparently these types of pops, and even black holes, are spontaneously popping into existence all around us constantly. It's just that since there is already a universe here, they quickly react with their surroundings and fizzle out. So pretty much everything about the origin of the universe was already deduced, and evidence for it observed, making the idea of "god" not even necessary for the universe's creation. Universe has all the mechanisms necessary to just create itself. Matter and anti-matter are simply some infantile thinkings that scientists will grow out of if people happen to last for another 500 years. |
|
|
|
Is good to know that there are a few people in the world looking for a better place to live, that project can be a wonderful solution for the energy problems of million of people, good to learn how to make it
Problem is, by the time we find it and figure out how to make it work, we'll be old. Then we will die. and our kids, who don't understand all the reasons behind what we did, will throw it away and go back into slavery. EDIT: notbatman probably has one of the best ideas: Stop trying to do things the hard way and get some solar panels!
The sun will provide free energy for at least a decade before the illuminati block it out and huddle inside their underground bunkers in a futile attempt to escape the all seeing eye of their boss who turns out to be nothing more than an oversized toaster in polar orbit.
|
|
|
|
Stop trying to do things the hard way and get some solar panels!
The sun will provide free energy for at least a decade before the illuminati block it out and huddle inside their underground bunkers in a futile attempt to escape the all seeing eye of their boss who turns out to be nothing more than an oversized toaster in polar orbit.
You are funny. But you are more on target than you think. Their boss is the Devil, who will get tossed into the lake of fire at the last day. |
|
|
|
''Magnetic Motor Electric Generators'' oh give me a break this is not possible at all.
Lots of things are deemed not possible. For example, lay out the diagram for a human being. Include everything that is medically known, and scientifically understood. If you do this from an objective standpoint, human beings are not possible. But if a human happened to exist, certainly an earth-sized planet full of multiple billions, along with all the components that could make them alive and thriving is utterly impossible. It would be stupid to even imagine that such a thing were possible, except for one thing... they exist! You know nothing of biology or any sciences for that matter. Why do you keep talking? Seriously, shut the fuck up. You're absolutely fucking wrong in almost every regard. I know enough about probability that the odds of something like human beings existing without a Maker is improbable to the point of being impossible. |
|
|
|
If you simply remember that atheism is a religion, and Karl Marx's version is simply a branch of the religion of atheism, everything fits into place like it should. |
|
|
|
"20 years from now, I will be in Heaven --bye !!" This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim. Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end. Joys of Muslim Women
By Nonie Darwish In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9. The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy. Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce. To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses. Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her. The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion. The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman. In the Western World (Canada , Australia , United States and Britain) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American, Canadian, and British Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law. ---------- Ripping the West in Two. Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two. She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza ...... When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society. But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television. In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping shariah law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries. For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world. Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world. While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Shariah teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Shariah encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others. While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Shariah advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation. While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere. (In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in Canada , Australia , the U.S. and Britain to elect the heads of Government by themselves! Rest assured they will do so. You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA. Dearborn, Mich., is one and there are others....) (Britain has several cities now totally controlled by Muslims.)
I think everyone in Canada, Australia, the U.S. and Great Britain should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized!
It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While Canada, Australia, the U.S.A. and Britain are getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on North America, Australia and Britain .........
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonie_Darwishhttp://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/muslimwomen.aspLet me tell you this all is a bullshits you are saying. lets start and finish with this" To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses " I do not really have time for your alll bullshit but just to tell you that you read wrong story or fake one. anyway rape do not need 4 witnesses to prove it. The thing which need 4 witnesses to proov is zena ( Man who have sex with a women who she is not his wife ) Sorry but do not know if zena in English also or not. anyway this is the only condition you need 4 witnesses to proov. zena is Punishable by Islam. about man have 4 wives while women have only one, That's really simple 1400 years old ago the world was full of wars and for sure Men was killed everyday and that was a problem because Women was much more than men, that's why Men can have 4 wives. why Woman have only 1 man ? Simple for Non-mixing of genealogy. Let me ask you a question. if your wife have you and more 3 guys, when shy get a baby you will know if this baby yours or not ? and lets say this was in 1905 not now ? Frindly advise you need Islam in your life, In usa i think youhave huge number of gays and that number increase everyday, you have few men compared to women, can you tell me if 1 man married 1 women how many women will live alone the rest of her life ? Islam resolve your problems really. Also not everyone can have 4 wives, they is a rules restricted to men, they have to follow it all and if they can not then only 1 wife. I am glad you are having fun. Did you look at the Snopes link in my post? Relax! I know most of it is BS. But I got a reaction, didn't I? http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/muslimwomen.aspEDIT: I agree that hundreds of years ago things were done differently. And I agree that at the time, they were the best things that people could come up with. I agree that people today often don't understand that those people, of hundreds of years ago, were only following their laws, just like we follow our laws today. Relax. |
|
|
|
God may exist, but the "god" of the religions we have throughout the world, does not. They differ so wildy in beliefs(polytheism, monotheism, etc and the people of those religion will all argue for theirs only. So that means, that the true God is either a collective of All religions on earth, or in none of the religions we have today) Read this article.... http://www.alternet.org/story/154774/the_top_10_reasons_i_don%27t_believe_in_god?page=0%2C3500 years ago, everything "explained" by religion was false, and is now explained by science. (They believed earth was flat, geocentric model, etc) 500 years from now, everything that religious people believe as "miracles" or "fact", will be explained by science. There's only one thing that can't be explained, and that's the origin of the universe itself. That's why I believe in an all encompassing being, "God", but definitely not the god of any religions known today, and they've all been proved wrong. Oh fuck, there's someone who has the same albeit different (thank fuck) stand point I have.. ouch.. Totally agree with your last paragraph.. sorry i dont do external links from site's I visit, ya never know where they end up..  Yet the overall picture is more evidence that God exists. Why? Because people all over the world have gods. In other words, they realize that there is a God. They simply don't have the correct info about Him. The first two chapters of the Bible may have been handed down right from Adam, who might have written them sometime within the first 930 years after the creation (creation 6,000 years ago; Adam's age at death > 930 years). If they weren't, they were originally written by someone who had recited the information, someone prior to Moses. Back in those days, when the earth was young, people had good memories, easily a hundred times better than we generally have today. They didn't need books, because info could be passed down, father to son, in exact form, without making any mistakes. But as time went on, as entropy increased, and memories started to be more like they are today, God realized that the record would be lost. So He commissioned Moses to start the writing down of the basics of creation, the general history of the world up to the time of Moses, the beginnings of His favored people, the nation of Israel. Then others were commissioned with recording the history of Israel over the years after the time of Moses. This whole Bible was written so that people would have a clearer picture of God, so that there would be a place that the nations of the world could go to find out about the God that they know exists, even though they don't know the details about Him. The same is true for the atheists. The atheists can go to the Bible to find out about the true God, rather than simply believing the false god that they believe in. What!? I thought atheists were people who believe that there isn't any god. So how can you say that they believe in a god? Here's how. Without realizing what they have done, atheists have set their info up as something greater than God's info. This means that they are greater (at least in their own minds) than God. They have effectively set themselves up as god above the Great God Who created everything, simply by denying the truth. Because of this, atheists are some of the most miserable of all the false god believers. They don't even have a hazy picture of the god they believe in. The more primitive peoples at least have idols that they envision God to be like. |
|
|
|
I think these conspiracy nutters would be more credible if their evidence didn't contain obvious lies. Why and for what reason would the FBI classify the SHES shooting when they did not classify the Columbine shooting which also was an Active Shooter Mass Casualty Incidents (AS/MCI)? The Columbine case was classified "Confidential" by the FBI. Why do they suppose the files released under FOIA were so heavily redacted? This fact is so easily verified that I'm baffled as to why anyone would lie about it. Did they honestly think nobody would check?  So, some "conspiracy nutters" made a mistake about classifying. The fact - if Sandy Hook was real - is that there were deaths, right. And everybody knows that there were deaths (except the conspiracy nutters, that is), right. So what possible reason could the FBI have for redacting the number of deaths right off their statistics page? Are they trying to flush out some conspiracy nutters by watching to see how many people will report the statistics page redacting? Or did they simply make a mistake? If they made a mistake, we should see a correction soon, right? I mean, its been 2 years since SHE! |
|
|
|
"Wars, and rumors of wars." Just like Jesus said 2,000 years ago. While there always have been wars and rumors of wars, they are increasing today because of our modern communications and transportation abilities. Jesus' words, above, were spoken in His description of the last days - I mean the real last days, not the ones that the early church thought were the last days. Expect: 1. Collapse of the banking system, worldwide. 2. Collapse of many governments, worldwide. 3. A new, unexpected, unknown world government system rising up. 4. Something that looks like peace and safety with the new governmental system. 5. "Marrying and giving in marriage" like in the days of Noah before the flood. 6. Jesus' return at that time. 7. The above will not take long to play out once the banks collapse. |
|
|
|
I think if US stops funding these terrorists & stops supplying them weapons ..ISIS will break into pieces .  This is true. This is what would happen. However, the United States Government is here to break Americans, particularly American common law. That's why they will keep on funding ISIS. ISIS is already here in America. Don't be alarmed. Rather, stand up and stand firm, and be watchful of your surroundings. The U.S. military, and even your local police can't help you against them. You need to arm yourself for your own protection. |
|
|
|
Just because it’s descriptive and contains stories of murder, rape, and incest does not mean the Bible is prescriptive in encouraging such atrocities. Such things were wrong then and they’re wrong now
But they seemed to be OK then, according to the bible, and are even given as examples of good behavior (like attempting to murder your child if the voice in your head tells you to). Back in the days of Abraham - about 4,000 years ago - entropy had not advanced as far as it has today. After all, the creation was only 2,000 years old back then. People could still hear God talking to them for real back then. That's why Abraham could hear God rather plainly at times. Now days, God has to holler for people other than His Christians to hear Him. And even His Christians are hard of hearing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
