Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2024, 02:06:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 [1999] 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 »
39961  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 09:42:30 PM
Proof?! There isn't any proof for anything until the pain almost kills you or until it tickles you almost to death.

If you look back into my posts in this thread, you will find all the evidence you need to have proof, except that it won't be proof until it almost kills you, or until it tickles you almost to death... or until you simply want to logically accept it.

Smiley
39962  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: September 15, 2014, 09:37:03 PM
There is no such thing as "unlimited energy" - see Thermodynamics. 

Free, or close to it, and plentiful energy however could well be a reality.  And yes, if it was plentiful and cheap enough it could solve most of the most important problems in the world.  It couldn't solve the fact that humans will eventually get bored and get ourselves into trouble, but things like hunger, the environment, poverty, clean water ect... yeah, it could.

Here is part of the problem in this forum. And who knows if it is intentional, or if it is accidental?

It might be an absolute fact that energy is limited. But what does that matter? The sun has so much energy that if the whole earth fell into it, there probably wouldn't be a sizable plop.

The point isn't how much energy exists. We can't imagine the amount of energy in the sun. We could NEVER begin to imagine the amount of energy in all the stars combined. The point is, the amount of energy in the whole universe might as well be considered unlimited, because there is so much of it compared to how much we need, even though it may have a limit.

The thing that we are trying to do is tap into a little of it for free. That's all. There's so much there, so, why can't we tap into a little more of it for free? I mean, 100 times all the energy we are going to use in the next 100 years is tiny compared to the energy of the sun. So, what do we need to do to tap into some of this virtually free virtually limitless energy?

Smiley
39963  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 06:49:30 PM
Lol.. sound.. as a scratch dj with over 35 yrs on the decks I can say this.. not many people know that if you record the sound of running water, and playback the recording + or - the origional pitch, the sound of the running water stays the same, you cant slow it down OR speed it up, it 'flows' at the same speed it always does Wink

This was common science training in high school decades ago. So, what's the reason for this? It's easy. Let me say that it works the same for the various liquids. And it is the same for solids. Yet, there is a difference from liquid to liquid, like water and oil.

So, why?

Smiley
39964  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 06:03:53 PM

There is more space between atoms than there are atoms in the universe.. I can see you have one atom. Wanna by the other so you have at least an excuse for the blank expression on your face that denotes the space in your head left after messin wi this mutha fucka?

As long as you are bringing that up, the spaces between the electrons and protons in an atom is where the parallel universes reside. The dimensions make them (the parallel universes) to be out of phase with regard to each other so that they don't overlap in a big way. The existence of the subatomic particles that make up the electrons and protons and neutrons, is the temporarily in-phasedness between certain of the parallel universes that actually gives substance to our universe; our universe reacts with other of the parallel universes to give reality to yet other of the parallel universes in a similar way. Probably the expansion of the earth as shown in the Neal Adams video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ, has to do with the gravity well of the earth actually "sucking" material from other parallel universes. Probably the emptiness of space has to do with all the other parallel universes that have gravity wells in those various spacial locations, sucking the material out of our space. It's all controlled by the various dimensional reactions throughout our mega-universe.

Smiley

So which god are we refering to?

Only kiddin, dont answer that..

I'll try not to answer too directly, but...

In my above quote about the parallel universes, we can see that all space is filled with universes (infinite in number?) that are separated by their vibrational phases that have to do with how the dimensions operate. The point is that space is "filled." This means that there is no "empty space" as we understand empty space. Everything that we call movement through empty space is really multitudes of vibrational "building-ups and tearing-downs" of various dimensional vibrations. Remember, subatomic particles are also vibrational in nature.

Okay, since space is not empty, but rather entirely filled with the various parallel universes, this means that space is not really space, but rather, it is an elastic solid... at least from a dimensional standpoint.

The thing about solids is that sound travels through solids. In fact sound travels through solids better than liquids, and better than air. And one of the most fabulous points about sound traveling through a substance is, that's how we talk. We talk using sound.

So, which God was it, again, Who spoke the mega-universe into being?

Smiley
39965  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: September 15, 2014, 04:42:01 PM
The laws of physics is a human construct to try to explain, and work, with parts of nature, nature is unconstrained by such laws.

I am going to stop here and recommend that you take another look at Conservation laws in the field of Physics. It is not what they say, but what they mean.

Yet, the laws are only as good as we can be good at determining them. Consider https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8831610#msg8831610.

Smiley
39966  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 04:38:22 PM

There is more space between atoms than there are atoms in the universe.. I can see you have one atom. Wanna by the other so you have at least an excuse for the blank expression on your face that denotes the space in your head left after messin wi this mutha fucka?

As long as you are bringing that up, the spaces between the electrons and protons in an atom is where the parallel universes reside. The dimensions make them (the parallel universes) to be out of phase with regard to each other so that they don't overlap in a big way. The existence of the subatomic particles that make up the electrons and protons and neutrons, is the temporarily in-phasedness between certain of the parallel universes that actually gives substance to our universe; our universe reacts with other of the parallel universes to give reality to yet other of the parallel universes in a similar way. Probably the expansion of the earth as shown in the Neal Adams video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ, has to do with the gravity well of the earth actually "sucking" material from other parallel universes. Probably the emptiness of space has to do with all the other parallel universes that have gravity wells in those various spacial locations, sucking the material out of our space. It's all controlled by the various dimensional reactions throughout our mega-universe.

Smiley
39967  Other / Off-topic / Re: What happens to the wicked upon death? on: September 15, 2014, 04:25:47 PM
You lie when you say that you want to see evidence.  You don't.  There is no evidence that you do.  Just a crusade against what you apparently still fear may be true.  Very sad.
I'm not discussing anything here, Zolace, I'm just making a point that I made long ago.
Your lies have been exposed; the man behind the curtain is naked. But you're just too stupid to admit it.
Continue your childish rants if it somehow makes your forget how stupid you are, but there is really no point.
You are  lying, and everyone but you knows it. Yours are not Christian beliefs, but the ravings of a lunatic.

Why don't you do REAL Christians a huge favor and shut up and crawl back under a rock. You give REAL Christians a bad name.
Well other people are actually interested in discussing this thread topic, rigon.  If you are not, why dont you crawl somewhere else?If all you want is to rant, start a thread on that.

Did you ever notice how the atheists get all vulgar and angry when they don't have a logical answer? Yet the Christians are peaceful, and simply pass it off as a child's rant.

Smiley
39968  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 04:21:50 PM

There's no space in URLs genius

At least Decky uses commas and periods.  Smiley
39969  Other / Off-topic / Re: I know there is no such thing as 'free energy' but what if it was possible? on: September 15, 2014, 03:54:59 PM
I know this is a science forum and not a forum for conspiracy theorists but I have always been intrigued by the idea of a world where everyone has access to 'free' energy. What impact would it have on the world? Would it solve 99 per cent of all problems?

There will never be "free" energy.  You'll always pay a fee to the power company to maintain the plants and transmissions lines, regardless of what the power itself costs to create.

I think the term you might be looking for is "unlimited" energy?

Now and again I can agree with Vod.

Consider that if you were wealthy enough that all your needs in life were taken care of, and all you had to do is digest your food, you would still have to expend energy to do that. It wouldn't quite be free energy, although it might be very close.

It is similar with ALL energy. Electrical energy that we have harnessed for use in everyday electrical and electronic equipment is freely available. It may not be entirely free to generate, because you still have to expend muscle energy to build the generators, etc., but it is available in such quantities that, once the equipment to harness it was built, it might seem free.

The thing that we are attempting to do is to harness a tad of the tremendous quantities of energy in the universe in ways that are not controlled by the big power corporations, or the governments. In other words, it isn't free energy that we are looking for, as much as freedom for the people.

Smiley
39970  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 03:44:42 PM

See, now you know why you fail at life, ye canny take a tellin.. here, and now, pick a space where folks can come and see how I smash ye tae a pulp.. You wont. you should thank your lucky stars I dont just steal a drone using bluetooth n blow up your house wi you in it.. wait a minute.. 'Follow my religion?' I have no religion, for I have yet to find one that has not acted like, well.. you. Thanks to a new email however, seems someone knows where you are, and is in process of heading your way, dont say I didnt warn ya.. there's bigger societies out there than masons ya root.. lets see how long it takes ye tae answer back fi hospital..
Oh, wow! Decky used a single period at the end of a sentence, as shown above, in the quote. Almost can't believe it.

Smiley

Lol, but I'm scottish, no need for apologies on my behalf, we refuse to do anything 'english' properly, unless it's gettin rid o em..

You ARE fun.   Cheesy
39971  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 03:42:05 PM

See, now you know why you fail at life, ye canny take a tellin.. here, and now, pick a space where folks can come and see how I smash ye tae a pulp.. You wont. you should thank your lucky stars I dont just steal a drone using bluetooth n blow up your house wi you in it.. wait a minute.. 'Follow my religion?' I have no religion, for I have yet to find one that has not acted like, well.. you. Thanks to a new email however, seems someone knows where you are, and is in process of heading your way, dont say I didnt warn ya.. there's bigger societies out there than masons ya root.. lets see how long it takes ye tae answer back fi hospital..
Oh, wow! Decky used a single period at the end of a sentence, as shown above, in the quote. Almost can't believe it.

Smiley
39972  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 15, 2014, 03:35:45 PM
And I hardly think hawkins would be stupid enough to warn folks 'bout messing with something that someone of his intelligence knows not to exist.. hypothetical means it does not exist, so why warn?

Are you talking about Steven W. Hawkins, the director of Amnesty International USA? How does he have anything to do with the things of this topic? He does sound like a pretty neat guy, though - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_W._Hawkins.

Smiley
39973  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Reversing privatization of important institutions? on: September 15, 2014, 03:27:38 PM
Reversing privatization is not the only answer. Cleaning up the mess is a better idea. Privatization with a membership, one that doesn't go outside the membership, might be a better idea.

---------

The most important thing one needs to discover is that corporations and governments never do anything. Governments and corporations are "states." They are states of mind that are written down on paper. Paper with ink on it doesn't jump up and do anything. The only thing that the paper does is stabilize in the minds and memories of people, some ideas, goals, organization, etc., that certain of the people thought up for themselves. NOW GET THIS: paper doesn't do anything; only people do things.

The second important thing to know and remember is that the government of the USA, Britain, and Canada, first and foremost, are based on the common law of the people. This common law is not statute common low - the massed judgments of all the court cases. Rather, it is the common law of private property for PEOPLE, HUMAN BEINGS. The common law of the people has 3 major parts upon which the whole nation resides (although people have forgotten this; these 3 have a lot more to them than the simplicity listed below):
1. Harm nobody;
2. Damage the property of no one else;
3. Fulfill the terms of all your contracts.
This is it. This is what the whole country is based on. It's listed in the constitutions and amendments. There is complete freedom regarding anything one can do as long as he doesn't break the 3. If you don't believe that there is complete freedom, it's because you used your freedom to limit your freedom, STARTING IN YOUR MIND.

The third important thing to realize is that all corporations are built to serve people. People are above the corporations, even the corporation of government. When a corporation harms a human being, in litigation, if the man/woman stands as a human being, the corporation loses, as long as the 3 points of the previous paragraph are not broken. Check out the below links in detail, and you will see.

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw

http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da

----------

A private trust is a contract between two or more people that defines the ways that one person (group) is going to handle the property of another person (group) to achieve a certain goal. As long as there is no breaking of the above 3 common law rules, this trust trumps government and other corporations. Also, if it remains out of the realm of government and the public, it is a private trust rather than a public trust.

Essentially, in the USA, the parties (trustees, managers, executors, etc.) to a private trust, as long as they do not involve the public in trust operations in any way, are like a government to themselves. They can limit their own rights by the contract of trust, theoretically right down to the point of binding themselves over to execution for breach of trust contract. As long as the terms of the trust remain private and inviolate, this trust can own property, coin money among its members, hold its own centers of education for its people, even have its own military. But it better be written well. If you do something like this, put a lot of thought into it. If you are going to form your own nation within the USA, Canada or Britain, get many advisers to help you design the terms of the trust.

----------

If you haven't heard of this stuff before, and if it sounds interesting, get studying and formulating. We don't have to be under the thumb of the bankers and the government. Why? Because they are simply people like we are. And the basis of all that they do is in corporate law which is less powerful, legally, than private trust law, and way less powerful than the common law of the people.

Smiley
39974  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:40:13 PM

Jesus along with His disciples said that people are either for them or against them.  Smiley

How could you possibly know that?
Were you there then?

Bible says so.  Smiley

The Bible says there's a guy would walked on water.
It says there's a guy who splited the water in 2.
It says there's a guy who spit in mud and un-blinded another guy with that.

Enjoy your fairy tails bro.

Thanks, jackjack.

The Bible exists, right? I mean there are book stores in many countries around the world where you can go to find a copy of the Bible in many languages, right? Well, if you studied the details of how the Bible came into existence, you would see that it is impossible for the Bible to exist. Yet, the Bible DOES exist.

Rather than do that, you study the details of how evolution exists. Then, rather than express your findings, that evolution is impossible to exist, you proudly and emphatically say that it exists. Yet, the only place anyone can see evolution happening is in the minds of the scientists. Yet people can see the Bible all over the place.

Smiley

Not sure what you mean. Lord of the rings excist in loads of languages, is that a proof of goblins?

But you sounded so knowledgeable the other times.  Smiley
39975  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:38:07 PM

Wow giga off-topic.
I didn't mention anything about infinity. And even the monkey page doesn't talk about infinity.

The point is that there are (1000 billions)^2 = 100000000000000000000000000 stars in the universe. The probability of having the conditions applied in the 70s in at least one of planet around one of them is rather high IMO.

Sorry. Me bad for assuming that you were, in part, talking about infinity when you mentioned a webpage - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem - that has as one of its basic premises the idea of an infinite amount of time. And, in real life, it seems that you almost have to have eternity for an infinite amount of time to exist. Sorry.

Smiley

I have to ask. Do you know what the theory of evolution is? It almost sounds like you think its some kind of random pick from the tree of life.
Or that guy. ( dont remember his name) that was worried about going around for millions of years waiting to evolve a mouth so he could eat.
Thre is nothing random about evolution.
You dont have to go thru every single configuration to get to your goal like that monkey in the link

Edit: Sorry I rememberd wrong. It wasnt a mouth. It was going to the toilet. Here is the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60Lt5ClxG5Q


If the idea of evolution has to do with randomness, then, because of the difficulty involved along with probability, evolution is impossible.

If the idea of evolution has to do with cause and effect, then, because of the difficulty involved, the proof for God has to do with universe/machine > machine Maker = no evolution.

If it has to do with a combination of the two (randomness at times), or with something else entirely, then we don't have a clue, and evolution theory is entirely pointless.

Smiley

In other words you dont know what it is. Please read up on the subject. Is easyer to have a debate when both sides knows the facts

Unfortunately, reading up on evolution facts doesn't provide any facts. It only provides conjecture.  Smiley
39976  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:28:32 PM

Jesus along with His disciples said that people are either for them or against them.  Smiley

How could you possibly know that?
Were you there then?

Bible says so.  Smiley

The Bible says there's a guy would walked on water.
It says there's a guy who splited the water in 2.
It says there's a guy who spit in mud and un-blinded another guy with that.

Enjoy your fairy tails bro.

Thanks, jackjack.

The Bible exists, right? I mean there are book stores in many countries around the world where you can go to find a copy of the Bible in many languages, right? Well, if you studied the details of how the Bible came into existence, you would see that it is impossible for the Bible to exist. Yet, the Bible DOES exist.

Rather than do that, you study the details of how evolution exists. Then, rather than express your findings, that evolution is impossible to exist, you proudly and emphatically say that it exists. Yet, the only place anyone can see evolution happening is in the minds of the scientists. Yet people can see the Bible all over the place.

Smiley
39977  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:18:12 PM
There's no proof that gods don't exist; However, there's also no proof that they do exist. Everyone's entitled to their own beliefs. But, some of these things can't stand.
You guys are wasting your time.

It's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a brainwashed person to understand there are no gods.

hah Cheesy an apt reference Wink

/thread

You forget the rest of it. Jesus said, but nothing is impossible for God. By the time you get through the eye of the needle and see that God is there, you will already be in the judgment, and there will be no chance to change your mind and believe. Why not? Here's why not.

You can only believe in things that you are not sure of. When you are sure of something that you know, you don't believe it any longer. You are beyond that... beyond simply having to believe it. You KNOW it.

Once you are in the judgment, you will KNOW that God exists. Yet you can only be saved by faith = believing. You won't have any chance to believe any longer. You will NOT be saved if you haven't believed BEFORE you get to the judgment, because in the judgment you will KNOW God exists.

Smiley

If nothing is impossible for god, why is it that he can't forgive you for not believing? Many people claim that god is a jealous god - would you want someone filled with jealousy determining your life's path and fate?

Oh come on! Do you just want to hear someone talk? Or what?

It's not impossible for God to make something impossible for Himself, and also make it possible. You are forgiven for as long as you live... forgiven for EVERYTHING. It's once you die that you have locked yourself out of forgiveness, if you have. God has given each of us some of Himself. So, who is He going to deny when you will not accept Him? You or Himself?

He is jealous for and on behalf of righteousness, for honor, for the law of love, for those who trust in Him, and for truth. How long does He have to put up with a bunch of God-haters who prove that they are such by attempting to deny Him His rightful place of honor He holds as Creator and Owner of all things?

Smiley

May I ask you this next question, please?

If someone has MPD, say, and one of their personalities thought that it was god, himself, would he be forgiven after death?

If god wants everyone to believe in their beliefs, why is it that we all can't get into this 'Heaven'? Were in the scripture is the usage of 'God-haters'? I'm Agnostic - does that make me a 'God-hater'?

Your argument sounds completely one-sided. You're not taking in the other non-religions, that also seemed doomed to your Hell. Freethinkers, Humanists, Apatheists, et cetera. Not to mention - will Muslims get into Heaven, too, or Jews? In which they believe in the same Allah/god as you? Hmm? How about the other branches of Christianity, which are in common feuds in one another and don't have the exact same beliefs? Huh? Will they too find salvation?

What about the murderous and treacherous ones? You make it seem as if the ultimate 'sin' is believing in your own beliefs. If you follow god's path, why is it that you call anyone who doesn't have your beliefs a 'God-hater' when so obviously your belief that god exists condemns my beliefs?

You don't seem that open-minded to me. To be honest, I don't hate Christians at all, or Muslims, or Jews, or any religion that doesn't aim to hurt other's beliefs. Your pale arguments are clearly why some feel the need to sway away from your beliefs. 

Jesus along with His disciples said that people are either for them or against them.  Smiley

How could you possibly know that?
Were you there then?

Bible says so.  Smiley
39978  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:16:33 PM

Cataclysmic event?
That's called plate tectonics. And that's not cataclysmic

You're welcome

Plate tectonics is a theory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics. If it is anything like the Theory of Evolution regarding validity, it has been disproved long ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HDb9Ijynfo

Smiley

Yeah so evolution has been disproved long ago, plate tectonics has been disproved long ago, but god is real.
Damn, you are hilarious, I love this thread.

Go ahead and laugh. The politicians of science are laughing a lot harder, because they got you to believe all their nonsense while the facts against it are right under your nose.

I love this thread. You atheists are so hilarious!

Smiley

Lol, I personally wrote a dozen scientific papers, so I guess I am the one making people believing my "nonsense"

Aha! The truth comes out. You are part of the conspiracy of scientists.  Smiley

Yeah exactly Sherlock Cheesy

Well, you're the one who said it.  Smiley
39979  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:11:43 PM
There's no proof that gods don't exist; However, there's also no proof that they do exist. Everyone's entitled to their own beliefs. But, some of these things can't stand.
You guys are wasting your time.

It's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a brainwashed person to understand there are no gods.

hah Cheesy an apt reference Wink

/thread

You forget the rest of it. Jesus said, but nothing is impossible for God. By the time you get through the eye of the needle and see that God is there, you will already be in the judgment, and there will be no chance to change your mind and believe. Why not? Here's why not.

You can only believe in things that you are not sure of. When you are sure of something that you know, you don't believe it any longer. You are beyond that... beyond simply having to believe it. You KNOW it.

Once you are in the judgment, you will KNOW that God exists. Yet you can only be saved by faith = believing. You won't have any chance to believe any longer. You will NOT be saved if you haven't believed BEFORE you get to the judgment, because in the judgment you will KNOW God exists.

Smiley

If nothing is impossible for god, why is it that he can't forgive you for not believing? Many people claim that god is a jealous god - would you want someone filled with jealousy determining your life's path and fate?

Oh come on! Do you just want to hear someone talk? Or what?

It's not impossible for God to make something impossible for Himself, and also make it possible. You are forgiven for as long as you live... forgiven for EVERYTHING. It's once you die that you have locked yourself out of forgiveness, if you have. God has given each of us some of Himself. So, who is He going to deny when you will not accept Him? You or Himself?

He is jealous for and on behalf of righteousness, for honor, for the law of love, for those who trust in Him, and for truth. How long does He have to put up with a bunch of God-haters who prove that they are such by attempting to deny Him His rightful place of honor He holds as Creator and Owner of all things?

Smiley

May I ask you this next question, please?

If someone has MPD, say, and one of their personalities thought that it was god, himself, would he be forgiven after death?

If god wants everyone to believe in their beliefs, why is it that we all can't get into this 'Heaven'? Were in the scripture is the usage of 'God-haters'? I'm Agnostic - does that make me a 'God-hater'?

Your argument sounds completely one-sided. You're not taking in the other non-religions, that also seemed doomed to your Hell. Freethinkers, Humanists, Apatheists, et cetera. Not to mention - will Muslims get into Heaven, too, or Jews? In which they believe in the same Allah/god as you? Hmm? How about the other branches of Christianity, which are in common feuds in one another and don't have the exact same beliefs? Huh? Will they too find salvation?

What about the murderous and treacherous ones? You make it seem as if the ultimate 'sin' is believing in your own beliefs. If you follow god's path, why is it that you call anyone who doesn't have your beliefs a 'God-hater' when so obviously your belief that god exists condemns my beliefs?

You don't seem that open-minded to me. To be honest, I don't hate Christians at all, or Muslims, or Jews, or any religion that doesn't aim to hurt other's beliefs. Your pale arguments are clearly why some feel the need to sway away from your beliefs.  

Jesus along with His disciples said that people are either for them or against them.  Smiley
39980  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: September 14, 2014, 04:08:59 PM

Cataclysmic event?
That's called plate tectonics. And that's not cataclysmic

You're welcome

Plate tectonics is a theory - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics. If it is anything like the Theory of Evolution regarding validity, it has been disproved long ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HDb9Ijynfo

Smiley

Yeah so evolution has been disproved long ago, plate tectonics has been disproved long ago, but god is real.
Damn, you are hilarious, I love this thread.

Go ahead and laugh. The politicians of science are laughing a lot harder, because they got you to believe all their nonsense while the facts against it are right under your nose.

I love this thread. You atheists are so hilarious!

Smiley

Lol, I personally wrote a dozen scientific papers, so I guess I am the one making people believing my "nonsense"

Aha! The truth comes out. You are part of the conspiracy of scientists.  Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 [1999] 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!