Thats what i always said, they cant take any critic. They are too sensitive to see some points objective, for example crypto_vokain, he could not stand the fact that his videostreams are of poor quality and no one except a handfull of people want to join his livestreams. He talks some rubbish about supporting the community but insists on getting paid for such poor quality content, neither has he the viewers  to make the payment legitime. If he would be able to get the critic, he would know that the payment for only a bunch of viewers is not legitimate at all. He only has about 100 viewers per livestream, but he still dont want to selfreflect how unnecessary those streams are, instead he loves to bash other people and ask why we dont do any productive. But i can tell you that not taking onions out of the devfund for such livestreams is much better than emptying the devfund with those actions. He couldnt even stand the fact that his streams were a big NO to the comunity, he had to make a "final countdown" thread in the forum to show his agony to the whole comunity, like if someone cared at all... Instead of taking it like a mod and asking the comunity whats wrong with the streams and how to improve it so he would be voted YES to do them, but no he cries like a baby instead and mock on people who disagree with him.
The constant censorship in the comunity is also toxic, people should be free to discuss and get some legitime answers. Also the childish behaviour of some mods in telegram is not acceptable. They have been choosen as mods to support the community and not to mock it constantly if someone asks uncomfortable questions. What do they think? To ban every single member, so even the loyal ones get disgusted about their behaviour so they leave ?

There should be a proposal to vote in votecentral for or against the current mods. I feel that many members would vote against some mods, this should be like in politics, we should be able to vote for some people being a mod or not.