 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
My 6xVega64 use stak2.5.1, algo Heavy,18.5.1driver Only get 7.8K,. But use stak2.4.7,20170823blockchain driver,can get 8.3k,Why? the same parameters: core 1408/900 mem:1080/900 powerlimit -20% Anyone having issues with the new version of XMR-STAK? Having hashrate issues. Old version I'm getting around 11,500 ... New version I'm getting 7500.
I am running two Vega 56's on Windows and XMR-STAK 2.5.1 (v8) and averaged 4,500 H/s now running 4,100 H/s (with CPU) - Newer AMD drivers cause problems - I run Adrenaline 18.5.1
- It helped me to increase AMD config 'worksize' to 16 and 'intensity' to a higher number such as 1904
- When updating to XMR-STAK 2.5.x you need to start with fresh config files and tweak them after running miner the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
6x Vega64 (2017.10.30manufactr) Core 1408/900 mem 1045/900 powertarget -20%
16+14 or 15+15 only get 7.25kh It seems too low .
My 6xvega56(flash to 64bios) 16+14 get 11.5k (core:1337/900 mem：1025/900 power taget -20%)
15+15,15+15,15+15,15+15
Team Red Miner version 0.3.6
[2018-11-05 11:21:49] Auto-detected AMD OpenCL platform 1
[2018-11-05 11:21:50] Initializing GPU 0.
[2018-11-05 11:21:54] Pool cal.cnpool.cc login succeeded.
[2018-11-05 11:21:54] Pool cal.cnpool.cc received new job. (job_id: 350770445476649)
[2018-11-05 11:21:54] Pool cal.cnpool.cc set difficulty to 150000
[2018-11-05 11:21:55] Dev pool connected and ready.
[2018-11-05 11:21:55] Initializing GPU 1.
[2018-11-05 11:21:57] Initializing GPU 2.
[2018-11-05 11:21:59] Initializing GPU 3.
[2018-11-05 11:22:03] Initializing GPU 4.
[2018-11-05 11:22:05] Initializing GPU 5.
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 0: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 19:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 1: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 03:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 2: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 13:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 3: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 16:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 4: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 09:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:07] Successfully initialized GPU 5: Vega with 64 CU (PCIe 06:00.0) (CN 15+15)
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 746.1 h/s, avg 1.206kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 738.8 h/s, avg 1.207kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 743.5 h/s, avg 1.207kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 729.5 h/s, avg 1.207kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 735.3 h/s, avg 1.211kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 728.2 h/s, avg 1.213kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-11-05 11:22:24] Stats Total - cnv8: 4.421kh/s, avg 7.251kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s
[2018-11-05 11:22:32] Pool cal.cnpool.cc received new job. (job_id: 573976627372422)
[2018-11-05 11:22:33] Pool cal.cnpool.cc share accepted. (GPU1) (1/1/0)
[2018-11-05 11:22:36] Pool cal.cnpool.cc received new job. (job_id: 175747342969107)
[2018-11-05 11:22:47] Pool cal.cnpool.cc share accepted. (GPU2) (2/2/0)
[2018-11-05 11:22:54] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 1.388kh/s, avg 1.334kh/s, pool 0.0 h/s 0/0
|
|
|
|
|
Hello，dev，why my miners use cast mining， there are too many Duplicate share on pool side？Do you have any comments to reduce it? When use xmr-stak or SRBminer , no duplicare share.
This ofen happen on rigs of vega56， vega 64 ，RX580，RX570
cast version include 1.30 1.50 all happen
|
|
|
|
Road map: September 2018 ◆ Launch of Bittorium November 2018 ◆ Refinement Of Code For Masternodes - ◆ Listing On Exchanges December 2018 ◆ Implementing Masternodes What is a real sense to start with CryptoNote algo in September to do swap (via exchage?  + extra cost) to other algo PHI/quark/x11/.... in December? Maybe just start with the right algorithm from the beginning? It confirms my warning about the project. We are not changing algorithm shows you know allot:) no where does it state that we will be changing algorithm... It's funny how trolls appear when they sniff something.. to be fair I'm sick of it, I'm just going to continue development alongside Mika and not even bother with these false comments... This is becoming ridiculous, it's like why do all new projects get called scams because of 1 person talking trash.. shows how mature some people are, or maybe they're trying to bring down the hashrate then mine more? I guess it's the circle of life... internet trolls talk nonesense then get proven wrong create a new account then talk more trash.. If I didn't work for PSTAR before would that change things? Nope I guess some troll would just try talk trash about something else instead and then use multiple accounts to try tarnish a reputation... funny how it doesn't stick right? If the plan is to sell the premine would I really offer people from PSTAR to exchange their worthless pstar to BTOR? Oh before you say worthless.. yep giacomo left PSTAR to die, my fault no... btor developments fault nope... go seek giacomo for answers and blame. The only node that is active on pstar is ran by our official pool admin who is only keeping that active untill 31st October for people from PSTAR to exchange to BTOR... So please think before you post nonesense that scrolling through comments proves you wrong anyway.. Anyway back to work I go, may you have a lovely day and thanks for your input, as I have already mentioned we appreciate all feedback negative or positive.. DEV, please confirm that Masternode functionality will be available in December-2018. Is there any Cryptonight-lite coin which already runs MasterNodes or POS? Please provide the links if any. Or will you plan to implement it from scratch? Please advise. Our masternodes have already been created the tests have been successful now we are just writing and implementing the code for the collateral and refining the API, the progress of this can be viewed on pool.raasu/#masternodes As far as I'm aware there is no other cryptonight lite coin that is running masternodes... Is masternode testnet okey? Can I test it? |
|
|
|
|
BLOK height 6741? no premine?
|
|
|
|
any best dual-thread intensity setting for xmr stak cryptonote-heavy?
I"m having same issue. "gpu_threads_conf" : [ // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920 // compute units: 64 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 6, "comp_mode" : true }, getting around 700 per vega 56 v64 bios and 1350/100 has anyone been able to achieve better on cryptonote-h ? try this para: "gpu_threads_conf" : [ // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920 // compute units: 64 { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 10, "comp_mode" : true }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 10, "comp_mode" : true }, |
|
|
|
website is down
Account Suspended
This Account has been suspended.
Contact your hosting provider for more information.
It is up now, please check it again. |
|
|
|
|
good team good coin, very fast trasfer
I love this coin!
|
|
|
|
|
