 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
|
Pulled my 7950 and 3570k away.
Those equated to about 2% of current network speed (195000kHash/s), [(750/((350/256)*2^32/(195000*1000)/3600))/750]
I'll be back thou if the dev explains himself, which I highly doubt at the moment.
|
|
|
|
So how many blocks have the people mining found?
Anyone gotten lucky finding a bunch on here?
I've found 33 blocks so far, plus two immature and four orphans  (Got to the party like two hours late, the diff was already around 40) Here's my getpeerinfo, hope it helps someone. Can't provide a node as I'm behind heavily NAT'd network. Had no trouble connecting to network thou, just used the nodes from 1st post. 07:30:07

[
{
"addr" : "209.126.71.68:12131",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1386221401,
"lastrecv" : 1386221396,
"bytessent" : 75200,
"bytesrecv" : 102190,
"conntime" : 1386189821,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 720,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "37.146.189.117:12131",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1386221396,
"lastrecv" : 1386221396,
"bytessent" : 46669,
"bytesrecv" : 76955,
"conntime" : 1386197082,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 852,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "113.140.43.130:12131",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1386221397,
"lastrecv" : 1386221399,
"bytessent" : 7777,
"bytesrecv" : 7755,
"conntime" : 1386219914,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1241,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "117.21.226.240:12131",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1386221397,
"lastrecv" : 1386221398,
"bytessent" : 4662,
"bytesrecv" : 7387,
"conntime" : 1386220314,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1247,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "119.178.230.186:12131",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1386221397,
"lastrecv" : 1386221396,
"bytessent" : 4540,
"bytesrecv" : 4762,
"conntime" : 1386220601,
"version" : 70001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 1251,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
|
|
|
|
2x5870 = 4MH
good or bad?
That's really nice! It equates to around 73 quarks per day and 14 SRCs at current difficulty. (Minus the 10% royalty) Hi guys, just wanted to give it a try but keep getting this message:  NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M (old laptop) Any ideas? Thank you! You should've read the 1st post completely
NVidia and old/rare AMD cards are not supported.
|
|
|
|
/snip/
Where is this quarkcoin.conf file located exactly? Searching the computer finds nothing. Nothing in the wallet data folder or the folder that launches the wallet executable. It does not exist by default, you must create it at %appdata%/Quarkcoin/quarkcoin.conf (wallet data folder) what card gets the best hashes?
Radeon 5000 and 6000 series cards run great. The best single die gpu would be 6970, I think |
|
|
|
Pointed one miner your way Site looks great but is in need of more users! |
|
|
|
Great update! Got a 32% boost AND a fluid desktop, awesome  Running at following settings:  I can keep it running at all times with no effect to my work/media experience and that's why I'll keep it running 'till the end of the world When I want to play something I just pause the miner with Process Explorer and when I'm finished I'll let it to roll again. Solo or poolmine with the latest version?
It's solo E: Tested Intensity's effect to performance, short 60 second rounds, so it's not 100% waterproof, but it shows to me that going over about 20-30 doesn't give a considerable boots: (yeah, it's low resolution data but it tells something) [Spreadsheet] |
|
|
|
|
When can we expect to see a new version?
I haven't been able to mine as the intensity is way too high to be run in background.
|
|
|
|
Snip
Obviously, skimming 1/8 is highway robbery. I wouldn't say it's robbing to get paid for what you do, 12.5% of income is alot but consider this: you wouldn't get any income if he wouldn't have shared his miner, on 6000-series gpus it's highly profitable even with the fee at the moment |
|
|
|
Yes. Simple question and simple answer  |
|
|
|
|
Around 40% of scrypts usage (atleast on my 7950)
[Following data pulled from HWinfo]
Quark: Core 57W Memory 14W Combined 71W
Scrypt: Core 135W Memory 35W Combined 170W
These powers are measured after VRM modules so total card consumption is higher, around 200W in scrypt and 85W in quark. (Rough approximation with bad multimeter)
Hopefully the miner gets updated to support GCN cards as soon as possible, I'd be more than happy if it would pull 2.5MH/s with 200W power usage, but as performance of 6000-series is great,over 2.5MH/s with 6970, I'm hoping for over 4MH/s when it gets optimized ^^
|
|
|
|
/Snip/
What CPU miner did you using? minerd_qv2.2_sse4, found if from somewhere in quarkcoin thread. |
|
|
|
Working here so far, just 1.05MH/s thou (7950) tomorrow morning we'll see if it has generated a block If yes +1, if no, waiting for adjustable intensity and +0.5  E:And we have a block! All we need now is adjustable intensity  |
|
|
|
How much SRCs I should be getting now per hour with current difficulty with 3570k mining at stable 720kh/s?
Asking because both pools seem to show my hashrates wrong, crypto-expert 0-50kh/s and feeleeps 7-24kh/s....
about 0.000000000000000000000000001 at the current diff i would say. Mine quark, sell it to buy this if that is what you want. More profit that way. That might be damn close, I think I'll stay at Quark and trade from that onward |
|
|
|
|
How much SRCs I should be getting now per hour with current difficulty with 3570k mining at stable 720kh/s?
Asking because both pools seem to show my hashrates wrong, crypto-expert 0-50kh/s and feeleeps 7-24kh/s....
|
|
|
|
|
Pushing meself to five posts....
|
|
|
|
|
