I want to start mining this coin, I usually use Suprnova pools, they are the most used pool for ZenCash, but are they the best choice ? zenmine.pro has no fees but how long will that last ? Also there are zhash.pro and LuckPool all 3 have about ~500 miners, the rest are mostly dead so I won't even mention them  I started with suprnova, tried zenmine.pro for a week. I averaged less zen with zenmine.pro so I have gone back to suprnova. I got a little less rewards at zenmine.pro too. I can recommend zen.catspool.org, if you're looking for a bigger pool maybe try http://miningpoolhub.com/ as one of the bigger pools. |
|
|
|
|
Danke nochmal für eure Tipps, es lag wahrscheinlich echt an den Windows Updates. Jetzt laufen die Rigs einwandfrei.
@marcmd
Es kann tatsächlich sein, dass die Auslastung des Netzteils so niedrig ist.. normaler Verbrauch der 1060 sind 120 Watt. Entweder der Miner lastet die Grafikkarten nicht voll aus, oder die Grafikkarten sind undervoltet, oder es minen nicht alle Grafikkarten, oder dein Messgerät ist defekt (sehr unwahrscheinlich, weil es sonst eher nichts als etwas falsches anzeigen würde).
Hast du das Power Limit verändert? Benutzt du MSI Afterburner zum übertakten?
|
|
|
|
Hi
kann dir was anbieten - ich schick dir eine PN.
Danke, hat sich inzwischen erledigt. |
|
|
|
bminer is better than dstm? for gtx 1070 ti ?
I personally get a higher hashrate of about 4% compared to dstm with bminer with my 1070 Ti's. |
|
|
|
I understand suprnova has most of the hashrate, however I just didn't seem to get as much mining on zenmine.pro, even though it had zero fees at the time.
Now it might just be variation since it was a smaller pool, however I did mine for close to a week on zenmine and still it didn't match payouts from suprnova. Do your own tests but this is one of the reasons I'm happy with the larger pools.
As I said two posts earlier, it's only zenmine.pro which has that issue, as far as I can tell. Maybe you could try anther pool, like zen.catspool.org as well and give another smaller pool a try? anyone here mining with 750ti?
can you share me your hashrates
I'm mining with another care, but maybe you can find some answers in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1691798.20 |
|
|
|
Same machine, same cards, same pool, same running time from scratch, same ... everything is the same ... running for 48 hours now bminer has somewhat lower pool reported average hashrate but higher cumulative actual payout by ca. 3% on the pool side.  Will keep it running until the weekend and then start switching if the status persists status after 72 hours... averages are last 24 hours and irrelevant now. the actual pool payout is ca. 4.5% higher for bminer. I will let it run for another ca. 48 hours before final decision. It runs on full autopilot, I dont even look at rejected shares or anything else. And it is 2x1070 for each miner.  It would be interesting to know with which cards you are mining with. |
|
|
|
Suprnova has, depending on the current network hashrate, between 35 and 43% of the network weight, so in order to support decentralization and prevent a 51% attack possibility, could you please recommend any other mining pool? I can recommend https://zenmine.pro/ with 0% fee or https://luckpool.org/ with 0,5% fee and 10% jackpot for the block finder. https://zen.2miners.com is also good and supports solomining as well. Sorry, but I only have personal experience with Suprnova. I only make recommendations based on personal experience. Suprnova is mediocre at best. Well, then tell us what's better? luckpool is fine, so is zenmine.pro. Im not saying Suprnova is bad, just average. After running on zemine.pro (it showed me around 10% reduced hashrate than any other pool and keeps the block fees) I am now running my cards on http://zen.catspool.org and would like to recommend that pool. It has zero fees and pays out 100% of the block reward and block fees as well. The only thing to mention is that to protect from poolhoppers catspool reduces the shares a little bit if you participate in less than 50% time of the round. I doubt that. The only way to compare pools is by running 2 identical rig or GPU at the same time, not the next day and to look for the rewards 24-48 hours later. Luckpool was the best when I did it. I was at zenmine for about three days and a week at luckpool before. Now I'm already a few days at zen.catspool.org and it's the first pool I found with 0% fees, a nice overview chart and no downtimes on the miners or front-end at all. Also, as I said, my hashrate was reduced about 10% at zenmine.pro compared to any other pool I have tried yet. |
|
|
|
Suprnova has, depending on the current network hashrate, between 35 and 43% of the network weight, so in order to support decentralization and prevent a 51% attack possibility, could you please recommend any other mining pool? I can recommend https://zenmine.pro/ with 0% fee or https://luckpool.org/ with 0,5% fee and 10% jackpot for the block finder. https://zen.2miners.com is also good and supports solomining as well. Sorry, but I only have personal experience with Suprnova. I only make recommendations based on personal experience. Suprnova is mediocre at best. Well, then tell us what's better? luckpool is fine, so is zenmine.pro. Im not saying Suprnova is bad, just average. After running on zemine.pro (it showed me around 10% reduced hashrate than any other pool and keeps the block fees) I am now running my cards on http://zen.catspool.org and would like to recommend that pool. It has zero fees and pays out 100% of the block reward and block fees as well. The only thing to mention is that to protect from poolhoppers catspool reduces the shares a little bit if you participate in less than 50% time of the round. |
|
|
|
|
Ich finde die Idee auch sehr gut mit den Merits und würde es begrüßen, wenn es einfach einen +1 Button geben würde.
|
|
|
|
|
Zencash.
Es stehen 2018 unter anderem an: Radical Usability, ZenHelp Desk, ZenPub (File Storage mit Browser-Zugriff), Hardware Wallet integrationen, Secure Node Integration auf Protocol Level, One-Click-Miner, DAO Research und Implementierung in Zusammenarbeit mit IOHK (DAO = Distributed Autonomous Organzation), Voting-System für Weiterentwickung integriert in der Wallet, Scaling Research und Implementierung mithilfe von IOHK (eines der erfolgreichsten Research & Development Unternehmen im Cryptobereich weltweit).
|
|
|
|
I'm still getting the best results with this miner with my 1070 Ti's. My pool reports an average of 6.23 ksol/s for my 12x 1070 Ti's, so that's about 519 Sol/s per card @66% Power Limit and 4,37 Sol/W. The miner reports 510 - 525 Sol/s, so that's just about right. Although the hashrate varies a bit, the average is always above 6ksol/s, which is 500 sol/s per card, which would be the minimum 510 sol/s -2% devfee. Also I have zero stability issues. Running my cards at +200 core / +600 memory. |
|
|
|
Hallo liebe Leute!
Ich habe einige Fragen, vielleicht weiß wer was da los sein könnte?
Mein Rig läuft inzwischen mit kleinen Herausforderungen recht stabil: RX580 Special Edition mit ca. 31+Mh/s, zur Zeit 135W/GPU Verbrauch an der Steckdose,
nach ca. 2h wird jede GPU aber langsamer - ca. 29-30 Mh/s. Die Temperatur der GPU´s bleibt immer bei ca. 60 Grad konstant.
Nach jedem Neustart des Claymorminer startet jede GPU wieder mit 31+ Mh/s, und nach ca 2h wieder das selbe Spiel- Speed geht runter auf 29-30Mh/s.
Außerdem kommt manchmal nach etlichen Stunden Minen die Meldung: Socket was closed remotely (by Pool) meist Nachts, tagsüber läufst auch den ganzen Tag...Dann verbinde ich mich wieder mit dem Claymoreminer, aber mit einem anderen Server (switche zwischen us und asia hin- und her, der eu-server läuft nicht gut bei mir) und dann läuft das Rig wieder mit Vollspeed...31+/GPU
Lt. HWInfo64 hab ich keine Fehler beim Minen.
Habt ihr auch solche Erlebnisse?
Vielen Dank für eure Antworten!
Anon2
Du solltest definitiv einen EU-Server zum verbinden benutzen, bei Servern auf anderen Kontinenten ist es möglich Shares aufgrund der Latenz zu verlieren. Auch die Verbindung zum Server kann durch eine hohe Latenz unterbrochen werden. Sollte der EU-Server in deinem Pool nicht rund laufen, empfehle ich dir einen anderen Pool zu benutzen. Ob es an deinen GPUs liegt, dass die Hashrate sinkt kann ich dir leider nicht sagen, da ich mit Nvidia Karten mine. |
|
|
|
Hallo,
ich bin bei den Angeboten von 1KW immer etwas doof in der Birne.
Wenn ein Minerstellplatz z. B. 1KW für 75 Euro angeboten wird, wieviel Cent sind das pro KW/h. Kann mir das jemand einmal aufschlüsseln?
Danke.
Also ganz simpel: In solchen Angeboten wird von einem konstanten Stromverbrauch ausgegangen. Sprich ein Miner mit einem Verbrauch von 1kWh kostet in einem Monat 75€. Gerechnet: 75€/1kWh*24h*30(Tage)=0,104167 €/kWh |
|
|
|
Ja klar, du kannst schon 6 PSUs an ein Mainboard anschließen. Damit die Netzteie synchron laufen und keine Geräte geschädigt werden können durch asynchronen Stromfluss solltest du so ein Kabel benutzen: https://www.caseking.de/kolink-dual-netzteil-adapter-24-pin-schwarz-15cm-zuad-767.htmlIch habe jetzt aber noch nie gehört, dass man mehr als vier Netzteile synchron geschaltet hat. Müsste schon endlos funktionieren, aber die Netzteile nehmen natürlich auch viel Platz weg. Empfehlen wird dir das wahrscheinlich niemand, es ist einfach unpraktisch. Praktikabler wäre es größere Netzteile zu benutzen oder die GPUs auf mehrere Mainboards zu verteilen, z. B. auf zwei Mainboards. Drei synchrone Netzteile sind kein Problem. Ich benutze z. B. das Cooler Master V1200, da es 12x 6+2 Pins hat, sprich es versorgt out of the Box 6 Grafikkarten mit Doppelanschluss. Sprich du bräuchtest zwei 1200 Watt Netzteile anstatt den 6 genannten. Oder du versuchst es mal mit Server PSUs und Breakout Boards. |
|
|
|
|
@cryptoyes
I'm getting less than 1% rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
I truly believe the partnership with IOHK will be awesome! It'd would be so amazing if Zencash could have a sustainable scaling solution. Really looking forward to see how the research and development goes. Suprnova has, depending on the current network hashrate, between 35 and 43% of the network weight, so in order to support decentralization and prevent a 51% attack possibility, could you please recommend any other mining pool? I can highly recommend https://zenmine.pro/ with 0% fee or https://luckpool.org/ with 0,5% fee and 10% jackpot for the block finder. https://zen.2miners.com is also good and supports solomining as well. Sorry, but I only have personal experience with Suprnova. I only make recommendations based on personal experience. No worries, I just wanted to point out that it would be better if less people would be mining zen at suprnova and more at other pools in order to support decentralization of Zencash. I have mined at all of those pools mentioned by me above, but I prefer zenmine.pro over the others as it has had no downtimes since I have been mining there. |
|
|
|
Suprnova has, depending on the current network hashrate, between 35 and 43% of the network weight, so in order to support decentralization and prevent a 51% attack possibility, could you please recommend any other mining pool? I can highly recommend https://zenmine.pro/ with 0% fee or https://luckpool.org/ with 0,5% fee and 10% jackpot for the block finder. https://zen.2miners.com is also good and supports solomining as well. would you please set a miners recommendation section for us to choose miners? It saw three miners, all looks great, bminer/ewbf/dstm I also find this : [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.2.0) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2519271.0I'm using bminer as it's almost 5% more effecient than dstm and ewbf with my 1070 Ti's. |
|
|
|
The version 5.2.0 has been released. It brings a few improvements on NiceHash and Windows: - Introduced the option -logfile to append the logs into a file.
- Minor optimization on Windows for cards that are mounted on the risers.
- Improve compatibility for NiceHash.
Enjoy! Thank you so much for developing bminer and sharing it with us! I really prefer bminer over dstm and ewbf as I get 2-5% better results with bminer v5.0. I'm just trying bminer v5.2 and it looks like it's 1-2% faster than v5.0! I'm mining with 1070 Ti's and get about 515-525 sol/s @66% power limit (4.37 sol/w) with +200 core +600 mem. Keep up the great work! |
|
|
|
|
Could someone update the bitcointalk signatures with the new logo and colours please?
|
|
|
|
|
Danke für die Tipps, werde ich nächste Woche beides ausprobieren. Habe dieses Wochenende leider keine Zeit mehr dran rumzuarbeiten, deshalb belasse ich die Rigs momentan bei 5 Karten pro Mainboard, damit sie erstmal weiterhin stabil laufen, bis ich wieder Zeit dafür übrig hab. Die anderen zwei laufen derweil im Tower-PC mit einem ineffektiveren Netzteil.
Beide Netzteile sind übrigens Cooler Master V1200 Platinum ATX mit 1200 Watt.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
