Good to see ckpool on the blocklist again! Congrats!! to 1h1P5WXZNsMF78XbydARdsfEhpe6ewoBv CK, on a seperate note, are you or can you get in touch with loshia of TBDice these days? There are a lot of miners posting on his pool thread who would very much like to speak with him and yet he has been "absent" for several months. There's currently a 3 LTC "bounty" to get him to respond to his thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290219.280 |
|
|
|
Giving this topic another 14 days for pool op to respond then it's red trust i'm afraid no reply last account hacked.
And there has been lots of members reached out to him with no response back.
Yeah, I'm not holding my breath... but my bounty still stands. I believe the total bounty is 3 LTC combined. Hell, I'm even willing to give the OP my 1 LTC bounty if he/she just happens in and does the right thing without being prompted. it sucks but he hasnt been online for nearly 6 months. there was some big storms in US. specially in California and midwest. also i think a few big tornadoes. i have no idea if he lives in US tho. maybe he lost access to the pools wallet.. no funds have moved for a long time. at this point it seems something has happened to him. hopefully nothing fatal or really bad. Litecoin Foundation announced an update coming soon for wallets. We'll know soon if the pool stops working. |
|
|
|
Giving this topic another 14 days for pool op to respond then it's red trust i'm afraid no reply last account hacked.
And there has been lots of members reached out to him with no response back.
Yeah, I'm not holding my breath... but my bounty still stands. I believe the total bounty is 3 LTC combined. Hell, I'm even willing to give the OP my 1 LTC bounty if he/she just happens in and does the right thing without being prompted. |
|
|
|
Or seeing the the pool owner does not touch the revenue other than to in the past send the block reward to the appropriate miner, he could be saving the earnings for a rainy day. If you look through older posts you will see that the OP did several times send the reward to the block finder who had been using a M address which the pool software does not support.
I worked with the OP on Litecointalk when he first set up the pool, and mined on the pool for several years. He is not trying to take anything from anyone. You can see that as the coins are still in the pools address unspent.
The real issue is where is, or what happened to him, as he has not logged into Bitcointalk since September 2018. I did see that the pool was restarted about 3 weeks ago, but prior to that it had been running for many months without a restart. Was this restart done by the OP, or the Data Center, or was it automatic?
I recently set up an new wallet and did not read this thread first and ended up finding a block with a M address too, so I am in the same boat as several others.
I see currently there ares still 17 different miners on the pool mining to a M address.
We need to get the word out, Number 1 if you personally know the OP tell him to come back on here and settle up with the block finders, adn 2 update the pool page to show a M address won't work for payouts.
I will join the Bounty for getting the OP back here and also pledge 1 LTC
So now the bounty stands at 3 LTC for finding the OP and returning him to the forums, him settling up with the M address block finders, and and updating the pool instructions to not mine with a M address!
-M
I am genuinely appreciative of the information and I really hope you are correct about the OP not keeping the coins for himself. Do you not have any method to reach out to him, having worked with him before? Or was it just strictly on the board? I wonder if perhaps CK could be reached. It seems they worked with each other as well to get the pool started. Perhaps he has a method to contact him. |
|
|
|
|
Seeing over 1000 LTC on the pool's wallet tells me that not only does the pool owner not care but that he/she will most likely use this as the reason:
* If you enter an invalid address it will be ignored and earnings will be generated to the following address: LUNyycVonDH9aQMZn1fxyUeu8N3yS8w7ud and be considered a pool donation. *
Although the new standard M address isn't "invalid", and only he/she would know that it wouldn't be accepted by the pool. This is an obvious ploy, especially considering the attention of a red address when the merge mined Doge address didn't exist.
|
|
|
|
If anyone personally knows loshia1974 (OP) please let him know to log in here and respond to the posts.
Several miners have found blocks using a M address that the pool is holding.
He has not logged in to BTC talk since September 2018. Did something happen to him? Is someone else running the pool?
-M
I will give a reward of 1 LTC to whomever gets Ioshia1974 to the forums and He/She pays what's owed to me and the other miners who have posted their legitimate grievances. |
|
|
|
|
I see another miner suffered from this pool 3 days ago on block# 1582074 - There's another $1300 for the pool owner that he/she didn't earn.
I still want my block reward too! #1556261 - You owe me 24.85 LTC!!!
|
|
|
|
Hey, from personal experience I can say this pool is the BOMB! Really fast payout times, low pool fees of 1%, VERY fast stratum servers, and the best part, *incredible* luck! They have a GREAT support staff that's always willing to help and can be reached on Discord or Telegram. I've hit a *lot* of ETH blocks on the solo side since discovering this gem of a pool. If you don't want to play the lotto for solo, they also have PPLNS pools. Give it a look! https://cdn1.imggmi.com/uploads/2019/2/18/f1400c8f4147159ba81a621afbb53e81-full.jpghttps://altpool.pro/ |
|
|
|
I just started mining on this pool and have already solved 4 blocks, 1 to an old legacy address and 3 to one of the new segwit addresses starting with M. I haven't received any payouts though and the blocks aren't showing up on the pool or the blockchain. I've checked to see if they were orphaned and I can't find that either. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Provide the block #s when you can. I can tell you if you mined at TBDice using an M address, the entire block reward went to the pool, however, it should still show on the block history page. The last M address that mined an LTC block was 2 weeks ago according to the history. Unfortunately I can't find the block #'s since they're not showing up anywhere. My miner tells me the blocks have been found but it doesn't display which ones. I'm using an L3+. the found blocks on bitmains fork of cgminer is mostly broken and cant be relied on. just one l3+ is not going to find 4 LTC blocks, unless you been running it for a couple years.. i think the calculated time to find a block is 500 days or so. it might find a dogecoin block tho.. you should check for that. Just to clarify, you mean that bitmain's cgminer is still capable of finding blocks but just doesn't display that info correctly? Or is the L3+ less reliable at mining in general? CGMiner is capable of finding blocks, it's just bugged on some of the reporting figures. Finding a block depends on your luck and speed vs. network hashrate and difficulty though. A single L3+ will, on average, find a single LTC block in a VERY long amount of time. It could happen on the first share submitted if you're in "Lotto Luck"... or it could never happen. www.whattomine.com is a great resource for checking your hashrate vs. finding blocks if you're wondering specifics. |
|
|
|
I just started mining on this pool and have already solved 4 blocks, 1 to an old legacy address and 3 to one of the new segwit addresses starting with M. I haven't received any payouts though and the blocks aren't showing up on the pool or the blockchain. I've checked to see if they were orphaned and I can't find that either. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Provide the block #s when you can. I can tell you if you mined at TBDice using an M address, the entire block reward went to the pool, however, it should still show on the block history page. The last M address that mined an LTC block was 2 weeks ago according to the history. Unfortunately I can't find the block #'s since they're not showing up anywhere. My miner tells me the blocks have been found but it doesn't display which ones. I'm using an L3+. Sounds like you might be looking at bad shares, not solutions. One L3 miner is not going to find 4 blocks... If you're mining on TBDice, only use a Legacy LTC address. |
|
|
|
I just started mining on this pool and have already solved 4 blocks, 1 to an old legacy address and 3 to one of the new segwit addresses starting with M. I haven't received any payouts though and the blocks aren't showing up on the pool or the blockchain. I've checked to see if they were orphaned and I can't find that either. Can anyone shed some light on this?
Provide the block #s when you can. I can tell you if you mined at TBDice using an M address, the entire block reward went to the pool, however, it should still show on the block history page. The last M address that mined an LTC block was 2 weeks ago according to the history. |
|
|
|
|
Congratulations on the launch of your new coin and best of luck!
Maybe I missed the information, but can you explain the Tier System? Who and how do those Tiers apply?
|
|
|
|
I was mining here however since the end of the thread looks bleak for the site, I stopped.. WHo knows, maybe they are "stealing" rewards???
nobody is stealing rewards. if you mine with a legit address that starts with a L the reward is auto paid to you. the issue is the M address are not legit and are ignored but nothing tells you about it on the main site. It's helpful if you know what you're talking about before making silly statements. Addresses that start with an L are known as Legacy addresses. Addresses that start with M are *not* illegitimate or wrong... as a matter of fact, plenty of blocks are mined directly to M addresses all the time. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ltc/block.dws?1573684.htmThere's a block showing you that there's nothing illegitimate with "M" addresses. Those addresses exist because Litecoin created them with an upgrade to keep from overlapping with BTC when their addresses were similar. The reason it appears to be "theft" (not my words by the way) is that the pool operator has known about this and has done ***zero*** to inform his miners. When the block is mined and swallowed up by the pool and there was no prior indication that this would happen, it feels like you've been robbed. I know because it happened to me. I updated my address after having mined no fewer than 50 blocks on that pool. There is zero support even though there is verifiable proof of whose funds those really are. It's ok... www.zergpool.com has a 0.5% fee for *all* coins (including DOGE which TBDice charges 5% on rewards), including LTC, has a solo option built into the command line, and can even support a party mode... and it doesn't matter if you use a non-legacy address. The pool Op (Pinpin) has had the pool for years and years and can be easily communicated with via Discord if there ever is a problem. TBDice hasn't seen any real hashing power in 2 months. Sure they find blocks... but they find maybe one a day, most times it's over multiple days. People don't want to risk their rewards with a shysty operations. |
|
|
|
|
Ok, so it crashed again... this time, CMOS indicated it shut down because of surge protection. I turned that off. I wonder if that's been the culprit all along.
Back to running the test. Now I'm absolutely *determined* to get this to stabilized.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. I hadn't seen the previous post.
So, in comparison, my 4 card rig is actually hashing very well when it produces 13.07 Mh/s:
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3789KH/s (Avr 3660KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=59C Fan=64%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3908KH/s (Avr 3756KH/s) : 15.33KH/W : T=54C Fan=61%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2715KH/s (Avr 2604KH/s) : 14.74KH/W : T=47C Fan=57%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2665KH/s (Avr 2557KH/s) : 14.46KH/W : T=51C Fan=62%
yes u're doing great, i get ~2805KH to 2830 for gtx 1080, with core+150 mem+1000 pow100% &fan speed 85 can u tell what is your oc setup for the 1080s? bc i don't like how is mine getting high temp, i don't mind loose some KHs for lower temp Those cards are leftovers from my old gaming rig and each has a waterblock that I installed. #2 has +100 / +100 with 100% power, no voltage increase - #3 has +100 / 0 with 100% power, no voltage increase. I noticed when I try to OC mem on #3 it gets frizzy so I left it alone. mine temp 58 @ fan speed 85-88, i'll try to test lower mems & core Without a waterblock, getting 58c while mining is *stellar* in my experience, especially considering the OC you have on it. I'd be very happy with those temps. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. I hadn't seen the previous post.
So, in comparison, my 4 card rig is actually hashing very well when it produces 13.07 Mh/s:
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3789KH/s (Avr 3660KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=59C Fan=64%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3908KH/s (Avr 3756KH/s) : 15.33KH/W : T=54C Fan=61%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2715KH/s (Avr 2604KH/s) : 14.74KH/W : T=47C Fan=57%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2665KH/s (Avr 2557KH/s) : 14.46KH/W : T=51C Fan=62%
yes u're doing great, i get ~2805KH to 2830 for gtx 1080, with core+150 mem+1000 pow100% &fan speed 85 can u tell what is your oc setup for the 1080s? bc i don't like how is mine getting high temp, i don't mind loose some KHs for lower temp Those cards are leftovers from my old gaming rig and each has a waterblock that I installed. #2 has +100 / +100 with 100% power, no voltage increase - #3 has +100 / 0 with 100% power, no voltage increase. I noticed when I try to OC mem on #3 it gets frizzy so I left it alone. The 1080s are FE's - forgot to mention that. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. I hadn't seen the previous post.
So, in comparison, my 4 card rig is actually hashing very well when it produces 13.07 Mh/s:
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3789KH/s (Avr 3660KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=59C Fan=64%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3908KH/s (Avr 3756KH/s) : 15.33KH/W : T=54C Fan=61%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2715KH/s (Avr 2604KH/s) : 14.74KH/W : T=47C Fan=57%
[10:11:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2665KH/s (Avr 2557KH/s) : 14.46KH/W : T=51C Fan=62%
yes u're doing great, i get ~2805KH to 2830 for gtx 1080, with core+150 mem+1000 pow100% &fan speed 85 can u tell what is your oc setup for the 1080s? bc i don't like how is mine getting high temp, i don't mind loose some KHs for lower temp Those cards are leftovers from my old gaming rig and each has a waterblock that I installed. #2 has +100 / +100 with 100% power, no voltage increase - #3 has +100 / 0 with 100% power, no voltage increase. I noticed when I try to OC mem on #3 it gets frizzy so I left it alone. |
|
|
|
pill gives only 2-3% icnrease, my GTX1080Ti zotac amp uses only 1500 core with TDP70% and 80+ core oc, it's rock stable, my rig needs around 26gb virtual memory and it hasn't crashed yet in 4 day mining, just do one system restart per day, well in readme file it says that you can put intensity 0 to 6 and default intensity is 6, after mining dev fee session your hasrate will drop, but in reality it' same as before dev fee session, my hashrate is around 13.63-13.65mh/sec, after dev fee it never goes 13.5mh/sec, but mintpool always shows 13.7 or even higher, it makes around 0.88 zcoins per day, i already made 0.00313411 BTC + 0.35 zcoin, that around 3 day and 15 hours of mining
It occured to me... I think you mean to say you're getting 13.5 KH/W - not KH/s - KH/W refers to power consumption vs your hashing - your actual speed is shown on KH/s. In any event, can you copy and paste the GPU info from CD? It should look like this: [08:46:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3807KH/s (Avr 3470KH/s) : 14.39KH/W : T=57C Fan=65% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3922KH/s (Avr 3648KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=53C Fan=55% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2702KH/s (Avr 2476KH/s) : 14.11KH/W : T=46C Fan=56% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2654KH/s (Avr 2497KH/s) : 14.17KH/W : T=50C Fan=60% [08:46:10] INFO - Block height 131315 : Network difficulty 5112.42 [08:46:10] INFO - Received new job #7a46be3d [08:46:12] INFO - GPU1: scratchpad is generated. 1.31306 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU2: scratchpad is generated. 1.32304 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU3: scratchpad is generated. 1.35023 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU0: scratchpad is generated. 1.34032 sec no, as he said 12.7MH/s (e.x. 2700KH/s = 2.7MH/s) and he is talking about 5 cards rig. here is some posts of him CD 0.16.1 cuda 10 works more than fine on my rig using MTP algo:  memory +500 and some core oc + pill with TDP 70%, it uses around 26gb pagefile (just 4gb ram and celeron G1840), i use mintpool, it's rock stable:  & my rig is rock stable, no single crash, using windows 10 1709 with latest updates (crap free enterprise) and 371.75 nvidia hotfix cuda 10 drivers but i have only 5 GPU, there's no stability or scalability problem with 4gb ram and celeron G1840 (650+1000+1000 PSU combination and risers) i'm using only 60gb ssd and it is enough for at least 5 GPU: i'm making around 1 Zcoin per day on mintpool european server, which is around 0.0014 bitcoin at the moment https://i.imgur.com/ig2stBm.pnghere's my oc settings with intensity 6 and ohgodpill and TDP 70% Zotac amp 1080Ti oc core +80 memory +500 around 1500-1520MHZ core and 56 °C temp fan 56% MSI gamer x 1080 oc core +150 memory +500 around 1500-1520MHZ core and 54 °C temp fan 54% EVGA FTW 3X1080 oc core + 0 memory +500 (on second bios which has automatic core oc) core operates around 1680-1720MHZ and 55-54 °C temp fan 55-56% using afterburner curve so at the moment it can pay electricity bills + around 80-100$ profit,or just keep everything in bitcoin and wait few more years, i think grin-beam coin algorithm should do good profits as well, my system is fine even with KIS 2019 and teamviewer is working fine as well without any major slowdowns or lags, as for system partition from 55.2gb i have around 12gb free space left, so it uses around 25.5gb virtual memory and it's very stable in longer periods and i'm about the same except i'm getting a litte more due to max oc (electricity not issue for me). Thanks for the clarification. I hadn't seen the previous post. So, in comparison, my 4 card rig is actually hashing very well when it produces 13.07 Mh/s: [10:11:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3789KH/s (Avr 3660KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=59C Fan=64% [10:11:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3908KH/s (Avr 3756KH/s) : 15.33KH/W : T=54C Fan=61% [10:11:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2715KH/s (Avr 2604KH/s) : 14.74KH/W : T=47C Fan=57% [10:11:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2665KH/s (Avr 2557KH/s) : 14.46KH/W : T=51C Fan=62% |
|
|
|
pill gives only 2-3% icnrease, my GTX1080Ti zotac amp uses only 1500 core with TDP70% and 80+ core oc, it's rock stable, my rig needs around 26gb virtual memory and it hasn't crashed yet in 4 day mining, just do one system restart per day, well in readme file it says that you can put intensity 0 to 6 and default intensity is 6, after mining dev fee session your hasrate will drop, but in reality it' same as before dev fee session, my hashrate is around 13.63-13.65mh/sec, after dev fee it never goes 13.5mh/sec, but mintpool always shows 13.7 or even higher, it makes around 0.88 zcoins per day, i already made 0.00313411 BTC + 0.35 zcoin, that around 3 day and 15 hours of mining
It occured to me... I think you mean to say you're getting 13.5 KH/W - not KH/s - KH/W refers to power consumption vs your hashing - your actual speed is shown on KH/s. In any event, can you copy and paste the GPU info from CD? It should look like this: [08:46:03] INFO - GPU0 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3807KH/s (Avr 3470KH/s) : 14.39KH/W : T=57C Fan=65% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU1 EVGA GTX 1080 Ti : 3922KH/s (Avr 3648KH/s) : 14.95KH/W : T=53C Fan=55% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1080 : 2702KH/s (Avr 2476KH/s) : 14.11KH/W : T=46C Fan=56% [08:46:03] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1080 : 2654KH/s (Avr 2497KH/s) : 14.17KH/W : T=50C Fan=60% [08:46:10] INFO - Block height 131315 : Network difficulty 5112.42 [08:46:10] INFO - Received new job #7a46be3d [08:46:12] INFO - GPU1: scratchpad is generated. 1.31306 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU2: scratchpad is generated. 1.32304 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU3: scratchpad is generated. 1.35023 sec [08:46:12] INFO - GPU0: scratchpad is generated. 1.34032 sec |
|
|
|
|
Well, it crashed around 3am. I was running pill and will stop that for today's testing.
George, you get 13.6 Mh/s for one 1080ti? If true, that is more than I am getting for 2x 1080ti & 2x 1080s... presently I'm at about 12.7 Mh/s for all 4 cards running. I'd love to hear the rest of your setup, including any of your nvidia settings.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
