Thanks for letting us know. 

My test withdrawal went through just fine, too.
Let me know whether you accurately calculated the sending fee. If so, I guess I'll deduct 0.01 as well and send it on.

I am trying to withdraw the remainder of my GEMZ from my Koinify wallet. When I enter in the exact amount I have remaining, I get a pop-up telling me that I don't have enough funds. Am I supposed to deduct the fee for sending? If so, what is that amount, and why isn't Koinify doing this automatically?

...which indicates an initial value of 0.00006904 BTC per GEMZ.
(Just to give those interested in buying or selling a reference price.)

I support the initiative to use Telegram.

As for those complaining that the application is not "built from scratch," I wonder if you even know what that means. Do you think they should create their own programming language "from scratch"? Or perhaps have their own chipset made for their own line of cellphones (without depending upon any current technology, of course)? Are they allowed to use trusted cryptographic algorithms for encryption or do you want them to spend time and resources creating ("from scratch") those things, too?

In short, nothing is ever "built from scratch" because everything is always built with and on top of something else. To do otherwise is impossible, and to desire to do otherwise is foolish.

Last night I had a withdraw go into "Processing" mode, too. I sent them a support email. Today I see that the funds have been restored to my account. No email from them.

Earlier today when I tried to withdraw, I got a popup that says that XCP withdrawals have been disabled.

Just now I was able to submit the XCP withdrawal. I tried this about one minute ago, so I will let you know how it goes.

UPDATE 1: It looks like the withdrawal is going through. Waiting on confirmations.

UPDATE 2: Confirmed. The Bter withdrawal came through.

No, you and fulcare don't understand the math.

They are raising 3000 BTC, and this is the entire initialization market cap of the project. The 8% that will go to developers is not funded externally. So 8% of the marketcap can be used to pay developers over the life of the project. At current BTC prices, this works out to about $91'200. Do you really think that is too much? I don't.

I also nominate Jean-Luc of Nxt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=587007.0)

Take a look at Huntercoin (HUC). They are still a long way from a smoothly operating user experience, but the underlying POW incentives are there. Playing the game is how you mine and acquire coins.

I'm not a big stakeholder, and haven't said much here, so I don't know if I qualify as a community member. But I'll post anyway and you all can do what you like.

Open Source definitely has some virtues in that it invites more developers and a wider range of voices to contribute interesting things. But historically very interesting advances have also been made by individuals or small groups of people working quietly away on their vision. The privacy afforded by the closed development process for right now allows for greater experimentation and daring. Think about how courageous you would be with your own creative projects if you knew that every few days or weeks, you had to show your work to the world. You might make more conservative decisions, knowing that the more adventurous choices would be met by resistance and doubt. You might do things that worked well now but foreclosed greater possibilities for the future, only because you have your "investors" to please. But if you toil away on your project in privacy, you won't need to anticipate the critical reception of slow thinkers, or those who lack vision.

I have no idea whether this is a visionary product. But I am excited by the possibilities and respectful of the creative process, so I am willing to let qora work away in private. Soon enough we will know whether it's really something amazing or full of fatal flaws, but for now, I am quite patient.

I was confused, too. I had to read his responses in Reddit to understand his implicit argument that actually supports Counterparty as a technical innovation.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2k055g/regulators_would_be_smart_to_shutdown/

Aristotle said that you know who a person is by their actions. I don't think he said anything about a photo id and background check.

Is there enough good code here that other developers would pick up this project? Is there anyone out there who thinks ZC can be implemented?

I think a coin is more like a contestant on American Idol. Sometimes you see something amazing and they inspire you, and sometimes you watch them melt down and fall apart. Then we vote.

Strange. Check out all the ZC notices on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/AnonCoinProject

What does this mean?

What if Burger King replaces McDonalds? What if t.v. replaces talking to real people? What if vibrator replaces boyfriend?

Nevermind. It's not funny anymore. Now I'm just depressing myself.

Right now Qora is closed source. Of course it will have to be open to Ian in order for him to do the Qora AT work, but I wouldn't assume he'd be against closed source. Ian, what do you say?

Right, now I remember. I get my lists mixed up. 

This is very helpful. Thank you! 

[I believe I am on smaragda's Ignore List, so if one of you bumps into him in the hallway, let him know I appreciate his help.]

New to Qora, but like what I've read so far.

I am trying to run v18 on a Mac, and having trouble. I had to kill the JarRsLoader on the last messy shutdown, and now I can't restart Qora. I get a "STARTUP ERROR: The application was not closed correctly!" message in Console, and cannot proceed. I've deleted all of the Qora folders and started again from the zip file, but I still get that error. Any suggestions?