Please share with us some of your inspiration and the creative process that went into this incredible invention  Chaincoin 11 hash (Blake, BMW, Grøstl, JH, Keccak, Skein, Luffa, Cubehash, SHAvite, SIMD, Echo)
XCoin (Darkcoin, Dash) 11 hash (Blake, BMW, Grøstl, Skein, JH, Keccak, Luffa, Cubehash, SHAvite, SIMD, Echo)
|
|
|
|
Of course i'm not fine with it. botnets are a fact regardless of my feelings  are you really this naive? Speaking of criminal acts and "anything goes", apparently you're not only "fine with" but actually advocate murder for hire if it potentially interferes with your investment. How's that hit fund coming along? It really does take a special kind of stupid to threaten someone on the open internet.  |
|
|
|
ROFL illodin.. defending botnets? that post is me calling out someone claiming XMR wasn't botnet mined since it wasn't profitable when it obviously was There's also a reason that other post is deleted, i'm no longer "in for the long haul". Believe it or not i did make a small profit on XMR. Now that the price is a lot lower i may begin accumulating again. |
|
|
|
So the Dashtards want this thread removed from Google search results... shocking Maybe its time for Evan or Tungfa to start cleaning up some of the Google search results :  If you look at Google's Search History removal policies we have room to manouvre i think : https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2744324?hl=enRemoval Policies
We want to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible, but there are a few instances where we will remove content from Search.
Legal Removals
We remove content from our search results if it includes:
•Child sexual abuse imagery
•We also remove content in response to valid legal requests, such as copyright notifications that meet the requirements of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Maybe we can ask the Dash foundation (who is helping Dash on legal areas) for legal advice on how to take appropriate action ? What should be removed when using google search with these two reference words "dash crypto" is : anything with SCAM in it --> directly attacks the reputation of Dash anything that links it to Dashcoin --> causes confusion for those people explicitly searching for Dash and not Dashcoin  |
|
|
|
Nothing personal Alpha goy, i just call it how i see it. This post of yours quoted below shows the obvious bias.. a few obligatory sentences about LTC before you move on to shilling hard for Dash. Seems you've gone from promoting the known shitcoin scam Dash to spamming.. what exactly? Yet another Monero thread with screenshots of the Poloniex exchange rate and node counts? So your intention with this thread is to try and make Monero, a coin that never had its block reward or total supply tampered with, look bad? LTCAfter the last straggling speculators realized that the halving party was over price has seen some downward pressure. August 27th marked the time of the slide. Currently sitting at around .0125 the price is getting dangerously close to 1:1 with DASH. Hashrate averages as of yesterday = 957.05 Ghash/s It will be interesting to see just how low it goes. What will be on the LTC short term horizon now that halving is history? DASHThe Bitfinex trading shutdown is right around the corner. Tommorow all trading is to cease there. They are still facilitating about 10% of the DASH/BTC trading volume. Here is how the rest of the spread looks according to CMC ( http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dash/#markets) 1 Bittrex DASH/BTC $ 6,548 $ 2.56 20.71 % 2 useCryptos DASH/BTC $ 6,462 $ 2.56 20.44 % 3 Poloniex DASH/BTC $ 5,568 $ 2.57 17.62 % 4 Cryptsy DASH/BTC $ 3,831 $ 2.56 12.12 % 5 Bitfinex DASH/BTC $ 3,271 $ 2.56 10.35 % 6 Bitfinex DASH/USD $ 2,581 $ 2.58 8.17 % 7 CEX.IO DASH/BTC $ 1,422 $ 2.58 4.50 % 8 CEX.IO DASH/LTC $ 1,133 $ 2.54 3.58 % Things have changed a bit since the last time I checked this. Cryptsy does not appear to be handling so much of the trading load anymore. Starting to see a more even spread. Nonetheless, price has been hovering around the .0112 range for the past few days. The door is still open for LTC holders to switch investments. If the DASH/LTC ratio flips in favor of DASH in the coming days LTC holders will only have moments before a wave starts picking up steam. Speaking of waves let's analyze the drawback and compare it to the pump that took place in March. March's drawback followed by Tsunami:  August's potential drawback with an unknown future:   |
|
|
|
I guess this must be the thread for passive-aggressive Dash holders.
Pretty much this, Alpha goy is a known Dash shill and bagholder.. he feels the need to blame his heavy losses on other coins |
|
|
|
I do not know the whole story with igotspots
Why are you even posting in this topic then? You saw an opportunity to brown-nose BCX and dove right in. I saw people misusing words and phrases for the benefit of making their argument seem more valid. This is a pet peeve of mine. Based on your contributions to this thread I'd say you have difficulty understanding even simple words and phrases. Either that, or just an extreme lack of intelligence and common sense. |
|
|
|
I do not know the whole story with igotspots
Why are you even posting in this topic then? You saw an opportunity to brown-nose BCX and dove right in. |
|
|
|
BCX is completely right about this actually. It is open source software, you can release as many versions as you want. No one is forced to mine it.
If I decide to release 1000 different flavors of an open source calculator I find on Github, would you call that a scam too?
Not at all the same thing. No one will invest or lose monetarily from your calculator. The opposite of a scam would be honesty and integrity, and you can't say Spots ran his coins with either. What about the lies about all of his plans to promote his coins and get merchants to accept them? He knew this was never going to happen, but he propagated these lies to encourage people to invest in his coins. I do not know the whole story with igotspots, I would need to look more into the history to decide whether or not it was a scam . I was agreeing with what BCX posted. Let us summarize using Merriam-Websters definition of a scam. scam noun \ˈskam\ : a dishonest way to make money by deceiving peopleTherefore, if no money was made in a dishonest way, just releasing 1000 different coins and not supporting them is not a scam. Releasing 1000 coins anonymously and not supporting them is the definition of a scam you simple-minded fuck. The implication is that he'll promise to support them and then not do so. Hence the scam. |
|
|
|
FYI, launching a 1000 coins and not supporting them IS NOT SCAMMING!
I am assuming this post was made to remove any doubt whatsoever that you're just a stupid cunt, smashing your thick head on the keyboard. In order for a scam to take place, a promise, payment and non fulfillment of a promise or delivery needs to occur. How is launching a coin and not supporting it equal a scam? ~BCX~ BCX is completely right about this actually. It is open source software, you can release as many versions as you want. No one is forced to mine it. If I decide to release 1000 different flavors of an open source calculator I find on Github, would you call that a scam too? Just wow He specified he would launch them anonymously. What exactly do you think that means? The implication is that he'll promise to support them and then not do so. Hence the scam. |
|
|
|
~BCX~
Wishful thinking. I was there in the polo box saw the whole thing go down and so did many others. Don't forget polo has your ass whenever they want it. Sleep tight By the way, launching 1000 coins knowing you're not going to support them is absolutely a scam. His statement was that he would launch them anonymously, so you wouldn't know it was his coin and that it would be unsupported. Either way, the intent to scam is clear. How stupid are you people or do you just enjoy defending known scammers? It's no surprise seeing one shitbag defending another one |
|
|
|
I've never DDOSed anyone and haven't even used Polo for well over a year lol where do you get these lies? It's incredible the amount of things you think I've done. You should write a fantasy book with that imagination of yours
Not that anyone should expect BitcoinEXpress to even know what a scam or a scammer is. He's the Mensa award winner... |
|
|
|
my new goal will be to release 1000 coins anonymously. Fuck all of you assholes. Whenever you see a coin launched from here on out, there is a 98% chance it will be from me, and I will not support any of them
No, no proof whatsoever. Not that anyone should expect BitcoinEXpress to even know what a scam or a scammer is. He's the Mensa award winner that confirmed his identity on the Poloniex trollbox, then proceeded to DDOS the exchange and admit to it. Afterwards he started backtracking and deleting his posts like a little bitch when someone informed him he committed a federal crime. It's no surprise to see one shitbag scammer defending another one. |
|
|
|
I gave 2 conditions for my trade and neither confirmed. Anyway, I'm still buying.  So you're buying even though neither confirmed? Why even bother with posting TA if you're not going to follow your own rules? Edit: LOL Evan edit your post a little more Evan's original reply: I gave 2 conditions for my trade and neither confirmed. Moving averages are crossing as we speak, so momentum is changing from negative to positive: <-- the MA's actually never crossed  If we break above 0.011, I believe this was a false breakdown <-- We never broke above 0.011  I guess trolls can't read? Not surprising. Anyway, I'm still buying. Which he then changed to: I gave a condition for my trade and it didn't confirm. If we break above 0.011, I believe this was a false breakdown <-- We never broke above 0.011 I guess trolls can't read? Not surprising. Anyway, I'm still buying. What happened? Did the MA's cross after all and instead of acknowledging it you just deleted it? Classic eduffield |
|
|
|
This certified instamined scam was not so long ago on the 4th spot. The world is waking up to cheats and liers.
 |
|
|
|
No end in sight to the Dash dumps. TIP for EvanTheInstaminer to help contain losses: - cut the block rewards again - reduce total supply some more In for a legit response from the Dash crew  Looks like you'll be waiting a while. |
|
|
|
How surprising, personal attacks but no answers (as usual) How does the timing of the scam matter? It's still a scam whether it happened yesterday or at launch. Dashtard logic at its finest. |
|
|
|
You try hard but it's obvious LTC is just there so you can pretend to compare them. Your bias is evident. This thread is a perpetual advertisement for an instamined shitcoin scam with zero credibility. |
|
|
|
Evan is obviously very confused about many things. His responses in this thread are laughable and essentially boil down to the following excuses: -Satoshi has lots of Bitcoins -Corporations are instamined Nevermind that Satoshi mined his Bitcoins. He didn't change the reward or total supply. He didn't instamine 1.5 million in the first 8 hours and then drastically reduce the block reward from 500 to 5, and lower total supply from 84 million to 21 million Like I said in my previous post, it's very clear to anyone with a brain that the instamine was intentional. Anyone promoting or even talking about "Dash" as if it's a legit coin is either uninformed or scam defending. Minotaur26's opinions boil down to 'buy Dash' and 'use as many words as possible to deflect away from the intentional instamine'.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
