mature.

I'd like this vocal minority to keep the thread bumped, I've got several PMs from more discreet interested parties

your flawed assumption is that everyone who replies is eligible to be a part of this project

have you ever seen a contract? prepared by an actual lawyer? usually jurisdiction and identification are part of the contract

I am guessing you just come on the internet to debate things, if you are not eligible for this project and are not willing to sign an NDA then this thread isn't for you

also, since I'm not from a small island nation its actually quite probable that the person(s) I engage with are within an applicable jurisdiction

I've gotten very cheap summary judgements approved, and retaining a lawyer for that is really not as expensive as *everyone* on the internet believes it is.

non disclosure agreements aren't about actually not disclosing anything, its about subjecting the person to civil liability when they do disclose something they agreed not to, so that person things twice, but its a limited financial hedge (insurance) for the company for actual or perceived losses from the disclosure

judges are very accommodating to this

seeking altcoin programmer that has already released a coin, willing to sign NDA


PM me

seeking altcoin programmer, willing to sign NDA


PM me

Any breakdown of the finances of this security?

Its based on trade volume essentially yes and listing fees

Hello, what is bitzino's betting limit on roulette

I am selling a 1.2 ghs machine for $900 in another thread, but you can just PM me

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=181746.msg1897629#msg1897629

Computer Specs:

MSI970A-DS3, 4GB, AMD Processor, 1000 power supply
Radeon 5830 + (120 fan)
Radeon 5850
Radeon 5830
Radeon 6870


No keyboard, mouse, monitor

I usually get average of 1,200 megahashes, 1,200 kilohashes, 1.2 gigahashes with it. Mined a variety of cryptocurrencies, ready for gaming etc.

Already built, configured, cgminer stable configurations. Selling because my mining rigs are in a remote location so I will not be doing maintenance on all of the machines.

PM if interested.

Asking $900 usd.

rG4AEUnD8SFgpb62BCHtmsqJaWogW3mtj3

you are right, I didn't realize I had to uncheck some settings in the account settings. It is very illiquid though

Hello, I am well versed in the ability to follow bitcoin transactions in the blockchain. As well as a user's ability to further obfuscate by masking their IP address or splitting their bitcoin transaction to multiple addresses.

But what about bitcoin to litecoin?  I only thought about this after converting some on a different exchange just to check it out.

specifically I bought bitcoin with USD on mt gox where my identity is known to the mt gox operators. I then opened an account on vircunex, same IP address but no id verification necessary. I generated an address in my new brokerage account and transferred the bitcoins in mt gox to an address at vircunex. This transaction is recorded in the blockchain, but it is from one exchange to another and I suspect this is how it looks on the blockchain.  So far, I don't believe that anyone could tell the origin of the bitcoins or the funds used to buy those bitcoins from the blockchain alone. I don't own a wallet.

Continuing, now on vircunex I bought litecoins. Can anyone continue tracing bitcoin once they are converted to litecoin? Can the origin of those litecoins or the funds used to purchase those litecoins be determined? This is where my knowledge gets murky.

Continuing, litecoins cannot be redeemed for fiat on vircunex, but they can be transferred to an equally anonymous account on btc-e, via generating addresses and coupons. on btc-e they can be redeemed for US dollars.

this wasn't intentional, just wanted to diversify and play around with cryptocurrencies for the experience as well as check out arbitrage opportunities, but then I noticed the ability to remove capital from the more regulated financial system while remaining liquid and digital.

would like to discuss how one would trace this with crossreferencing blockchains or something.

PM'd you too

congrats on being there for the litecoin run-up

be better off buying bitcoin in limited times

didn't know it was called that

I thought scrypt or whatever was built to use the sram on the cpu cache, this is usually limited to very tiny amounts of ram and otherwise doesn't touch the other ram on the motherboard. and I figured people found a way to parallelize the algorithm and offloaded processing to the gpu, where again it didn't take advantage of the system's other resources

most of that is assumption and more accurate information would be helpful

Hello, what is most important in a gpu to be used for litecoin mining?

is it the amount of ram? the speed of the ram? the speed of the cores?


it seems that reaper and cgminer are the only two softwares relevant


any insight appreciated

you should be able to secure shell (ssh) into any system you control and in theory deal with the mining software too and check diagnostics of your system

Hello,

I would like to know other's thoughts on having insurance in the event of block splits. The software glitch between mining versions required centralized guidance to recommend which block series to continue with, something that people would have preferred the network to figure out on its own. Within those 30 minutes the price of bitcoin fell on Mt Gox over 20%, and merchants were advised not to take any transactions until this was solved.

This makes me imagine a world where transacting in bitcoins is highly liquid, but occasionally having to wait 30 minutes at a store front due to some network emergency where transactions cannot be validated. As if it was a modern reality of moving away from fiat.

Instead, what if there was blocksplit insurance. Where merchants and miners may have made contributions to a block chain but found out later that they were on the "wrong chain" and that major pools had democratically decided to use a different chain rendering some merchants and miner's transactions obsolete. With blocksplit insurance they would still be compensated for the value of those transactions.

This would enable merchants and miners to have peace of mind. It would also enable people to not have to wait for transaction confirmations to complete a purchase, something that some people voluntarily do and others voluntarily do not, due to the riskyness of not being able to complete a transaction. Especially given the competition in which other cryptocurrency transactions can be verified faster

This kind of insurance would be better than hedging with derivatives since futures and options do not account for block splits, only change in price.

Sorry if the terms I use are not the ones everyone else uses, but I think the context is clear.


Does this seem like something useful?