So how do you deposit on an onchain game.
The pots would grow daily weekly and monthly if player base was higher, we arent very far.

And I thought eth is going too far with the pos requeriments just as I thought with dash, why the fuck would i pay to host a node for a company that makes money off your data.
Bah we shall see where this goes, but a privacy destroyer currency wont supplant bitcoin.

You should perhaps make a poll, add games as you get sugerences if it seems doable. You could in this thread.

It is just like that . I know of atleast one that won a chunk with the same amount they gave to test the site.

Wow the superprize is huge, it will get interesting .

First one should be able to be sure the elections are fair and that people isn't influenciated by any mean and that is impossible. Then you need to know that the money the government manages is employed towards the country or it's interest.
Enviromental care should be a priority independent of wealth.

Could go on for a while but I feel it would be pointless.

I really like these things, I think we could use them as wallets too, and remembered me a lot of the https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5111005 bitcointalk collectible, could be waaay cheaper to implement than any metal wallet.

Against the house for now.

That's complete bullshit , I had another on-chain game go that way and im telling ya it almost closed, ETH fees are just too much to make the ticket price smaller, otherwise there could be different pools, one for small bettors and one for important people, however, more than a fortune was made off pennies.
Also, perhaps better to just add a cheaper coin .

Curiosity over pricing on those 10k bit brass-

It mostly depends on the processing power of your cpu-gpu and the certainity of a power floor to cope with possible threats, as bitcoin grew bigger so grew the hate of the government between other organizations towards so it raised the requeriments of processing power, perhaps,
in a future with a nearly absolute adoption it would be possible.
But I find that a bit hard to happen since:
- The chain size and the little concern towards
- I see bitcoin as the main coin, which means that with usage unless proper attention only companies will afford to run a node, have a wallet and other very worrysome vulnerabilities for a safe and decentralized network.
It is most safe to say from my opinion that we are being driven towards this "dead end?" a bit of FUD I can see.
- As an example, ethereum shows how heavy and fast a chain can get compared with btc's with a slightly different possibility offered. I consider this to be a problem of most projects nowadays which obfuscates the real use case of bitcoin as coin and blockchain as utility for storing information.

Evolution of bitcoin depends on many factors, I will edit the post gradually.

I keep commenting that fees are too high for the huge block reward we have, we should have better ways to prevent chainspam.
The arrival of quantum on a usable and efficient scale will change the way bitcoin works and existence as long as there is enough adoption made when the transition is made and the efficiency, we already have trouble with consume now when using POW so it might be another way to try to tackle bitcoin in a future.

For now we are in a real need of POW, POS makes it very easy for wealthy institutions to take control, however eth might go ahead, I use CLAM since 2014 to check how POS method go, there is an amazing distribution for anyone that had funds in DOGE LTC or BTC addresses the 12th May 2014 get 27 usd per address.
It developed some nice features eth could have a look to if it ever moves onto POS.

It would be great, It would be amazing, It would need to be audited by known and trustworthy bitcoin community developers or atleast open source it after a presale held by an escrow was made, most specialy in case of "fixes" needed thru time, it get's really nasty when things pop up and developers run away after leaving a "unpenetrable" site. So the more people pay the longer you should provide support. However that gives quite a bit of power, thats why people should code themselves or have a really good contact.

I wonder if their slack is active and they are up for development, there is plenty of ideas as long as people has the means and want to do it, however in this case there is a lot of things a community needs to see besides spontaneous and casual activity by dev team.

Wooow, this one is amazing, good luck and early grats to the winner . Any idea of the supply? I often wonder in a lot of such collectibles.

Slowly the prizepool growing it becomes a target which is an incentive for hackers to do it, which at the same time shows the vulnerabilities.
This is the 3rd version of the contract, in the first two it was almost impossible to lose as gambler.
I think it's pretty solid by now and will surely get improved in the future, the development team is pretty active.

First of all KYC perhaps should go for both parties in some way.
Second, KYC is essential in a way to prevent or perhaps more important act against scamming yet again innocent users should be able to preserve their privacy, the privacy of their funds and their doings which such methods can complicate at times, most of the ICO KYC requests end up sold in darker markets than we know.

So most of my worries about KYC are about privacy loss on people that deserve or need it. I has no support towards specific opressor behaviour such as the one usualy excercised by governmets or unlogical organizations.

The ban was framming and I has proof, silencing is easy.

Canceled raffuction.

Equal value of metal and crypto would be pretty neat, however would make it a bit expensive for silver world wide, this leaves us on to copper for cheap production and cost.
Perhaps higher cost for silver version, I'm certain the member's that bought silver version will be buying the copper version from other's in that case and get a mount of the coins anyhow.

Looks very cool, I hope I don't miss them .