Am I the only one who understood Bitpop, when he said this was a community coin and that he wouldn't be actively developing it?
I get the frustration of mining something for a long time and seeing that it's dieing, but why blame Bitpop is my question.
He was clear from the start that he wasn't going to be developing the coin and he welcomed the community to develop the coin.
There are some lame posters in this thread who expect others to work hard so there precious resources aren't wasted on a "shit coin".
Why not instead of wasting your time bashing the OP, try downloading the source code, learn how to compile it, and start making changes?
Oh wait, that means you'd actually have to do some hard work...
Thank you. I hope I brought exposure to your pool and new miners of other coins. You have a great setup and I wish you success. I hope other of you got something out of this, whether it's exposure, new contacts, experience or knowledge. Thanks Bitpop, I too wish you success. I would like to take over development of BPC, rather than have it be abandoned. Would you be willing to share with me the admin rights to the github? |
|
|
|
is http://bsty.altpooler.com run away, i can't open it now, i open it , remind me this Account Suspended This account has been suspended. If the owner feels this is invalid please contact support. CODE: ZEUS Please try again later. That message was from our DDoS protection provider, it's back to normal now. |
|
|
|
Yo ! I can't connect my worker on http://bsty.altpooler.com/ after disconnection... I use stratum+tcp://mine.altpooler.com port 3500  Should be ok now, let me know if you're still having trouble. |
|
|
|
prgbsty 1,054.705 51,493.693 the top first guy has 1054K hash rate, are you guys sure that is not a private GPU miner? don't tell me he just open hundreds computer with all good cpu in it  it seems he just use one miner to get 1054 k hash rate, look anonymous, he has different rank with several hash rate, but prgbsty has only one to get 1054 k hash means that each of those miners have chosen to hide their display name (you can do this on the settings page for your account). They are not all the same account. |
|
|
|
|
Stratum connections went from 250 to over 800 now.
Doesn't look like a private GPU . If it was, it'd count as just a single connection.
|
|
|
|
X:~/crytpo/cpuminer-yescrypt$ chmod +x autogen.sh
X:~/crytpo/cpuminer-yescrypt$ ./autogen.sh
Makefile.am:12: warning: 'INCLUDES' is the old name for 'AM_CPPFLAGS' (or '*_CPPFLAGS') Try to compile on ubuntu 14, I need small help  Best That's just a warning, keep going: ./configure make checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking whether gcc understands -c and -o together... yes
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C99... -std=gnu99
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -std=gnu99 -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 needs -traditional... no
checking dependency style of gcc -std=gnu99... gcc3
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking sys/endian.h usability... no
checking sys/endian.h presence... no
checking for sys/endian.h... no
checking sys/param.h usability... yes
checking sys/param.h presence... yes
checking for sys/param.h... yes
checking syslog.h usability... yes
checking syslog.h presence... yes
checking for syslog.h... yes
checking for sys/sysctl.h... yes
checking whether be32dec is declared... no
checking whether le32dec is declared... no
checking whether be32enc is declared... no
checking whether le32enc is declared... no
checking for size_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for getopt_long... yes
checking for json_loads in -ljansson... no
checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
./configure: line 5609: syntax error near unexpected token `,'
./configure: line 5609: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'
X:~/crytpo/cpuminer-yescrypt$ make
make: *** Pas de cible spécifiée et aucun makefile n'a été trouvé. Arrêt. Don't works :/ Try these commands: ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" make |
|
|
|
X:~/crytpo/cpuminer-yescrypt$ chmod +x autogen.sh
X:~/crytpo/cpuminer-yescrypt$ ./autogen.sh
Makefile.am:12: warning: 'INCLUDES' is the old name for 'AM_CPPFLAGS' (or '*_CPPFLAGS') Try to compile on ubuntu 14, I need small help Best That's just a warning, keep going: ./configure make |
|
|
|
|
A 2% premine of 21,000,000 coins with a 10 minute block time will allow the dev to hold a tremendous share of all available coins for quite some time.
Look at this math and make your own judgements.
Premine - bounties:
368,000 coins
10 min blocks = 144 blocks per day
144 blocks per day = 7,200 coins per day
10 days after launch:
492,000 coins in total (420,000 premine + 72,000 mined coins)
Dev's remaining premine equals 75% of all existing coins
20 days after launch:
564,000 coins in total
Dev's remaining premine equals 65% of all existing coins
50 days after launch:
780,000 coins in total
Dev's remaining premine equals 47% of all existing coins
100 days after launch:
1,140,000 coins in total
Dev's remaining premine equals 32% of all existing coins
365 days after launch:
2,628,000 coins in total
Dev's remaining premine equals 14% of all existing coins 1 year after launch
|
|
|
|
That's awesome!! I got 300+ immature. ) At last. I think it should cost a lot... So difficult to mine...
I've been working hard on the minerd so I can start testing the stratum I modified, but I'm having trouble with the scanhash function..damn yescrypt  |
|
|
|
|
I've added a pool for this coin. The link is in my sig below. I've also sent it to the dev to post in the op.
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one who understood Bitpop, when he said this was a community coin and that he wouldn't be actively developing it?
I get the frustration of mining something for a long time and seeing that it's dieing, but why blame Bitpop is my question.
He was clear from the start that he wasn't going to be developing the coin and he welcomed the community to develop the coin.
There are some lame posters in this thread who expect others to work hard so there precious resources aren't wasted on a "shit coin".
Why not instead of wasting your time bashing the OP, try downloading the source code, learn how to compile it, and start making changes?
Oh wait, that means you'd actually have to do some hard work...
|
|
|
|
will there be a linux release?
Check the readme qt file to compile linux gui |
|
|
|
|
I believe I have stratum working, BUT, there is no minerd that supports the yescrypt algo, so I am unable to test.
If anyone has a working minerd for yescrypt, please let me know!
|
|
|
|
Some highlights from an earlier post of mine:
The distribution is going to be very bad with 5 wallets owning 80,000 coins right from the start.
Now, the block reward structure. It's going to take 1 month to generate ~21,419 coins from POW.
After the first month, the reward halves for 1 year. This means each month following the first month, ~10,709 coins will be generated from POW.
It'll take 7 months of POW to match the 80,000 presale amount that went for a whopping 0.02825 BTC.
|
|
|
|
Maxminers is having trouble as well, tons of orphans. Not sure what's going on.
shit coin ready to be relaunched i guess Better to have some orphan blocks than fork 10 times. Everything has been smooth since launch.Which coin did you fork to make this? |
|
|
|
stratum+tcp://mine.altpooler.com:3313
When do you anticipate payouts to resume?
i am still waiting the same as you  when we will get payed ? it has been more than 24 hours ... My apologies for the delay, pool maintenance is finished and payouts have been sent. |
|
|
|
|
There is not much that I can find about this coin being fair.
The pre-sale would be fine if the remaining coins were destroyed. The distribution is going to be very bad with 5 wallets owning 80,000 coins right from the start.
The bounties are also not fair. 1st exchange is going to be rewarded with 10,000 blocks. A new logo is going to be rewarded with 1,000 blocks.
Now, the block reward structure. It's going to take 1 month to generate ~21,419 coins from POW.
After the first month, the reward halves for 1 year. This means each month following the first month, ~10,709 coins will be generated from POW.
It'll take 7 months of POW to match the 80,000 presale amount that went for a whopping 0.02825 BTC.
Destroying the remaining 79,774 pre-sale coins and the 20,000 pre-mine coins is the first step in attempting to save this coin. Otherwise, the distribution is going to be horrible and 5 wallets are going to own a huge percentage of the total coin supply.
|
|
|
|
AltPooler.comProfessionally Managed and Reliable Mining Pools for Alternate Crypto Currency. Welcome to our Bitcointalk.org thread. We will update this thread with any of our latest news announcements as well as our additions of new alternate coin mining pools.
News8/3/2014:The beta release of our brand new custom programmed pool interface is tentatively scheduled for 8/17/2014. Stay tuned!
Latest Pools
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? Advertising is still allowed, just on a reasonable level.
Read about 7 posts back from this post, staff member says otherwise. Sorry my bad, I've missed his post just now. Well that is a bit too much. I mean making a limitation like once per 24 hours in a thread or such would be okay I guess. This rule is just too strict. I understand what the mods are trying to do, but yes, this rule is too strict. Mods, what is the harm of a pool posting just one time in a coin's ANN thread to announce their pool is ready? I do see one bad thing that can come out of this. After a pool op makes a post about their pool, they create multiple accounts to quote it, and re-quote it. I'm not sure how that can be stopped, but I do not think completely disallowing pool ops from posting their pool in a coin's ANN thread is a solution to stopping spam. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
