 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
Hi, I have set up a new p2pool node for mining DGB Qubit: http://104.131.153.196:5041/static/P2Pool is a descentralized mining, so you earn coins directly in your wallet. You must use miners that support Qubit algorithm. Thanks ! Happy mining. |
|
|
|
A miner is not a car. If you buy it and don't use it you're quickly losing money. Antminers S4 are one of the newest and most expensive units on the market, there's no way they'd buy it just to show the photo.
I'm afraid you are very naive... They no need to bother with hardware, power supply, conditioned air, if there are people who is giving them a lot of money with an illusion to be mining cryptocoins. Suppose you buy these Antminers, and I offer to you to pay a high daily maintenance fee (like you are using them), about the 75% of the usual bitcoin payout, and you only must to pay me 25%. All you need is take my money, and give me a small portion of my own money in return. You don't need to power on any miner. The miners are simply marketing costs. Please, think... when the "cloud mining" concept appears? Yes. When mining became less profitable. But I insist: It is very simple. If they are mining, they must disclose the pools, blocks found and wallet address where payments went. Period. |
|
|
|
They showed their s3/s4 data center and the seler confirmed that they bought 5PH from them.
I have a car in the parking and of course my seller can confirm that I bought it. Is this mean that I am driving and consuming fuel ? Good try  We are talking about cryptos ! The only valid proof is the blockchain (block mined, payment address) There is no evidence that they are running a significative mining operation. |
|
|
|
Stay away from it, it is almost certainly a scam. GAW appears to be running quite the Ponzi scheme.
I fully agree. They already scammed with Hashlets, and I'm sure they will scam with HashStakers too. Hashlets: They claim they are mining, but they are not mining, So the fees to cover "electricity and repair" are the scam. The proof they are not hashing is the bitcoin blockchain (or another cryptocurrency blockchain). They never could show in the blockchain they are hashing, usually they send a picture of a mining farm, haha! They promised Hashlets will ever be profitable, but last week they made negative payouts. Also, the value of hashlets are dropping in the market, because people are realizing that payments are decreasing and never will have the money back. HashStakers: They are using the name Paycoin, but Paycoin already exist. Based on "Gnome" case (Gnome Foundation vs Groupon) there is a high risk of legal problems, because no matter it is not registered trademark, "Paycoin" is a pre-existent "Art" for the law. With Hashlets and Hashstakers, it is evident that they are borrowing capital from their customers invoking cryptocurrencies to seduce cryptocoin community, but there is nothing related with cryptocurrencies here. They are not mining, and the coin they use to stake is not descentralized, does not have a public trackable blockchain, and you cannot have your own wallet. |
|
|
|
Itīs my understanding that "ZenCloud" is virtual and not actually hashing. If i would be GAW, i would not hashing at all. For what? Why bother with hardware miners? LOL Enough $$$ to pay out customers with selling overprized hashingpower, high maintenance fees, high trading fees etc etc. Itīs no scam, just a very clever business model. People are even mining worthless (at this point) HashPoints. While btc and ltc are flying  I agree. But if they call "mining operation" to a simply borrowing operation with arbitrary daily installments, they are lying. If they lie to investors about the business, it is fraud. And fraud sounds me like scam, sorry. It is very simple to cut all this speculation, because we are talking about cryptocurrencies: They must to show in the dashboard: the pools, blocks mined, tx id's of payments, the total volume of incomes per hash and per algo, and the resulting value for each hashlet. Since they show nothing, i'm afraid the mining operation does not exists. Then, if mining operation does not exists, the "maintenance fees" are the reason to take them to court. |
|
|
|
Yes. Today I was paid, but passed 36h from my purchase, no 24h. Regarding your beautiful picture... We are talking about cryptocurrencies! the proof is the blockchain, not pictures. If you want to prove the volume of mining operation, all you need is disclose the payment addresses so everyone can check the blockchain. I will continue speculating until that moment. Best regards! |
|
|
|
Update: I have received an official answer to my ticket: "Since your miners were activated yesterday you will receive your first payout on this following rounds payout tomorrow" It means that "prorate theory" is another lie. All it is completely arbitrary there. If you still have doubts about the volume of mining operation of them, please visit: https://blockchain.info/poolsMmm.. there is no such "Zencloud pool" there... maybe they are as "Unknown" Regarding dashboard... the answer says: "We are unfortunately having a problem with the dashboard reporting properly. This will be fixed as soon as possible. We appreciate your patience". I can imagine that with "maintenance fees" thay are able to contract the best web development team to fix the dashboard ASAP.  |
|
|
|
|
I must agree with this topic.
Yesterday I have purchased 3 different hashlets to test them.
When I entered in the site for the first time I was very dissapointed. Very poor. Lack of information. Dashboard is deactivated and it no showing any information. Hashlets seems to emulate changes on the hashrate as they are really hardware miners, but -as you know- they are virtual miners, so the hashrate must be fixed.
Well, after 24 hs I have no received any payout... nor a prorate, nor a lower payout... big zero payout !
I have submitted a ticket and I will wait for answer.
But I think all the hashlets and the site related, the mining operation, is a huge lie.
In fact, we are lending money to GAW miners, and they are borrowing money with the rate they want, for the time they want, and some day they will say that "maintenance fees" cannot be lowered and the loan will finish.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 4e43f50d-8a2a-40f0-b4ee-a21bdb90b7fe
|
|
|
|
Ok, I am making progress on the License verification front, but nothing solid to report as yet.
I am having some trouble getting the domain privacy company to understand the current situation (the keep telling me to contact the domain owner via their form - which I have of course already tried). However, I am persisting on this front for now.
I have also been checking out some options for engaging a Private Investigator in the area where Tom's driver's license indicates he lives. I have found another PI who works only 20 min away from Tom's address and charges $80 per hour plus travel. The first PI lived an hour away and charges $100 ph with a minimum of 4 hours billable. A third PI has not returned either of the 2 emails I sent to them in the last week.
I am thinking that if the license is legit, we could contract a PI to pay Tom a visit and (gently) try to ascertain what's going on. I am hoping that a number of shareholders would be willing to chip in and help me pay for this. I imagine that it might take 2-3hrs for this initial work - so the cost would be $160-240 in total. If we could get 25 shareholders to put in $10 (~0.017 BTC @ $580/BTC) each, that would cover it. I would be happy to use some kind of Escrow if that's what everyone wanted.
What does everyone think about that idea?
Sorry, but I think if you have his first and last name, and the location where he lives, you do not need money. Instead of sending a PI to "gently" speak with him, you can send flowers to his home making a simple call to a delivery. It's cheaper. PD: Text for flowers card: "From your shareholders" |
|
|
|
Have you thought that maybe these guys are in Brazil for the FIFA World Cup. They stopped paying dividends the same day that World Cup began. But unfortunately, many people have liquidated their shares so quickly... If I'm right, what were a simple vacation of owners of CR, now became a big problem, because all shares are undervaluated  I agree that they should posted a message, but I live in Argentina, and I know that in Brazil there is a great caos right now. Are you really comfortable with this excuse? Why wouldn't they tell you in advance that they are planning on taking a vacation? Even if they did that or that was true, would you feel comfortable with the guys who were hoping for volatility taking a huge, unannounced break during the most volatility in months? I'm not confortable. I have shares too, and if I sell them now I will get satoshis. But, it happen to me to travel with my notebook assuming that I will continue working, and arrived to cities where internet is expensive, wi-fi places sucks and have no signal, and the hotel connection is saturated. I don't condone them. This is not a valid excuse for me. But, I'm trying to think what is happening. |
|
|
|
Have you thought that maybe these guys are in Brazil for the FIFA World Cup. They stopped paying dividends the same day that World Cup began. But unfortunately, many people have liquidated their shares so quickly... If I'm right, what were a simple vacation of owners of CR, now became a big problem, because all shares are undervaluated I agree that they should posted a message, but I live in Argentina, and I know that in Brazil there is a great caos right now. |
|
|
|
Have you thought that maybe these guys are in Brazil for the FIFA World Cup. They stopped paying dividends the same day that World Cup began. But, many people have undersold their shares so quickly... |
|
|
|
|
