You are with all of these (factual or or infactual) excuses you're making for the casino.
They are not excuses. It's my point of view of what was happening. You are the one making a lot of assumptions based on your own feelings.
2. I'm not misrepresenting anything.
You are. Despite what your feelings are, no matter how incompetent the management was, they did not scam the entirety of the ICO proceedings. They scammed whatever was left after their mistakes. EDIT: Unless they somehow planned it from the start which I doubt very much
2/3. Security exploits, big winners, etc. Does not mean anything. The management that ran BitDice and who sold those proceeds should have used those funds to continue developing on top of the casino and make it a successful business, instead, they ran off which most od the procesaes and sols it over to another party (probably for a large fee) and left them with the mess.
They matter in painting the picture what was actually scammed. If, as you say, nothing this major is a scam from beginning, then it is very important to know what happened before they actually decided that scam/exit scam was their plan. You have no factual proof to say they ran with most of the proceedings. These are all assumptions. Just like I am making assumptions based on my experience.
4. You helped with the ICO.
Yes, I helped the casino that was very reputable at the time. Investors invested because BitDice
was a reputable casino. You can't pin that on me. My actions after the fact did not make investor situation any worse comparing if I never worked for BitDice.
If there was no signs of clear scam BoXXoB
I did not say signs of clear scam. I said there was no clear scam happening. A clear scam would have been if they did not try to make things change for the better in any way. They did though. I may have given them too much benefit of the doubt but I don't like making decisions without facts. If there had been a case where I got a clear sign that investors were forgotten, then I would have acted on it.
5. How could you possibly know the the intentions of the original management if you aren't them.
You say that as if you can't form an idea based on your interactions with someone and what they say.
You are here making claims without ever having dealt with me personally. Is it not a bit hypocritical what you are asking?6. And yet, you led people to believe that things were OK while you apparently saw these issues.
This is a completely separate matter. When there were critical bugs or exploits, I advocated for making them public and we did. I did not lead people to think things were OK. You are making it seem like I was, as customer support, supposed to come forward about everything.
7. What happened was, one day the owner woke up and thought "Hmm, how can I make this thousands of BTC in the BitDice bankroll mine?" ... Answer: Convert them all to a useless token and keep the liquid assets. From that point onward it's just a gradual exit.
Let me just leave this quote from you here:
5. How could you possibly know the the intentions of the original management if you aren't them.
8. Because you're naïve or it's just what you're saying to keep yourself out of trouble. Either way, you promoted the ICO and was a player in the scam whether you knew it or not, and you should be held accountable.
I just want to know what reality you live in. I promoted ICO of a reputable casino. Investors invested in the ICO of a reputable casino. Neither party knew what was going to happen.
you defended the business to angry investors ...
I mostly relayed information to investors without adding any opinion or bias. What you see here on Bitcointalk is a very narrow view over the whole situation and almost all communication I had with investors did not happen here.
10. You tried your best? I don't see any efforts on your part in finding the scammers, and I don't see any public apologies before I started barking...instead you tried to hide and wait for the dust to settle, and now you're suddenly back managing a campaign for another casino with another mysterious person.
Yes, I tried my best to keep investors informed during my time at BitDice. I don't have more information to go on about finding them than what the general public has. I was not privy to any of their private information. I also do not think it's my responsibility to find them. Neither do I feel like I need to personally apologize for the scam. I can only say that I regret working for them but apart from that, I do not owe any apologies.
You are making assumptions. I was not "hiding". I was not active on Bitcointalk for quite some time before I left BitDice. I only returned after dewez asked if I can manage their campaign. You are the one making dewez a "mysterious person". Did you not see his post where he specifically asked to message him if you had questions. Not everyone wants to make their information public on a forum.
EDIT:
I think the main thing here is that none of us have full information about what happened. It's all just assumptions and personal opinions apart from the fact that they eventually ended up scamming.