Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
decred not working?
It should be working. There's been miners on and off it for a little while now [2016-02-18 00:05:06] HTTP request failed: Protocol "stratum+tcp" not supported or disabled in libcurl [2016-02-18 00:05:06] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds Does your miner actually support stratum? Other pools I think are using getwork and not stratum ive tried sp mod and tpruvot
|
|
|
decred not working?
It should be working. There's been miners on and off it for a little while now [2016-02-18 00:05:06] HTTP request failed: Protocol "stratum+tcp" not supported or disabled in libcurl [2016-02-18 00:05:06] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds That's a problem with your build. Compile yourself or find another pre-built copy somewhere... miner works fine on other pools.
|
|
|
decred not working?
It should be working. There's been miners on and off it for a little while now [2016-02-18 00:05:06] HTTP request failed: Protocol "stratum+tcp" not supported or disabled in libcurl [2016-02-18 00:05:06] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds
|
|
|
Hi, I see on invisible-miner.com that they are selling a kind of miner that put your Pc to work as a zombi. Ideea that this program is very useful for PC-schools, internet-caffe, etc and I really want a piece from that software, but I think that is too expensive. Have someone from this forum already bought a pack ? Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I can make you one cheaper LOL. and its undect.
|
|
|
If you implement the block split in the cudaport like you did in the opencl version I will donate 0.1BTC. then steal the source and resell im guessing?
|
|
|
Ethereum is still hot BTW.
Bensam seems to be the only one in the thread who understand how to mine with a profit. The rest are trolls. 5% bro 5% go get it done already
|
|
|
I said +30% in the quark algo. Quark doesn't have the SIMD512 and you should know it.
No shit - I assumed if you've got a private Quark, you've also got a private X11. If not, sorry, the question is pointless in that case. Somebody does. X11 is not profitable with the public bins. a wellcoded x11 should do 4-5MHASH on the 750ti I'm getting 3.2MHASH with an EVGA 750ti w/o overclocking on X11 using your private miner. It took about 3 weeks to get 0.1 DASH on suprnova. Why do you mine x11, it is lower payed than the other algos: Current prices at nicehash: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi63.tinypic.com%2F10z8sc0.png&t=663&c=1HfveCZbCstBsQ) You get 200% more BTC if you switch to quark/x15/neoscrypt/lyra2v2 (use a profit switcher software), and then you can buy Dash afterwards on an exchange. With the current prices it will take 1 EVGA 750ti 7,9 days to mine 1 DASH (if you mine quark) (6.5MHASH with the private miner) He prob uses ur maths. 5% on everyyyythaaaaaang
|
|
|
I had bacon for breakfast!!!!
|
|
|
Latest github
Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC
cuda 7.5 ---> 135 KH/s pool rate 175 KH/S !!! works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16 no nonce errors after 5 minutes
cuda 6.5 client: 125 KH/s client pool: +/ 5% same intensity limits
SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s same intensity limits
The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.
This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.
Edit: corrected cut/paste error.
im getting 213 on my 750ti SC without -i
|
|
|
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970
dope ill give you speeds ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) !!! cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds [2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042 [2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884 [2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU! [2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903 [2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979 [2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes! the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well kk testing 2 mins. and dude i can give you access to one of my 980ti rigs if you need it to test? 6.5 no sync 980ti [2016-01-24 13:39:43] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 989 [2016-01-24 13:39:43] accepted: 63/63 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1009 [2016-01-24 13:39:46] accepted: 64/64 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1000 [2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 65/65 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 883 [2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 66/66 (100.00%), 1880 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:49] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060071 [2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1003 [2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 853 [2016-01-24 13:39:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 993 [2016-01-24 13:39:53] accepted: 67/67 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:58] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1002 [2016-01-24 13:39:58] accepted: 68/68 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:39:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 995 [2016-01-24 13:39:59] accepted: 69/69 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:40:04] GPU #0: result for nonce $00C5907F does not validate on CPU!
|
|
|
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970
dope ill give you speeds ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) !!! cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds [2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042 [2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889 [2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884 [2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU! [2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903 [2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979 [2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
|
|
|
Umm and after letting my 960 run for a bit ....
2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419 2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429 2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422 2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031 2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432 2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425 2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032 2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431
|
|
|
things went a little higher after running for a bit....
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959 [2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999 [2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944 [2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988 [2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!
wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...) whats the default intensity it runs at i keep getting out of memory errors when i raise it 960 went up also...... 2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419 2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429 2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422 2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430 2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031 2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432 2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425 2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes! 2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032 2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431
|
|
|
things went a little higher after running for a bit....
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959 [2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999 [2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944 [2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988 [2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!
|
|
|
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955 [2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948 [2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206 [2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!
ok looks good, is it cuda 6.5 or cuda 7.5 ? for the moment cuda 6.5 should do better on the big gun yea 6.5 is a little faster maybe 100 if that do u think u will be able to get more out of 7.5 with a 980ti?
|
|
|
[2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 955 [2016-01-24 12:30:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 948 [2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 215/215 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:30:11] accepted: 216/216 (100.00%), 1895 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:30:36] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 206 [2016-01-24 12:30:36] accepted: 47/47 (100.00%), 202.73 kH/s yes! [2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fdjp564981%2Fasdasdasdasdasdsadad.png&t=663&c=zgUYUkaVQLz0eA)
|
|
|
This is the same rig running djm34's version: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F24m50rr.jpg&t=663&c=Ted0Pm546AW0dQ) This is not a joke. This is djm34's exe runing on one of my rigs. 680KHASH on the gtx 980. My private kernal is doing 680 on the gtx 970.. ok but why are mine doing this? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fmrhdmtga5%2Fasdasdasdasdasdsadad.jpg&t=663&c=iTKbqJYh1jD9Uw) GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 209 GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988 GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 947 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 417 [2016-01-24 12:28:55] accepted: 29/29 (100.00%), 400.06 kH/s yes!
|
|
|
testing now. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you sir!!!!!
|
|
|
|