[ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt

[s7icky]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

[djm34]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these  (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

[s7icky]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these   (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

whats the default intensity it runs at
i keep getting out of memory errors when i raise it



960 went up also......


2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:02:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 419
2016-01-24 13:02:45] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 427.48 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 429
2016-01-24 13:02:50] accepted: 108/108 (100.00%), 427.33 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:02:52] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 422
2016-01-24 13:02:53] accepted: 109/109 (100.00%), 427.18 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 430
2016-01-24 13:03:12] accepted: 110/110 (100.00%), 427.37 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:14] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060031
2016-01-24 13:03:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 432
2016-01-24 13:03:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 425
2016-01-24 13:03:19] accepted: 111/111 (100.00%), 427.50 kH/s yes!
2016-01-24 13:03:20] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060032
2016-01-24 13:03:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 431

[djm34]

things went a little higher after running for a bit....

[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 959
[2016-01-24 12:51:11] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 999
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 944
[2016-01-24 12:51:12] accepted: 796/796 (100.00%), 1919 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 12:51:15] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 988
[2016-01-24 12:51:16] accepted: 797/797 (100.00%), 1920 kH/s yes!

wow almost 1MH/s I should have bought one of these  (yeah well, waiting for Pascal now...)

whats the default intensity it runs at
i keep getting out of memory errors when i raise it

not entirely sure...
#thread = 256 * 64 * 5 on cuda 7.5 intensity is #thread =  2^intensity (so it is between 16.47 and 16.48)
and
#thread = 256 * 64 * 4 on cuda 6.5 (probably possible to raise it here) ==> intensity = 16

[djm34]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

[s7icky]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

[rednoW]

Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))

[djm34]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well

[djm34]

Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))

looks good indeed
I am jealous of your 1gb 750, my poor 750ti wuth 2gb  gets only 200kh/s

[s7icky]

I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds !!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well

kk testing 2 mins.  and dude i can give you access to one of my 980ti rigs if you need it to test?



6.5 no sync 980ti

[2016-01-24 13:39:43] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 989
[2016-01-24 13:39:43] accepted: 63/63 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1009
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] accepted: 64/64 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1000
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 65/65 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 883
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 66/66 (100.00%), 1880 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060071
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1003
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 853
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 993
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] accepted: 67/67 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1002
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] accepted: 68/68 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 995
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] accepted: 69/69 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:40:04] GPU #0: result for nonce $00C5907F does not validate on CPU!

[bobben2]

update: the miner is now released and can be found here:  https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 25% faster than the sp/pallas version compiled with cuda 6.5
and around 100% faster when compiled with cuda 7.5

This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If the pledge is successful both windows and linux version (the source) of ccminer will become available.

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:

The hashrate given in the image is for ccminer compiled with cuda 6.5, I am also planning to retune the miner with cuda 7.5
At the moment the hashrate for the 750ti is mostly unchanged while the 980's lose around 40kh/s.



Thanks in advance for your participation.  

here the link to the blockchain explorer where you can check the advancement of the pledge: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc)


ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

Thanks djm34
Up from 500 to 590 on my 970 (from sp-1.5.74 release), Cuda 6.5.

[2016-01-24 19:39:32] accepted: 70/70 (100.00%), 588.91 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] accepted: 71/71 (100.00%), 589.15 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] accepted: 72/72 (100.00%), 589.23 kH/s yes!

Also, both fan%  and temp went up, as expected.

Sent you some coin
txid  74887611da7963c0cbac2399531d2d8d41221fd009f4482c6a7d6c4f34db0378-000

[djm34]

update: the miner is now released and can be found here:  https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-sp-neoscrypt/releases

Hello,

I am about to release a new version of ccminer supporting neoscrypt, it is around 25% faster than the sp/pallas version compiled with cuda 6.5
and around 100% faster when compiled with cuda 7.5

This is a co-joint effort between myself and Nicehash which will contribute to the pledge as well

This means that it will be publicly available once the donation reach an amount of 2.5btc.

Donation will have to be made exclusively to that btc address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
(careful it is a new address, not the old one, one should already consider that 0.1btc has been donated)

The goad for this pledge is of 2.5btc (included NiceHash contribution).
The pledge start now (obviously) and should end the January the 24th (ie 2weeks and half).

If the pledge is successful both windows and linux version (the source) of ccminer will become available.

If those 2.5btc target is met, then the miners will be released through NiceHash

Current speed of the miner:

The hashrate given in the image is for ccminer compiled with cuda 6.5, I am also planning to retune the miner with cuda 7.5
At the moment the hashrate for the 750ti is mostly unchanged while the 980's lose around 40kh/s.


Thanks in advance for your participation. 

here the link to the blockchain explorer where you can check the advancement of the pledge: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc)


ps: this thread is self moderated (assuming I have time and not in a troll mood  ), off-topic trolling won't be permitted

Thanks djm34
Up from 500 to 590 on my 970 (from sp-1.5.74 release), Cuda 6.5.

[2016-01-24 19:39:32] accepted: 70/70 (100.00%), 588.91 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:39:51] accepted: 71/71 (100.00%), 589.15 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 594 (T= 71C F= 49% C=0/0)
[2016-01-24 19:40:03] accepted: 72/72 (100.00%), 589.23 kH/s yes!

Also, both fan%  and temp went up, as expected.

Sent you some coin
txid  74887611da7963c0cbac2399531d2d8d41221fd009f4482c6a7d6c4f34db0378-000

thanks a lot,
however you should get more, try to increase a bit the intensity (and try the nosync version as well) (on linux, the nosync are obtained by commenting out in cuda_neoscrypt.cu the "__syncthreads()" function)

[joblo]

Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.

[s7icky]

Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.

im getting 213 on my 750ti SC without -i

[antantti]

Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

[kangjooe]

not entirely sure...
#thread = 256 * 64 * 5 on cuda 7.5 intensity is #thread =  2^intensity (so it is between 16.47 and 16.48)
and
#thread = 256 * 64 * 4 on cuda 6.5 (probably possible to raise it here) ==> intensity = 16

THANK YOU djm34!!!!!  

my 970 now run @ 657 kH/s!!!!!!!!

before i'm using sp release 7.4 and get around 542 kH/s.

i'm currently using your cuda 65 version.

can you give more info the difference between standard and nosync version?

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

[djm34]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here

[Eliovp]

Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 

already submitted

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34) 

it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here

Haha, i noticed, i kind of stopped reading it. It's gone to far.... :p