At least you lot got a wallet !

Chrome wont let me download it, says it's "malicious and chrome has blocked it" lol

me too add dogecoin

DONT ADD ANOTHER COIN - It will kill the price of GML

if you want to play you have to play with GML . if you add doge or any thing else , every one will rather take doge then GML

please DO NOT ADD ANOTHER COIN
or give me some warning so i can dump mine

Agreed that Minerals do not need anon per se for betting. However, the argument for anon is to create a demand other than betting which will include the market outside of betting. This will cause a natural demand and volume for the coin to trade at higher levels which will mitigate a lot of risks that coins face that trade at <1000 sats.

If you drop anon then make sure there are other ways to keep it alive, like artificial trading and paying the market listing fees or whatever for a period of at least 6-12 months. Also, at these low levels do not be surprised if the portfolios tilt from more people holding less to fewer people stocking up huge bags of Min and then dump on everyones a$$es later when the price increases. Lower prices work against wider distribution as it enables a few people to gather up huge bags. With only betting there will be no demand in the short term to cause a breakout over 1000 sats.

So the decision is between anon, trading between 10-20k with less artificial measures to leep it alive during betting development, or no anon trading <1000 sats for some months to come. I guess it is a tradeoff between the risks going either route as each has its pros and cons. Looking at the market it might be that Min missed the wave on anon due to the delays and it could be too late, although there will always be a human nature demand for something anon like to keep what they are doing to themselves.

I have since reduced my Min holding significantly so I do not care as much as previously about how the coin is managed. I am just stating the principles as some people think that the argument for anon is because the coin needs it for betting which is not the case. However, having said that anon betting would be a killer combination.

I am saying it again, the principle of Min is sound, some of the best I have seen. It is just how you get to the end result that needs to be determined. If the devs struggle with anon then drop it. Just have a plan B of how to get to the end result. An example of a plan B would be for the devs or community to buy and sell into their own orders come Oct/Nov to make sure an avg trading volume of 0.1 BTC is maintained, while natural demand is slowly grown outside of the existing holders through awareness, marketing, tournaments and expanding the portfolio. To support such a plan B, the community can raise 1 BTC or so with the purpose to every 23 hours assess the BTC trading volume and if it is <0.1BTC do a few trades into itself until the volume is over the threshold. The fund then becomes a market fee fund. This way time can be bought while betting services are being developed and marketed.

You clearly don't get it do you. You are obviously have no knowledge about economics or business economics and obviously never had to run a company while doing R&D. To give you a hint - you are saying that the profits of the product after R&D is finished will make sure that the company runs and don't close doors while you are still doing R&D and building the product. Do you get it now or do I have to type it slower? Do you realize that the betting services alone of Minerals is not strong enough to make the coin survive until it is finished and adopted by the wider public? Alternative means of creating demand and volume is urgently required to prevent the coin from dying before the betting services can be rolled out and adopted. Shame on you as you obviously want the coin which has an excellent product and future to die prematurely.

MIN  @500 sat ?    

1)Can dev updates And put this ***** anon who every body wants ?
2) Can stupid shit noob traders stop dumping great coins for put volume in shit scams

We are debating between anonimity and redesign.

we manage to salvage the tournament by having the players to agree to play on monday afternoon pst. everything should be fine then and the games were excellent today, might i add.

Wow.  So that did not go well at all. 

maybe that is the joke

I saw a 4.5 BTC (126,440 ROX) buyout yesterday on C-Cex!

Less tolerant? This should be the last straw. MT4 is the defacto CFD platform used in the forex world, via BTCe. Those Russians sure have their shit together unlike these Bitfinex jokers.

"Virtual currency, also known as digital currency or crypto-currency, is a medium of exchange not authorized or adopted by a government. There are many different digital currencies being used over the internet, the most commonly known being Bitcoin. In Washington, digital currency is included in the definition of "Money" in the Uniform Money Services Act (UMSA), chapter 19.230 RCW:

"Money means a medium of exchange that is authorized or adopted by the United States or a foreign government or other recognized medium of exchange. "Money" includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more governments."

Companies wishing to transmit money for Washington residents in a digital currency form can contact DFI for a determination whether licensure under the UMSA is required. If it is, a license is required before the company can engage in the activity."