 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
Any LISK devs here ? looking for coope please pm me  |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1783594.new#newplease comment How would ICONOMi end up if there would be real escrow not escrow from forum. OTD - On time Delivery is always a part of the deal. I hope ICONOMi will be a good coin not shitcoin in near future, as there is a lot of potential in this concept.
|
|
|
|
Lisk community is so harmony, so many innovative projects, I am satisfied with Lisk project, I am buying more coins, to wait for the future pump on the way moon.
Community a harmonious, but this price is not rising, I would like to sell the purchased own LSK still on 40k, but as a coin dropped in price, in fact, it did not fall, and returned to her ICO price, which is very disappointing many, but still I'm waiting for 40k for 1 coin The price for using the main chain should be always reasonable if not the chain is dropped us to expensive for dapps to runing on it. If etherum double or triple the LISK will rise soon after. |
|
|
|
|
Is that to show up or have much value ?
|
|
|
|
|
Ether, Bitcoin, Monero , maybe ZCash (but there are problems ongoing on markets)
|
|
|
|
This is a very complex software project will there be a REAL escrow and MILESTONES funds release ? or On time DELIVERY + 2 Years  is planned ? |
|
|
|
|
"IO vs DAO.
The "DAO" experiment last year was at attempt to extend the idea of decentralization not only to base-level protocols, but to human-level organizations themselves. The premise is all wrong. The purpose of markets is to discover which entities are trustworthy: to sort the wheat from the chaff. People who overvalue the concept of "trustlessness" assume that all organizations are equally untrustworthy, but this couldn't be further from the truth.
It's simple: protocols work better when they are decentralized, organizations work better when they are centralized. In the early days of the internet it was considered important for DNS to be decentralized, so that everyone around the world could plug into the same standard instead of having competing interests attempting to act as a gatekeeper. But that doesn't mean individual websites, apps or blogs have to be decentralized. That wouldn't make sense.
"Trust" by Francis Fukuyama looks at this question in depth. There are many benefits to compact, flexible, high-trust environments with a clear chain of command in terms of productivity and cooperation that can't be achieved via dislocation and decentralization at the human level. As long as it is embedded in a framework of freedom of association, I would argue centralized strategies are superior.
That's why with Pax I'd like to offer the concept of "IO's"- Incorporated Organizations- as an alternative to the DAO fallacy. IO's are centralized companies which have their crypto-legal entity on the Ethereum blockchain. You can define specific roles, create tokens, create contracts with other entities, set salaries, define rights and responsibilities similar to an LLC. And the goal would also to be to insure IO's in the same way that LLC's are insured, to give founders the protection they need to build a business.
That's where we start." Ph.S.
|
|
|
|
I see lot of ICOs with such called escrows but: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escrow"An escrow is an account established by a broker for holding funds on behalf of the broker's principal or some other person until the consummation or termination of a transaction" I just wonder why people tolerate in ICOs where main product is software tolerate a very simplified escrow which is escrow called but have little to do with escrow? OK you get some Tokens or simplified coin before new one is developed, but this is not a consummation of transaction or agreement. Right now the best escrow transaction example are holidays, where you pay to travel agency when you come back from holidays. Because they bankrupt to many times leaving people on the AirPorts on they back home or in worst situations. How escrow for ICOs which are not assets like http://digix.io or hardware related like https://bnktothefuture.com/pitches/2893/_embs-ether-mining-backed-security-fund.html?? In my opinion escrow for strongly software related ICOs should be an institution or software house which will have in mind keeping good reputation - like software house working often with Venture Capital and similar. Escrow should release funds after reaching milestones after proper Quality of Service tests and Software tests. Reaching part of milestone results in receiving part of funds. After bugfixing and patches. With IO or DO decisions can be also altered by community... Why not ? |
|
|
|
|
I see scams on this forum are very annoying
|
|
|
|
Long term 50 years Short term 3 years Just near future <1 year  maybe some kind like that LISK or it's mutations |
|
|
|
|
FYI - I leaving core of the team SONM, Barnaba
I will not publicity comment here the internal affairs of project SONM till end of March or if faster end of crowdsale by ICO.
Don't count me in white paper.
|
|
|
|
|
FYI -
I will not publicity comment here the internal affairs of project S/O/N/M till end of March or if faster end of crowdsale by ICO.
|
|
|
|
|
What to buy for 1 mining unit
best speed/price/power usage per unit ?
|
|
|
|
 nice is this gonna be paid software as it says open beta ?
|
|
|
|
|
what about digital gold ?
Ethereum will in long term goes up because there is a team of devs behind this coin.
Everything may happen, it might look everywhere like in Venezuela.
So good investment is always a little gamble.
|
|
|
|
|
any good solutions for such tech ?
|
|
|
|
|
maybe there should be ico which would be crosschain ? liek Eth + something ? but what is _MORE_ reliable right now than ETH with similar functionalities ?
|
|
|
|
|
